Why do Sup Forums janitors delete age of consent threads as soon as non-americans start red pilling americucks?

Why do Sup Forums janitors delete age of consent threads as soon as non-americans start red pilling americucks?

I thought this board was a free speech board.

Other urls found in this thread:

govtrack.us/congress/bills/106/hconres107/text
twitter.com/SFWRedditVideos

It's not because MODS=FAGS. No, the mods are cool guys who are definitely not ruining this site with rampant over moderation.

I still disagree with pedos though.

What is your disagreement? Let's talk this situation out.

>Sup Forums
>free speech
Pick one

Could you please stop posting pictures of prepubescent children?

I'm only trying to prevent ephebophiles from getting involved in witchhunt situations for being attracted to 14/15 year olds because normalizing it would likely restore a lot of order to civilization if the entire degenerate stuff is being purged from the public view.

How come pedo's post the same types of pics?
for real on tv some guy has a bot that spans these girls he calls "cunnies". So I guess cunny=cunt.
Anyways it's the same 5 girls in Instagram like poses and idk who the fuck they are but they must be like pedo celebrities.
Idk why they are though because even as a non-pedo I can tell they're not even attractive kids.

tl;dr why do pedo's have such shit taste?

pedos are ruining it for non-degenerates who want to have a healthy romantic relationship with a teen girl and create an actual family

Because it's the cunnybot spamming the same pictures

who is this semen demon?

Pedophilia is the real red pill. Deny the Holocaust all you want and no one gives a shit, but say that sex isn't bad for kids and suddenly it's time to SHUT IT DOWN.

Well, personally I only have a few pictures I always post.
And fuck you, Ryry was hot.
>want to have a healthy romantic relationship with a teen girl and create an actual family
That's what we want too, just with younger girls.

Ryan Newman(the actress, not the racecar driver)

Then at least wait until she hits puberty if you want to date her.

>govtrack.us/congress/bills/106/hconres107/text

Remember that time science said that child "abuse" isn't harmful and the entire country flipped the fuck out?

>On July 12, 1999, the United States House of Representatives passed HRC resolution 107 by a vote of 355-0, (with 13 Members voting "Present", the latter all members of the Democratic Party) declaring sexual relations between children and adults are abusive and harmful, and condemned the study on the basis that it was being used by pro-pedophilia activists and organizations to promote and justify child sexual abuse. The condemnation of a scientific study by Congress was, at that time, an unprecedented event. The resolution passed the Senate by a voice vote (100-0) on July 30, 1999 and was greeted among psychologists with concern due to the perceived chilling effect it may have among researchers. Representative Brian Baird, who has a Ph.D. in clinical psychology and was one of the 13 Congressmen to abstain from the condemnation of the study, stated that of the 535 members of the House and Senate fewer than 10 had actually read the study, and even fewer were qualified to evaluate it based on its merit. In September 1999, the American Association for the Advancement of Science (AAAS), upon a request by the APA to independently review the article, stated that it saw no reason to second-guess the peer review process that approved it initially and that it saw no evidence of improper methodology or questionable practices by the authors.

Why are pedophiles always wormy low-testosterone weaklings? Was /fit/ right all along?

...

I don't believe in dating. "Dating" is just a word for "girls being sluts". Why shouldn't girls be married good and young?

>thread is up, nobody responds that's why it gets shut down
>you're a fucking faggot who realizes this but will bitch anyway

ahmed please

>I want to fuck a 12-year old

>help I am being opressed

>>thread is up, nobody responds that's why it gets shut down
Are you retarded? It was getting tons of replies, that's why it was deleted.

lmao

I actually want to fuck a girl if she's between 15 and 20. I personally find girls around 13 and 14 the prettiest but I'd wait until she's older as I'm attracted to her innocence.

Because diddling 12 year olds is weird. You can't do that shit anymore, Mohammed.

Have fun getting shunned by your society, lynched and raped in prison when the girl why told you she was 19 was actually 17

It's not about free speech. That's just something moot used to lie about whenever he was interviewed about Sup Forums. It's just that the mods are shit, vastly outnumbered, and very ineffective. So it's the closest to free speech you're going to get.

Well, now that entirely depends on what state you're in. Do a little research, would ya?

Good that there are still states less cucked than others.

>Receive nude picture of 17-year-old
>Get 10 years in prison
>Get beat up by murderers who think you're a child molester

could it be because they never had a girl and so never developed beyond what horny threenagers beat it to?

Age of "consent" is 16 in about half of the country, and 17 or 18 in the rest. The legal age for "porn" is 18 everywhere though, and the punishments for "child" "porn" can be even more severe than actual statutory "rape".

this guy gets it

the only difference between you and pedos is how deep in hell you'll burn you piece of fucking shit, kill yourself immediately you goddamn kid-diddling fucking tryhard, Sling Blade Romeo retard

16 to 20 no problem though; the age of consent in the US, for the most part, is 16 -- the autistic screeching you get over it is generally a result of US educational systems

I think people get too distracted by statutory rape laws when what's really fucked up is our child porn laws.

In America, child porn is anything sexually explicit with anyone under 18. It doesn't matter if they're 0 or 17, it's child porn all the same. "Sexually explicit" can mean sex, simulated sex, masturbation or just plain nudity.

If a minor takes a picture of themselves, that's production. They're the child victim and the adult criminal simultaneously. If you torrent a picture, that's distribution which means you're a sex offender and you're going to prison for over 10 years. If you just look at a picture online that's considered possession, which is like 3 years in prison. Even drawings of fictional minors are illegal if they "lack artistic value".

Everyone is perfectly fine with this draconian violation of freedom of speech because the only people who actually look up what these laws are are pedophiles.

>1 year difference between 15 and 16
>you want me to burn in hell

You're so fucking closed minded, it's insanity at this point. This is why nobody likes americans.