Are we about to see the disappearance of the Union Jack on Sup Forums?

Are we about to see the disappearance of the Union Jack on Sup Forums?

Fake spoiler [spoiler]should have been leafs[/spoiler]

Other urls found in this thread:

petition.parliament.uk/petitions/173199
youtube.com/watch?v=pcSlowAhvUk
en.wikipedia.org/wiki/First_they_came_...
twitter.com/NSFWRedditImage

Trolltrace is a real thing now?

So what we fake news nao?

>Food standard agency

Wut. Will posting a toast sandwich get Nigel in trouble?

They want to make sure you are eating halal

No this one is real, still I've nothing to hide so nothing to fear. Safety and security first, then liberty

>Food standards Agency can see all my Ja/ck/ posts.

Welp.

will they keep a list of the DNS addresses they resolve for you? I don't see how you can do it otherwise in a cheaper way

>still I've nothing to hide so nothing to fear.

>says the man to the police officer, knowing that his stash is not in his car, but buried in his back yard.

Why would food standard agencies need to see what I browse? I find this the most confusing out of all of them.

>Safety and security first, then liberty
Oh wow is this bait or do you cheerios actually belive this

petition.parliament.uk/petitions/173199

If anything, this actually improves our level of privacy.

"The Investigatory Powers Act dramatically increases transparency around the use of investigatory powers. It protects both privacy and security and underwent unprecedented scrutiny before becoming law."

Just think of it this way, your country is keeping a record of all your greatest shitposts using others' tax revenue

If the tories want to look at the weird stuff I masturbate to I'm not fussed. This law is designed to combat terrorism, the silent majority in this country approves.

i hope they like tranny porn

I just kind of assume that's true for everything I do.

If I were scared of the things I post on Sup Forums getting me in trouble, I'd just run a Whonix VM and post on one of the Tor chans.

I'm fine with this. To counteract terrorism we need extreme measures. Whether the Food Standards Agency knows of the type of porn you watch, or is aware of your anti-Semitic messages is insignificant compared to the food terrorism we can stop.

Why are there so many random as fuck agencies that get to have a look like why the fuck dose the food standards agency want to see all the weird porn i look at.

>If anything, this actually improves our level of privacy.
How so?

Russia push for data localization laws (many EU countries do the same, but the EU comission won't pass the laws), so the NSA is physically unable to spy on us.

The UK's attempts seem barbaric 2bh. They're all so old and don't know what they're doing.

If you're not already encrypting your data and using a vpn you're a mug 2bh

what vpn do you recommend mate?

What will you do once unlicensed VPNs and all personal encryption is illegal (for all non-MPs)?

Are you this retarded?

>Arguing that you don't care about the right to privacy because you have nothing to hide is no different than saying you don't care about free speech because you have nothing to say.

>Over the last 16 months, as I've debated this issue around the world, every single time somebody has said to me, "I don't really worry about invasions of privacy because I don't have anything to hide." I always say the same thing to them. I get out a pen, I write down my email address. I say, "Here's my email address. What I want you to do when you get home is email me the passwords to all of your email accounts, not just the nice, respectable work one in your name, but all of them, because I want to be able to just troll through what it is you're doing online, read what I want to read and publish whatever I find interesting. After all, if you're not a bad person, if you're doing nothing wrong, you should have nothing to hide." Not a single person has taken me up on that offer.

youtube.com/watch?v=pcSlowAhvUk

Whatever.
I'll keep posting from the re-education camp
Niggers have low IQs
Jews exploit mankind
Women shouldn't have positions of power
White men created the greatest civilisation
Transgenders have a mental illness
Soros is a cunt
I have proof and...hang on, just gotta get the door...

Says Hydra the country, btfo my freedoms you wanker
>Hail HYDRA

>British Police

>ISPs have to store your browsing history
>ordinary police chavs has access to the data
>oh i'm okay with this i'm not a terrorist or anything

i dont think they actually have that capacity OP. i have a dynamic ip but over the years i doubt my service provider has kept every ip i have been given by them

after 2 years i think that shit gets thrown away. at the very least maybe 4 as they have never been required by law to keep it past 2

I hope you realize that it's only a matter of time until Trump passes a similar law. He has already admitted that he hates Snowden for making all this shit public.

British police are generally seen as the best in the world, they don't need to shoot their own citizens to restore order. Watch the full video of that webm, the situation was resolved without death or serious injury, In the US you can bet there would have been at least 1 casualty.

I like our Police they are usually pretty chill even got caught smoking a joint one time and they guy just said to stub it out with no further action taken.

>Everyone who can now see your entire internet history
Is this supposed to be fucking english? This is what happens when you let 14-year-olds write articles.

The police force is made up of people, I am also a person, British people have shared values unlike most countries

Kek.

Did the first policemen on scene wait for like six more before they even could take on that guy or what is the story behind this?

>still no link to the article in question
Making threads with an image of the beginning of an article without posting the full thing should be bannable.

I'm so glad you motherfuckers handed over internet regulations to the UN.

Fuck me. I never thought I'd say this.

So glad we actually have consumer rights to privacy here in the EU.

You can't be that stupid user.
How long did it take for the local councils to start going through peoples bins etc looking for evidence of petty crime.
It's always the slippery fucking slope.

The quality of Sup Forums posts will skyrocket surely

Are you a fucking looney?

What do we have but our personal freedom, I'd rather be blown up by muhammed than live under a totalitarian regime

Soon everyone will be a happy and a dancing like a britain

From what I remember reading a few days ago, they have to track what websites you go on, but they're still not allowed to track the individual pages.

The police force also looked the other why while muslim rape gangs were working their way through 14 year old girls.
Get a grip fella they are not on our side.

What is with the UK suddenly going full retard 1984 after brexit? I thought you guys were uncucking yourselves.

Unless this is all the final "fuck you" throes of EU drones on their way out much like Obama is doing before the presidency changes hands.

Grow up this isn't America, nobody is coming for your freedumbs we just dont want terror attacks

Can I set up some webcams in your house user?
You don't have anything to hide so you don't have anything to fear.

If you really dislike someone, just sneak up in his home and visit dubious website with his internet

>that strawman

Why is it a strawman? I'd also like to watch you whenever I feel like it.

Also kek at terror attacks argument:

>The chances of being killed in a terrorist attack are about 1 in 20 million. A person is as likely to be killed by his or her own furniture, and more likely to die in a car accident, drown in a bathtub, or in a building fire than from a terrorist attack


You're either a shill, or severely mentally impaired.

Sounds like something your shitty country would do.

>the chance of being killed in a terrorist attack are about 1 in 20 million
That number will never go up, no way, no sir that number is set in stone.

>What is Tor

Or we could deal with the real problem and not take away our rights to a private home life.
Just how far are you willing to let them go?

Baby dont watch me

I see. "Fuck your personal privacy because I can see the future". Nice argument, comrade.

Let's take the number of terror attacks in Europe for the past 20 years. 520 deaths, and 3792 injuries (most of which were at Madrid Train Bombing - 2050 injuries).

Those happened in In 20 years. Including 2016.

I'm too lazy to make the calculation as to what your chances are to die/be injured in a terror attack but I think you can approximate yourself.

Forgot to mention, the population of Europe is around 740 million people.

Not sure I could recommend a single one because I'm still researching and looking for the best option, but I'm using pureVPN atm. Whichever you choose you have to pay for the full service of course, free versions usually give you limited options/bandwidth etc. Thing is if you're going to pay every month you might as well install OpenVPN on your own server and not have to trust some company.

You're being hit by your very own version of this, mulatto

Britain will face myriad issues in the near future, I think the safest best is to have a strong government to lead us through them

Those are just a bunch of platitudes with no backing arguments.

>myriad issues in the near future
All countries have ALWAYS had a myriad of issues. It's no excuse to rob citizens of their privacy.

>strong government
That fucks over it's own citizens instead of the scores and scores of mudslime illegal immigrants who are actually importing the terrorism you're afraid of (even though statistically immune to)

Listen, stop thinking in general, political buzzwords you pick up from TV - they mean nothing. Instead, try to look behind WHY you believe what you believe and back it up with numbers and facts - all of which are against mass surveillance.

Let's bring this back into frame: Why would I be bothered if the government wants to see browser metadata? They aren't interested in me, they are looking for extremists

When you want to make an argument, actively look online for counter-arguments and fight them. If you lose, you maybe want to change your mind.

As to why you should be bothered. Well, here:

youtube.com/watch?v=pcSlowAhvUk

I remind you that the biggest surveillance states were also the most authoritarian. It goes hand in hand, and at this point, if you believe in your government "cuz they said so" you are an idiot, plain and simple. If the still-warm corpse of the USSR hasn't taught you anything about surveillance, if the communist block hasn't scared sense into the inevitable overreach of all governments, if you haven't read 1984... I dunno, m80. When they come for you, eventually, you are the one who called them.

If nothing else, the fact that they use terrorism as a reason to enforce this on millions and millions of people, after I've just shown you that barely a couple of hundreds died of it, and it's a joke in terms of fatalities and injuries - should at least give you pause.

It looks like we'll be seeing a lot more of the Union Jack now!

Cuck

"Those who are willing to sacrifice a little liberty for the sake of a little security deserve neither and lose both."

You should be bothered because you may, by matter of coincidence, end up being arrested for something you didn't do with little chance to assert your innocence in the face of this "evidence".
Let's say a man's movement is monitored and he frequents the same areas that the local bigshot cocaine dealer does. He goes to where the cocaine dealer is suspected to be and drives to the places where his customer base or lackeys are. But he's not buying or selling cocaine. His favourite pub is by the coke dealers', and his drinking mates live all over town in the same places. But he gets arrested because of the correlation.
It's the same with the internet. You're on Sup Forums for crying out loud.

Secondly, it might seem fine now, but what about in a years' time, when one of your favourite websites or pasttimes is declared a threat to national security?

They've already got all of your data, they've had it for years, and they know everything. Say hello to prison.
en.wikipedia.org/wiki/First_they_came_...

>Britain is always first to moan about muh freedomz and totalitarian everyone
>Does shit like this over a decade

this is pretty dystopian.

You don't understand Britain, we love to complain but hate to act.

What's more expensive: 2 bullets, or 9 cops running around for a coudple of hours? Imagine the price when you scale this to every chimpout.

Well i am fucked


See you in the gulag friends

What i understand, that in next 5-10 years you'll be too scared to even speak out on chinese cartoon scrolls.

We don't have chimpouts in Britain because our police don't shoot anyone, so I'd say we save money.

>wanting some power hungry idiot to shoot you because you didn't bring your hands up quick enough

Britain also doesn't have anywhere near the number of firearms that the US has so there's really no need for them to be armed except in counterterrorism (which they are).

What baffles me is that US police don't get bulletproof vests as mandatory clothing. UK coppers wear stab proof vests and helmets. They can't be that expensive.

ill be natsoc till i die