In our cultural evolution we have characters/archetypes that recur in inter-generational stories. These archetypes are a form of moral code that aids us in how we should act to continue our society and culture. For example: The just and protective father, the nurturing mother, the heroic son, the obedient wife and the obedient daughter. We also have the counter-types: The despotic and destructive father, the evil witch mother, the cowardly son.
But what our culture does not have is an archetype for women as such, outside of their roles as wife, mother and daughter. And it seems quite clear that the reason for this is that females historically speaking were first girls and then they were mothers and wives, they were never the character "a women".
Now that most females inhabit this new cultural character of "a woman", how do we interact with them? The archetypes listed above are not just prescripts of moral behaviour in a vacuum, they are actually prescripts of moral interaction between the archetypes themselves. What would the great father say to the obedient wife? What would the heroic son say to his nurturing mother? We know. But what does "a woman" say to any of the moral characters? We don't know. We have no cultural blueprint for how the character of "a woman" behaves in relation to the archetypal characters.
The widespread use of birth control has fundamentally challenged the structure of our society. We really have no idea how society should function with this new character interacting in unknown ways. What are the moral boundaries for "a woman"? What are their moral responsibilities, duties and rights? What is the pattern of action which makes "a good woman" as opposed to "an evil woman"?
You heard them OP. Start dumping faggot.. Or is that all you have in that folder full of dicks.
Christian Gray
it's the only one i have
Xavier Perez
That's our natives, not japs
Lucas Hughes
We are all described as people and beings by our "roles" in society. A man is oftentimes thought of in terms of his prowess in regards to his industriousness (I'm a lawyer making 120k), his familial bonds (I'm a father of two wonderful sons and a beautiful daughter), or in his role in protecting his community (I'm a veteran). The last could be said to fit into the first, but it also differs in the sense that we view the former as being less wild than the latter.
So you could just ask what is a "person"?
The answer would probably be based around the roles they fill in life.
Isaiah Mitchell
Tl;dr
Gavin Hughes
this culture is finished lol
Thomas Carter
nevermind here's the full one
Brody Lewis
You're easily disheartened and made a bad decision. Never forget the rule "don't post an image more interesting than your thread". Is it any surprise it attracted people who would prefer to talk about jap qts? Should really use 2hus as image starters. At least then you might attract autists who care enough about this shit to discuss it.
Asher Thompson
This. Now I want sauce of OP
Benjamin Barnes
Honestly its not an image that's more interesting than the thread. It's just girls being silly.
The culture is done because no one cares that its done.
You're oversimplifying, while still sounding too complex, which is impressive. You believe society needs these roles to continue, but I argue that we've been shifting out of those roles for some time now, and the socially progressive end game boils down to "everyone is a person". They don't want to force these roles onto younger people, giving them a chance to decide for themselves. That's the goal anyway, the result is turning out much worse. The end goal is to see every individual as "a person", but to get to that point we have to consider all women "a woman", all men "a man". With this comes chaos, as change inevitably does. They want a breakdown of societal division, but the culture itself is feeling the pain.
Whether you think the end game is good or bad doesn't change the fact that change will be hard. What one calls "growing pains", others call "the collapse of the western world". Cultural changes are being made with little regard to their societal impact, and it's all coming to a head
Austin Barnes
til that straight below your ears are your nipples
Nathaniel Ward
Thanks senpai. You can do it too.
The harder it is the more reason to quit.
It's affecting your mind and life.
Henry Campbell
>what makes a person good or evil
It's the same for everyone man or woman.
But to respond to your post as a whole, Women and men have different roles in society. You're literally falling for the feminist blue pill that women will somehow change their biology driven behavior and become equal in every way to men.
Logan Martin
"The Devils of Loudon." This book is a microcosm of the Occidental tradition. If in a hurry see the mass scene in "The Devils" for what women left to their own devices are like.
Cameron Bailey
>You believe society needs these roles to continue
Society is composed of these roles. The good citizen, the good father, the good husband, the good wife. It's literally what society is.
Hudson Lewis
YOU NEED SOME WHITE WOMEN
Isaac Barnes
...
Gabriel Jones
>Inb4 thread deleted
Charles Gray
It's fucking true.
420 blaze it.
Christian Lopez
You answered your own question. Women are first girls then they are mothers and wives. If a girl does not become a wife or a mother then she is a girl and should be treated so.
It's not really complicated, without motherhood women rarely move past the mental maturity of a teenage girl.
