Real polspectrum

>real polspectrum

Post 'em

Other urls found in this thread:

politicallyincorrect.work/extras/polspectrum/
twitter.com/SFWRedditImages

Am I a Nazi yet?

...

...

Finally, an actual good spectrum that gets the left/right divide.

I disagree with the liberty/duty divide though. I believe people should have the basis for a liberty orientated life, but it's their own individual duty to live a respectable life style. A government coming in to tell people what they can and can't do defeats the purpose of a Nitzschean ethical structure. The concept of Wu Wei is very right wing.

Also, not sure why I'm not 100% spiritual. I guess I need to read more Evola, probably pick up Doctrine of Awakening, I'm reading through Revolt right now.

whoops wrong pic.

Revolt is Fantastic

PRAISE KEK

TRIPS OF TRUTH

Altruism as well. I am very altruistic but I'm a realist in that the 'right' answer isn't always the correct one. There's a necessary 'greater good' that is hard to explain in these tests.

What is wrong with you ? are you french?

rate, niggars

reporting in

Gottem.

Actually made me realize I'm more right-wing than I had previously thought.

Link anyone.?

How hard is it to google?

Wtf is google

...

...

I want the government to leave me the fuck alone and rather kick out darkies.

Actually more right than I expected.

...

The questions need more work. Too many stances are bundled together and simply not refined enough.

>be libertarian-leaning conservative
>get 22% leftist

what the hell, did i do something wrong?

...

also why is liberty a leftist value? lefties hate liberty, not regulating people allows "oppression" and allows hierarchies to form

...

Am I doing it right?

Probably a bit to the left of this result

I think a lot about answers I give in these tests, and can very easily see what the author is getting at with certain questions and while I may agree/disagree with the statement in the question, I feel differently about what they're *actually* getting at. All tests have bias's and personally I feel like If if the test was more comprehensive and gave more complex options rather than agree/disagree I'd probably end up maybe 10-15% closer to the centre but I'm not too bothered by the result.

>We all know what "left" and "right" mean politically — or do we? Through the efforts of a very dedicated group of luminaries, a tremendous change occurred in the Western world several hundred years ago. Basic assumptions about the nature of the universe and life itself were challenged and a revolutionary Age of Reason began.

>These revolutionary forces sought to destroy previous institutions, such as monarchies. When representatives on both sides gathered with the now-threatened king, those loyal to him and pre-Enlightenment values were seated on his right, while the revolutionaries were on his left.

>But, political experiments in liberty and democracy (like the United States) now have existed for centuries. Over the years, terms like "progress", "conservatism", "capitalism", and "socialism" have greatly confused the originally very clear meanings of "left" and "right".

>The PolSpectrum political quiz accurately tests whether your political ideology fits more with the true definitions of "left" and "right". The results are correct for any Western country and are as true today as they would have been two hundred years ago and will be two hundred years in the future.

Libertarians are fundamentally leftists

Not a bad test, lots of loaded questions though

...

What does this mean?

I used the screenshot feature? Did it do this shitty framing job for anyone else?

You were tricked with the questions on parenthood/tradition as well as natural equality vs natural hierarchy. An example of the latter would be that one question "Is it natural for elites to form in society?" or something to that effect. Example of the former would be something like "Do mothers do better with maternity?".

...

Wtf is wrong with u

25% to the Right

Details

Hierarchy
60%

Modernity
55%

Duty
40%

Kinship
80%

Nature
77%

Material
63%

I am fine with the assessment though it is somwhat inaccurate

What could he mean by this?

you're a fucking idiot

So many of these I'm like yes but our no but and I'm pretty sure I should be a few more ticks towards liberty.

What we were calling niggers for a while but it seems that fad has passed.

Seems about right. As I believe all people are fundamentally different, but should be treated equally until such a time as that they show themselves to be unworthy of equality.

...

Damn

...

>hey goys check out this fun honeypot
>come post your IP addre ... I mean test results
Oyy.

True neutral reporting in. Also feel free to poke fun at my tabs and bookmark bar.

When you believe in certain aspects of National Socialism and Fascism but also believe everyone should have their equal rights maintained. Do I kill myself now or later?

no, it's just that most of the questions deal with social rather than fiscal issues

How'd I do senpai

No you're a pragmatist that isn't autistic enough to unreasonably take away everyone's rights/opportunity because of "muh ideology."

Through will power anyone can become anything regardless of who they are. Everyone should have the opportunity to define themselves and be given the tools to improve themselves.

Rights are benefits bestowed on society by society in order for every individual to experience a more fair and decent life. Taking those away will just create a society of unfairness and fear.

I believe in the same thing you do. National Socialism/Fascism and American Exceptionalism. There's nothing wrong with combining the best of all ideologies in the form of a synthesis. In fact that's how true progress is made, rather than the leftist dogma of pseudo-progress we suffer with today.

...

why are the colors backwards

dumb as fuck

Also, these questions are extremely vague and I mainly focused on the social aspect. While that's ok, it doesn't necessarily show where you are exactly on the scale. Fairly inaccurate as a whole. I agree with you, and I wish more people did because that's the only way to make meaningful, lasting progress. Take the best of ideologies and make them work for your situation, not fall in wholesale with 1 specific ideology and fuck the rest. That's my take on it anyways.

How the fuck are you guys so """spiritual"""? What a meme.

Holy shit, why are you here?

I consider myself a centrist

I.. I didn't even meme the answers and this is what I get....

ALT-LEFT MASTER RACE

...

May science save us from this treachery.

Lolbertarian at best, but that's decent for a leaf

politicallyincorrect.work/extras/polspectrum/

...

I'm quite surprised I'm 44% to the right. I expected at best 20%.

>100% spiritual
Been raised traditionally conservative Catholic though

>have six dimensions
>Then fuck it is sum them up in a one dimension slider

Who ever made this is a fucking retard.

>less than 90% right
Why are you even here

>less than 95%
you should get out as well, my friend

1% is within margin of error desu

I honestly don't know how I scored more towards the spiritual end of the spectrum

I'm okay with this and think the test fairly accurately portrays my opinions. I do think some of the questions were far too vague though, like "It's not the governments buisness what people can and can't do in their own homes". Does that include illegal activities like drugs, murder, animal cruelty, physical abuse or is that just about sex and shooting? I assumed it included illegal activities but I don't really get what the question is even asking.

I don't usually post often and just lurk if that helps.

If you're not memeing it's because I like to see both sides of the story(engage with lefties and right wing people) and also some people here actually make really good points that I wouldn't hear anywhere else because they're not politically correct.

Forgot to ask but what would the best way to describe what I am, preferably more specific than right leaning.

>spiritual is right and material is left
what

Meh, I just believe that niggers should be treated equally without any welfare help or diversity.
If niggers suck they will sink and perish.
If they can compete they are welcome.


Egalitarianism will sort people out, the good ones on the top and the bad ones in the ground.

Did a lot of don't knows related to questions of democracy and right to do whatever you wanted.

Hella don't think anything based on race is a good idea.

Duty is a weird thing.

The questions are heavy handed and written from a very black and white view of the world it feels.

I would very much like to know the source for the questions as these are very subjective and held a lot of strongly bias driven ideology that like false equivalencies

I don't know why this seems strange to you.

>The questions are heavy handed and written from a very black and white view of the world it feels.

THIS
did /pol make them?
Also there are in sufficent question and theres no fucking economical scale.

As expected.

I'm a good person :3

I'll do this in two posts, here's where I stand politically in my own country. I'm substantially more socially conservative than the rest of the politicians in my country.

A couple of the questions were worded pretty badly, in such a way where I would agree with one statement and disagree with another. As it is, I believe hierarchies and inequality are natural, I think that tradition can be a good indicator of the right path but should not be upheld if it has no basis in logic (I mean, you could argue that Muslims being a shit stems from tradition, worded from a Muzzie or a Christian perspective, some of ye would disagree or agree with the same statement). I believe that while everyone has a duty not to abuse society, they should also be able to do whatever they want in privacy. Multiculturalism is a curse, there are literally no benefits to it and a hundred downsides, and everybody is ethnocentric by nature. And I don't believe in religion, but I think it is useful.

Here's where I stand according to Sup Forums and I'm supposedly a rabid leftie because I'm not a full blown 1488er.

Shit made by extremists on either side has little to no merit as if you don't agree with them 100% you'll be branded as the enemy.

...

It's more that conservatism has been heavily conflated with being what right wing is about, rather than just being one of the right wing belief systems I think.

I think it would be further right in some places, but I'm a firm nurture over nature guy.

Basically anywhere it mentioned inherent racial qualities I disagreed, but would have agreed for the superiority of certain cultural qualities.

Yeah, they're very leading for any Sup Forums browser.

There's clearly a 'right' answer for almost all of them.

It would get thrown out of any study, but it was still fun. There were a few good thinkers in there.

So yea, I feel like I'm not wanted here on pol

Check em

...

ok

This is quite funny considering I'm an atheist.

Also, some of the questions were too broad and therefore aligning with either side felt retarded. In general a good test, but the questions need to be more specific.

Is this normal? Sup Forums

I feel like I was being pretty reasonable.

Honestly, I was dreading being on the left. I'm happy I've evolved somewhat, I don't like being associated with those faggots.

Relative centrism is best area on the spectrum.

welp being a libertarian makes you a leftist now apparently

Looks about right

i thought it was a decent thing

...

Could really use an economic scale

...

Franco did nothing wrong