>watch Look Who's Back
>I don't disagree with Hitler
>his only show of extremism is the scene with the jewish grandmother
>ending is basically "what's happening now with muslims is literally WW2" and if you disagree you are literally Hitler
Was I duped into watching "progressive" propaganda?
You were duped into watching a comedy movie thinking it had any worthwhile message to take away.
yeah p much, the whole point was that hitler lurks in the heart of every german and now that people are ever so softly rejecting insane globalist agenda its practically anudda shoah
I loved the movie. I saw some underlying antisemitic propaganda like when the main guy is about to fuck the girl, a menorah falls off the shelf and bumps his head abruptly ending the scene. Not sure what to think of it.
I think it was just to say "DUDE THE CHICK'S JEWISH, THAT'S GONNA CAUSE CONFLICT WITH HITLER!"
Maybe so. Regardless, it was a fun movie. Massuci did a great job as Hitler and gave me many a hearty kek.
Alright let's get the memes straight, this movie was pure genius on many liberals due to an ambiguous message it conveys.
If you watch it from a purely pro-Hitler standpoint (everyone who is supposedly joking actually support him and the nu-male actually went insane at the end)
It drops many many redpills. For instance, why is it that some 90 year old senile jew becomes the expert in the holocaust in the movie goers mind? Why is it that the only satanists in the movie are jewish? Why is Hitler right about everything , but the jews, except for the obvious problem that in this movie realm jews still pose a problem? Even the dog shooting scene (which is hilarious) would be somewhat accurate to Hitler's post WW 1 personality.
Also , all the jews are Satanist in the movie except for the grandmother.
K I N O
It's a case of backfiring liberal humor where it actually proves the opposition is pretty much correct. The whole movie goes to show Hitler is literally right, but "das rayciss" with no actual explanation why.
It's also a really funny movie.
This is correct.
They changed the ending because they realised it was too pro-Hitler. The book has a different ending.
Only part I ever saw is the scene where Hitler appears to be in some kind of TV show dropping redpills.
From that alone it looked very pro Hitler so I am kind of confused how it managed to top the book charts in Germany for quite a while.
>Was I duped into watching "progressive" propaganda?
Wasn't there literally a scene with a woman complaining about migrants in a real interview and then hitler nodding and agreeing?
Is this propaganda?
Is it on netflix?
That's where I watched it
I think it was meant to be a commentary on the influence of celebrities in contemporary culture and how you can watch something "just for the entertainment" then it ends up shaping your worldview. Just look at veiled propaganda efforts from literally every globally significant government.
Well, she's complaining about migrants to Hitler. I'd take that as a yes
The book is covertly pro-Hitler. They changed the ending but it didn't really change the effect.
Yes.
Yes but the main draw is that he appears relatable and interesting for the majority of the movie. It's trying to do the Paradise Lost thing and making the villain out to be sympathetic so you are caught off guard by your own support of Hitler and recognize you need to be careful when facing those bad views.
The German people always have the ability to return to their Nazi ways, it says, so we need to be cautious and fight it off. That's the point of the movie.
now I'm curious, how does the book end?
>Judaic symbol falls and bops the head of a person about to have premartial sex with a jewish girl, stopping him
>thinking this is, in any way, anti-semitic.
>The book has a different ending.
What happens?
yes it was propoaganda
too bad they wrote the movie in a way that everyone who went seeing it with me actually agreed with Literally Hiter™
The point of the movie is that Hitler is charasmatic and the world is shit and these two things feed into each other.
The audience is supposed to "ironically" agree with him because of how well he plays everyone. It's just funny because he makes valid points despite being literally Hitler.
Don't read so deep into it.
...
...
...
this
i've LMAO'd irl
...
It's ridiculous, if anyone actually expected anything else. Especially out of German funded movies about Hitler.
Completely agree with you, i loved the movie.
The Burger gets it.
...
how does the book end btw?
i watched it and thought it was a pro-hitler movie. i didnt find out it was supposed to be anti-hitler until later. bet whoever made it feels pretty dumb right about now. heil hitler!
Amazed this actually made it into the cinemas. Every single line I saw from it so far was like a forcefully administered red-suppository.
They completely depend on the viewer/reader later on going
>"Well I did agree with absolutely everything Literally Hitler said, but he's Hitler so I will reject it!"
If you end the movie after that scene then its completely redpilled.
>It wasn't all bad
Like this post if you think the girl on the left is just as pretty
>retarded movie made by slimy jew producer who leeched this piece of garbage of the population because "lel """""arts""""" funding"
>MUH GERMANS ARE BAD, AND GET TOO MUCH MANIPULATED BY MEDIA, but eat up our bullshit Goyim
>last clip shows right wing people as "literally" Nazis
yes truly the best movie of all time, please elaborate how sympathetic Hitler was when he shot that dog
This, the entire movie is based on shaming people because they agree with 'literally Hitler!1!!!'.
Only stasi Germcucks could come up with propaganda like this.
It's too bad that they hamfist the message at the end. Hitler is entirely relatable, even when wrong, so it doesn't actually become worrying when the grandmother fucking flips out and Hitler is entirely unapologetic. It was a very "why do we hate Hitler again? Oh yeah, the Holocaust" moment.
I'd disagree. I think this draws on something called the Great Man Theory in history which assumes that a collective few people are responsible for most historical changes in a given society. This argues that the Nazis didn't create Hitler, but Hitler created the Nazis, through sheer force of will. It's a partially true theory, bit the last quote where the movie says "I am a part of Germany" refers to esoteric Hitlerism and the ultimatum of the German ethnic mindset. This assumes that via the Great Man Theory Hitler became the ultimate embodiment of the German ethnic image (Funny how it's the nu-male who ends up killing him?) and so he becomes a sort of eternal image. Therefore he will always exist as long as Germans exist.
So it's not about fighting off the Nazi image, it's just an observation on modern Germany's trend towards hating it's own ethnic image. Germans becoming nazis is therefore just consequential, it's just going to happen whether you fight it or not.
>so it doesn't actually become worrying when
Change "when" into "until". My bad.
Hitler was a good person, discussing why the Muslims were bad. Many agreed with him. I thought it was an accurate portrayal of Germany in modern times. Unwilling to start the rwds, but damn near everyone wants to participate
>Even the dog shooting scene (which is hilarious) would be somewhat accurate to Hitler's post WW 1 personality.
Not to mention it's also one of the things most normal people would find ridiculous and contrary to the actual person. Everyone knows Hitler loved doggos
Clearly not since it says right there that it's kino. Is The Pest progressive propaganda?
...
This is now a Nazi doggo thread.
Was Hitler a manlet? Or that doggo is yuge
He was 5'9 I think.
I found the movie surprisingly redpilled too. It basically showed people that Hitler is not literally the devil and that he was right about things.
We should remove the end which is basically "you're a useful idiot and literally Hitler if you support right wingers today", but even that part can be seen redpilled desu.
That's not Hitler, it's Frank Zappa
Like I said, it comes off as pro Esoteric Hitlerism. Anyone who treats this as 100% anti-nazi isn't paying attention. I was pretty shocked to see how redpilled it could be based on ones own interpretation.
I get your argument, and it doesn't disagree with my much except for the idea that "trending towards hating its own ethnic image" understanding of it. The whole movie is showing people being agreeable and coming to 'follow' Hitler from beginning to end which wouldn't display a trend to hating its own ethnic image at all. Sawatzki's issue at the end is not that he'll become a tyrant whether he fights it or not - he's not showing any signs of this until this situation with Hitler happens. Hitler shows him that hating something and trying to overtly act against it will turn you into a tyrant in the same vein as the person he hates. It's bringing up an existing threat in being overtly anti-Nazi.
Just watch the movie and ignore the ending.
It is redpilled while trying to be bluepilled as it portrays Hitler realistically. See here
The rooftop scene could be viewed as ultimate redpill or ultimate faggotry.
Redpill if you don't actually hate Germany and being German, therefore Hitler is seen as embodiment of German identity and that somewhere deep inside normal Krauts agree with him.
Faggotry is that every Kraut is evil and they should hate themselves. Sad that this is what Germans will take from that movie.
where can i even find this shit
and we view hitler and nazis kinda like russians do
we hate them because of the things they've done to us here
even though most serbs know that the only reason we went at war with them is because British agents and commie scum staged a coup in Serbia at the time
Netflix or from torrent sites. (such as Bay)
The film started out great but quickly went down the drain. The highlight was my friends saying they were feeling bad for Hitler.
huh i thought this was basically a SNL skit about muh bad Hitler
gotta see this one.
Thought so too. Instead it truly does try to portray Hitler AND why people followed Hitler realistically.
Shame he killed Slavs, he was pretty much right about everything.
>The antifa is just as bad as fascists
Someone needs to take more of the redpill. This movie has innately pro-nazi sentiments within it as well. It's pro-tyrant at times even, in the sens that the tyrant may become the singular embodiment of a people's wishes/ethnic identity. To me, as it is with more esoteric arguments, Sawatski is the personification of the modern feminized man being afraid of his own identity and thus pathologically fights against what he doesn't understand about himself. So in this vein, antifa is simply the redirection of the fighring human spirit into a self destructive sense, whereas with the fighting human spirit on Hitler side it's constructive.
holy shit that looks like a low budget movie from Nigeria
I was pleasantly surprised.
>He killed Slavs
In the Balkans maybe, but the reason for that was because even then the Balkan states were a tattered group of divided and violent factions all fighting one another, the Soviets, and Nazis.
The movie is very tongue in cheek, but to call it leftist propaganda is a lie.
If anything, the movie seemed redpilled.
Hitler recognizes the shit state of his country and people, and pulls them together to unite under a common interest.
In addition, he mocks the stormfags, and makes his own right wing political group, that actually knows how to do some damage to the mainstream agenda.
It also exposes how right wing infighting hurts our common goal when Hitler is beaten up by triggered neo nazis.
Also Jews get imprisoned and the movie literally portrays the left as insane.
Beyond cringey edgelord memes can someone briefly explain to me how Hitler was "right"? Thanks.
The book was better.
Read the thread you lazy nigger
The book ends with Hitler finishing the book after being beaten by neonazis and pursuing political career now, after he achieved success in the media.
The numale-guy still dates that girl(made kid with her or something) and isn't mentally fucked up as well.
I have. If the claim is he was a nationalist hero for Germany, sorry; not completely buying that.
it's a scene from the "movie" inside of the movie
Assuming that is the claim, why not?
Holy shit this is good. Downloading it now
You forgot how he kills a dog and jokes about it, which is extremely wrong since Hitler loved dogs.
That jewish grandma represents the jewish propaganda and media. You saw what happened to the guy, he went crazy because of the jewish empathy.
Therefore, jewish lies and propaganda media will drive you crazy.
As canniving as Jews may be I can't get behind the Holocaust. If he wanted German working class to rise, that was not necessary. Feel free to school me btw I'd like to hear the pro's for Adolf.
I really liked the movie, except the end ofc. I was very surprised to see how they (well, whoever wrote the book) present Hitler as he "really" was and the movie turns into a big red pill. I saw it with a friend and all he could say was "well I guess I'm a nazi then".
Can this movie be used for introductory redpilling?
he was forced to, let's be honest
My take away from this film is that all Germans are nazis, but they're just shy about it now. Also the scene where Hitler tells the soccer hooligans to beat up the Antifags is hilarious
>He still believes in the hocaust
It's kind of the final destination of the redpill, but the holocaust didn't happen in the way which the Allies/Jews/Soviets said it happened, it mostly occurred in the forms of prisoner abuse. There were no systematic exterminations of jews, just starvation, disease, and some bigotry during war. Most of the death came from the Einzatzgruppen. I also assume you haven't read Ebola yet, so for a TLDR;
It wouldn't matter if the Holocaust had happened or not, Hitler was right, he had the force of his people behind them to protect them from jewish invasion (the Soviets and Capitalists) and was completely correct in assessing that WW 1 was fought over colonial/economic interests.
This. Fucking gopniks couldn't make up their mind and just started to kill everything.
Don't forget he had to keep them in camps so they wouldn't back stab the Germans for what, the fourth time?
The movie is red-pilled.
Hitler was right entirely, and the movie shows it.
Beyond that, the reason why jews needed to be expelled (look up the Havaraa Agreement) was die to their degeneracy in Russia and Germany at the time. Whether it was in distribution of pornography, degenerate films, or having basically owned Germany after the Treaty of Versailles caused massive hyper inflation to the German economy (which means jewish banks owned the mark and the lives of all Germans). Hitler was able to recreate the currency , build massive infrastructural works (like the Autobahn) and revigorized an incredibly demoralized people from degeneracy, drugs, and a sense of hopelessness. Most of which was caused by jews apathetic to the goys, and this willing to capitalize off people's suffering.
>watch a comedy movie
>turns out it isn't a comedy movie
I didn't like it.
Nah bro, based movie, what he had to say about television is spot on
I don't remember the lines exactly, but they basically interviewed a bunch of guys from right wing parties while the actor pretended to be hitler
>interviewer: "would you follow him?"
>german politician guy: "Shut down the camera."..."If he was the real one, yes"
pretty funny movie desu, I appreciated they didn't take the easy route and dehumanize and villify hitler
watch The Greatest Story Never Told, nigger
Please continue to wake me up man. The Jewish conspiracy is a reality is what you're telling me.
It is. If you want a scholarly perspective on this (meaning hard, but insanely informative reading) look up a Culture of Critique PDF and start reading. The JQ and international needs to stop.
Another redpill is that Hitler had. Jewish general, bodyguard, and about 100,000 - 150,000 jewish soldiers working for him. Some of them in the same camps jews were supposedly mass executed in! T b h jews dont play much in the history of the world until around the time of the French Revolution, then it becomes even more relevant once Herzl popularizes a more active Zionism among his congregation and many other jews in the 1890's. I'd also read Chaim Potok's "Chosen" for a more brief history on the jews.
how can this seen redpilled when it shows pegida and afd in a bad light?!
Because it breaks with too many of the stories that are told about Hitler, how he was a complete monster in every aspect and so on.
That was probably not the intention of the author though. Similar to Elysium, where the intention of the author is very clear, yet he fucks up to provide any reason why his antagonists were actually in the wrong.