卐 SIEG HEIL! 卐
Thread for discussion of National Socialism, Fascism, Traditionalism, and European Identity Movements. Share links, PDFs, reading, videos, and propaganda.
> 卐 - THIS GENERAL ENRAGES SHILLS!
> 卐 - TAKE BACK THE BOARD!
> 卐 - ADD YOUR OWN ORIGINAL CONTENT!
卐 IF YOU DO NOT SEE A GENERAL IN THE CATALOG PLEASE COPY FROM THE PASTEBIN AND CREATE ONE! - HELP SPREAD THE LOVE! 卐
卐 PASTEBIN - pastebin.com
卐 TAKE THE SURVEYS! SHOW THEM WE BELONG! SHOW YOUR STRENGTH!
poal.me
poal.me
poal.me
卐 - NEWS, RADIO, COMMENTARY & FORUMS
dailystormer.com
therightstuff.biz
fashthenation.com
theoccidentalobserver.net
counter-currents.com
ropeculture.org
infostormer.com
commonfilthradio.bandcamp.com
radioaryan.com
ironmarch.org
vnnforum.com
卐 - VIRAL MEDIA
thegreateststorynevertold.tv
youtu.be
youtu.be
youtu.be
youtu.be
youtu.be
youtu.be
youtu.be
youtu.be
youtu.be
youtu.be
youtu.be
youtu.be
youtu.be
卐 - PHYSICAL MEDIA
imgur.com
/nsg/ 卐 - National Socialism General
Other urls found in this thread:
ub.edu
aryanism.net
voxeu.org
pridecomethbeforeafall.wordpress.com
youtu.be
counter-currents.com
books.google.com
en.wikipedia.org
well.ox.ac.uk
cell.com
youtube.com
youtube.com
youtu.be
youtube.com
youtu.be
youtu.be
youtu.be
youtu.be
youtu.be
youtu.be
youtu.be
youtu.be
youtu.be
youtu.be
youtu.be
youtu.be
youtu.be
archive.is
youtu.be
jane-griffiths-my-book.blogspot.com
worldfuturefund.org
youtu.be
youtu.be
youtu.be
jrbooksonline.com
youtu.be
youtu.be
youtu.be
youtu.be
youtube.com
youtu.be
youtu.be
youtu.be
youtu.be
youtu.be
youtu.be
youtu.be
youtu.be
youtu.be
youtu.be
youtu.be
youtu.be
youtu.be
youtu.be
youtu.be
youtu.be
youtu.be
youtu.be
youtu.be
youtu.be
youtu.be
youtu.be
ub.edu
mk.christogenea.org
mk.christogenea.org
mk.christogenea.org
youtu.be
tomatobubble.com
youtu.be
youtu.be
youtube.com
youtube.com
mattbrundage.com
youtube.com
thedarkenlightenment.com
twitter.com
卐 - MYTHS ABOUT NATSOC (Part 1)
>"National Socialism is just (((socialism)))"
Marxist (Left) socialism and National (Right) Socialism are "antipodal zeitgeists engaged in dialectic". That's a fancy way to say they're opposite ideologies designed to clash, like Yin and Yang.
NatSoc was fundamentally an ideology built around race, while Marxist socialism was entirely different: built around class. Hitler aimed to unite the right and left, including workers and their bosses, into a new German nation based on racial identity. Socialism, in contrast, was a class war between workers, bosses, and owners (Capitalists), aiming to build a workers state in which race and gender were insignificant. Socialists, especially Marxist socialists, were anti-religious atheists, whereas NatSoc went so far as to make Christianity the religion of the state.
The differences go on and on: Marxist socialism was internationalist, NatSoc was nationalist. Marxist socialism was egalitarian, whereas NatSoc believed that nature was unequal and required competition. Marxist socialism wanted to nationalize all private industry, while NatSoc privatized every major industry except the railroads (it considered these a military asset. In fact, Hitler once joked "they didn't need to nationalize property because they nationalized people". NatSoc drew on a range of pan-German theories, which wanted to blend Aryan workers and Aryan magnates into a super Aryan state, which would involve the eradication of class-focused socialism as a non-German ideology.
卐 - MYTHS ABOUT NATSOC (Part 2)
>"National Socialism is just (((socialism)))"
Hitler tried to clarify the distinction in 1938:
>“’Socialist’ I define from the word ‘social’ meaning in the main ‘social equity’. A Socialist is one who serves the common good without giving up his individuality or personality or the product of his personal efficiency.
>Our adopted term ‘Socialist has nothing to do with Marxian Socialism. ((((Marxism))) is anti-property; true socialism is not. ((((Marxism))) places no value on the individual, or individual effort, of efficiency; true Socialism values the individual and encourages him in individual efficiency, at the same time holding that his interests as an individual must be in consonance with those of the community. All great inventions, discoveries, achievements were first the product of an individual brain. It is charged against me that I am against property, that I am an atheist. Both charges are false.”
>Against the Mainstream: Nazi privatization in 1930's Germany (Germa Bel)
ub.edu
aryanism.net
voxeu.org
pridecomethbeforeafall.wordpress.com
youtu.be
卐 - MYTHS ABOUT NATSOC (Part 3)
>Racialist myths:
counter-currents.com
books.google.com
en.wikipedia.org
>A study by Firasat et al. (2006) concluded that the Kalash lack typical Greek Haplogroups such as Haplogroup 21 (E-M35),
>Some of the Kalash people claim to be descendants of Alexander the Great's soldiers; and a recent genetic analysis has substantiated this belief.
>A study by Hellenthal et al. (2014) on the DNA of the Kalash people showed evidence of input from modern day Germany and Austria between 990 and 210 BC, a period that overlaps with that of Alexander the Great...
well.ox.ac.uk
cell.com
I just watched a documentary on Neo Nazis and frankly I was disgusted by these untermensch besmirching our name.
Needlessly violent
Drug addicts
Criminals
Unintelligent
White trash.
What do we do about these kind of people? The biker gangs, the skinheads, the Neo Nazi thugs that use our flags and name as an excuse for getting drunk and geating up niggers?
Is it possible to use them, to civilizae them? Should we even pay them any attention? If nationalism rises in 2017 I can see them becoming a problem that will hurt our cause.
Also, inspiring video
What say you, brothers and sisters of the Reich?
dont really give a fuck but you can ask Argentina that.
2017 is going to be a good year boys. Getting my flag next month.
...
>unironically calls other sub humans
>posts anime
Ha
In truth all who call themselves nazis are untermensch. If you can't realize the fact your brand has been so besmirched that it's better to find another vessel for your ideology, you have to be sub-human. That's why every modern day nazi looks and talks like a cretin and is essentially controlled opposition through useful idiocy.
I fucking love eye-patches. Approved.
...
Bump
You don't know the difference between a National Socialist and a Neo Nazi skinhead. I too view skinheads as subhuman.
Are there any good manga or anime with a fascist theme?
Good thing I call myself a fascist :^)
Fascism is on the rise again, but it isn't gonna be called fascism or National Socialism. The names are permanently tainted, but the ideas are not.
letting someone have power of life and death over you because you like their aesthetics is a bad idea
Her eyes are way too fucking close
>implying the only good thing about NatSoc is aesthetics
then you should know free will is a spook. In a natural society there will be people to be commanded, and the commanders.
bump
Fascism has a lot more going for it than just aesthetics.
Jesus christ this is like the commie blocks. only without the Russian weather.
>just watched some (((msm propaganda)))
>feels disgusted
That's what you get for watching propaganda.
Do you think the people who own the media want you to be open to white nationalism, national socialism, or anyone they consider their enemy?
Pretty much. For hundreds of thousands of years despotism has been the way society has moved forward, it is only recently that we abandoned that ideology. We were ruled by Chiefdoms, Kingdoms, Emperors, and Autarchs. Fascism attempts to bring that back, but without the silly system of authority being determined by blood, but rather through meritocracy. Things can definitely go horribly wrong under a fascist nation, but they can also go fantastically right. Democracy and bureaucracy is simply too prone to corruption, apathy, and deadlock.
卐 - WHITE GENOCIDE & JEWISH INFLUENCE
>Endgame - White Genocide
youtu.be
>The Jewish-Bolshevik Decimation of the Russian People
youtu.be
>Jewish financiers and the Russian Revolution
youtu.be
>Putin confirms, 85% Jews behind Bolshevism
youtu.be
>The Talmudic basis of Jewish supremacy
youtu.be
>Miscegenation illegal in (((Our Greatest Ally)))
youtu.be
>Jews pushing immigration for white nations
youtu.be
>Barbara Lerner Spectre
youtu.be
>Jewish Supremacism
youtu.be
>Noel Ignatiev
youtu.be
>Mainstreaming white genocide
youtu.be
>Sarkozy on forced misecegenation
youtu.be
>Ben Freedman on World Zionist wars
youtu.be
>Alon Ziv promoting interracial couples
youtu.be
>Alon Ziv defending Jews refusing to breed outside their race
archive.is
>The Frankfurt School of Cultural Marxism
youtu.be
>Germany caused the war
jane-griffiths-my-book.blogspot.com
worldfuturefund.org
>Why Germany Invaded Poland
youtu.be
youtu.be
youtu.be
>Polish atrocities against the Germans
jrbooksonline.com
>Eisenhower's Rhine-Meadows Death Camps
youtu.be
>Hellstorm - Post-war Genocide of Germans
youtu.be
youtu.be
youtu.be
youtu.be
>The Rape of Berlin
youtube.com
>Hitler's War - the Allies caused the war
youtu.be
卐 - BRITISH NATSOC
>Jonathan Bowden:
youtu.be
youtu.be
youtu.be
youtu.be
youtu.be
>Sir Oswald Mosley:
youtu.be
youtu.be
youtu.be
youtu.be
youtu.be
卐 - GERMAN NATSOC
youtu.be
youtu.be
youtu.be
youtu.be
youtu.be
youtu.be
>25 Demands of National Socialism:
youtu.be
>Rodney Martin - The Economic Plan of the NSDAP
youtu.be
>German Economic Miracle of the 1930's
youtu.be
>Hitler's Economic Reform:
youtu.be
>Social and Cultural Policies of NS Germany
youtu.be
>Against the Mainstream: Nazi privatization in 1930's Germany (Germa Bel)
ub.edu
>NatSoc German Economic Policy
mk.christogenea.org
mk.christogenea.org
mk.christogenea.org
>Hitler's Warning about the Zionist Control Structure
youtu.be
>Adolf Hitler: Man of Peace?
tomatobubble.com
>Hitler: We Want Nothing But Peace
youtu.be
>Hitler's Appeal for Peace in 1939
youtu.be
Bampen this absolutely glorious bread
HAIL VICTORY MY BROTHERS
...
Thank you for not answering the question.
...
t. fat balding English teacher
You know, religion doesn't get talked about a whole lot on here. What are you, and what would you want your fascist state to be? Atheist? Christian? Neopagan? Secular?
>English teacher
Fuck no, I'm a contractor. I don't teach anyone anything. I work for weeks at a time sometimes, 16 hour days, then I'll have like 5 days off with nothing to do except workout and shitpost.
>fat
Ironically...I got bored and started doing crossfit a few months ago because it's free, now I'm underweight. My metabolism freaked out and I kept shedding weight. Got a little scary. Still not sure why that was happening.
...
does nat soc have democracy?
I believe it does have limited amounts of democracy in the form of corporatism. For example, if you are an civil engineer, you might be able to vote for someone who you think is qualified for a position in the Ministry of Infrastructure, which would work with private corporations and businesses to ensure the infrastructure of the nation is good. If you're not an engineer or other job related to infrastructure, you probably can't vote for that position.
Very very limited democracy, but functionally, no. Especially not as you or I have known it.
youtube.com
youtube.com
Quick question guys and I thought this might be the right place to ask.
I am a white dude. If I have the choice, should I avoid stores with non whites in it?
To some extent lad
Christianity is intricately tied to Western progress and althought i harbor distrust towards its roots I don't believe a revival is possible desu m8
>100%
Always support your native citizen before a brown m8.
I wouldn't worry about it. If the store is on the "bad side of town" then you shouldn't be going there whether they're white or not. Otherwise, you're fine. But then again, I'm fine with anyone who integrates into the culture, matter what race, so you might not want to ask me.
Non-white owners, or just non-whites in it?
In this day and age, good luck finding stores with just white ownership or employees. Most stores are coporate franchises anyway, so god knows which international interests owns each one. I think a good principle is to support mom and pop shops, support local, non-corporate if possible. Buy from family-owned, by from your own race before buying from some immigrant who setup shop on government grants to help white genocide.
That does bring up a good point. How does the Christian population on this thread deal with the origins of Christianity? And if you're on the racial genocidal side (I know that most of the NatSocs here support deportation though) how do you deal with the morality of that? Or the whole "made in God's image" thing when dealing with untermensch?
Bumping this
Yeah I am more of race nationalist instead of a civic nationalist.
People hate on niggers because of their crime and all that shit.
If they were to remove or replace the 100 IQ niggers than they would not have a much crime etc.
I would still not want them here.
Not because of hate, not because I dont like them.
I just dont like them here. I want my nation to be pure aswell as my people. This tolereance goes both ways,
I dont want genocide by mass immigration and mixing to be done by other races, nor my own.
I would rather live in a multicultural world than a multicultural ( multiracial) society.
Thanks.
Thb The only non white stores i actively go to are a barbershop (not a turkisch one) a black man and a black woman( not a couple) and a qt philiphine girl work there. they do a great job.
The other one is a kebabshop which I only go to After I went out. which is rarely.
For the rest I dont actively go to non white stores and will try to distance myself from them.
warfare by money
fuck off
My personal views are this. When you have too large of a minority then it becomes a problem because they get big enough to form their own subculture and it causes racial tension. However, you can let in small amounts of minorities and spread them out, thus forcing them to adopt your culture, and because you're only letting in a few you can afford to let in only the best and brightest of the group, benefitting your nation. I harbor no disdain towards large groups of minorities, but there is inevitably tension when they grow too large.
thanks user, is it bad i kinda agree with hitler somewhat?
I think white western countries are way beyond that point.
Sure a couple of minorites arent a problem and can actually enrich your life.
Like chineseand their food, arabs and their food and shit like that.
No problem. But it opens the box of pandora for more people of different races to enter. Because those who came before were allowed, so why not them.....
And then you have white genocide.
I suppose you could have a multicultural society if either you blended the cultures to try and make it one culture, or had the cultures seperate somehow. If Mussolini had ever succeeded in making his new Roman Empire it would've included quite a diverse set of people, so he definitely would've been banking on a strong state nationalism over race nationalism.
>those digits
>checked
No my brother, the Führer fought for our future and to bring awareness of (((them))) to the world once more.
You are on the right path.
we all do. so does Mencius Moldbug, so do most traditionalists. Democracy is degenerate as fuck.
youtube.com
thedarkenlightenment.com
I agree with how he says the information is controlled by the elite so the masses dont have true democracy but couldnt we just make actual free media we have the internet now.
what puts me off going full nat soc is mainly free speech seeming limited, democracy, and killing undesirables.
I know there are differances between races and some superior to others but i want more studies done.
I wouldnt say im a racist but i would say im a race realist i just dont like the hate you see the stormfags have.
you post this in evvery thread, what the fuck does it mean?
Yeah, the thing for me is that in a fascist society the leader has the power to shape the culture. They have propaganda, military youth programs, paramilitary and military conscription programs, strong nationalism, an enemy or rival to unite against, a single nationwide religion, and the power of censorship. A nation should be able to get different races to have the same culture, or at minimum two different cultures to work together with that kind of influence.
But it would erode society.
The race is a foundadion of a society. I am not even talking about superior and inferior races which would ruin the former.
I am talking about tribalism.
As much as I can respect a black dude who has a good paying job etc. I would still not like him if he plowed my sister.
Not because I dont like him, but because I cherish my race and want it to be pure.
In a multircacial socieety this will also come into effect.
if people dont want to mix IE want a racially pure society, then they will survive
if people dont care about it, then what is the point of having an army and all those boundaries.
those armys and boundaries are in place to make sure your people will not be taken over, breed out of excistence etc.
So if you follow the second approach, the multiracials approahc, you will errode the society which will cause it to be destroyed, either from outside ( ie a stronger country takes it ( partly) over.
or from within where people will form new enclaves and fight eachother, or breed out of excistence ( white flight and white genocide)
Differences in culture between nations ensure that there is still a culture in yours. Sure, you may be white and your neighbor black. But you're both Christian and have the same German culture, went through all the same indoctrination and training, you might have served side by side in the military, and all media that might try to divide you has been censored. Meanwhile, the other country you both mutually hate is filled with muslims with a different culture who you would never let in to your country, not because of their race, but because of incompatible cultures, ideologies, and religions.
Do you guys know about the Indo-Aryan migration theory, and have you heard of the Kalash peoples?
Can anybody tell me about Natsoc economics? The mainstream (Jew) narrative is that there wasn't any well defined economic ideology under the Third Reich
>tell me about Natsoc economics
From the pastebin:
卐 - MYTHS ABOUT NATSOC (Part 1)
>"National Socialism is just (((socialism)))"
Marxist (Left) socialism and National (Right) Socialism are "antipodal zeitgeists engaged in dialectic". That's a fancy way to say they're opposite ideologies designed to clash, like Yin and Yang.
NatSoc was fundamentally an ideology built around race, while Marxist socialism was entirely different: built around class. Hitler aimed to unite the right and left, including workers and their bosses, into a new German nation based on racial identity. Socialism, in contrast, was a class war between workers, bosses, and owners (Capitalists), aiming to build a workers state in which race and gender were insignificant. Socialists, especially Marxist socialists, were anti-religious atheists, whereas NatSoc went so far as to make Christianity the religion of the state.
The differences go on and on: Marxist socialism was internationalist, NatSoc was nationalist. Marxist socialism was egalitarian, whereas NatSoc believed that nature was unequal and required competition. Marxist socialism wanted to nationalize all private industry, while NatSoc privatized every major industry except the railroads (it considered these a military asset. In fact, Hitler once joked "they didn't need to nationalize property because they nationalized people". NatSoc drew on a range of pan-German theories, which wanted to blend Aryan workers and Aryan magnates into a super Aryan state, which would involve the eradication of class-focused socialism as a non-German ideology.
Thus, "socialism" in National Socialism was an appropriated, bastardized term from the perspective of the Left. NatSoc redefined socialism as "Germanism/Volkism", which they saw as "producer-oriented capitalism", as opposed to "Jewish capitalism", aka, international finance, globalism, wall street, etc. In theory, NatSoc economics was a version of Keynesianism, tailored to the Völkisch nature of whichever people adopted it. Its not one dogmatic economic system,and Hitler often joked that the lack of a specific ideology was their strength. NatSoc could be more "free market" as Americans know it, or less. But NatSoc is always in favor of the Volk over economic identity, of "producer capitalism" over "finance capitalism".
Hitler tried to clarify the distinction in 1938:
>“’Socialist’ I define from the word ‘social’ meaning in the main ‘social equity’. A Socialist is one who serves the common good without giving up his individuality or personality or the product of his personal efficiency.
>Our adopted term ‘Socialist has nothing to do with Marxian Socialism. ((((Marxism))) is anti-property; true socialism is not. ((((Marxism))) places no value on the individual, or individual effort, of efficiency; true Socialism values the individual and encourages him in individual efficiency, at the same time holding that his interests as an individual must be in consonance with those of the community. All great inventions, discoveries, achievements were first the product of an individual brain. It is charged against me that I am against property, that I am an atheist. Both charges are false.”
>Against the Mainstream: Nazi privatization in 1930's Germany (Germa Bel)
ub.edu
aryanism.net
voxeu.org
pridecomethbeforeafall.wordpress.com
youtu.be