These are the sites the Washington Post claims are free from Fake News.
They are suggesting legal measures should be taken to ensure people are obtaining correct news from these sources and not potential foreign agents.
>NPR
>BBC
>New York Times
>Wall Street Journal
>Washington Post
>Buzzfeed
>Vice
Fake News sites (like Rolling Stone or Breitbart BTFO)
B T F O
T
F
O
Other urls found in this thread:
neopolsmokery.com
youtube.com
theintercept.com
en.wikipedia.org
en.wikipedia.org
vice.com
en.wikipedia.org
europarl.europa.eu
reddit.com
reason.com
youtu.be
youtube.com
twitter.com
so reuters is FSB propaganda?
What a shitty list.
No way. This is retarded. It means through funding, probably.
I think we have a new D.C. restaurant to investigate!
Post yfw the left is cannibalizing itself
>Buzzfeed
>Vice
They can't even pretend to be fair, can they?
>no AP
>no Reuters
>Buzzfeed and Vice somehow made the cut
>vice
>PropOrNot does not articulate its criteria in detail, merely describing its metrics as “behavioral” and “motivation-agnostic.” That is to say, even if a news source is not technically a Russian propaganda outlet and is not even trying to help the Kremlin, it is still guilty of being a “useful idiot” if it publishes material that might in some way be convenient or helpful for the Russian government.
News outlets that criticise or disagree with articles put forward by the above White Listed groups;
>While blacklisting left-wing and libertarian journalists, PropOrNot also denies being McCarthyite. Yet it simultaneously calls for the U.S. government to use the FBI and DOJ to carry out “formal investigations” of these accused websites, “because the kind of folks who make propaganda for brutal authoritarian oligarchies are often involved in a wide range of bad business.” The shadowy group even goes so far as to claim that people involved in the blacklisted websites may “have violated the Espionage Act, the Foreign Agent Registration Act, and other related laws.”
They are really pushing for this fake news bullshit.
And the method is quite smart. Basically based on the modern dependency on social media... In Facebook for example sites will have different rates, this will force sites to fit with whatever they want so they can get traffic from social media.
>Buzzfeed
>not fake news
>not potential foreign agents.
>BBC
I don't think they count AP or Reuters as the same kind of news site. They don't inject view points into anything.
Still a crappy list though. The only trustworthy one is the WSJ in my experience. Maybe the Post for a limited number of things. Definitely not the NYT, Buzzfeed, or Vice though.
>Buzzfeed
>fucking VICE
This is next level crazy. Why a newspaper would think publishing an article like this is incomprehensible.
Source on this?
>>Buzzfeed
In other news, the establishment media claims that, according to the establishment media, the establishment media can be trusted. The establishment media had no explanation for why record numbers of people do not trust them.
>Buzzfeed
>reliable
youtube.com
>WaPo, NYT, Buzzfeed , Vice
top kek
Doesn't this remind anyone of the Ministry of Truth?
What the fuck are these people thinking? We're no way sheepified to that point yet. Is there a culling planned?
>Buzzfeed
>legit news site
>tfw Bernie Bro's are shitting themselves for going against Madame President and wondering if they are on the list of potential Russian 400lb Hackers that will be Shut Down
The Saudi Monarchy owns a big fat share of half these fucking networks
>f-fake news sites are subversive foreign propaganda
The MSM is the Propaganda arm of the US Federal Government, and Obama was the one who sat there and retired the restrictions we had against full-on lugenpresse.
I wish they'd list my friend's site so he can get more traffic, but maybe it's too hard to be threatened by a site called buttpost.org
>buzzfeed
>vice
Much hyped Washington Post article doing the rounds this week.
The "story" was "shopped" to numerous outlets, apparently, including fucking Buzzfeed, who rejected it for its stupidity.
Here's Glen Greenwald's piece on it;
He's a leftist, so it's not like he's sticking up for "fascists" here.
Of course, Salon, The Daily Beast and USA Today are running the story as well without any question.
BBC has real news, it is just highly biased in the writing style and on the stuff they report
>CNN didnt make the list
>MFW
So, "fake news" is the buzzword for "We don't want the public to be able to think for themselves and need the government to censor or shut these sites down. Also they are exposing our lies and cutting into our profits." Full retard has been achieved far too much for my liking this entire year.
Not even the establishment can pass them off as credible anymore.
>tfw CNN has less perception of credibility with normies than Vice or Buzzfeed
Maybe they shouldn't have run the Russian Hackers story.
Oh wait - The people making the list do think Russian Hackers stole the election.
The left is purging itself. Glorious.
AP and REUTERS inject a viewpoint into everything. During the election They were both as bad as CNN.
They also push feminism and diversity, and label anything remotely conservative as 'far right' and 'Islamaphobic'.
They are Very blue pilled and actively pushing a socialist/Marxist agenda.
>buzzfeed
>vice
>reuters
>en.wikipedia.org
>The Reuter agency was established in 1851 by Paul Julius Reuter in Britain at the London Royal Exchange
>en.wikipedia.org
>Born Israel Beer Josaphat in Kassel, Germany, his father, Samuel Levi Josaphat, was a rabbi
For fucks sake his name is so damn jewish putting parentheses around it would just look stupid, and you trust them to be unbiased?
Describing anything against the narrative as Fake News sounds like something straight out of 1984.
Fakes News is code for;
>We lied and it worked
>But now the other side have figured out you can lie and that's not fair
Pic resulted. I said during the election campaign that;
1. The media lying
2. Indulging identity politics
Was going to have a huge blowback for the establishment. Once the right figured out you could ditch facts in favour of appealing to emotion, or that you could appeal to people's ethnic identity, they would use it and begin to win back large chunks of the culture war they lost.
Yeah this term really exploded right after Trump won as well, it just seems like a coordinated fabrication.
>mfw i was ranting about buzzfeed once back in 2014 and my mother says, "what, that joke news site?"
Literally what the Ministry of Truth does in the book.
>Buzzfeed
>Vice
What the actual fuck?
> the fourth estate is destroying itself
Thanks for the link. Good article. I am still absolutely confounded as to why WaPo would think this is something they should publish. I expect a retraction if that's something media still does.
>buzzfeed
Holy shit is this real life anymore. Way to delegitimize your narrative.
Actually, AP and RETUERS, because of their agendas being pushed into everything, is why it's so prevalent, because so many outlets just reprint their material.
Same goes for all the news outlets underneath the Time Warner label (CNN, HuffPo) which are now in "partnerships) with hundreds of foreign outlets. That's also why the narratives are so easy to spot when they start pushing them, because all of their linked outlets start printing the same thing at the same time.
Aside from suggesting a google chrome plugin that will identify "fake news", it was the;
>the FBI and DOJ should investigate employees of these organizations
>The accusers must remain anonymous, of course, for their own protection from Russian Hackers
>Also, we're not saying they know they work for the Russians, but anyone who publishes that sort of material must have other skeletons in their closet, right?
It's full Stasi mode.
>MFW this is real news
vice.com
They're dying, they are bleeding money. Organizations do stupid things before their death.
I think it's desperation. Guys like Bezo's and Slim probably don't have/want the ability to ride out the financial burden for 4 more years.
Same goes for CNN.
They're throwing up fucking insane conspiracy theories the likes of which Alex Jones would have run back in the day, coupled with a complete disregard for basic journalistic standards. It feels very Last Stand.
I thought after the election that the NYT would have gone with a different tactic - Publish very bland, but objective and accurate reporting, to get their reputation back.
Then turn the tables once the next election cycle hits.
But it seems like they've looked at their current standing with normies, decided they can't repair their reputation, so they're going to go down flinging as much shit as humanly possible and see what sticks.
The "Russian Hackers" one run by CNN that prompted the Stein recount was at least obfuscated by them simply "quoting" a fake report.
This one from WashPo actually uses it as the basis of an article calling for these actions. Which is very different.
Likewise, Samantha Bee got taken by a hoax regarding Russian "Psyops" which is fine - It's a comedy show no one watches.
WashPo on the other hand is putting it's neck on the line with blatant propaganda. They usually leave that to scummier non-prestige outlets like Salon or Buzzfeed, since they have no reputation to uphold.
Pretty crazy times.
Theres a bounty up for the identities of whoever is behind propornot.
Get ye neetbux, anons.
>ensure people are obtaining correct news from these sources and not potential foreign agents
Sounds awfully familiar. Oh wai~
en.wikipedia.org
europarl.europa.eu
Information rules the world.
So can Obama actually do anything for the lugenpresse at this point or is he too lame a duck?
I think we just need every kike media figure removed/dead and then see if that makes things better.
Pretty sure all of these are fucked. They dug their own graves.
It was (((them)))
Where do I get my money?
What is your source on this? I read the WaPo article and it doesn't say which sites are free from fake news, and it doesn't say that the "fake news" sites identified by the bullshit report from PropOrNot should be banned.
Just so we're clear, a major political party is now of the opinion that because they lost an election, the people are clearly not to be trusted and must have the information they receive and their votes carefully monitored for thoughtcrime.
But they're the anti-fascists.
...
And it's the party that now controls not a single branch of government. The sheer, overweening arrogance of it is what gets me. These people can't understand not only why they lost, but that they lost at all. They demand things with absolutely nothing to enforce their wishes beyond a lame-duck president who's about to be fired by Donald. Are they hoping for the tumblr doxxing crews to become their homegrown stasi? Those people are weak, and all they will accomplish is turning the electorate permanently against them.
This could not be more beautiful. It's the smoothest self-inflicted fucking I've ever seen.
Monopoly
Propornot is owned by google.
Fake news is working.
>it's all russian propaganda
Those crazy fucking russians, destroying the west by encouraging moderate nationalism, immigration control and accountable politicians.
It's coordinated. Same thing about fake news, russians and blocking is suddenly being talked about in Europe too.
Yeah, we are sick bastards, aren't we?
>That face
From the PropOrNot website itself, genius.
>inb4 Washington Post is just reporting on the report
They cite it as a factual source and advocate for the site.
The best part is that they're calling on the government to investigate journalists who do not support members of the Democratic party.
Did they forget who won the election?
What if Trump agrees, and then turns the dogs loose on the Washington Post or The New York Times?
It seems short sighted to say the least.
Cut it out Ivan. We can't survive without another ten million migrants from undeveloped nations and you fucking know it.
I literally don't understand the left's whole Russia angle. I'm 30 years old and the last time I even heard about 'the red scare' was learning about it when I was like 12. It wasn't even a thing when I was 12, I just learned about it (in history class).
Its such a relic of a bygone era that when Hillary and her ilk kept fearmongering about it I was just left baffled. Why did they think that would work?
I'm not a russian apologist but the guys are alright. Putin is respectable enough and he seems to honestly want to restore peace to his part of the world. It was this year that I realized we really are the bad guys, like universally the bad guys. We fuck everyones shit up.
But the nation got woke and they got that way because we just didn't care about what the US gov't told us we should care about. US citizens just want to get on with their lives at this point. We don't want to get dragged into a war, we don't want to fuck up entire cultures. We just want to look inward and MAGA.
All that was wrong with the US is getting expunged Dec.20. We are gonna have to spend the next 4 years hunting down these unpatriotic faggots and then when Trump gets his second term we can finally look back out at the world and smile again.
We won our freedom, we earned it this year. Europe, we hope you can join us as brothers.
No can do, i am evil and, therefore, must save those refugees' home so they won't reech your liberal heaven.
>Wall Street Journal
Damn, I read the WSJ. Are (((they))) in on it?
>must save those refugees' home
By "save" we mean bomb their homes into dust.
Because it's not entirely unfounded.
Hillary and the Democrats just took it and rode it hard.
>We are the bad guys
You're not 12 user. Their aren't good or bad guys (or at least in charge of Western democracies and Russia or China). Just conflicting interests.
There ARE lots of things the Russians and Putin get up to, including supporting nationalist movements and media outlets.
But Hillary uses it as a tool to bludgeon all opposition with.
Much like the "Alt-Right" shenanigans.
You can take all media that opposes you, and simply tar it with the "Fake News" and "Russian Propaganda" brush and dismiss it.
Much like we can simply read a statement, think about it, and then slap it with a (((Goldbergsheklstein))) and dismiss it without addressing it.
What's worse is that we have no power. Those pushing this stuff do have power and can use it for suppression.
The list just contains outlets that are pro-Hillary.
The website, according to sleuths over on leddit the creator was a mod who created a Pro-Bernie and Pro-Hillary and Anti-Trump spam communities.
Cool clothes, not white
All the fashion houses are white European.
>what's worse is that we have no power
The democrats lost the White House, the Senate, and the House in a single day. Power was utilized, it was flexed, and lady liberty was sopping wet at the sight of it.
They can't claim "Russian propaganda" and dismiss it because it just doesn't work. People don't believe it, at all. The claim was so outrageous and so last millennium it just fell on deaf ears. And the more she yelled it the more insane she looked. The fake news angle isn't going to even work because these idiot fucking leftists are just too high strung on emotion right now. They can't relay any message and sound reasonable. Their heads and hearts just aren't in it anymore. All they have left is impotent rage and they aren't brooding on it and making it into something, they are wasting it by bursting at the seams with stupidity.
>no, stop, it's too much winning
Those are all the sites that had the most incorrect coverage during the election
Not only did MSM forgoe their ethics by siding with Clinton, they also made themselves just as 'fake' as actual fake news.
It's all on a more level playing field now. Bullshit is expected from the MSM now at least as frequently as any tabloid newspaper.
...
buzzed is literally a commie rag founded by a fucking commie with the goal of instilling commie values.
Why do journalists even have agendas? This is disgusting, they are allowing freedom of press to die. All news is allowed and none of it should be thrown out based on assumptions without investigation of the claims. This will lead to Facism and dictatorship its propaganda.
>Potential foreign agents
Fucking hell it's been the US' policy to spread their news to the rest of the world.
I love how the "free" media is relying more and more on the government to control information and censor dissenting news website.
Remind me of French absolutism actually, where the press was a tool of propaganda extremely controlled.
>Never been on buzzfeed before
>How bad can it be
>see this
How the fuck is this site considered news
>Same goes for CNN.
>They're throwing up fucking insane conspiracy theories the likes of which Alex Jones would have run back in the day, coupled with a complete disregard for basic journalistic standards. It feels very Last Stand.
youtu.be
I know it sounds like I'm being sarcastic when I say "what the fuck isn't a commie plot these days?" but I swear to God I'm not.
Seriously, what the fuck ISN'T a communist plot?
daily reminder Vice is now owned by Rupert "The Walking Corpse" Murdoch and is primarily a regurgitation of his poltical prejudices and financial interests
>Buzzfeed
>Vice
Yare yare...
Are these idiots SPLC 2.0?
Same people behind (((politifact)))
>Buzzfeed is a reliable source
Holy shit ((((they)))) aren't even trying to be subtle anymore.
>that pic
>NPR
Fuckin kek. NPR is an audio shitbomb.
Sweet trips, goy.
If this story was shopped around. I bet it was the State Department taking advantage of the the repeal of the Smith-mundt act in 2012 when Clinton was secstate and spreading that propaganda aka "fake news"
>he is jewish
Man this 100%
Fucking hell. Makes perfect sense.
No wonder it's aligned with the Washington Post and his other "alternative" outlet news.com.au runs exactly the same stories.
Rupert Murdoch owns the WSJ. Some say he's a crypto Jew.
>Buzzfeed is real news
>reuters and Fox aren't
lol
>Buzzfeed
>Vice
Murdoch owns the Aussie news site, WSJ, Heat St., Sky TV, the New York Post, and VICE. I'm sure there's more media he owns.
Forgot Fox News and Fox Business.