These two people do not belong to the same species

Besides your two eyes, all the proof you need is in the Bible. God created the different races and nations of the earth after the Tower of Babylon went down.

Other urls found in this thread:

youtube.com/watch?v=KvTlZjpnJv0&index=2&list=RDXRg_GNPUhG0
twitter.com/NSFWRedditGif

Species, yes.

Subspecies, no.

The majority of scientists know you are wrong. Just because your eyes see something, that doesn't mean that's all there is to it. Our DNA of all human beings on earth is virtually indistinguishable. There is no such thing as race.

But go ahead and claim that you know more than educated scientists.

I own the entire Boxcar Kids collection and it is a far better book series to create a religion on.

Anybody have books they worship?

Yeah because Jews aren't people

>no such thing as race
You're right about the race part but there is a thing called subspecies. We are almost diverging to the point where we can be called that give about 500 to 1000 years

>muh appeal to authority
>indistinguishable
Then why are there DNA tests that can tell you your race and ethnic origin?

It's honestly amazing that people have become SO SUBVERTED they think niggers have souls.

Observe one for 20 seconds. That's all it will take.

Pretty sure Ivanka is not white. Also non-whites do not descend from Adam.

>No such thing as race

>"Race is the classification of humans into groups based on physical traits, ancestry, genetics or social relations"

Nowhere does it mention that race is based on dna or being a different species. Race is an entirely social construct, based on the biggest visual differences between people from vastly different geographic locations.

Except it was God that created the nations of the earth, separating them by race and geography. There's nothing man made about it.

>Pretty sure Ivanka is not white.

I mean..

So which of Noah's sons did niggers or chinks come from? All of the original Japhethites, Shemites and Hamites were white. Asians and Africans have both existed for tens of thousands of years.

>go ahead and claim that you know more than educated scientists that were educated in liberal left-wing colleges

They test non-coding regions

Fucking retards posting about ancient Semitic folklore characters in a biology thread... God give me strength!

Africans are a different subspecies. Australian abos would probably be a different species though, if we were honest about it. If the standards were applied that we do to beetles or butterflies, the Sub Saharans MIGHT be in with a chance, though.

despite appearances, the one on the left has had many, many more body modifications

Our DNA is 99.9999% the same as a fucking monkey. Maybe you should realize that humans don't really know fucking shit and your gay ass appeal to authority belongs on Reddit.

Then why can forensic pathologists determine the race of a corpse simply by examining the skull?
Checkmate.

medicine is not left wing lol

Exactly. In the past decade the whole argument of being "college educated" meaning they hold authority in intellectual discussion has moved to actually mean nothing. When the whole system is owned by liberals it puts a little doubt in their "facts".

This. Whites like Russians and slavs have far shittier countries than east Asians. So whites are not superior.

>Bible
Not proof.
The proof is in science.

this man has it right

something went wrong and a good 98% are horrible

i blame some ancient genetic bottleneck due to a something, same to abbos

>Brown eyes

>Human

Nice try

>pay thousands of $/y for gender studies and "countering microaggression" class
>simplified programs in real science
>reject science as a whole and call others "cuck"

There is subrace and biology acknowledges the differences to some extent. It's still hard to get funded for constructive research regarding race since it's been made a complete taboo subject. For biological experiments there is enough proof that there are differences between black and white. This goes from physical structure to hormonal levels where testosterone measurements and observations have proven to have varied to a statistical significant degree between whites asians and blacks. I can't quote the exact studies at the time, it's easy to find and I can provide if you want.

There is also plenty of observational proof that there is inequality by people. IQ and global inequality by Richard Lynn is a book that I would greatly recommend that explains differences why countries with a higher IQ (which mainly belongs to Asians and whites) have a higher overall GDP than countries with lower IQ. The distinction that he makes early on though is that he seperates countries that had a planned market economy (communism / socialism) from those who didn't.

true fact

youtube.com/watch?v=KvTlZjpnJv0&index=2&list=RDXRg_GNPUhG0

It's not a secret that public universities have moved away from teaching objective truths and instead have begun to push a liberal agenda.

The base problem is that Africa has much more genetic diversity that the rest of the world combined, so it's difficult to define a nigga race or subspecies.
It's quite the opposite: we are the subspecies of Homo sapiens.

Those whites were fucked by communism for years. China is much worse than Russia. Eat a dick faggot.

Nor is medicine taxonomy.

The proof is also in evolution. You would have to be a liberal creationist to not believe race exists. We are past such science-denying nonsense these days. Its 2016, racism is progressive.

>the Bible

...

FPBP

Also the most hilarious thing is how they oppose this: "We are actually homo sapiens sapiens, not homo sapiens, as another subspecies from sub-Saharan Africa went extinct."

>Our DNA of all human beings on earth is virtually indistinguishable. There is no such thing as race.
1.) We can distinguish forensically between the races of perpetrators.
2.) We can use ancestry tests to determine race and ethnic origin.
>But those are noncoding regions!
3.) We use race and ethnicity to diagnose diseases unique to certain races and ethnicities. Without the concept of genetic race, this would be impossible.
4.) IQ and criminal likelihood correlate greater to race than to economic situation or environmental situation.
5.) We can distiguish between races from skeletal DNA and from teeth, the defining features when classifying species in paleontology. If a paleontologist looked at east asian, whites, africans, and australians, he would see 4 different species.
>But there is a gradient! We're all mixed
6.) Does having a spectrum of colors mean there is no red, blue, or green that form that spectrum? Races are formed by unique environment, when mixed other races genetics are immediately selected against. This is called outbreeding depression, and has served to preserve races in the absence of mass intercontinental migration for the last 60,000 years.
7.) We are 60,000 years apart on the evolutionary time span, or 3000 generations of human reproduction. That is more than enough time for important differences in behavior and structure to occur.

But i believe only in Torah and Talmud.

...

This.

Species we are all the same but liberal say humans don't have subspecies wich is bullshit proven by the fact that not everyone have Neanderthal DNA

Yep I literally no basically nothing about Russia that's why I'm watching documentaries to learn about it. It's just such a big place it's crazy how they could keep that much land for so long.

>bullshit proven by the fact that not everyone have Neanderthal DNA
That wouldn't really prove anything. Proof of the existence of subspecies is provided simply by looking and seeing the major morphological differences. Noses, lips, eyelids, teeth, skin colour, hair, AND the great blasphemy of behavioural and intellectual differences.