Discuss

discuss

Other urls found in this thread:

en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Russian_famine_of_1921–22
worldaudit.org/civillibs.htm).
twitter.com/AnonBabble

I mostly post on

Sup Forums
Sup Forums
Sup Forums

is that nu Sup Forums?

>Left libertarianism
Even more of a meme ideology than ancap

...

I'm a Leninist

kys

>Leninist
thats a funny way to spell "turbo cuck"

Is this accurate?

>Leninist

gas youself

top left doesn't have enough things to blame, but yea overall not bad

switch the lefts with each other and it will be

swap red and green imo

Bloody hell, mate. You're even more cucked than a Stalinist.

authoritarian left green and red both blame the rich and traditionalists.

Nothing to discuss. Politics is just to control the plebs.

...

You can't get economic left with anything but authoritarian. So delete the green square entirely.

based fin

why is /gif/ on there twice in left-libertarian and right-libertarian?

>lgbt
>right

must have moved it and forgotten to remove the old one

twinks for trump basically purged the lefties from what i understand

Compass Thread?

Are these based on anything?

Sup Forums is way more left

general ideology of the majority of posters, based on posts

>Sup Forums
>left lib

...

Okay.
en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Russian_famine_of_1921–22

...

based /s4s/, it is nice chile

I'd replace Sup Forums with /lit/ and put Sup Forums as authoritarian left.

Bottom left doesn't really care. They just want free shit & weed.

I'm just not sure if left libertarian is possible. But here is what the political compass website has to say about anyone who says "you can't be libertarian and left wing"
This is almost exclusively an American response, overlooking the undoubtedly libertarian tradition of European anarcho-syndicalism. It was, after all, the important French anarchist thinker Proudhon who declared that property is theft.

On the other side of the Atlantic, the likes of Emma Goldman were identified as libertarians long before the term was adopted by some economic rightwingers. And what about the libertarian collectives of the mid-late 1800s and 1960s?

Americans like Noam Chomsky can claim the label 'libertarian socialist' with the same validity that Milton Friedman can be considered a 'libertarian capitalist'.

The assumption that economic deregulation inevitably delivers more social freedom is flawed. The welfare states of, for example, the Nordic region, abolished capital punishment decades ago and are at the forefront of progressive legislation for women, gays and ethnic minorities — not to mention anti-censorship. Such established high-tax social democracies consistently score highest in the widely respected Freedom House annual survey on democratic rank eg Denmark ranks 2, Sweden 3 and Norway 7, while comparatively free markets such as the US, Singapore and China rate 15,74 and 121 respectively (this detailed checklist can be viewed at worldaudit.org/civillibs.htm).

Despite their higher taxes, the social democracies' degree of social freedoms would presumably be envied by genuine libertarians in more socially conservative countries.

Our point is that a regulated economy and a strong public sector are not necessarily authoritarian, and a deregulated economy with a minimal public sector is not necessarily socially libertarian.

Hello, fellow comrades.

d-do you even know what money is?

Daily reminder that anyone in the blue quadrant is a good goy.

No, what is money?