is it true that your president is pretty much only ceremonial? if so why are we caring about the results?
Is it true that your president is pretty much only ceremonial? if so why are we caring about the results?
Other urls found in this thread:
Because right wing populists are eternally BTFO now and they will never recover. No place for these scumbags in europe anymore.
Mostly yes but that old fuck can refuse to appoint members for government.
Say the FPÖ wins the national elections and wants to run the government, he can say no.
austrian pres has actually power. VdB announced in round 1 that he'll never let an FPÖ politician become chancellor.
The damage control is just hillarious. Especially the German one.
he lost by like less than 3% rofl settle down leftypol
how cucked was austria before and how fucked are they going to be going forward?
It's a good indicator that Austria doesn't like v countries and abandoned us for their westerner friends.
>Hitler-Hofer loses by 3%
OMG, soo close
>Drumpf loses popular vote by 3%
LOL, shillary eternally blown the fuck out
Feel bad too.
They choose Germany instead of Hungary.
the dems aren't blown the fuck out tho you kraut retard
our country is deeply divided, do you even watch the news?
a 3% is not a conclusive BTFOing
the sJWS in america are louder than ever
Yes, the president in Austria holds almost no power. Like said, he could technically refuse to let a party run the government, but I hope that even that libtard wouldn't go against the majority.
can he block elected members of parliament or just prime minister/chancellor?
Because it's symbolic. That's why Sup Forums cared about the results. If the right won, it would be a sign.
Now Hofer lost, everybody suddenly pretends it's unimportant. Something about stages of grief, i don't know. Sore losers really.
this
Yes
because it's symbolically important to make right-wingers electable in West Europe
He said that yes. But he would never go through with it.
The chances, that the FPÖ will win a huge percentage of the Nationalratswahlen is quite big.
If he would deny the chancellor of the elected party, there would be a public outrage, which would fuck up the whole political situation.
He would probably try to avoid strache and ask the party to elect someone else as chancellor.
>has no power
>can refuse other party from running gov't
Hey Hanz & Franz, I nein unterrstandbooten.
It's 6,6% not 3%
its 3.4%
Your facts are highly outdated. Your picture is from the election in april. Here's the new one
He won the electoral vote in a landslide kraut nigger. Also if you did a recount in all states you would find out that shillary didn't win the popular vore at all