Monarchy is the ultimate redpill

Prove me wrong
>protip; you can't

Other urls found in this thread:

theguardian.com/commentisfree/belief/2016/nov/10/us-election-result-donald-trump-terrific-argument-for-monarchy-the-crown
twitter.com/SFWRedditVideos

B-but m-muh democracy :((

>muh democracy
What's next?
>muh women rights
>muh gender equality
>muh sexual liberty
>muh gay marriage

Look, Sven. People are stupid, and the guys who are in the top of the pyramid know what's good for them.

Democracy is literally a Jewish trick

Except when the monarch is a complete retard

i love how the artist painted what direction his dick hangs

true

Of course a family of parasyte and degenerates living of the taxes income from million of citizens are the ultimate red pill.

kys faggot

Also
>when you meme so hard that libcucks turn into monarchists
theguardian.com/commentisfree/belief/2016/nov/10/us-election-result-donald-trump-terrific-argument-for-monarchy-the-crown

Go live in Saudi Arabia then

So, always, since monarchs aren't elected but born into inbred families

>sucking royal cock because the kings says good gives him and his family the right to fuck everyone over
Nah now get ready to be tarred and feathered

America needs a king. A father figure that every man look up to. How are you suppose to have a cohesive nationalism when your president change every 4/8 years? Monarchy = preservation of national identity.

As soon as you challenge the Republican he threatens violence, just like in the War of American Independence. Remind me what separates you from a terrorist?

>sandnigger intellectuals
Don't you have a goat to fuck Abdualla?

kings are like presidents on countries without term limits.

if you get a good one its ok, if you get a bad one it's terrible. Think Chavez and Maduro.

that said if Europe had not insisted on inbreeding the fuck out of their kings it probably would have turned out better

>Remind me what separates you from a terrorist
They were actually freedom fighters you dumb mongel UK doesn't even have a bill.of rights

That's the truth; take it as you will. Your men are turning into passive weaklings, you need a father figure, a king.

ITT: Democracy cucks that hate God
Muh we need authoratarian leaders like Hitler so after he dies we can have divisive civil wars over power struggle, but God forbid we have a family with the divine right to rule that leads to centuries of prosperity and stability.

Orthodox Christian Monarchy is government divinely established, and directed, ultimately, to the other world, government with the teaching of Christian Truth and the salvation of souls as its profoundest purpose; Nihilist rule--whose most fitting name, as we shall see, is Anarchy---is government established by men, and directed solely to this world, government which has no higher aim than earthly happiness.

The Liberal view of government, as one might suspect, is an attempt at compromise between these two irreconcilable ideas.

It is of course impossible to believe in both with equal sincerity and fervor, and in fact no one has ever done so.

Now a government is secure insofar as it has God for its foundation and His Will for its guide; but this, surely, is not a description of Liberal government. It is, in the Liberal view, the people who rule, and not God; God Himself is a "constitutional monarch" Whose authority has been totally delegated to the people, and Whose function is entirely ceremonial. The Liberal believes in God with the same rhetorical fervor with which he believes in Heaven. The government erected upon such a faith is very little different, in principle, from a government erected upon total disbelief, and whatever its present residue of stability, it is clearly pointed in the direction of Anarchy.

A government must rule by the Grace of God or by the will of the people, it must believe in authority or in the Revolution; on these issues compromise is possible only in semblance, and only for a time. The Revolution, like the disbelief which has always accompanied it, cannot be stopped halfway; it is a force that, once awakened, will not rest until it ends in a totalitarian Kingdom of this world.

No. If we had monarchy today they would have imported cheap labour just like the globalists.

No they wouldn't, unlike politicians they have the state of the nation and it's culture in best interests as it's what their children will inheret, why would they ruin their legacy and inheretance with shitskins?

francofag knows

French Revolution = spark that started NWO

The best version of redpilling is essentially a slide to the right, which ends at the edge with Monarchy. Many people fall off the slide with conspiracy theories of various kinds but a dedicated dispassionate approach will always lead back to our traditions.
Many Monarchies have survived literal retards being king for decades. Convince me that it is worse than having a corrupt president.
We owe them the taxes since they own the country. Disagree? you must believe in some sort of popular sovereignty, an absurd enlightenment concept that has led to the deaths of hundreds of millions.
That is epic
Saudi Arabia is a illegitimate un-Traditional monarchy that was created 84 years ago.

Can you come up with a King who ruined their country with leftist economics like those two?
People call Hamas freedom fighters too, what freedom were they fighting for, freedom from paying any taxes? Freedom to take their neighbors property just because he was loyal to the King?
Give me a historical example of that happening.

Monarchies are just the extreme elite ruling over the people and deciding what's best for them. Today that would mean Hollywood ultra liberal elite.

What happens when the heir is a shithead?
How do you elect the royal family? Or how do they come into power?

Only a person with no understanding of how a monarchy actually functions would think this. It works well for you if you are a part of the monarch's inner circle.

>most cucked countries in the world are monarchies

good one

Monarchy is the only system that can create a good life for all people living under one system. Laws can be fair, just, and strongly enforced while opportunity is spread to all who deserve it and purpose and meaning is obvious and open to all.

However, monarchy gone bad can be one of the worst systems possible because you can get the opposite of all that.

The key is wisdom. Kings must be enlightened and the path of wisdom must be taken by anyone who wishes to claim the throne. Blood lineage has to be interrupted if the son cannot fill the shoes of the father. It's about spiritual development, not blood.

In traditional societies actors are in the same social class as prostitutes, only in modern Republican societies are they elevated to the role of cultural icons, so in fact the reverse is more true. Consider how magazines will talk about the royal family's clothing and how conservative it is compared to Hollywood stars.

are people itt serious?

>what is absolute monarchy

Sure, Charles the V of spain was a pretty ok king, chavez like.

his idiot son phillip destroyed the empire where the sun did not set in about ten years.

100% Monarchy has been the main form of government for thousands of years for a reason, only Monarchies have been able to persevere for thousands of years, all Republics fall after at most a handful of centuries.

That was overextension, not socialism, his only mistake was dreaming to large and reaching too far.

Monarchism never went away. The public just no longer knows who the monarchs are.

Ah yes, the old "foreign inbred kleptocratic douchebag ruler" redpill. I'm sure you'll convince many many people that incestuous foreigners that pillage locals for personal enrichment are the very best decision makers. They do rule by the will of "god" after all.

Protip; every monarchy is a backwards ass upside-down buttfucked retard circus.

The heir will be forced to do better to keep the people's love, it happened many times in history.

But still, the country would be 10 times more stable than "democracy"

nigger tribes existed for thousands of years.

~Does that mean we should run naked and ooga booga all day long?

Yes, people think they can escape the problems of centralized government power by adopting Republics, but it only gets worse, and now the rulers have no loyalty to their people's identity.

Good post. Made me think of Plato's concept of Philosopher Kings.

You last "President" was a nigger

Shut the fuck up and vote Trump for Monarchy to save the white blood

While I agree, most people will only see the merit of aristocracy, once the flag-ship sinks. As in, your country. The one, who forced wide-spread democracy upon europe in the first place.

Fucking pizza captcha? Dang spoopy.

Monarchies were notoriously unstable, suffering from brutal civil wars every few decades.

Meanwhile there isn't any recorded war between 2 democratic countries.

No, the ultimate redpill is constitutional republic with a unitary system.

Also, only men ages 18+ and women ages 40+ are allowed to vote.

That's relative freedom.

I'm not black, so no.
Seriously though, Tribes are the precursor stage to Monarchies, I don't want to regress back to that stage, I just want to stay at the good stage where we set the stage for everything good in the world.

You're talking about your fucking shit Spanish Monarchy?

Yes, I think Monarchies will only emerge again centuries in the future, my interest in this is only theoretical.

At least he's not a human buttplug like your president.

But no seriously I would rather have a moderate nigger run my country than an inbred religious fanatic bent on preserving their degenerate bloodline.

Also, Obama runs very little. Head of Homeland Security and DoD and staate governors have more power than him. He was pretty ineffective.

Pic related. genetic freak created by royalist sister-fucking.

What you mean is there isn't any recorded war between Anglosphere countries and the countries they influence since the War of 1812.
Also In ancient Greece there were many wars between Republics which were more democratic than our current Republics, consider Athens conquest of Melos.

Oy vey, shekelstein, Christendom is a cancer!
The reason you are so much more prosperous now is because you have thrown off the shackles of a backwards Christian society.
Down with the oppressive monarchies, goyim! Onward with (((progress)))!!
That's right, goy, now hand over the sovereignty!!
Don't forget the money supply!
Mazel tov, everyone!
You are now free to be our slaves!

Uh, no he's not. Monarchies are constantly fraught with infighting, factionalism, and rulers that have no legitimacy, so they have to beat people into submission or genocide whole communities that won't acknowledge their ridiculous illegitimate rule.

Then tell me what war did i missed bro ;=)

>ancient greece
>modern democracies

HAHAHAHHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHHAH
fucking retard

>an immigrant is taking my """"""job""""""
At least the first lady will actually be a lady again

btw, modern governments don't do any of that shit, do they?

Thank the jew we don't have monarchies anymore. I almost can't handle all the (((Freedom)))

no, our monarchy was somewhat stable compared to the rest of europe desu.

Traditional monarchy is in fact the final redpill. Reduces wars, gives you a strong leader to fight for, and they protect their citizens against invaders (blacks, muslims).

Convenient, you ignored the War of 1812 part and totally missed the point. The reason we have world peace right now is that most of the world has been reconstructed by Britain and the US, so its not a good argument for Republics, but a good argument for having massive spheres of influence.

LOL really? jews got rid of the inbred retard faggot royals? That's fucking awesome, I'll send a jew a thank-you card. Funny cause I thought it was Aryans who loved democracy? You know, like how the longest lasting democracies are all Aryan as fuck, like ICELAND and England and basically Western Europe, which is the only place democracy organically developed.

Stupid faggot.

One would believe you frogs knew better than to want monarchy back.

and you conviniently ignored that there isn't a single ocurrence of a war between 2 democratic countries

I kek'd at this.

All Republics become a dictatorship sooner or later, much like the Roman Republic did.

Forgive him, they dont pay attention to history class or american education is shit

Praise king George VI!

Fascism is better, but monarchy is pretty good too.

Inb4: ENGLAND WASNT A MONARCHY THEN!!111

KG III and his noblemen held a considerable amount power over the House of Commons.

Also, you get INBREEDING with royalty (see KG III, Crown Prince Alexei II, Charles II of Spain, etc.) which debilitated the intelligence of the royal.

Thanks KG III for America, the reason y'all can shitpost on this Nepalese Shadow puppet board in the 1st place

No true Scotsman fallacy

Oh great educated one, teach me with your excellent arguments!
>One post by this ID

lol, please explain

Are you actually trying to claim that ancient greece republics were democracies in the modern sense of the word?

>ITT: I just read Herman Hoppe for the first time and didn't understand shit

Calling others passive weaklings when you lose territory to houthis rebels, fucking pathetic.

That guy looks like an American admiral.

I can't remember his name, but that's the first thing I thought when I saw his face.

Based baguette!
AVE GLORIA AVE O IMPERIO DO BRASIL!

LONG LIVE TO EMPEROR TRUMP!
UNITED KINGDOM OF AMERICA!

"Democracy" as a form of state is a misuse of the term, Republics are an actual type of state that exist on a spectrum from Aristocratic to Democratic. We have Democratic Republics, but they are less democratic than Athens was at its most democratic. They actually voted on minutiae of policy the majority of the time including voting on exiling people. In our system bureaucrats make policy and senators and Representatives make laws, we only get to vote on a few things. The EU in particular exemplifies an Aristocratic Republic because it is insulated by several layers from the public.

I'm talking socially. Don't be an idiot, friend.

philosopher kings when?

this, kinda like how Roman emperors choose their succesors, most of them were nephews or adopted sons sadly there were idiots like Nero and Caligula who buttfucked the empire.

And then Marcus Aurelius probably the best emperor chose his idiot son Commodus to buttfuck the empire he had so hardly develop during his years

This very rarely happens since the monarch is literally groomed from birth for the position.

I see you haven't learned from watching generations of inbreeding in the european royal house(s).

The only reason your country is not burning is because the royal twat doesn't have any real power.

Giving away your freedoms and opportunities to self determination to prop up a person above you who did little to no work to get to that position is the definition of cucked.

A person who represents you should not only be the one who most agree with, but the one who displays the strength to lead the nation. Trump, and Caesar are good examples. It should be earned. Not passed.

Vive le roi!