WHEN THE FOUNDING FATHERS WROTE THE CONSTITUTION THAT WERE TALKING ABOUT MUSKETS, NOT AR-47S!

WHEN THE FOUNDING FATHERS WROTE THE CONSTITUTION THAT WERE TALKING ABOUT MUSKETS, NOT AR-47S!

kek

KCUF TAF UOY EGATS EHT FFO TEG

WHERE ARE THE ARMENIANS?

>this kills the argument

fuck offno the guns were for protection against the goverment and protection for yourself. you asswhole, you have never lived in a rural area mr city boy

dude people still live near wild animals, how the fuck are going to protect yourself from a bear

Can someone explain what TYT is please.

>AR-47s
It's AK-47 you retard. I thought right wingers were supposed to know everything about guns.

socialist cuck go back to mexico or a shithole like the uk or germany

...

>Being so autistic that you don't realize that's the joke.

THE FOUNDING FATHERS WEREN'T TALKING ABOUT AK-15s!!! THEY WERE TALKING ABOUT MUSKETS AND PISTOLS THAT ONLY HAD ONE SHOT!!!

> that's the joke
> being this new

Depart

Its a well regulated militia ATFbois

Of course it applies to modern rifles.

Cunk is a Armenian Genocide denier.
Oh and they have a huge budget from google or youtube or something.

STOP ASKING QUESTIONS

A fat SJW genocide denier and his lickspittle fanclub, rejecting reality and substituting their own and then commenting on it.

hey dipshit, its obviouslly a FAMAS

WHEN THE FOUNDING FATHERS WROTE THE CONSTITUTION THAT WERE TALKING ABOUT WHITES, NOT ALL PEOPLE!

Cenk is a talented, informed, and most importantly objective talking head for altetnative media. Give him a break guys

>WHEN THE FOUNDING FATHERS WROTE THE CONSTITUTION THAT WERE TALKING ABOUT MUSKETS, NOT AR-47S!

Does the constitution say muskets or arms?

>when the founding fathers wrote the constitution, they were talking about then-current military weapons, not now-current military weapons!

Really makes me Puckle

pretty sure a civilian could buy a gatlin gun back in the wild west. and cannons. not positive but im pretty sure.
they were not cheap and probably most trading posts didnt have them. but if you could find one you could buy it

So does this mean I can start a privateer and blow immigrant boats out of the water with my cannons to defend the homeland?

>2nd amendment established in part to help protect against a tyrannical government
>the founding fathers would only want the government to have access to assault rifles

I hate this argument, some might say, its not an argument

ha very true,

Every political ideology gets to deny one genocide and still claim the moral high ground.

Cenk gets a free pass on the Armenian Genocide but we get a free pass on the holocaust.

...

AND CANNONS...
AND THOSE OLD SCHOOL GATTLIN GUNS...
THE GRENADES WITH FUSES...
AND SWORDS...
BUT WE SHOULD STILL OUTLAW THEM NOW BECAUSE EVERY ONCE IN A WHILE SOMEONE GOES CRAZY AND KILLS A COUPLE PEOPLE WITH THEM

Subtle, Adam Savage

And the First Amendment was never meant for fake news web sites or message boards. Only government approved official news outlets.

It wasn't just how many gold pieces. You had to gain enough experience points to level up and unlock the Gatling gun.

ALRIGHT... OKAY... ALRIGHT... SO UH, NOW, RIGHT UH...

CONSERVATIVES

Holy shit, she really had a hook nose.

They said arms. I see no mention of muskets anywhere. Please provide the source of your delusion.

YOU KNOW, UH... NOW OKAY, ALRIGHT...

why tho

someone should send her that on twitter

...

Until 1934 there was zero regulation on the type of weapons/ammo you could buy and they've been slowly chipping away at the 2A ever since.

...

they had repeaters back then, and cannons, which were privately owned commonly

>canada

TRYING TO HAVE A REASONABLE DISCUSSION

Why do people say this? When they wrote the first amendment they were talking about small newspapers and literal speech, not the fucking Internet...

would you, Sup Forums?

whats this about the chick having a meltdown over a question?

China, India, and Pakistan are literally the three most butthurt countries on the planet. I don't blame them