What's wrong with multiculturalism?

I think we've all heard the saying that to predict the future look into the past.

Where there past societies that failed or prospered due to them being multicultural?

Other urls found in this thread:

worldnews.about.com/od/africa/f/tutsihutu.htm
twitter.com/AnonBabble

Rome

Soviet Russia.

>Where there past societies that failed or prospered due to them being multicultural?

were there any that succeeded because they had open borders?

Its pretty shit brah

The Balkans

Was it multicultural?

Wern't they racist?

That's what I'm asking?

Did nelson Mandela improve the country of the contrary.

What's the story?

>Multiculturalism and diverse societies work!

How anyone can say this who has cursory knowledge of the past two hundred of European history alone, is beyond me.

He prevented civil war, thats about it.
Oh and he enshrined socialism within our constitution so yes he made the country worse.

look at what happened to Paraguay

How worse?

>the saying
wtf nigger u on crack

???

We went from having a currency which was comparative in strength to the US dollar to being weaker than the currency of Botswana in just 22 years. Thats how much worse.

How did multiculturalism effect you directly? Did effect crime rates the cost of housing infrastructure?

Rome fallen because Gallic generals had no loyalty to the capital.

>whats wrong with white genocide

Go push your multicultural bullshit experiment in Asia, or Africa. Stop forcing it on white countries you evil scumbag.

Move to South Africa, there is a multicultural country for you. Or possibly Zimbabwe, I hear they are looking for farmers, you f-u-c-k-i-n-g- TWAT

i cite the fall of Rome. in the begining u converted to roman beliefs or you died, there was no "tolerance." then they became tolerant, they let weaklings and degenerates into their armies, and then they were forced to look to foreigners with no loyalty to defend their interests. sound familiar?

...

No just looking for knowledge also don't always amuse bait i mean it's so common on this site.

>Did effect crime rates
Big time, murder and rape has skyrocketed with the end of apartheid. The police force is incredibly corrupt and inept at doing their job so most people rely on private security to get the job done.

You can do a 10 minute google search and read some horrifying shit about it.

You sire just gave me something to study.

Will use against liberalcucks.

Look:

Fucking balkans. Thats the perfect example of how multiculti can lead to dangerous consequences.

PLC

Isn't that a good idea?

>Isn't that a good idea?
Your ancestors thought about doing the white mans burden didn't they?
No its not good idea, good idea would not bother with it and just close the fucking border.

>was Rome multicultural

They controlled half the known world, you bet your ass it was multicultural. London was a Roman settlement, for fuck's sake.

Even between niggers from the same country but diff backround there were genocides in Rwanda some decades ago.
You put 45% muslim population in Russia and see how tensions arise.
worldnews.about.com/od/africa/f/tutsihutu.htm

>rwanda genocide

Dumb blacks killing smarter blacks.
Sad. Their communities have not yet evolved in a way that permits smart or nerdy people.

Once that happens they will evolve, it will take a few centuries at least.

It took them a civil war to give citizenship to Latin people that lived few kilometers above them

And if you look into the great empires, they all (or to my knowledge most of them) started by uniting clans/towns/cities that had common culture and then moved on to conquer other cultures.

IS there any hope or are we going to have the same fate?

> T-that wasn't real multiculturalism!
Literally commie-tier defense.

What is Brazil

>believes Brazil is multicultural and not totally segregated

top kek, we might have better harmony in that regard but shit has castes

it doesn't seem to be working right now because there are still too many racist and xenophobe.

After we crack those neo-nazis down we will built utopia here

>believes Brazil is multicultural and not totally segregated
>multiculturalism
>segregation
sounds about right

Yeah Brazil is not multicultural.

>Wern't they racist?

Multicultural doesn't always equal race.

LOOK AT ME GOD DAMNIT!!!!!

I see you dawg. But isn't Brazil mainly... Brazilian didn't know it was multi cultural?

Because it doesn't work, when people have their own cultures thy form heir own,nations basically, within the greater society causing strife and violence

You can have a multi-ethnic society so long as the culture is maintained.

No culture means no unity, no unity means the state will ultimately come apart

Multi-culturalism fails. Eventually multi-culturism will breed contempt between those cultures, which leads to multiple cultures opposing one another living in close quarters, which leads to tribalism.

America is proof of that right now. Don't believe the Libtards who chest pound and tote successful multi-culturalism, race relations and cultural/social relations are at their worst in decades in the US now.

What's brazillian??? carnaval or rock in rio?

Okay
Reminder that multiculturalism does not necessarily mean being like United Kuckeddom white burkas and shit

It makes an anxious society, and all multicultural societies have more crime of equal financial levels

Putting a country through that simply because of anti-racist and progressive ideals, isn't really fair

Failed:

YugoSlavia
Africa
Indian-American War (USA)
Mexican American War


Prospered:
Rome
Modern Day USA
Europe
The entire world

Civic Nationalism is the real redpill

I think some cultures can get along fine. But the reality is that some cultures just can't. A lot of people refuse to acknowledge that.

>Rome
>Modern Day USA
>Europe
XD

"Saying" can be a noun. It can mean anything from a common phrase to a proverb.

Better brush up on the World Language, Hans.

>Prospered:
>Rome
>Modern Day USA
>Europe
>The entire world

THIS CANNOT BE FUCKING REAL.

multiculturalism is fine, it just depends what cultures, and which tenets of the cultures mix or carry on to the new location.

in Australia you will find more Thai and Vietnamese restaurants than anywhere in asia excluding Vietnam and Thailand themselves. this is a good thing, since those cuisines are really nice, and it made Australia's culture and identity grow, but then you also have those restaurants taking over small local businesses which may have been there for decades.

its all circumstantial, and im glad we are multicultural to some extent, because even though i like alot of the relevance that british culture has on australia, im also glad british cuisine didnt stay here

None of these were multi cultural
Europe hasn't even made it 30 years and is literally coming apart

Rome and he us have a mono-culture with multiple ethnicities

wdym? they did prosper

Modern day globalization is responsible for the technlogies allowed to even make nigger countries like Namibia decent

You cannot be this retarded.

I thought multiculturalism was fine until 9/11 happened. After that everything went down hill.

How are they coming apart?

Europe has one of the best economies in the world, they just need to have better vetting systems and refugees are ok to take in

not that hard friend

How am I retarded, rome conquered and peoples from conquered territories came and did business within rome

Are YOU retarded?

>they did prosper
not because of multiculturalism you nigger
>Modern day globalization is responsible for the technlogies allowed to even make nigger countries like Namibia decent
you are thinking about colonialism

Literally grexit and brexit and Italy

Are you retarded?

>thicc Mexico wants a piece of America
>America gets off on withholding

Well no, white people drained the resources there so namibians had to resort to a goods and services based economy

They did have some EU help but they are on their feet now

What's right with it?

Nah colonialism is what genocided ndigenous peoples senpai

ISLAM

Are you fucking stupid? Thats the EXACT example of why homogeneous culture fails

>Put all of europe into one group with only europeans
>it collapses
>"wahhh its bc of blacks n shieeet waahhh"

Get educated moore ron

Came to post this.
Lack of loyalty to country means it will be easy prey for monolithic nations with strong leaders.

>Liberum veto
H-h-hahaha...

>white people drained the resources

Yes, that's why many of them moved there and built hospitals and schools.

>namibians had to resort to a goods and services based economy

As opposed to having no economy?

Everyone did trade, conquered or not, your point is dumb

>Well no, white people drained the resources
Resources are still there
>so namibians had to resort to a goods and services based economy
>agriculture: 47%, industry: 20%, services: 33% (1999 est.)
>They did have some EU help but they are on their feet now
What do you mean some? These people did not even have a written language when Europeans came
>Nah colonialism is what genocided ndigenous peoples senpai
hmmm I wonder why that continent is still filled with niggers then

>muh wypipo built hozpitolls n shiet

They didnt do any of that, they drained resources and left africans to die asshole

>rome
Its people like you who gives civic nationalism a bad name.
Go fuck yourself.

The economy prospered and allowed namibians to create a strong culture

Would fuck mexico

>Where there past societies that failed or prospered due to them being multicultural?

Rwanda.

1 million dead inside 100 days.

Pretty quick work given they were mostly using machetes and hammers.

Egypt and Greece both faded away due to race mixing with foreign spear chuckers.

>muh wypipo did x
Wrong

>Muh wypipo left resources n shieeet
Wrong

>Hurr they killed off millions of natives... but dey r still dere xdddd!!111!
You really are fucking retarded, learn some history you fucking asshole

Rome never failed, it's still here you morons

nice argument brazillian street monkey

lol
We built schools, hospitals, railways, irrigation systems, dams, power plants, and the blacks couldnt even keep them going.

You should watch "Empire of dust" to learn why Africans cannot into civilisation.

Multicultural =/= having many cultures under your rule. Romans were racist as fuck.

>multiculturalism
Rome died
Germany died
The native americans died

Japan closed its borders and still lives today

Hmmm

...

>whitey go to under develop country
>genocide the strong and enslave the rest
>exploit resource and bring them to their own country

>built some shit building
>MUH WHITE PEEPLEO GIVE THEM CIVILIZATION
>MUH WHITE PEEPLO HELPED THEM POOR PEOPLE
Sup Forums unironically believe this

>Europe
>Homogeneous

Are you fucking stupid? Have you forgot that Europe's history is one of thousands of years of war and bloodshed between different cultures? Or are the French, Germans, and British the same to you because "lol they all whyte anyway"

Fuck, white people hated other white people even after coming to America. Or did you forget about how the Irish were treated like niggers?

Claiming Europe is a homogeneous area and all Europeans make up a homogeneous culture is pants-on-head retarded.

There are no strong "multicultural" societies because they ceased to be quickly - the best example might be Phoenicia which was something like a trade society. They did invent some new ideas from the synthesis, but failed to ever become much of a force due to the utter lack of unity.

There are no completely homogenous societies either but every lasting entity such as Rome, China, or the like had some form of unifying cultural concepts whether it be dignitas or Confucianism. On top of that, due to the cladistics of how old societies worked, it was always vaguely related to sex and ethnicities.

I have

Its the perfect example of how whie people and chinese with Higher IQ's and better technology push down poaor africans and their developing ntions


its like taking a poor black kids milk money while being a 6'4" buff aryan guy

Its just being an asshole dude....

fpbp

>Multicultural =/= having many cultures under your rule.

Wow dude.

Multuculturalist societies eventually become monocultural over a period of time as social norms and traditions morph into one another as the status quo changes.

Rome was many things, but not multicultural at its center. They pretty clearly distinguished between "barbarian" versus "Roman" virtues as ridiculously evidenced by the constant purges of Christians.

JU
GO
SLA
VI
JONANOGE

PEVAJ NEKTE CUUU
JUUU

KOOOO NEEEE SLUSA PJESMU SLUSACE OLUJUUUU

PLJUNI

I ZAPJEVAJ
MOIA
JUGO
SLA
VIJO

MATERO I MACEHO nesto nesto nesto nesto

OVDJE KOME NEPORASTU ZUBI
EEEEEEEEEE KUKALA MU MAAAAAAAAAATIIIII

you get the picture

seeYou moore rons need to get fucking educated, I can't believe stormfags are going to ruin a movement where we include based blacks and a diverse society with GOOD cultures

We just need to admit our mistakes and move on fr

(YOU)

Most of our blacks are descended from Bantus that were stupid enough to be caught and sold by Igbo traders though.

They're not exactly the cream of the African crop.

Yea and then you are some ugly mulatto faggot. Damn what a desirable outcome.
shit b8

>only europeans
>jews

Just because they ruled them didn't mean they were respected as equals, or were able to contribute to the empire. Romans always put Romans first.

Confirmed. The post you referred to did not in any way refute my point.

Good job bro. Would have been way easier to see if you had simply done a "1 post by this ID" type deal. I'll give (you) one last (you) for your troubles.