Wtf is up with this global warming meme...

wtf is up with this global warming meme? I literally never even heard about global warming until a few weeks after Trump was elected. Now suddenly everyone is spamming muh global warming muh global warming and claiming to be a global warming researcher or scientist.
This meme literally sprang forth overnight after Trump was elected and the media ran with it because they want to tie in his followers to an anti-science movement

>daily reminder there is no such thing as global warming
>daily reminder global warming is a meme that was created by the media to make Trump look bad

Other urls found in this thread:

mudancasclimaticas.cptec.inpe.br/~rmclima/pdfs/destaques/sternreview_report_complete.pdf
static.skepticalscience.com/images/SLR_models_obs.gif
static.skepticalscience.com/pics/RFC12_Fig1.jpg
i.guim.co.uk/img/static/sys-images/Guardian/Pix/pictures/2015/8/11/1439266359421/fee9951a-ca6b-4fa9-8715-fa8c207e2bfc-620x569.png?w=620&q=85&auto=format&sharp=10&s=63c6f259d86c7bbc2f535ec9dca574d6
static.skepticalscience.com/pics/realclimate-christy_new.png
nsidc.org/arcticseaicenews/files/2015/01/Figure41.png
masterresource.org/debate-issues/skeptical-science-website/
populartechnology.net/2012/03/truth-about-skeptical-science.html?m=1
joseduarte.com/blog/cooking-stove-use-housing-associations-white-males-and-the-97
poseidon01.ssrn.com/delivery.php?ID=495104001002067116001071068020118081101069081061084031018005019028083093002113085101000003027026054116046003011029118029031089107048048080009069023114097081083005008051035087103119119118000099100071015126127127090124125012074119020087108098082119101022&EXT=pdf
wattsupwiththat.com/2013/08/28/cooks-97-climate-consensus-paper-crumbles-upon-examination/
twitter.com/NSFWRedditVideo

>This meme literally sprang forth overnight after Trump was elected and the media ran with it because they want to tie in his followers to an anti-science movement
Or because people with an ounce of sense know that its terrifying for the worlds most powerful man to completely ignore the current greatest threat we face

global warming is fuckin real dude, i watched it happen with my own eyes. shit is scary

Greatest threat, not China, not the fourth reich starting up, not the influx of tens of millions of savages into first world nations.

No, it's a fucking polar bear drowning. Who gives a shit.

>not China
If you mean their contributions in terms of CO2 emissions then maybe. Even granting worse case scenario and they conquer the entire world somehow and we all become subjects of the chinese that will at most last for several hundred years and be terrible for the time being. If the models continue to be correct then the earth will be incapable of sustaining any sort of advanced society for several thousand years.

>not the fourth reich starting up
If you're scared of this then honestly get your shit in order

>not the influx of tens of millions of savages into first world nations
Yeah some women will be raped and some people will be killed, thats nothing in comparison to global warming.

>global warming!
again, who gives a shit

lmfao you're not serious are you. I hope you realise just how dependent you are on the entire world economy being able to adequately function and just how devastating the hindering of food production in the south of the US, South America, the middle east and SEA would be for the entire world. The refugees created alone should be enough to scare you.

>The refugees
Luckily we've learned our lesson there. Just sink the damn boat.
> the earth will be incapable of sustaining any sort of advanced society for several thousand years
lay off the tinfoil, bud

>Luckily we've learned our lesson there. Just sink the damn boat.
So we just kill everyone in all those regions?

>lay off the tinfoil, bud
Mate ever wondered why the human population began to boom following the agricultural revolution?

This isn't even close to tinfoil in any case, its estimated that total costs of climate change could see a loss of up to 20% of global GDP each year.

mudancasclimaticas.cptec.inpe.br/~rmclima/pdfs/destaques/sternreview_report_complete.pdf

Reminder that if the economies at the equator collapse, their citizens will migrate to where food and shelter are

And they will be greeted with Refugees Welcome signs every step of the way :^)

This is spam.
Saged.
We are being slammed because a major Obama supporter has been outed as a pedophile and because Clinton is losing in multiple states in the recount due to fraud.

What sort of backwards shithole without internet do you have to live in to not hear about global warming?

Not even arguing for or against, you must be fucking amish to not hear about it

>So we just kill everyone in all those regions?
Just the boat people, bud.
>Mate ever wondered why the human population began to boom following the agricultural revolution?
War, and exporting agricultural technologies to races that are too stupid not to breed like the vermin they are.
>THE END IS NIGH!!!!
>This isn't even close to tinfoil in any case
yeah, ok

Implying that they have an economy to collapse

links please
ive seen this in other threads
but no threads on the subjects you mention
if you have info post it

>Just the boat people, bud.
Well if they can't buy or produce food that'll be almost all of them

>War, and exporting agricultural technologies to races that are too stupid not to breed like the vermin they are.
lmfao you do realise there was a point when the european population was also booming right.

>yeah, ok
An intelligent and well reasoned refutation of the paper

4/10

>Well if they can't buy or produce food that'll be almost all of them
So be it.

The fate of the world depended on this election, that's what caused so many liberals to vote for a criminal, because all that mattered was stopping global warming, so anything else was unimportant.

Kind of a foolish belief I thought. Hillary wouldn't do anything for global warming.

eh you almost got me. Here's your (You)

It's a leftist conspiracy to frame right wingers as anti intellectual

>American education

5%-20% of the global GDP each year isn't the greatest threat we face?

mudancasclimaticas.cptec.inpe.br/~rmclima/pdfs/destaques/sternreview_report_complete.pdf

>implying our models are ever right for very long

Enjoy fucking the world without a condom

>daily reminder Venus was probably once an earthlike planet

All of these are correct and predicted accurately seperate physical quantities
static.skepticalscience.com/images/SLR_models_obs.gif
static.skepticalscience.com/pics/RFC12_Fig1.jpg
i.guim.co.uk/img/static/sys-images/Guardian/Pix/pictures/2015/8/11/1439266359421/fee9951a-ca6b-4fa9-8715-fa8c207e2bfc-620x569.png?w=620&q=85&auto=format&sharp=10&s=63c6f259d86c7bbc2f535ec9dca574d6
static.skepticalscience.com/pics/realclimate-christy_new.png
nsidc.org/arcticseaicenews/files/2015/01/Figure41.png

> If the models continue to be correct

Lol

If far right pantshitters deny climate change,move the hell on. There's no reasoning with flat earth, antiscience retards.

Especially when climate change has more evidence and consensus behind it than the existence of the goddamned MOON.

Donald Dumbfuck and his numbskull sycophants need to be obstructed, sabotaged, and severely mocked at every turn. The whole fucking planet is depending on it.

Since Russia already stuck their hands into our cookie jar and gave us President Pussygrabber, I hope to Saint Fuck the Chinese and EU get involved in our elections too. This fucker up, regressive country is going to kill us all if we let it go to the dogs, and all because creationist wingnuts are allowed to say and do whatever the fuck they want. Bullshit!!!

...

>skeptical science

Next youre going to tell me that the earth is legit flat

Skepticalscience is shit
masterresource.org/debate-issues/skeptical-science-website/
An actual physicist shits on the site as being anti-science
populartechnology.net/2012/03/truth-about-skeptical-science.html?m=1
Loads of inconsistencies and lies and falsehoods with censoring and deleting and ignoring debunking. SkS is a political machine, not a science


97% myth. Skepticalscience reports 97% Cook study is truthful
joseduarte.com/blog/cooking-stove-use-housing-associations-white-males-and-the-97
Analysis of the study by an expert in the field discovers massive bias and cooking of results while also cherrypicking datapoints and refusing a double-blind study in order to shame scientists who may have had doubts
poseidon01.ssrn.com/delivery.php?ID=495104001002067116001071068020118081101069081061084031018005019028083093002113085101000003027026054116046003011029118029031089107048048080009069023114097081083005008051035087103119119118000099100071015126127127090124125012074119020087108098082119101022&EXT=pdf
95% myth
wattsupwiththat.com/2013/08/28/cooks-97-climate-consensus-paper-crumbles-upon-examination/

No one can do anything about global warming.

If what the alarmists say is true and there is no natural kickback, then we've already passed the point of no return decades ago. This is why the climate should be a non issue

Friendly reminder that the cost of reducing the rate of global warming by 1/100 degree by the time we hit 2100 is 7 Trillion USD. There is nothing we can do to effectively fight climate change save for a mass extinction event.

>Skepticalscience is shit
I'm not sure if you're retarded enough to actually think that its their model but I won't put anything past you. The projections from sceptical science are from the IPCC and if you notice there are another two models that are dead on.

As for the 97% figure I have to take the peer review over these claims. Beside that science isn't decided by consensus in any case.

>No, it's a fucking polar bear drowning.
Global warming has a lot of unstoppable effects other than drowning polar fucking bears. I thought you had better education up there.

It doesn't hurt us, and we aren't even contributing to it thanks to our massive forests. Hell, we couldn't if we tried with our piddly population.

So who cares? It's a complete non-issue.

>as for the 97% figure

They took the percentage of papers that were like "greenhouse gasses probably have an effect maybe" and extrapolated to 97% of climate scientists are full on alarmists who believe everything the globalists say about climate change. The real figures are about 30% alarmists, 55% moderates, 15% natural change

Global warming is a globalist tactic to shame the world into accepting a global tax paid to the banking cartels for the right to breathe.

(continued)

Literally the only "Solution" that is EVER offered to this "Problem" involves giving huge amounts of money to a centralized global authority.

I'm not sure what to think on global warming but I know that if I'm to believe what is said about it then there's nothing that can be done about it short of banning cars and stopping cows from being created since most of these gasses are created from people driving their cars everywhere and cow farts.

>cows being created

I mean and killing off livestock

>They took the percentage of papers that were like "greenhouse gasses probably have an effect maybe"
Have you even read the paper? They then emailed the authors of the paper and had them then self-report the conclusion

>97% of climate scientists
As far as I'm aware Cook doesn't attempt to quantify that rather he attempts to quantify what percentage of abstracts affirm that the majority of current warming is due to man

I fucking love Trumps speech pattern
It's so positive