So most of you are probably wondering "what the fuck is Nordicism?". Nordicism is the ideology that the Nordic race should remain pure and that almost all of human accomplishment is because of Nords. All great civilizations were founded and run by pure Nordic people and fell when they became mongrelized. I will be taking questions about Nordicism and just answer some common ones right now
>But Nordicism can't be true because Rome, Greece, Persia, Egypt, China, and India were advanced while Scandinavia and Germany were inhabited by barbarians! First off there is nothing wrong with being a barbarian, they lived very good natural lives, worked less than us, and the average barbarian was stronger, taller, and richer than the average citizen of those nations I just listed. Secondly the people of those advanced nations I listed were pure Nordic. Egypt, Persia, Rome, and Greece were all pure Nordic before mongrelization. The word "Iris" came from the Greek word for colour, if almost everyone had dark eyes back then it would make no sense for them to title the ring in your eye the "colour". Only a people who have many eye colours would call it that.
>What about the Celts? Ah the Celts, don't get me wrong these people can be very great, but they are inferior to the Nord. Why has England, the part of the British Isles that is Anglo-Saxon always dominated the celtic parts? It is because the Anglo-Saxon is SUPERIOR to the Celt
>What about Darker skinned geniuses like Einstein and Nikola Tesla? Doesn't that debunk Nordicism? No, first off Einstein was an idiot. He went from anti-war to working on the A-Bomb when it suited him. He never discovered E=MC2, that was already discovered by a German scientist a few years earlier. About Tesla he was actually Nordic. I know he had darker tanned skin like a Southern European but there are rare occasions where Nords have that. There was vikings described as "swarthy" in the Sagas. It is Possible to be darker skinned Nord like Tesla
>He went from anti-war to working on the A-Bomb when it suited him.
He never worked on a bomb, you dumb kek.
Jaxon Flores
> so teacher can you link me something to back up your claims that Romans, Greeks, Persians etc were actually Nordic? I'm in university studying in a similar field and am interesting in hearing your research.
Cameron Murphy
>About Tesla he was actually Nordic Tesla was as Southern Slav as you could really get without being some crossover with Turk and Albanian.
Chase Brooks
>He never discovered E=MC2, that was already discovered by a German scientist a few years earlier k nvm looks like you are just a troll
William Long
>there is nothing wrong with being a barbarian >we wuz was medis and egyptians a fucking leaf
Nathaniel Ross
You're a troll, please leave before you get banned
Actually he did, and you should thank Einstein for giving us the means to end the war with you nips prematurely.
Christopher Garcia
>Nordicism is the ideology that the Nordic race should remain pure and that almost all of human accomplishment is because of Nords. All great civilizations were found aka WE WUZ VIKANGZ N SHEEIT
Ryan Howard
No shit, you're a troll
No one doubts we were vikings
Brody Baker
WE
Josiah Gonzalez
"SEX EDUCATION AS A TOOL OF WORLD GOVERNMENT
The sex education was to get kids interested early, making the connection between sex and the need for contraception early in their lives, even before they became very active. At this point I was recalling some of my teachers, particularly in high school and found it totally unbelievable to think of them agreeing, much less participating in, and distributing of contraceptives to students. But, that only reflected my lack of understanding of how these people operate. That was before the school-based clinic programs got started. Many cities in the United States by this time have already set up school-based clinics, which are primarily contraception, birth control, population control clinics. The idea then is that the connection between sex and contraception introduced and reinforced in school would carry over into marriage. Indeed, if young people when they matured decided to get married, marriage itself would be diminished in importance. He indicated some recognition that most people probably would want to be married, but this certainly would not be any longer considered necessary for sexual activity. "
Evan Wright
>v RESTRUCTURING EDUCATION AS A TOOL OF INDOCTRINATION
Another area of discussion was Education. In connection with education and remembering what he said about religion, was in addition to changing the Bible he said that the classics in Literature would be changed. I seem to recall Mark Twain's writings was given as one example. But he said that the casual reader reading a revised version of a classic would never even suspect that there was any change. Somebody would have to go through word by word to even recognise that any change was made in these classics, the changes would be so subtle. But the changes would be such as to promote the acceptability of the new system.
Jose Cook
>Actually he did, and you should thank Einstein for giving us the means to end the war with you nips prematurely.
The atomic bombs didn't end the war. Russia invading Japan did. Truman stalled Russian involvement so he could test his new toys.
Ryder Ross
MORE TIME IN SCHOOLS, BUT THEY WOULDN'T LEARN ANYTHING
As regards education, he indicated that kids would spend more time in schools, but in many schools they wouldn't learn anything. They'll learn some things, but not as much as formerly. Better schools in better areas with better people, their kids will learn more. In the better schools Iearning would be accelerated. This is another time where he said, "We think we can push evolution." By pushing kids to learn more he seemed to be suggesting that their brains would evolve, that their offspring would evolve; sort of pushing evolution where kids would learn and be more intelligent at a younger age. As if this pushing would alter their physiology. Overall, schooling would be prolonged. This meant prolonged through the school year. I'm not sure what he said about a long school day, I do remember he said that school was planned to go all summer, that the summer school vacation would become a thing of the past. Not only for schools, but for other reasons. People would begin to think of vacation times year round, not just in the summer. For most people it would take longer to complete their education. To get what originally had been in a bachelor's program would now require advanced degrees and more schooling. So that a lot of school time would be just wasted time. Good schools would become more competitive. I inferred when he said that, that he was including all schools - elementary up through college - but I don't recall if he actually said that. Students would have to decide at a younger age what they would want to study and get onto their track early. It would be harder to change to another field of study once you get started. Studies would be concentrated in much greater depth, but narrowed.
Michael Parker
But we really were.
Adam Brown
You wouldn't have access to material in other fields, outside your own area of study, without approval. This seem to be more where he talked about limited access to other fields. I seem to recall this as being more at the college level perhaps. People would be very specialised in their own area of expertise. But they won't be able to get a broad education and won't be able to understand what is going on overall.
SCHOOLS AS THE HUB OF THE COMMUNITY
Another angle was that the schools would become more important in people's overall life. Kids in addition to their academics would have to get into school activities unless they wanted to feel completely out of it. But spontaneous activities among kids; the thing that came to my mind when I heard this was - sand lot football and sand lot baseball teams that we worked up as kids growing up. I said the kids wanting any activities outside of school would be almost forced to get them through the school. There would be few opportunities outside. Now the pressures of the accelerated academic program, the accelerated demands where kids would feel they had to be part of something - one or another athletic club or some school activity - these pressures he recognized would cause some students to burn out. He said. "The smartest ones will learn how to cope with pressures and to survive. There will be some help available to students in handling stress, but the unfit won't be able to make it. They will then move on to other things." In this connection and later on with drug abuse and alcohol abuse he indicated that psychiatric services to help would be increased dramatically. In all the pushing for achievement, it was recognized that many people would need help, and the people worth keeping around would be able to accept and benefit from that help, and still be super achievers. Those who could not would fall by the wayside and therefore were sort of dispensable 'expendable' I guess is the word I want.
Caleb Anderson
Education would be lifelong and adults would be going to school. There'll always be new information that adults must have to keep up. When you can't keep up anymore, you're too old. This was another way of letting older people know that the time had come for them to move on and take the demise pill. If you got too tired to keep up with your education, or you got too old to learn new information, then this was a signal - you begin to prepare to get ready to step aside.
SOME BOOKS WOULD JUST DISAPPEAR FROM THE LIBRARIES
In addition to revising the classics, which I alluded to awhile ago and with revising the Bible, he said, "Some books would just disappear from the libraries." This was in the vein that some books contain information or contain ideas that should not be kept around. Therefore, those books would disappear. I don't remember exactly if he said how this was to be accomplished. But I seem to recall carrying away this idea that this would include thefts. That certain people would be designated to go to certain libraries and pick up certain books and just get rid of them. Not necessarily as a matter of policy - just simply steal it. Further down the line, not everybody will be allowed to own books. And some books nobody will be allowed to own.
Kayden White
Das rite
Hudson Kelly
An now what has the nords become? How is Sweden doing?
Adrian Bell
1). This is copypasta. 2). I'm fairly knowledgeable (well just enough to debunk you) about Greece, Rome, and Egypt and you're full of shit. Literally the white version of we wuz kangs
Gabriel Nguyen
IDK man they just voted for Brexxit and Donald Trump so pretty good
Prove it wrong then, oh right you can't
Luis Evans
>implying the Ruskies would have invaded if we didn't drop the bombs
You can't give credit to someone who kicks somebody else while they are down.
>The most complete study of Greek skeletal material from Neolithic to modern times was carried out by American anthropologist J. Lawrence Angel [6] who found that in the early age racial variability in Greece was 7% above average, indicating that the Greeks had multiple origins within the Europid racial family. Angel noted that from the earliest times to the present “racial continuity in Greece is striking.” Buxton [30] who had earlier studied Greek skeletal material and measured modern Greeks, especially in Cyprus, finds that the modern Greeks “possess physical characteristics not differing essentially from those of the former [ancient Greeks].”
>In a critical review of his book [53], J. Lawrence Angel states that “Poulianos is correct in pointing out ... that there is complete continuity genetically from ancient to modern times.”
>Physical anthropology indicates racial continuity in Greece, with main Dinaric-Alpine-Mediterranean racial elements. Racial type of aristocrats, commoners and criminals is the same.
>Greek literature furnishes evidence of brunet and fair individuals, as today, without ascribing any superiority to either type.
>Greek art shows a predominance of brunet types, with a small minority of fair ones, rarely as fair as northern Europeans and with the same physique as their brunet counterparts.
>Greek descriptions of themselves and others indicate that they were intermediate in pigmentation to northern and southern barbarians, as they are today.
Aiden Adams
Then why were they described as blond?
Tyler Watson
Modern Egyptians (especially Copts) = Ancient Egyptians
>They also associate the Coptic component with Ancient Egyptian ancestry, without the later Arabian influence that is present among other Egyptians.[42]
>Most scholars believe that ancient Egyptians looked pretty much like today’s Egyptians - that is, they were brown, becoming darker as they approached the Sudan (Snowden 1970, 1992; Smedley 1993).[34]"
>DNA studies of modern Egyptians show that while Egypt went through several invasions in historic times, the DNA contribution from these invasions is only about 10%. The remaining 90% is much older, from neolithic times, presumably including the predynastic and dynastic periods.
Carson James
I wish I had a QT3.14 Christian gf like her. I'm currently surrounded by socialist crybabies here at college, and it's pretty depressing.
Carter Ward
Greeks were (and are) majority brown/black hair with a minority blonde component (~7%). Its native to them and not due to nordic mixture.
Brandon Turner
can confirm
Jack Bailey
greek? nice
Evan Rodriguez
he was their mathematical advisor. For all intents and purposes he worked on the bomb
Evan Sanders
I love quality posting
Settling in for a comfy thread
Ethan Powell
think I already shut down OP. at least with respect to Greece and Egypt.
