Prove this man wrong

Prove this man wrong.
You can't.

Other urls found in this thread:

en.wikipedia.org/wiki/No_true_Scotsman
en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Gas_van
twitter.com/NSFWRedditImage

Its just the "not real communism" argument repackaged.

did u just assume xir's gender?

No one has suffered under fascism, only under dictators that use the word facism

ayyyyy

Tbh I respect commies more when they actually try and defend guys like Stalin or the Kims instead of when they play the "muh no true communism" card

Cuck

Define "real fascism", then.

>except no one has suffered under Nazism. They have suffered under dictators who use the word National-Socialism.

en.wikipedia.org/wiki/No_true_Scotsman

Really makes me think though, not even memeing. Why is it so universal that dictators seize power after revolutions

No

>tfw no one has ever suffered under libertarianism

real fascists could kill all the jews in 4 years. it's like they weren't even trying.

en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Gas_van

How can you ever possibly recover?

ITS NEVER COMMUNISM ITS ALWAYS A DICTATOR WE NEED TO TRY COMMUNISM SO I CAN PROVE YOU WRONG ... liberals have a mental illness

You need a strong hand to calm everything down and bring back stability.

He's DEFINING communist as a system that works.
We can't argue against him because he's fucking retarded.

Communism and socialism always leads to dictatorship and corruption.

What is happening to America that it's now socially acceptable to side with leftists.

Someone please post the repeating communist ball.

Also, saged.

>but it doesn't matter because that wasn't real communism

no one has suffered under capitalism. they have suffered under presidents who use the word capitalism.

>let's use the word "liberalism" when we don't even know what it is

Liberalism literally first existed as a word that went hand in hand with freedom. Bolshevism is literally the exact opposite to that, being an authoritarian form of social and economic control.

Can you fucking Americans fix your vocabulary and stop putting Liberalism in the left spectrum when it clearly isn't.

But communism is what the let the dictators be there.

He's a fake shill, an asshole selling shit as chocolate chips. He pisses on your head and tells you its raining.

It's almost as if every time communism is tried it inevitably leads to dictatorship and totalitarianism...

Remind me, what's it called when you do the same thing over and over again and expect different results?

"REAL COMMUNISM HAS NEVER BEEN TRIED!"

The Ukrainian Genocide remembers

They've suffered under communism put into practice. If you fucking bust your leg up in a pick up game of basketball or practicing for football you've still fucked your leg up playing sports. Fuck man I'm a bleeding heart liberal and I can acknowledge this.

This is foryou OP

That's either because
A) "Real libertarianism has never been tried!"
or
B) you're arbitrarily redefining "suffering" to only refer to cases where harm is caused by an entity that is considered a state

"Fascist efficiency" is a meme.

Why exactly is democratic Communism a bad thing?

That was pretty much always true, every time and everywhere, for at least several centuries. The whole point of the terms "left and right" is to refer to opposing ends of the acceptable political spectrum. If "the left" becomes too radical to be accepted, they become the "far left", the former "centrists" become the new left, and so on.

>m-my version of communism is good I swear!

Eat shit and die, /leftypol/

it hasnt been tried because its a shit business model. anybody who does try it has to radically shift the business model around to even get some semblance of a functional society

atleast fascists have proof of making utopias. there hasn't been a single communist utopia in human history

Because it takes away the rights of the individual for the rights of the collective

AKA you can now justify fucking over the minority for the good of the majority

So I suppose you want to live in a lawless society then?

Wat is dis strawman?

No one can infringe on your rights because there is a society with laws, retard

>when they play the "muh no true communism" card

what they mean is THEY'd be better communist dictators

yeah, right

Real panslavism or pangermanism hasn't been tried.

the reason communism doesnt work is because humans are to fluid to act as cogs in a machine

in communism you cant even pack up your shit and move without going to jail. because if you do you can throw off the whole machine. you are a cog

in capitalism if a business goes down an individual and his employees lose their money

in communism if a business goes down the country goes with it

communism could only ever work in a fully automated society. but it would a disgusting unhappy life because work is good for the mind

1 POST BY THIS ID, SAGED FUCKING B8 CUNT

Funny how many dictators communism has created

Any law that is passed with anything less than consent of 100% of the people is a violation of personal freedoms. Unless you promise not to use violent in enforcing the law, in which case the law is meaningless.

>communism could only ever work in a fully automated society. but it would a disgusting unhappy life because work is good for the mind
Work would still be performed in a fully automated society. There is no amount of technology that can eliminate the need for labor. Even if you have machines to do the work, and machines to repair those machines, and machines to repair those machines, and machines to repair those machines, somewhere at the end of the line you have problems that only a human can solve. Automation just increases the efficiency of human labor - and in the long run, rather than driving down the usage of human labor, human labor stays constant, but thanks to automation and technology, output increases.

>#notallcommunism

1 post by this ID

Sup Forums UTTERLY BTFO!

HOW WILL THEY RECOVER?

Huh... that really gets the noggin joggin

Because "real" Communism isn't possible unless Jesus comes back or one group of people manage to conquer the entire planet and revert everyone to an agrarian state.

Either way the "intellectuals" of communist thought lose.

...

this man is right,
imolying that communism is impossible

>but it wasn't real communism!!!