Support high social freedoms like drug use, gay sex, abortion, freedom of speech, freedom of belief...

>support high social freedoms like drug use, gay sex, abortion, freedom of speech, freedom of belief, freedom of the press
>but racist and against multiculturalism, support tight immigration

Where would I be on the y-axis?

in the oven

>support high social freedoms like drug use

how to ruin productivity 101

bottom right

>muh everyone will use drugs

The only people who would use drugs are degenerates who are using them already why shouldn't the state take more money?

Whichever axis Hans Hermann Hoppe is on.

Basically ancap teir.

>drug use, gay sex, abortion
gas thyself

>high social freedoms like drug use

I dunno, take the fucking test and find out.

Because if it gets acceptable, that number will only increase.

We should all look up to China. If you sentence a druggie to death, the mafia lost a customer.

you are very far on the "I can't handle coherent schools of thought"-axis

>be me
>want a small government with basic easy to understand laws. (lib)
>think that it's the government's responsibility to care for it's citizens who can't care for themselves. (basic socialism)
>also an extreme nationalist.

where am I?
Also I've taken the test multiple times, it always puts me somewhere different each time.
It says that it's having trouble finding where I belong and gives me another 10 questions.
does this multiple times, each time I take the test I get an extra 50 or so questions.

>small government
>socialist
it doesn't know where you belong because your views are impossible

I'm not a socialist, I selectively believe that it's the governments responsibility to care for its citizens.
Just like how you can believe in the concept of equal rights and hate feminists.

Basically I'm a small govt national socialist.

>support as big of a goverment as i needs to be to enforce the rules
>mixed economy
>ethno-nationalist
>no gay marriage but no outright ban of homosex
>universal healthcare(except for drug users(incl. smokers), and selfinflicted risky lifestyles(obese people and faggots))
yeah i think this test got me right

you can not care for such people without a big government

you can't have socialism with small government because redistribution of wealth requires a powerful state

retard

...

Remarkably accurate

...

I like that picture.

I prefer this one.

Am i woke Sup Forums

Frogort pic

>care for its citizens
With money?
With money taken from people with a job?
It's a big government then, or at least a medium one if little money is involved.

>not using political simulator

>national socialist
Basically, a gynocracy where the entire state is at the service of mothers in general and single mothers in particular. Manpower for the army is at that price.
Also nationalization of every industry related to war or strategical interests.

Link?

politicalsimulator.com

How is it not coherent? Genuinely curious.

Drugs only affect society in a harsh way if you don't have a strong social group, ie tribe, to adhere to.

Professor Jordan Peterson mentioned a study done on rats about it. If you keep the rat alone in a cage without any social interaction, he's going to be taking the drugs more often than not. If he's allowed to be social, the drugs aren't nearly as addictive and won't be taken nearly as much.

With that said, my conclusion is that drugs can be okay, but it needs to be in a society where you can't shut yourself off from the world and never interact with anyone so that we can avoid addiction and lives being ruined.

Pic related OP, you're the dildo.

just like the KKK having the right to scream "fuck niggers" publicly became accepted and now the grand wizards are the most influential people in politics

Thoughts? I'm a dissatisfied liberal who hates PC culture

...

Legalizing or decriminalizing drugs doesn't mean society now necessarily condones its free usage, it just means we're no longer using the force of government to put people in jail. It frees up resources for police departments to focus on actual crimes. Arresting drug users wastes taxpayer money and puts more pressure on already crowded jails and often makes it difficult for the user to get a job and become a productive member of society. Instead we should just ridicule stoners and those who would promote drug usage as harmless fun.