Daily reminder that Hillary Clinton WON THE POPULAR VOTE by nearly 3 MILLION. Yet Trump won.
inb4:
>Uhhhh yeah if you count the millions of illegals.
No proof of that, post a real source that's not Breitbart and Infowars, aka fake news.
>We aren't a democracy.
Yeah ur right, but yet more human beings WANTED HILLARY.
You can try and defend this all you want. Trump is an illegitimate president, don't even get me started on the Russian's hacking to help Trump win.
Other urls found in this thread:
independent.co.uk
youtube.com
youtube.com
favstar.fm
youtube.com
youtube.com
twitter.com
More Californians wanted Hillary. And they're not human. I know because I am one.
Now add all the votes who weren't counted or manipulated and Trump would have won the popular vote in a landslide.
The system is rigged, but even the most rigged system couldn't win against Trump.
Sorry,
California doesn't count.
There is no way Clinton inspired more legal citizens to vote for her in CA than Obama in 08.
Nobody cares
New Yorkers and Californians wanted her. These two groups are NOT people, and should not even be allowed to vote. They are verminous filth which needs to be exterminated, NOT given the right to select political leaders. On JAn 21, the day of the rope, they will disappear.
Without the rigging she probably lost it by over 5 million
...
Wait, I thought hacked the planet in Trump's favor.
>liberals
>humans
Don't even get me started on the corrupt media and the CIA that helped Hillary win.
>this thread again
Low tier bait, no understanding of how the presidential elections work etc etc
Sagerino and Hiderino
daily reminder she lost
*Russia hacked
>the Russian's hacking to help Trump win.
>No proof of that, post a real source
Wait... people actually believe she won the vote fairly? Yikes. Rigged as fuck.
>Russia hacked the election to help Trump
no proof.
Are we forgetting the US government already went on record saying 3 million non US citizens also voted?
No illegals voted because that would be immoral and they are the most moral of non citizens. California doesn't just give out drivers licenses to anyone with a utility bill, oh wait they do. New york requires ID to register to vote, oh wait nevermind.
>sage goes in all fields
OY VEYY
IT WAS 6 GORILLION VOTES YOU ANTI SEMITE
DELETE THIS POST NOW
The United States is not a direct democracy. It is a representative democracy or a republic.
Popular vote doesn't mean anything
No proof of Russia rigging the election. Also New York + Cali =! America
Swiggity Swoo here is your (you)
california is hillarys state so its possible honestly.
california went to hillary in the primaries back in 2008.
FRIENDLY REMINDER THAT HILLARY WON AT A VOTING SYSTEM NO COUNTRY SHOULD USE, BECAUSE IF THEY CAN USE FIRST PAST POST (WHAT YOU PROPOSE), THEY CAN USE TWO ROUND SYSTEM.
AT TWO ROUND SYSTEM, TRUMP WILL WIN.
PS: First past the post, "Give yes to a candidate the one with more votes win even if not 50% of all (at some countries valid ones only) votes"
ALL SYSTEMS EXCLUDING FIRST PAST POST WOULD HAVE TRUMP WINING OR A THIRD PARTY WINNER
Voting System 1: Two round with electoral system (by area or same amount of votes or population, by state or county) or without electoral system:
How it works: "Give yes to an candidate, the one with more votes win if has has 50% of all (at some countries valid ones only) votes, if he dont have this amount of votes, a second round is made with the two candidates with more votes and the first, the most voted at second round win."
Result:TRUMP WIN
Voting System 2: Instant runoff with electoral system (by area or same amount of votes or population, by state or county) or without electoral system:
How it works: Like two round system but you remove only the least votes candidate when going to the next round. People just need to vote once unlike two round system because they put all candidates in order.
Result: TRUMP WIN
Voting System 3: Coombs method with electoral system (by area or same amount of votes or population, by state or county) or without electoral system:
How it works: Like instant runn off, but instead of removing the candidate with least amount of first place votes (remember you order every candidate in order) you remove the candidate with least amount of last place votes
Result:THIRD PARTY WIN
Voting System 4: Disapproval system method with electoral system (by area or same amount of votes or population, by state or county) or without electoral system:
How it works: People pick their most hated candidate, the one with least votes win.
Who wins: A TIE BETWEEN THIRD PARTIES
>Yeah ur right, but yet more human beings WANTED HILLARY.
Trump won the popular vote if you remove California from the equation.
>Californians are human beings.
>Trump wins election
>but muh popular vote! RECOUNT RECOUNT RECOUNT
>nothing changes, some places even tally MORE votes for Trump
>MUH RUSSIAN CONSPIRACY! REVOTE REVOTE REVOTE
>all of these claims of corruption coming in the face of the Dems being proven corrupt to the core themselves
Jesus Christ you faggots just dont know when to quit
And she still lost! Sad!
Pretty much all the states went to Hillary in 2008. The supedelegates chose Obongo because they wanted a nigger.
Oh so because more people live in a state means it shouldn't count ? Just cuz it's a liberal doesn't mean we shouldn't count them. Not my fault MORE HUMANS live there.
Again, accustations that have no proof. The real proof (that you can't seem to get through ur skull) is that Hillary HAD MORE PEOPLE VOTE FOR HER. Plain and simple, what's so hard about that ?
So 20 states should count for more than 30 states?
Trump is a New Yorker.
> B-but Trump won if you deleted all the Liberal Votez
>Resitrcting people from voting
"He has a different view from me so he shouldn't be allowed to vote".
K, I see where this is going.
"More human beings" is not equal to a "popular vote." Once again, Civics 101: There is no country-wide popular vote for President of the United States. The popular vote is a vote for electors state-by-state.
Please, please educate yourself. 0/10 troll.
Exactly, see
and
>Yeah ur right, but yet more human beings WANTED HILLARY.
Californians aren't human beings.
>chessboardwherethesidewithlesspiecesloses.jpg
>Who lost (“lost”) the popular vote (“popular vote”) is irrelevant for all sorts of reasons. For one thing, it doesn’t have anything to do with the outcome of the election. For another, it doesn’t, strictly speaking, exist. We don’t have a popular presidential vote, or a campaign for that vote. There are all sorts of good reasons for that, most of them anticipated by men such as Alexander Hamilton and other people wiser and more prudent than Joe Biden and Jill Stein and you.
>Donald Trump, who won the election, is annoying the heck out of Democrats by having the audacity to act like he won the election. Which he did. “Oh, sure, he won the phony-baloney Electoral College election,” the Democrats say, “but our girl Hillary Placeholder Clinton won . . . this other imaginary election . . . which is now super-important!”
>To call this rhetoric “transparent” would be a disservice to Shrinky Dinks and Cold War–era Buhl Industries overhead projectors and other things associated with transparency.
>Allow me to translate this language from the original Democratic: “Please, please, don’t go acting like you won the election you won and wielding that power the way we would and will and did last time around. Pretty please. If we believed in God, we’d be praying to God right now that you don’t act like us.”
I hate this argument. It's like know the rules of the game but complaining afterwards. Imagine in football if one team lost 28-17 and the losing team started bitching saying "but we had more yards. We should have won!"
>no proof
>confirmed 3 million dead and illegal voters
Trump won the popular vote in every state he won and that is how our elections are decided
>agree to a contest with set rules
>lose by said rules
>complain afterwards that the rules are unfair
WHOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOA.
yeah but what if you count voter fraud, illegal immigrants vote, etc
>No proof of that,
very reasonable to expect since in many states it's a possibility and illegal immigrants would have all the incentives in the world to vote
>Russian's hacking to help Trump win.
No proof of that, post a real source that's not fake news.
Also finally Trump won because he tailored his strategy to the rule in place, if only popular vote mattered he would have played a different strategy and won anyway
Don't even bother, m8.
Technically Trump won the EC, so he won the election by the rules as they're set.
But conspiracy tards on Sup Forums will tell you Trump won the popular because of illegal voters, despite there being no evidence of that shit.
Trumptards will continue burrowing further and further underground into conspiracy to avoid the truth.
No, just the illegally registered non-citizens and deceased
sage
>I don't understand elections
I hear many many bad things about Calfornia
should I never visit?
> My vote in Wyoming somehow means more than in California even though 5 people live there
Wew
*sigh*
Clinton won California by a margin of 4 million votes. The rest of the country (49 states) chose Trump by a million votes. Now you know why we have the Electoral College.
>The question, our Democratic friends insist, is one of “mandate,” one of the most popular and stupid words in the American political lexicon.
>According to this line of thinking, the fact that Trump won but did not win lots and lots of votes in highly populous Democratic states such as California where he did not campaign very much means that he should give Democrats what they want instead of trying to get what he wants. This is, of course, a one-way street: American voters have entrusted Republicans with the management of 68 of the nation’s 99 legislative chambers, 34 of its 50 governorships, a majority in the House, a majority in the Senate, and the mayoralty of Miami, but Democrats still believe that their elected officials, hated and despised and spurned as they may be in that vast sea of electoral-map red dividing Oakland from Trenton, should keep trying to get what they want, secondary considerations be damned. There is something to be said for the argument that if you won your election you should fight like hell to do what you told the voters you were going to do; Democrats just can’t quite see extending this thinking to Trump, who won the biggest and most hotly contested and most-talked-about election.
its a nice place, just stay away from the spic infested zones.
>lose majority of states
YEAH BUT MORE CALIFORNIANS WANTED HILLARY!!!!!!
That didn't happen
...
called a republic sweetie
>Turns and flips hair
3 million democrats voted for trump.fuck those assholes.
More than half of america didn't want Hillary though
Yes it did
Too bad, New York and California ARE america. But since you like to cherry pick these two states because they don't have the same opinion as you, you discard them. Just how those two states likes to discard the fly over states.
Socal is not America, its mexico. Even jf there is still a few hundred thousand white voters there, they vote on behaf of their ethnic friends that need to be thrown back. And the millions of blacks and legal mexicans there vote on who promises the most gibsmedats.
>despite being no evidence
youtube.com
If that is possible, vote fraud is possible.
Here's video of a democrat hired operative ADMITTING that he helps bus around people to vote numerous times.
youtube.com
You're projecting as well.
You claim that we need to avoid the truth by creating conspiracy, but you're just labeling anything you're too lazy to research or understand as a conspiracy in a cheap ploy to avoid ever having to admit you're wrong. Your pride will be the end of you and millions of liberal progressives.
FAKE NEWS detected
>US government is fake news
WeW
Why the fuck does the number keep getting higher, is Soros forging ballots as we speak to get more protests
You just said that the claim of illegal immigrants is true without proof, while right after saying that Russia influencing the election was false because of.. no proof?
Never change, Sup Forums.
Audit for illegals.
But still, we are talking about humans, say you shove every person in California into Hawaii, will it then not count "cuz there are too many people" What logic is that ? IT DOESNT MATTER. It just so HAPPENS that there is a lot of people in California, so why should they be disregarded ?
i know its 18 million fraud
favstar.fm
youtube.com
GET FUKT GET REKT U LOST LOLOLOL
Link or source
could this analogy bring in dead voters\illegal immigrant voters? Like a comic showing Trump with more pieces and Hillary in a check mate in panel 1, then hillary adds illegal pieces to the board, and then demands popular college victory?
>Less than 1/10th of California.
>popular.
>people who live in areas around millions of other people should decide what life is like for towns with less than 100k population
Urban areas need to be under different rule of law and structure than spread out country towns and farmland.
>comparing USA elections to a game of chess
Kk.
You guys are like the faggots who after their team gets kicked their asses in a game start bringing up statistics how your guys ran way more, or how your guys are more expensive, or how your guys play way more styleful or some shit.
It doesnt matter. You scored less goals, which is all that matters. Crying to change your roules from Footballrules to Rugbyrules afterwards because acording to that rules you would totally have won, because no way the enemy would have adapted to different rules, unlike you fucks unable to win the game.
...
Might as well whine about Senators and their equal representation too.
For fucks sake, are liberals the new jew? "don't forget the six million bruh, Hillary totally won bruh"
to be fair, you're comparing the us elections to a prom king/queen election
Prove the Russians hacked it
I'm waiting
Also how unlikely is it that illegals didn't vote considering their risk of deportation looming with states like CA offering the right to vote to them.
Come on faggot
>The system is rigged, but even the most rigged system couldn't win against Trump.
this, the reasonable people had everything stacked against them yet they managed to obtain victory.
Mass media gaslightining, social media cracking down on Trump, yet the reasonable people didn't give a shit about that and choose the more resonable candidate anyway
this was an historical victory, and it's nice and funny to see the mass histeria among shitlibs, it will be nice seeing them self destruct
Not an argument.
Excellent
cool story OP
your participation award is in the mail!
Educate yourself on the problems of a pure direct democracy. Then you'll realize that you're a plebbit faggot who should go back home.
You don't belong here Isaac.
It probably bothers Trump knowing that even though he's president most of the country still doesn't have any respect for him, so there's that at least. Also it's going to be fun watching him fuck over all the people who voted for him, which he's already in the process of doing.
Your arguments should be directed toward FPTP and gerrymandering not the Electoral College.
We are called the "United States" not "United People" of America
Not an argument
>T-the American people wanted Hillary!
3 million people in a country of 350,000,000 is not a lot. When there is 100,000,000 undocumented immigrants in this country you truly believe not even one voted? Even when states with most sanctuary cities and illegal immigrant populations fight hardest against voter id you think none of them voted? Keep plugging your ears with mud youre almost through the grieving process.
popular vote doesnt matter.
State electors choose the president not the people.
DNC Hatchetman said the Soros machines accounted for a 5% increase in the vote for Hillary.
Est. illegals voting in California = 3 - 5m.
Dead people voting D = 2m
Evidence in Florida of rigging the absentee ballots for HRC, probably happened in all the inner cities
No evidence that Russia hacked
= Trump in a landslide.
>No proof of that, post a real source that's not Breitbart and Infowars, aka fake news.
You realize that illegals are given driver's licenses, these forms for health care have virtually no stop-gaps to stop illegals from lying aside from "LE ILLEGAL TO LIE BUT WE'LL NEVER COME AFTER YOU" claus in the fucking form
President Trump and his PERFECT CELL FOR CELL CLONE BARRON strategically won over 300 delegates using completely legal campaign tactics reminiscent of the Yankee days of yore. It was an amazing display, I was on such a cloud during the election coverage.
All the fucking dopey illegals went to the polls with scores of anchor babies in tow, ferried around by Lena Dunham, Stephen Colbert, and pathetic manlet Patton Oswalt.
Three million brainwashed fucks, illegals, welfare parasites, and the corporate class who can all go fuck off.
Shills, post more. Bait more. We love it. The overton window is creeping to the right and all you censorship-happy Marxist fucks can go whistle. Oh, it will be glorious.
We're winning the culture wars, and you are losing in such disgrace, I love it. No sportsmanship, no dignity. You will be set out to pasture kicking and screaming while we blindfold you and count down from ten.
You can take your neoliberal asshats and your nasty Queen cunt and GO WHISTLE son.
Hillary won the popular vote by 3 million, and she still lost the election. youtube.com
Law is the law. I don't even have to discuss how stupid you are by allowing votes to still flying in after it's over and president is known and then discuss shit that happened after somebody won.
Don't like the system, change it before you elect somebody.
It's literally THE argument that BTFOs your stupid narrative.
I'd also like to add that urban ghetto trash aren't people either.
She won because:
We count California
We count New York
We don't count oversea military votes
We don't count absentee votes
Who needs illegals when you got that on your side?
This
Daily reminder that Hillary Clinton WON THE CALIFORNIA VOTE by nearly 3 MILLION. Yet Trump won.
> FTFY