Minarchism

What is the best form of government and why is is Minarchism?

Other urls found in this thread:

youtube.com/watch?v=aAITxlCsj4Y
youtube.com/watch?v=DqDeH3hwxfw
twitter.com/NSFWRedditGif

Because it respects my personal freedom while it protects our country

Minarchist Monarchy

Minarchism is the best form of goverment because it is the purest form of capitalism that we can achieve.

bump

politics is simply a form of macrobiology predicated on microbiological realities

anarchy has never even worked at the microbiological level, ergo anarchy is impossible at the macrobiological level

minarchism =/= anarchism

>libertarian political philosophy which advocates for a particular variety of minimal state that acts only to enforce a universal framework of natural and legal rights essential to the functioning of a free marketplace in economy and culture

again, free exchange does not occur at the microbiological level, why would you expect it to work at the macrobiological level

>le /r/atheism/ reductionism

> What is the best form of government
Republic.

ok then help me out here

> muh science
Retard. If you are right, where are all the microbiologists in politics?

well, they're scientists, so...

Distributism and fascism are the best forms of government. A fully automated society is coming, and they are the only governments equipped to deal with the cultural issues that will arise when it does.

it is

just enact a few laws for infrastrcuture, national defense, judges and national sovereighty/racial purity

cringeworthy

>free exchange does not occur at the microbiological level
So microbes have governments?

>The use of tools does not occur at the microbiological level, why would you expect it to work at the macrobiological level?

ITT: minarchy and metal


post 'em

youtube.com/watch?v=aAITxlCsj4Y

They can form/be a part of a larger organism.

youtube.com/watch?v=DqDeH3hwxfw

So who has agency: microbes, people, or governments?

>microbiologists in politics

I said politics is /macro/ biology, the decisions political organizations make that affect populations at large, like initiating an islamic invasion of Europe, will affect the genetic landscape at a microbiological level, and the culture further at a macrobiological level, both macro and microbiological factors are considered heavily by government organizations such as the NSA/CDC in implementing policy

microbes govern their systems according to their mechanisms for reproduction and regulatory mechanisms with their environment

>The use of tools does not occur at the microbiological level

cells most definitely have nanomachinery

>microbes govern their systems according to their mechanisms for reproduction and regulatory mechanisms with their environment
So microbes are moral actors, same as people?

explain this?

I remember back in Middle School how we had to let microbes grow in a petri dish over the course of a week. I was the only one in the class to get yellow spots. Must've been the piss on the floor I swabbed.

>nanomachinery

Nanomachinery has nothing to do with tools moron.

The larger organism acts as one, with all the parts playing their role.

That's a stretch don't you think?

>Nanomachinery has nothing to do with tools moron

and yet the most advanced tools humanity is currently inventing, like CRISPR, are nanotechnological

you could do all sorts of philosophical gymnastics to say something like that, but in the end most microbes exist to organize organic material that gets eaten or sabotaged by other organisms

>and yet the most advanced tools humanity is currently inventing, like CRISPR, are nanotechnological

This has literally nothing to do with the conversation.

it really does though, politics and biology are now hopelessly interlinked

how do you think lower testosterone levels in white males has affected things

at some point (if not already) the government will put surveillance backdoors into your body to counter biological or nanomechanical threats the same way they've put backdoors into your computer to do the same thing against computer viruses or hacking groups

>Minarchism is a libertarian political philosophy which advocates for a particular variety of minimal state that acts only to enforce a universal framework of natural and legal rights essential to the functioning of a free marketplace in economy and culture, and operating through a limited government societally managed according to democratic or republican principles.

Unless it's being enforced and upheld by a dedicated committee of microbes, it's anarchic.

microbes and the chemicals that constitute them follow rules enforced by their environments

>Unless it's being enforced and upheld by a dedicated committee of microbes, it's anarchic.

yeah and it doesn't work well, organisms that are highly organized and have centralized control systems (that's you) are the most successful and live the longest

>The larger organism acts as one, with all the parts playing their role.
But to which part can we ascribe agency? Do we blame microbes, or in other words cells, for the actions of the individual, or do we blame the individual? Do we blame individuals for the actions of the government, or do we blame the government as a self-contained organism?

>That's a stretch don't you think?
That's exactly my point. Saying that because microbes do not exhibit some feature, we as individuals cannot exhibit it as well, is nonsensical. Especially in this context of economic systems.

>you could do all sorts of philosophical gymnastics to say something like that
No you couldn't, that's the point. Microbial interactions are not the same as human interactions.

Breddy gud desu