>Benjamin Barber was convicted of unlawful dissemination of an intimate image Thursday in Washington County Circuit Court. Judge Beth Roberts allowed him to remain out of custody and ordered him to report to the county jail by 7 p.m. Friday, deputies said. But Barber never showed.
>As part of his sentence, Barber was also restricted from possessing photos of the victim or using the Internet for non-work purposes. But within hours, he apparently violated the agreement, according to a memo filed by prosecutor Marie Atwood Friday morning seeking Barber's arrest before the jail deadline.
Why can you not freely distribute copyrighted material that you own the rights to? Can a pornstar magically withdraw her consent to have her videos sold after she agreed to it, just because she regrets the decision?
It is kind fucked up to record the girl and release it online.
Jonathan Gutierrez
looks like he has a tumor pushing his entire left side of his face out of whack
Jason Cox
Stop making threads about yourself, doing this on Sup Forums won't help.
Zachary Diaz
So what are the best "revenge porn" sites?
Daniel Peterson
herp derp xD
Colton Ramirez
Make this a thing
Mason Wilson
He doesn't relax around anyone.
Dylan Torres
I appreciate you user.
Aiden Smith
...
Jordan Adams
Kek
Nathaniel Hill
Can't sneak up on this guy
Carter Harris
No nigga those things are like going two different ways. A little more than lazy eye.
Jonathan Williams
Except from straight ahead.
Mason Carter
He can watch a Tennis match without turning his head.
Elijah Flores
>restricted from using the Internet for non-work purposes
Lincoln Cook
Didn't UN decide internet is basic human right recently? time to bomb america for human rights violations.
Alexander Morales
Yeah this is pretty draconian Might as well ban someone from using the phone or opening their letter box
Julian Lopez
One eye on the revenge porn, one eye on the streets.
Leo Peterson
This is endo. He's known around image boards and such for getting himself into stupid kinds of easily-avoided trouble. Like, this guy publicly blasted Intel management, then ended up taking a job with Intel, only to get booted out once they figured out who he was. He's been living out of his car and squatting in foreclosed houses during the revenge porn ordeal.
Some people collect baseball cards. Others have a garden, or build cool electronics. This guy's hobby is making a flaming wreck out of his own life in as many stupid ways as possible. I think the law is completely fucking stupid, but this guy is totally indefensible and deserves zero sympathy whatsoever.
Jaxon Hall
I have never heard of this guy, got more to this back story?
Why is there a law specifically against "revenge porn?" Thats fucking stupid.
Blake Watson
user-ib is the only one I know of.
Jackson Edwards
...
Aaron Sullivan
Evidently, his porn is still up.
Nathan Thomas
If you are so stupid to be photographed nude or whatever and risk them leaking only to complain "I dindu nuffin" you deserve to be stabbed to death with a fork.
Austin Baker
Fucking kek I lold way too much at that fellow bong
Aaron Wright
He has seen some shit.
Ian Richardson
Holy fuck, so everything he said was right most probably.
Leo Gonzalez
Yeah there is so many of them. like do you know what website you were on?
Connor Thomas
From what I've gathered, he tends to be on-point with most of the shit he says and talks about. He's just got this superpower for getting himself caught up in stupidly avoidable shitstorms.
Thomas James
>bitch has virus on her phone/computer >bitch sends nudes to me >"hacker" that runs the virus sees the nudes >hacker copies them over to his computer >hacker distributes nudes >full circle comes round, and she sees them >flips out at me >calls the cops >I get arrested and jailed THANKS OBAMA
Jackson Cox
it was a thing, in 2010.
Jose Cook
No it isn't you stupid fucking leaf.
Jaxson Taylor
How can they actually restrict you from doing anything in your free time?
It's like treating someone like a child? Where was the precedent set for this bullshit? How is it legal to even do something like that? Isn't it an unusual punishment?
Kevin King
A lot of the SJW type laws are like that. In certain states, if a woman merely accuses you of anything that falls under their vague laws for "domestic violence," which can include something as stupid as calling her a bitch over text, you automatically go straight to jail.
Matthew Thompson
That's not a lazy eye. That eye is totally blind and there is some other kind of muscle problem going on, too.
Leo Thompson
His eye was shot out when he enlisted in the ROTC. He was a Marksman.
Oliver Johnson
No I mean the judge deciding his punishment is banning him from recreational internet use? Can they even do that? That is an unusual freedom restriction and sounds pretty fucked up. Shouldn't they just put in in a cell for a month or whatever?
Is there a term limit for his internet ban?
Bentley Lee
It's probably not constitutional, but it happens on the regular with these types of laws.
Jaxon Gomez
>pranking people is illegal now
Jose Clark
That's disgusting and infantilizes people. Who the fuck gets "banned from their computer/internet" past childhood. Does the judge think she's a fucking parent. People need the internet for many things not just work. God these fuckwits piss me off.
I'd rather juts do the whole thing and go to jail for a month than do some internet banned but free to do anything else crap. Why doesn't anybody ever challenge this shit?
How will they even enforce it anyways? Do they cut connection to your house? Or just monitor you extensively?
Jaxson Johnson
Link
Matthew Nguyen
Anyone have the video?
Grayson Sanchez
...
Christian Campbell
No repealin the human chameleon
Jose Sullivan
pornhub ph56ef834e43d8b ph56ef9236daf29
evidently, she got that nasty bruise while being a cheating whore.
Tyler Davis
Guaranteed they will never punish a woman for these crimes
Logan Martinez
>Can they even do that? Yes they can they do it to sex offenders all the time.
Andrew Baker
Usually it's people convicted of major crimes like distributing CP or malicious hacking.
Don't you think being banned from the computer in these circumstances is a good thing?
Aiden Wright
Holy fuck. I know this guy. First time this has happened to me on Sup Forums.
Dylan Sanchez
>albino porn >lazy eye
I'll be damned.. 24 years on the internet and that was a first for me..
Carter Bennett
Spreading nudes online allows people to see a girls body without them having paid the necesarry fees (dinner/wine etc) He is therefore violating the NAP by giving people visual access to her body without paying, which is theft.
She should hit him with a TOW missile
Samuel Rodriguez
It's Portland.
Semi-communist state with laws protecting pedophiles.
Portland ranks 1st in sex trafficking and pedophiles. It's not surprising that Portland is home to some of the largest gay communities in the world.
James Morgan
What's his name?
Cameron Walker
holy shit imagine if you had eyes like that
you could look at two different porn videos at once
Eli Butler
Sounds like law written by Google.
Joshua Johnson
One eye on the streets, one eye on the sheets.
Charles Baker
Revenge porn is a dick move not really a manly thing to do.
Nathaniel Gomez
Nope. It seems like an unusual punishment. Just stick in in a cell for their alloted time. No need for this bullshit "you are le banned from PC lel" shit, who's to say he wont use his mates PC?
It's just so mind boggling retarded that some judge thought that was a good idea.
So wait it's to protect pedo's from jail time? They get temporary internet bans instead?
>captcah Sold Pizzeria
Jose Carter
Not lying but I talked to this dude a few times on mumble. He's a nice guy.
Grayson Hernandez
>Can't sneak up on this guy
It's his super power.
Liam Thompson
Kek
Wyatt Parker
fpbp
Xavier Barnes
You sound like you've never lived a day in your life without internet access.
Jesus.
This board is for people 18 years old or older toddler fag. Please GTFO
Cameron Hernandez
I support this, "revenge porn" always seems like a fucked up thing. Especially since i know girls who had their nude photos plastered over the web, even underage ones.
Christian Hughes
kys
Grayson Bennett
Someone needs to take this shit to the supreme court and get these laws shut down. Don't like your nudes being spread? then don't fucking take them in the first place. Simple as that.
Brayden Robinson
>be femanon >bf doesn't vote for Hillary >take his phone >take nudes with it >upload >bf is now in jail >go fuck Jamal like every saturday
Robert Rivera
No the city doesn't give a shit about sex trafficking and pedophiles. Look up all the child abductions and sex rings. The city hushes it up and makes it a "safe city".
There are strip clubs and sex shops all over the city. I think even prostitution is allowed. There's lots of shady shit around the city.
The corrupt police simply do not care about it, and the city pretends it doesn't exist.
Reed College had pesos living near by and no one cared. I think even a registered sex offebdor was hanging around the school for several years until the community forced them to kick him out. Reed is a liberal shithole. It makes Berkeley look like a southern Baptist bible college.
They have ties to the Clintons(no conspiracy, literally was friends with the Clintons).
Thomas Sullivan
>that guy scored more pussy that you
brb killing myself
James Murphy
I'm 24 and didn't get internet until around 2008 at my place, though my dad got it earlier probably around 2005 so I could visit him and use it there.
>tfw had to regularly visit my local library to use their PC's when I was a kid
I'm also aussie so my internet is shit tier at that. I just think it's a fucking retarded punishment.
Angel Davis
No. A basic tenet of penology are that punishments should be proportional, and this is way out of proportion. Upload pictures in your possession to a revenge porn site, which embarrasses a woman = complete internet ban? It's draconian. If this guy hacked to get the pictures that's different, but even then, once you've done your time in jail, that should be it.
Good point, the constitutionality of these laws has been challenged for First Amendment violations. Can't remember which state it was, but one state's law got thrown out because it was a blanket ban on distributing nude pictures without the consent of every party involved, which would have violated the First Amendment.
Thomas Cooper
That mumble server is full of totally off-the-wall characters. Those fuckers have me in goddamn tears when they're all going full-throttle. They have this guy endo... another guy who does parrot shows at parties full time... a chinese brit who is obsessed with weaponry he's not allowed to buy... a guy who drove to Desu's house and shot holes in his door... a petroleum engineer that constantly rapes ethnic minorities... a random shitposter with aspirations of being a hiphop star that blew up a grain silo when given the creds to their SCADA HMI.
But yeah, endo always seemed like a calm and thoughtful guy any time I talked to him. Most of that crowd is actually pretty sharp if you can get them to stop shitposting.
Jack Mitchell
Almost as fucking stupid as madthad. He was sentenced to probation with terms including not being able to use a computer for any non work related activities for something like 3 years. A couple days after sentencing he tried to defend himself on reddit, and defence is using it as violation of probation and he's now wanted again.
Connor Powell
I don't see the problem, outside of his internet restriction. He broke the law.
Gabriel Powell
The unconstitutionality of these laws is really obvious, and I'm frankly surprised that more states haven't thrown them out.
Lincoln Garcia
>Can a pornstar magically withdraw her consent to have her videos sold after she agreed to it, just because she regrets the decision? Woukd be a good way to kill the porn industry desu Go for it
Zachary White
That's the primary issue, the photos in many cases are taken and disseminated consensually in the first place. If it's hacked photos, or a hidden camera, that's a privacy invasion, but you lose your claim to privacy once you start sending photos to other people. If photos are private and you can't share them with other people, even after being sent to you, why aren't texts also private? Why not voicemails? Why are only nude photos considered private, and not other photos or videos as well? There's plenty of just as embarrassing material and communications sent between people, which they don't expect the other person to share with others, that doesn't involve being naked.
Jack Walker
Court order Condition of not being jailed i.e. part of a sentence for a criminal conviction/parole
Cameron Thomas
Taken consensually? Yes. Disseminated consensually? C'mon son.
Bentley Powell
He photographed her body (her property) which is fine, but then distributed the photos without consent, so her earning potential had she decided to sell her photos would have been diminished with nudes already floating about. This is theft.
Noah Clark
You have to have some actual balls to challenge it based on the First Amendment. Of course, all these beta faggots plead out.
Xavier Foster
Are you worried he's going to post your photos?
James Lewis
Good. Fucking inbred deserves to be jailed. No release signed = illegal dissemination.
Josiah Johnson
>first amendment No. If I allow you to take a photograph or video of my property (be it documents, a film or whatever) under the condition that you do not distribute them, can you then plead muh first amendment when I later find a torrent of work and try to rek you for it?
Jackson Clark
They've gotten around that by adding an intent requirement, namely intent to cause emotional distress or some type of blackmail situation. This would arguably be constitutional, unlike a simple ban on distribution entirely. Intent is very difficult to prove, and would likely only apply where there is direct evidence that you want the girl to know you are sending the photos to other people or are attaching contact info (phone number, email, Facebook profile) to the photos. I can see how this situation is harrassing and not necessarily a First Amendment violation, but simply distributing pictures that were sent to you or which you even took yourself? There's nothing illegal about that, billions of pictures are shared without the explicit consent of every party involved in the picture.
Juan Morales
Absolutely.
I assume you are thinking of copyright, which is a constitutionally allowed infringement of the first amendment. But that's a whole different grill of burgers...
Noah Rivera
Yeah, they were disseminated consensually when they were sent to other people. If hacked or taken secretly, that's not consensual, but you don't need permission from every person in a photo to show it to other people. Otherwise media companies couldn't publish copies of photos, nor could people give copies of photos of family events, etc, to others. Once you send a photo to one person, you've lost your claim to privacy, and to distribution unless someone starts profiting off of it.
Alexander Sullivan
That's not how licensing or consent work.
>I said yes to one guy, that means anyone can fuck me at any time
Christian Lopez
>rights
Jayden Collins
I've had about enough of your shit Stirner I'll bang you out you little cunt.
