My Political Compass

So i took the Political Compass test and this came out as an result. Tell me where did i go wrong (if i did) and how can i fix it.
Also post your own political compass.

Other urls found in this thread:

politicalcompass.org/
heatst.com/culture-wars/marxist-vegan-restaurant-closes-after-customers-no-longer-willing-to-wait-40-minutes-for-a-sandwich/
twitter.com/SFWRedditImages

Also this is the url for the test: politicalcompass.org/

Left-wing economics guarantees social degeneracy and dependency on the state. You are subsidizing bad behavior and poor decisions.

But i am more central than left.

I'm pretty much where you are which is pretty much the opposite of Sup Forums, Good in my eyes though Left Libertarian friend

Ok, so what party would be the best for me if i was an American?

i'm right around there a fraction to the right, don't know of any
makes me think either we're ahead of our time or retarded

Probably ahead, because my IQ test says otherwise.

I have an estimated IQ of 153

Why did my ID change?

my iq doesn't though

this
Basically, the general problem with leftist libertarianism is that you believe people should be socially free to do whatever they want. That's fine, to an extent. Libertarians are mostly okay. The problem with being a leftist libertarian is that you believe people should be free to commit whatever degenerate bad decisions they want, and that they should receive a paycheck from the government regardless.

Capitalism is freedom with consequences,
Socialism is welfare slavery,
Leftist libertarianism is the idea that you can do whatever you want and you shouldn't have to face the consequences.

Another problem is that in any leftist position, things will inevitably become more and more authoritarian because dependency on the state is a feedback loop.

Best position incoming

My change over time.

> this doesn't mean anything

...

why?

...

You literally swept through every indefensible stance on the chart. Congratulations, you are a gullible, naive retard, and, at present, a subhuman communist.

I remember getting around there. not gonna bother doing it again though since my ideologies haven't really changed at all.

Why what?

master race
little more to the right m8

just look at it!

What wrong with it?

you went from libertarian to commie

I realized that profit was theft. Plus I was a one issue guy back then. I was only concerned with government survivable.

So this just happen.

Nice.

I see this position all the time, is it safe to say people who fall here took baby's first red pill on corporations while being pushed to socialism, rejected that and became a Centrist?

...

...

...

Centrist master race reporting.

>Profit was theft.

You are a retard. It's hard to get further from a reasonable position then that.

say I get a job working making chairs. The money generated from the sale of the chair and therefore made by my labor is distributed in multiple place. Some goes to the overhead maintenance or other overhead which is fine. But some goes to the boss. He didn't do the work that I did that generated the labor he simply stole from me and took the fruits of my labor. Profit is theft.

Not good goyim.

I have a very similar chart.

Yet I voted for Trump, think there are real differences between races, hate SJWs and feminists and identify with the Republican party.

Nice meme.

Cuck.

>LTV

Lmao. Good one. 2/10 bait. Needs work.

Right Wing Death Sqauds is no meme my boy. This piece is what all true conservatives strive for.

Nice to know that there are comrades on Sup Forums

Whats wrong with the LTV?

i REALLY like ayn rand

answer all the questions opposite to what you feel then post it!

...

You went wrong by being left of centre.
Retard

The boss gave you that goddamn job. He sells the chair, buys the raw materials for you to make the chair with, arranges for the transport of the chair, manages the manufacturing plant itself, ensures the plant keeps making a profit and thus can keep employing your sorry ungrateful ass, and, possibly, even fronted the money to start up the business itself.

You are a fucking retard. You have just shown yourself to be entirely lacking in empathy. You cannot for a moment perceive of how someone not in your situation can function, so you assume because someone with a high stress job doesn't do a job a trained monkey could do, he must not be deserving of his money.

Well fine, I guess you can get quality raw materials, make it into a chair, ship that chair to market, advertise that chair, and sell it for a profit, all by your goddamn self, right?

You fucking subhuman commie cunt. Go take a helicopter ride and take the quick way down.

sjw tier

what did i mean by this?

>profit is theft
but actually taking everyones money at gunpoint to redisribute it isnt

Am I a minarchist or ancap?

So taking back something stolen is theft?

see

What was wrong with 2014?

>The boss gave you that goddamn job.

No. Work is not voluntary. You work or starve.

>He sells the chair, buys the raw materials for you to make the chair with, arranges for the transport of the chair, manages the manufacturing plant itself, ensures the plant keeps making a profit and thus can keep employing your sorry ungrateful ass,

All of which could be done collectively and would make the business operate less like a totalitarian regime and more like a democracy.

>and, possibly, even fronted the money to start up the business itself.

I paid good money for these slaves!

I've scored this every single time, always in this corner close to the center.

I'm a lot closer to center than I was a few years ago

Oh no. I'm a leaf!

>t. class cuck

...

>and that they should receive a paycheck from the government regardless.

That's where you're wrong kiddo. that's just straight left. Libertarians hate government doing anything.

>Profit is theft.

Phew.

You cry a lot. Don't you? Little bitch.

...

>Liberaltarianism
>free markets
>decent welfare state
>socially libertarian
Prove me wrong

>No. Work is not voluntary. You work or starve.

Did you even read it?

>All of which could be done collectively and would make the business operate less like a totalitarian regime and more like a democracy.

You realize communism is by definition totalitarian right?

>I paid good money for these slaves

>takes risks and invests money into business
>you come along
>he pays you for manual labor
>you dont get all the money for making a chair that he supplied you with everything to make it with and means to sell it
>all you do is make a fucking chair
>but youre still deserving of an equal amount of money regardless of the fact that he is doing more work than you

Also who ever pays there slaves doesnt get slavery
GULAG

R8 me

>You work or starve

As you should. Don't want to make chairs? Get a different job. You always have the option of wandering off into the wilds and living off the land yourself, but you don't, because you like all the nice shit of modern life but just don't want to pay for it you lazy piece of shit. Someone toiled to make that food you see in the store. Someone else drove all night and day to get that food to the store, then someone else unloaded it from the truck, made sure it was good, and stocked it all in its place.
For you.
So pay those people for their labor and product, or you can go kill yourself a deer.

>All of which could be done collectively
Than do it. There is literally nothing stopping you from doing this, hell, I told you to do it if you wanted. The only thing preventing you from running a plant this way is the fact that it would drive itself into the ground within the year, but you are free to try. Go ahead, fucking do it your own goddamn self.
Oh wait, people already have tried it.
heatst.com/culture-wars/marxist-vegan-restaurant-closes-after-customers-no-longer-willing-to-wait-40-minutes-for-a-sandwich/

Turns out it doesn't work. Goddamn, what a surprise.

>I paid good money for these slaves!
No, he and his employees came to an agreement where they would sell him their manual labor in exchange for an agreed upon rate of pay, and possibly additional medical, dental, and/or pension benefits. They are all free to quit, find another job, or fuck off and live off the land whenever they goddamn want.

You are a fucking retard with no argument. You don't have a position, you are just outright goddamn wrong. It is beyond a matter of opinion. You think that if I start a business, I should not be paid for my labor, and you are wrong in every way. If you actually believe this, I honestly hope you die, because you and people who think like you are making this world a worse place. You shit up everything you touch and you should feel bad.

>All of which could be done collectively and would make the business operate less like a totalitarian regime and more like a democracy.

Tell me how that would be done collectively? Would all employees vote on every single issue the company faces? Do they get to vote on which person to sell the chair to, etc.?

That sounds fucking retarded to me and a great way to go out of business fast!

>You realize communism is by definition totalitarian right?
Communism is by definition anarchism.

>he is doing more work than you
That would only be true if everyone worked. It's entirely possible to have someone live off the capital of other workers.
Who extracted the resources with which the chair is made? Workers. Who transported the resources? Workers. Who assembled the resources into finished goods? Workers.
Who oversaw the extraction, transportation and manufacturing? Workers. (Managers are workers too, they do a job instead of living off capital.) Who is a tthe top - the CEO, right? No. He didn't found the company or fund the company, he's just a manager too.

So who gets the profit? In the end, a lot of the time, it's a shareholder who doesn't actually have to labour - he's extracting the value of all the work those workers have done, and which they could now do autonomously of him, to extract profits in disproportion to his initial investment. It's even possible he's paying someone else to manage his investments for him.

If the CEO is also the company owner and involved deeply in the running of the business, he's not bourgeoisie but Petit-bourgeoise. The bourgeoisie in practice can live off capital only, without needing to labour.

I got the SAME thing you did...same exact place and I am a wild, hard core conservative. I think this thing is screwed up.

Pretty much. Basically you don't trust corporations to look out for the common good. Capitalism needs regulations to some extent but you also think people should be able to make mistakes with there lives and work out those consequences. That's where we don't agree. People in general cannot handle and mitigate the bad decisions they make. On average people are extremely simple-minded and will continue down a path of least resistance. People are incredibly unambitious and lazy you can't run massive social systems like that you'll end up with Somalia or 1970s New York where crimes will skyrocket and people just wake up, fuck around and twiddle their thumbs until they die. Entire generations will live and die in the same homes. Human life and progress will stagnate forever. It's like the 10,000 years following the agricultural revolution vs the 500 years after the enlightenment period. Which world do you rather live in

fellow centrists

This right here

Fggt

absolutely disgusting

nice proxy canada

oh look, a unique and special snowflake.

trump supporter here but i cant stand right wing conservative religous rednecks

Softer on social issues and am fine with homosexuality.

Unapologetic nationalist though. Nationalism is what works when things are multi-ethnic and we are culturally unitied.

If all the immigrants want their own laws and cultures it won't work. It's evident now it's not working.

Wow,
how did you drastically fail that hard over the past few years and go so backwards?
Jesus....

Yeah.... your responses show that is also correct.......

You are a fucking idiot.

the bottom left quadrant does not exist, this means you' have some pretty intense cognitive dissonance and your political views are directly conflicting

You were one issue back then....

You think income and being paid fairly for your work, and paying others for their time and work is theft?


Holy fuck, you're a MORON.

Working actually builds fullfillment in life and makes people happy. This is why people on welfare for long periods of time start to get ill and depressed.

You can't psych, neuro, or do economics.
You are so fucking retarded. Please, just gas yourself.

How'd I do?

You're a reasonable person who wasn't born rich.

>Political Compass test

>implying theft is the only problem with wages

you chose the job
its not being forced from you
taxes are forced

he didnt violate the nap, you did faggot

I used to be a full blown libertarian before this election
after fully understanding the lefts agenda I realized the need for authoritarianism to preserve american values
I think this is a very common transformation

>I think this is a very common transformation

Bullshit, you're just a spineless kike who never had principles in the first place.

>muh NAP
NAP is an ancap concept and we do not live in an ancap society. fuck off.

whateva nerd

what goes in the bottom left?

I've only moved very slightly right since I started browsing Sup Forums. If your current beliefs are what you truly uphold then you'll have a hard time actually changing. The people here who were "redpilled" came without any real beliefs in the first place.

If you really do want to change what you think then sit down, pay attention to politics, and do your own research.

The progress of mankind is dependent on all members of society voluntarily advocating for each other member.

That's actually really good, never thought about it like that. So basically, it would be about advocating for complete voluntary collectivism, with absolutely no coercion?

I agree with your definition.

so would that mean libertarian leftist would essentially be the most humanitarian position.