Why are politicians so afraid of discussions about race?

The last scientific taboo.

Other urls found in this thread:

joe-b-porn-lover.tumblr.com/post/154315391413/blackeduk-my-kind-of-party
twitter.com/SFWRedditVideos

There is no nice way to say some races are more intelligent on average than others.

They say it with Ashkenazi Jews all the time.

Let's be honest. What's the absolute worst case scenario?

I've never heard a public figure advocate that before.

You've never seen anyone say something like "Well the Jews are a very smart people" ? I'm pretty sure I have.

1. It's taboo
2. It ostracizes minority voters

Because it's impossible discuss openly and rationally without coming to certain conclusions. Conclusions that would rip society apart were they well known.

I'd definitely say that the Jews got some skill making fancy shit, and selling it on the open market.

What imprecations would it have?

You cannot propagate socialism without the myth of equality.

I don't think the collective silence is preventing the reality of said conclusions from currently ripping society apart

So what would happen? Race riots? Laws baring certain groups of people from immigration to another country?

>What imprecations would it have?

A lot. Some races would be viewed as subhuman. Possibly ethnic cleansing and genocide.

Because if even 5% of the population were to pay attention, and employ any level of critical thinking, they'd realize that most of the shit we've been told up until this point is just that, shit.
If people knew that at at genetic, behavioral and physical levels different races are in fact different, it would throw a spanner in the multi-culti one world narrative being pushed right now, and they'd have to admit that asians are smart and shrewd, whites are creative, tenacious and tolerant to a fault, and blacks are predisposed to being fitter but dumber and more violent that others.

It's not just race, even the mere implications of genes influencing intelligence and behavior can get shut down.

One day people are calm and docile the next day they want genocide because they learn for sure a group of people they didn't think were equal wasn't equal?
That seems like quite a jump.

Gender is getting that way too...
Politics in science is killing science.

It's just the scientific community fearing itself?

When did nurture win the damn debate?

It was the "nicer", "more digestible" option

people are cowards

Because the post WWII religion of the west takes it as axiomatic that every human being is fundamentally the same not only in term of value but also biologically. The cardinal sin of the modern western secular religion is that separating human beings into different group is a violation of the patently self-evident principle of the fundamental unity of mankind, from which it follow that such a distinction must have been made either out of crass, borderline criminal ignorance or for nefarious purposes.

It is also well known that dividing humanity into different group is the necessary prerequisite for war, conquest, oppression and genocide, so that anyone who would ever suggest that there could be such a separation would also be suggesting precisely those things and nothing else, making him absolutely vile.

So sayeth the secular religion of the west, which will realize the fundamental unity of mankind in practice through mass immigration, race mixing, and the destruction of gender.

Ashkanazi jews are really smart.

Like relativity and atomic bombs smart.

Like compound interest loans to nations smart.

Like Hollywood accounting smart.

They aren't covered in the Bell Curve but I've read elsewhere that on the average, they have higher IQs except for spatial reasoning.

It is advantages that have been honed and developed by the Jewish people since forever.

The culture teaches education and lifelong learning to be virtuous.

They also were heavily a fishing culture in while in Israel, so their diets had high levels of fish oil and DHA which promotes brain health.

The antisemitic policies in many places they lived over the centuries kept them from practicing normal trades, so they took up accounting and record keeping, as well as being scribes.

The culture has had a very high literacy rate since a long time ago.

All these things contribute to their mental superiority to other ethnic groups.

>Jews are generally rather smart
>Aboriginal Australians are generally not

Why is this concept so terrifying?

we need the japs or chinks to work on it, they won't be impeded by western bs

These are all correct. Equality is pushed because politicians need voters, those politicians in turn push socialism to achieve their "everyone is equal" world.

It's kind of a shame, really.

Because I.Q. tests are made by Westerners and can not quantify the intelligence of other cultures.
I swear I wish I was kidding, but that's the majority of the sociology field.

That's just logic bending. "Magic" can't be a answer.

If you're going to talk about race scientifically, you will need to talk about genetics in general and the genetic history of human evolution.

if you like them so much why don't you merry them lmao

Can confirm. Was taught some Jared Diamond level shit in highschool about how intelligence, technology, and civilization are subjective and was that tribal Africans are just as intelligent and civilized as modern Europeans.

Because they are pc cucks and do whatever their jew puppet masters say

Because they can't have an honest conversation about it without recognizing that blacks are a net drain on society.

The same reason Sup Forums never talks about blacks having bigger weiners, more testosterone and more muscle mass on average as proven by statistical data

joe-b-porn-lover.tumblr.com/post/154315391413/blackeduk-my-kind-of-party

That's the consensus.
Trying to use the WAIS with underprivileged populations in a study is a good way to get precluded by an IRB (in psychology and sociology anyway)

I guess they'd either be shipped out or a new black ethnostate would be made in America.

>What imprecations would it have?
it is an imprecation
>what implications would it have?
in this day and age, political suicide maybe get attacked by psychos calling you hitler and shit.

Never was a single double-blind peer-reviewed legitimate study proving any of those things.
Kill yourself immediately, cuck

So what would happen when they talk about the future of Africa?

Listen to a high priest of atheism

Many blacks would welcome this, at least until they realized what they just did.

"forward-looking statements that don't necessarily predict future performance"

And somehow also has nothing to do with Chinese influence.

Nothing, because Africa is mostly serving its purpose to supply cheap raw materials and that's all anyone cares about.

Is political suicide the biggest fear?

race is just skin-deep. Get over it.

Look at his nose and tell me you don't think he's trying to propagate socialism.

Yeah... Okay.

That's pretty much it.

>See China

Every race has strengths and weaknesses, whether you're honest enough to acknowledge that or not.

It's Pandora's Box.

the filename is autistic, so I dont expect you to understand the comment I made.

>calling a dick a "weiner"

what are you 8?

I didn't name it.

kek

fine.

You got it. And there are those that have actually swallowed the blue pill and think people are equal in any way other than under the law.

So infuriating.

Not smart enough.