How true is this pol? I need more ammo to shut down libtards propaganda

How true is this pol? I need more ammo to shut down libtards propaganda.

Some of the different news anchors are siblings or even have ties with the white house

>Slate
>Vox
>The Atlantic
>Not steaming piles of shit.

This is b8

WTF breitbart is way legit than fucking naturallnews.

In fact natual news is fake news.

This is BS.

CNN is definitely left leaning.

Total Bullshit!

still says "partisan bias" below. it's like...the default these days to have a little

>ny time minimal partisan bias
>vox/slate complex
>huffington post analytical in any sense

fairly accurate imo

>leaning

I actually like the Atlantic a lot. Disagree with some of the stuff they say but they know what they're talking about.

lmao what fucking millennial made this?

Why is there no highly analytical options on the far side of either position?

It does look very Intellectual (tm) doesn't it? Makes you feel smarter for reading it, no matter what you're reading.

>HuffPo the Atlantic Slate Vox
>not super liberal sensational or clickbait

Bullshit graph.

>Slate
>Vox
>"Great in-depth sources of news"
>"still reputable"

The Guardian, The Economist, WSJ, AP and Reuters are decent. CNN, NYT, WaPo, NPR and MSNBC all lean heavily to the left. The rest is accurate.

52KB complex graph, not in png format not restricted colours

breitbart got btfo by a fucking weather channel

Total BS. NPR is very left and the Economist and the Hill are left, not right. They endorsed Obama both times.

thats accurate if you define moderate as George HW Bush and liberal as Nixon

Where did you find this image?

>occupy democrats
>Not under liberal utter garbage/conspiracy theories

fucking retarded schematic

It looks like they're sketching out a metal gear.

>CNN
>unbiased
Ahahahha

Move everything about two rows to the left. Then it's accurate.

...

Is there a better one? Idk were to get my news.

Garbage

>economist
>leaning conservative
not in the last 3 years

Atlantic is still good, bit Vox and Slate should not be in that highly reputable area. Slate has really gone downhill in terms of clickbait, sensationalism, and quality over the past 4 years.

Breitbart should be on the same level of quality as Huff Post.

>good for confirming your existing opinions
how pathetic is this?

>Huffington Post
>Slate
>Vox
>not clickbait

>CNN
>NBC
>not biased

Into the trash it goes.

>still says partisan bias
that is just defining the axis. it's not saying that those the stations above it are biased.

Not necessarily. They've posted some pretty dumb shit in the past (i.e. some of their stuff on Putin and his interests) that I didn't like.

>CNN
>neutral
Give me a fucking break

they forgot to add motherjones to the libtard section.

This matrix is shit. Economist belongs in center. Slate belongs in bottom left corner. The Hill could go where Fox News is. The should be where Slate is. In fact every source in the middle except Reuters and AP should move to the left.

NPR is left at times but they definitely grilled Hillary guests a lot

I'll just leave this here

>usa today
>not fake news

Not 100% accurate, but mostly good desu. HuffPost is just the left wing Breitbart though, should be moved.

t. shitebart drone

They are all shit IMO. I saw one for TV channels but we don't have our own, I'll have to make our own kek wills it!

They did? They were fairly soft on Clinton, but quite hard on Bernie and his supporters. NPR has definitely become more liberal rather than centrist over the past 5 or 6 years, but they're not HuffPo or Salon. They started shifting leftward sometime between the 2008 financial crisis and OWS in 2011.

>the washington post

All of the mainstream should be in the left.

The economist is owned by Clinton's good Rothschild friend

Breitbart is not infowars tier.

Sup Forums

very true

>The Huffington Post