Transfags want Obam to pardon BRADLEY MANNING

Bradley "bradass87" Manning was tried and convicted for transmitting over a million documents to Wikileaks, and is the direct cause and catalyst for Arab Spring.

In MALE prison, he was rightfully treated as scum by other inmates and routinely subjected to isolation because, believe it or not, people wanted to kill him for being a fucking traitor. The military prison has also forced this faggot to cut his hair, because he is not a girl and can't grow it out.

Because this mentally deranged transfaggot can't handle being in a PRISON for being a TRAITOR, he has tried to kill himself, half for not being allowed to be a pretty girl and chop his cock off on the taxpayer's dime, and half for being treated like the dirty fucking traitor he is.

The cucked military system has caved in and allowed YOU to pay for this faggot to chop his cock off ("prescribed surgery that is medically necessary and recommended care"). Now, cucks want Obama in his lame duck session to pardon this traitor responsible for endangering and killing Americans to walk free.

Two days ago, the White House petition to commute his sentence to time served reached 100,000 signatures. I hope you Trump voters will do the right thing, and submit a counter-petition when Donald Trump is inaugurated to keep this condemned traitor to his rightful 35 years in prison.

Other urls found in this thread:

youtu.be/5rXPrfnU3G0
web.archive.org/web/20131020142823/https://www2.centcom.mil/sites/foia/rr/CENTCOM Regulation CCR 25210/Death of Reuters Journalists/6--2nd Brigade Combat Team 15-6 Investigation.pdf
amnesty.org/en/latest/news/2010/12/preguntas-respuestas-wikileaks-y-libertad-expresion/
amnesty.org/en/documents/pol10/001/2011/en/
politico.com/blogs/onmedia/0511/WikiLeaks_hailed_as_catalyst_in_Arab_Spring.html
theguardian.com/world/2011/may/13/amnesty-international-wikileaks-arab-spring
twitter.com/NSFWRedditImage

They should write a pardon for Chelsea Manning and then waltz in there proclaiming Chelsea free then when he gets all excited and thinks he's about to be let out the guard says "sorry Brad, this is for some woman named Chelsea, not a man named Bradley" and then call him a faggot and leave

>be american
>gets thrown in prison for blowing the whistle on jewish trickery
>your government tortures you and cuts your dick off
>some loser one the internet calls you a traitor

>blowing the whistle on jewish trickery
Except he didn't even do that. He mass-downloaded any document he could get his hands on, put it on a CD, and went on IRC saying
>if you had unprecedented access to classified networks 14 hours a day 7 days a week for 8+ months, what would you do?
>im in the desert, with a bunch of hyper-masculine trigger happy ignorant rednecks as neighbors

The US Military has procedures to whistleblow. You can send out an email to all 535 Representatives and Senators and be protected as a whistleblower; surely one of them will do something.

Fait enough, didn't the (((come out))) as a freak after he got thrown in prison though?

>You can send out an email to all 535 Representatives and Senators and be protected as a whistleblower; surely one of them will do something.
This

He was getting discharged because he admitted to his NCOs that he wanted to be a little faggot girl. He told his roommate that he was attracted to him (who told Bradley to fuck off) and kept a fairy wand with him during deployment.

>On May 7, according to Army witnesses, Manning was found curled in a fetal position in a storage cupboard; he had a knife at his feet and had cut the words "I want" into a vinyl chair. A few hours later he had an altercation with a female intelligence analyst, Specialist Jihrleah Showman, during which he punched Showman in the face. The brigade psychiatrist recommended a discharge, referring to an "occupational problem and adjustment disorder."

All this seems fair but can someone explain how he caused the Arab Spring? Excuse my ignorance.

Some of the US Diplomatic Cables leaked by Manning revealed that african niggerlords of Tunisia had palaces full of tigers that ate better than the plebs on the streets.

Cue democratic uprisings.

>blow the whistle on the U.S government the U.S government will surely do something against the U.S government

really got my neurons firing up

Most of the information was Bush-era documents. Liberals would've jumped on it. And there are numerous near-independent Representatives who were elected on the premise of not giving a fuck. Someone would've said something.

Watch the video he leaked.
youtu.be/5rXPrfnU3G0

The only scum here is the US army and its enablers.
War criminals the lot of you. killing reporters and then claiming they were killed in a completely different situation, blatantly LYING then refusing to disclose the video that proves you are guilty of a war crime.

Sup Forums called Assange a warrior for freedom when he helped trump but you're ok with the army going after him for disclosing a war crime?
No wonder nobody takes this board seriously.

Oh right this happened back in 2011. I was under the impression it started with food riots but didn't really follow the whole manning thing. Thanks for clearing that up.

between neocons calling Snowden a traitor for revealing the extent of NSA spying and shitlibs doing a 180 over wikileaks exposing Clinton, this isn't even remotely true lmao

politicians will always protect power, (((they))) don't really care about us

It just happens they fucking didn't.
When the army killed these reporters the American government BACKED the army.
Shameful.

Your politicians are nothing but Jewish puppets controlled by their military contractors lobbyists.

I guess Eddy ain't going to be too happy that a Putin Pal is in the WH now. He might be getting a trip home soon (or Gitmo).

>War criminals
No such thing.

Okay ausfag, I'll engage.

Q: Why didn't he just leak these videos if he had such a moral quandary about it.

Because that's not what he really cared about. All of the trial evidence shows he was an attention-seeking faggot, and after finding out he was going to be discriminated against and potentially discharged from the military, he did the equivalent of a convenience store smash-and-grab for anything he could download to his "Britney Spears CD".

But lets get back to the video. NINE INSURGENTS were killed, and evidence of rocket-propelled grenades were discovered among their possessions, after incidents in the area led the engagers to believe they were the ones responsible for attacks earlier that day.

It just so happened that two war reporters, who knew full well what it meant to be embedded with a fucking Opposition Force, were killed.

Stephen (((THE CLINTON SHILL))) Colbert even said this:
>The army described this as a group that gave resistance at the time, that doesn’t seem to be happening. But there are armed men in the group, they did find a rocket propelled grenade among the group, the Reuters photographers who were regrettably killed, were not identified...You have edited this tape, and you have given it a title called ‘collateral murder.’ That's not leaking, that's a pure editorial.

Go kill yourself and stop polluting the board with boring shit.

>kill news reporters filming
>destroy a van with kids inside that wanted to help him
>helicopter with a cam that can see 3km away and it's trained crew either didn't see or decided to ignore the 2 kids sitting in the front

It was a war zone, wherever we kill people innocent or not it's a war zone k.

It happened in "new Baghdad" too, the side of Baghdad that was under complete American occupancy, no combats had been registered for 2 months before that.
What you see in the video is the definition of a war crime, then they run over one of the camera crew members in violation of treaties America has signed and pushed for.

Kill yourself bootlicker if this had been done to American reporters everyone would be up in arms.

>But lets get back to the video. NINE INSURGENTS were killed, and evidence of rocket-propelled grenades were discovered among their possessions

Source?
You can see in the video they have fucking cameras ffs, that bullshit about terrorists was just the army trying to cover ass, and they backtracked on it later.
Go ahead I'm waiting for your source cuz I just linked you a fucking video in which you can see how it went down by yourself, trigger happy retarded soldiers.

I love how vehemently Americucks fight to get cucked by their own government.

I'm 99% sure OP is a huge faggot and dreams about Obama's dick in his ass.

How about the legal review?

web.archive.org/web/20131020142823/https://www2.centcom.mil/sites/foia/rr/CENTCOM Regulation CCR 25210/Death of Reuters Journalists/6--2nd Brigade Combat Team 15-6 Investigation.pdf

But before you shitpost with your inevitable

>LE ARMY COVERUP

Professional reporters and legal analysts have examined this issue to death and back, and surprisingly, they do not reach your "Austrialian Shitposting PHD" conclusion of the attacks.

Kill yourself, abbo-loving dingo man.

The Bradass did nothing wrong.

Let me add about the van with kids inside as well.

They guy trying to help the Crew definitely does not look like carrying out a military operation, he has no idea how to help his friends and tries to get it into the van (assuming they had been attacked by mistake) otherwise why else would he park his van with kids inside and take ages to drag him inside the van?
And what happens next? Americans blow it up too, even when they could see the van driver had no weapons on him, and neither did anyone in the crew and you know it.
You want suck dick, go ahead. It won't be long till that lawless army turns against its own population.
Continue to enable them idiot.

excuse me, why are they acting like they're in a warzone if there hasn't been combat for 2 months? you're retarded.

>hey guys, there is no active combat here, lets kill us some idiots with cameras yeee haww

that is how you think.

>investigation carried out by the criminals themselves
>the same criminals that refused to hand over the video after a handful of courts requested it.

Gotta love Americans

For the love of God, somebody post the "We investigated ourselves and found we did nothing wrong" picture.

Hey retard, if you watch the unedited, non-editorialized non-Wikileaks version of the tape, there were 20 minutes not included on that part of the tape.

Guess what happened on that part? More fucking towelheads showed up and started firing on the two strike sites when ground troops arrived.

Maybe, if you aren't a fucking retarded Iraqi, you'd try not driving right next to a fucking ATTACK SITE with your VAN FULL OF CHILDREN to pick up a POTENTIAL TERRORIST.

the guys a fucking idiot.

I would save my own skin over whistleblowing. The "truth" is not worth it

You're right. I'm sure the hundreds of investigative journalists and independent sources were just making shit up. :^)

That's exactly the whole point of the video idiot.
Your retarded ass soldiers pretending they're in a movie. Not caring for life. It just happens this time they killed a filming crew instead of Arabs nobody gives a shit about.

>shoot people with cameras
>shoot clearly unarmed people who show up to aid the wounded

Dindu nuffin, right?

nah must be a setup, right dawg? scum americans

whistle blowers shouldn't get a free pass. if they were truly honorable and true to their convictions, they would take any punishment for doing the right thing.

There's no way to objectively look at the video and say that they did nothing wrong.

>investigation carried out by the criminals themselves
Nice generalization. The people who committed the crime did not do the investigation. Furthermore, there were hundreds of independent investigations done by news and journalists after the incident was leaked.

>Bill Keller of The New York Times wrote "But in its zeal to make the video a work of antiwar propaganda, WikiLeaks also released a version that didn’t call attention to an Iraqi who was toting a rocket-propelled grenade and packaged the manipulated version under the tendentious rubric Collateral Murder."[4] The New York Times reported that "Critics contend that the shorter video was misleading because it did not make clear that the attacks took place amid clashes in the neighborhood and that one of the men was carrying a rocket-propelled grenade."[67]

>the same criminals that refused to hand over the video after a handful of courts requested it.
Except the video has been released. Wikileaks has released the full 39 minute video, but only publicized the 17 minute editorialized version you reposted.

You are the worst fucking shitposter.

>people exposing government lies and corruption should be punished for exposing it

yup. they knew the consequences. if someone rapes your daughter and you kill him, you shouldn't expect a free pass from the judge no matter how right you were. the important thing is that you did the right thing, even if the law doesn't allow it

>Your retarded ass soldiers pretending they're in a movie. Not caring for life
isn't that what their occupation is about?

to slaughter people?

Have you watched the full 39 minute video?

The 17 minute video that the australian shitposter posted edited out a lot of the footage that shows the justifications for the attack.

You are believing in the message that a doctored video is sending.

If I expose that my boss is doing something illegal, why should I receive a punishment for that? It's absurd to make it more costly for people to expose government wrongdoing if your aim is to make government more accountable.

What a fucking freak, I've seen shit here and that is freaky. Kill it with fire

At least when Aztecs or Indians chopped your dick off they had the decency to not brainwash you into asking for it.
Whew, fucking savages

you should get fired for not being a trustworthy team player. the equivalent at the federal level is going to prison. sure you did the right thing, doesn't mean anyone would want you around

>all enemies, both foreign and domestic
>blows whistle on domestic enemies of the citizens of the United States
>they call him a traitor, mentally break him so he turns fag and wants his dick chopped off
>you eat that shit right the fuck up and support the kikes that he exposed

This.

Your making a false equivalence.

There are procedures to whistleblow. You do realize that in Bradley Manning's emotional temper-tantrum, he released diplomatic cables responsible for starting the Arab Spring uprisings, correct? A violent and bloody series of protests.

That is nothing like your shitty example.

Let us also remember, that Bradley Manning was a mentally deranged individual who punched out his coworker because she made him mad. Clearly, a character of unquestionable moral conduct.

The US military acts like an unaccountable cunt. There's no reason for them to have shot the people trying to give aid to the victims. It's a clear war crime.

Either you want people to expose wrongdoing or you don't.

>There are procedures to whistleblow.
>follow the government approved whistleblowing protocol when whistleblowing the fucking government

Sure, what could go wrong there?

Manning was playing the long game

That's an absurdly immature view of what caused the Arab Spring. To say nothing of the fact that the US championed the Arab Spring.

>there are procedures to whistleblow

Tell that to Thomas Drake or Bill Binney, both of whom tried to whistleblow through the proper channels and had their lived ruined for it.

>Either you want people to expose wrongdoing or you don't.
Guess what, there are already people hired specifically for this very job in any large organization. Its not your job to second guess the system. If you truly want to expose something, be prepared to face the consequences. Simple as that. The SMART thing to do would be to not be an idiot about it and not get caught, of course.

Cool, so you don't want people to expose corruption and waste.

>mentally break him so he turns fag
he turned fag long before he enlisted

>equating your Army with your elected officials
Come on britbong, you can do better than that.

Its nice when people do the right thing, but the right thing isn't always the legal thing. We have laws for a reason, and we can't just throw them out the window when we get a good feels in our tummies.

That's why we have whistleblower protections, to make it legal to expose corruption and waste. Why would anyone want to criminalize increased government accountability?

Your top elected official is the commander in chief of your army.
With the amount of lobbying and military contracts in Washington, there is basically no difference between the two. Eisenhower tried to warn you this would happen.

>That's an absurdly immature view of what caused the Arab Spring

I guess Amnesty International has an immature view of what caused Arab Spring.
amnesty.org/en/latest/news/2010/12/preguntas-respuestas-wikileaks-y-libertad-expresion/
amnesty.org/en/documents/pol10/001/2011/en/

And there are 535 elected officials, 100 elected by the state, 435 elected by the counties, that you are legally allowed to whistleblow too.

I assume they're all corrupt government stooges though by your definitions. :^)

What I don't want are government employees that feel like they have a carte blanche to leak whatever they want if they think it violates their own personal moral code. Enforcing the laws on the ones who even do the right thing keeps the whole system of confidentially in check.

The video was not released by the army. It was LEAKED.
Then they released to try and cover ass, nobody can look at the video and say "yep justified killing, yep justified to blow up that van, yep finish him off with your hummer"

The whole "clashes were happening nearby, we found weapons I swear" it's bullshit and you know it.
To slaughter certain people not anyone they feel like killing idiot, that's the definition of criminal.

The difference between a cop and a murderer is the reason behind the kill.

>The whole "clashes were happening nearby, we found weapons I swear" it's bullshit and you know it.

I know it? I think you know YOUR explanation is bullshit, given that there are scores of investigative journalists who put far more time and effort into uncovering the truth of what had happened, and argue against your shitposts.

>post link to 200 page pdf

Nice try. In any case, the US government worked with Google and Facebook to fan the flames of the Arab Spring. We WANTED IT. Hell, if that's the worst you got, then maybe they should be giving the guy a medal.

>The difference between [good guy] and [bad guy] is the reason behind the kill
>The difference between American Dogs and Muslim Freedom Fighters is the reason behind the kill

everything is relative

That's why we have a whistleblower system, you dope. We just need to strengthen it.

I'll whistleblow the government to the government. Surely the government will do something about the government!

>post link to 200 page pdf
Well I could post a link to the news outlets that read it.

politico.com/blogs/onmedia/0511/WikiLeaks_hailed_as_catalyst_in_Arab_Spring.html
theguardian.com/world/2011/may/13/amnesty-international-wikileaks-arab-spring

How fucking retarded are you? All it takes is one press conference and boom, its out there.

So what's the issue with skipping the middleman and releasing it straight to the people?
Did this election cycle not show you that the press absolutely cannot be trusted?

>The world faces a watershed moment in human rights with tyrants and despots coming under increasing pressure from the internet, social networking sites and the activities of WikiLeaks, Amnesty International says in its annual roundup.

Again, maybe they should give the guy a medal. He would be a worldwide hero if he had crossed any other military to leak those documents. But he embarrassed the US government, so he's a vile creature.

>So what's the issue with skipping the middleman and releasing it straight to the people?
I sincerely hope you're being deliberately thick to bait. It is illegal to release classified documents. It is not illegal for a US Congressman to come out and say "there is a deep coverup within our armed forces, and I'll get to the bottom of this"

>Did this election cycle not show you that the press absolutely cannot be trusted?
You have to be retarded, if you don't think the left-leaning media would take a Bush-Era Iraq War video and do exactly what... oh, say, JULIAN ASSANGE did, cut it in half, and release only the part that demonized the Army.

Who? Julian Assange?

Probably. He's done a lot of good work. :^)

I was against the wars in ME and still am but my gay friend was crying about this faggot and I told him straight up "actions have consequences". It's freaking war what did he expect!?

Fuck the geneva convention it's only purpose is to ensure no one wins wars absolutely so the military industrial complex can make money indefinitely

Fuck off, government stooge.

On a scale of 1 to Faggot, how bad do you want to suck Bradley's cock?

>he likes assange

what a fucking tool

assange is a twerpy faggot