HuffPo considered above high standards

>HuffPo considered above high standards
>Breitbart considered conspiracy theory right wing garbage
>CNN, NYT, WaPo, etc considered non partisan

wow really tangles your jangles, pol

>Slate
>reputable

meme graph

>slate
>guardian
>cnn
>vox
>non-partisan
>the hill
>conservative


epic

>CNN
>Better than nothing

I disagree.

>Local TV
>shit

In all honestly, Local news has been one of the most honest news I've seen, even though they report mainly boring shit.

It's important to care about what's going in in your town.

>yfw your kikebook friends repost this meme graph as an accurate representation of current news media
>yfw some of them voted for the don

Or MAYBE each publication has good writers and bad? I quite like some of the NY times writers (David Brooks) but some are buzzfeed-tier garbage (Charles Blow).

Same for Breitbart - some of their stuff is straight up propaganda, but they have some great reporting in the mix too

kek is saddened :(

Where does Breitbart publish the conspiracy theories? I'm a big fan of those but every time I visit the website I just find well written, well sourced news.

>the hill
>skews conservative
jesus christ

btw the diagram actually looks like a bent over cuck, are we being bamboozled?

>NPR also slightly leans more conservative than liberal
This chart is bait.

Slate literally has a podcast called Trumpcast where a gay Jewish dude with a lisp talks about how much of a terrible person Trump is.

The podcasts have titles like :

>Enemies of the Planet
>Six Rules for Surviving an Autocracy
>How Trump Duped the Republican Party into Funding its Own Destruction
>The Groper
>Time For an Intervention?
>Playing Footsie With Racists
>Why Hillbillies Love Trump

This Podcast has been going on for over a year.

Reputable journalistic integrity my ass.

slate and the atlantic great sources of in depth news? FO. It means fuck off

I saw an atricle by a MSM source the other day discrediting "fake news" and they kept referring to some bogus breitbartt.co site with two Ts. Was not the actual breitbart but they played it off like it was. I wish i saved the link.

laughed hysterically when i read this.

real one

fixed that for you

>CNN not in the trash bin of liberal utter garbage

you almost fixed it m8

NBC and ABC are the Democrat old guard. They sucked Carter's dick and shat on Reagan constantly. They continue their trends today.

you forgot to move fox a little more left

holy shit that double roll in a row

...

More accurate.

>bbc
>minimal partisan bias
minimal partisan bias maybe but on the issues they are a propaganda machine.
they are paid by the fucking people. involuntarily.
and then after the majority voted Leave, they go on and in their mock the week "comedy" show have a 20 minute rant about how leave voters should shut up because they will be dead anyway soon, and that we should've used internet voting because no leave voters could've voted, and how voting leave was an objectively bad decision

how can they insult half the country and not the other,
and then still claim to not have committed fucking treason by breaking the statutes of the royal charter granting them the right to exist and take peoples money, in exchange for them "serving the people"

yet, we keep winning.
Just do your part to fight the cancer by making sure to call OP a faggot for posting links to give these niggers like ((CNN)) web traffic.
If its not an achieve link, its cancer

i especially laughed about the guardian.

Me too, horizontal Italy.

>archive literally wikipedia level begging

still phenomenally better than cnn or msnbc or huffpost