Kind-of Insider Here

I've written white papers for the United Nations, the Trilaterial Commission, and for the cosmetics industry on replacement migration and population integration.

First, the idea that "the global agenda" is leftist or communist or somehow related to the neo-Marxism of the Frankfurt school is misguided. The organizations I've worked for over the years see the number one priority as the maintenance of global economic integration and open markets.

In collaborating with the intelligence community, I've found their goals to be extremely anti-left and very concerned with maintaining global commercial institutions.This is the reason the CIA worked so far to defeat communism; it was a threat to a unified global market.

What many of you have picked up on is the New Left elements of the global agenda. But this is a misunderstanding. The system apparatus from 1945-1980 was the Keynesian welfare state, which successfully integrated potential opposition from the left and right into the system. The New Left (born out of the Frankfurt school) strongly opposed the welfare state, which they correctly saw as a method of ensuring the working class did not succumb to revolutionary tendencies, and mobilized identity activism against it (Women's Liberation, Black Power, etc.).

The solution to this threat was the co-optation of identity politics, and the movement of economic administration to supranational institutions (WTO, IMF, World Bank, EU). That way this new mobilization would not threaten the global economy but could be allowed to manifest without state repression (as Nixon tried from 69-73).

Other urls found in this thread:

youtube.com/watch?v=KBYwELtMt40
realityzone.com/product/hidden-agenda-dvd/
twitter.com/NSFWRedditVideo

You're also picking up on the visual integration strategies of sublimating resistance to global capitalism. The left has been largely dealt with by focusing leftwing economic agitation into non-threatening identity activism. The right, and ethnic sectarianism especially, still poses a threat to global economic administration.

Hence, the open borders and integrationist strategy of visual, sociological, and biological integration. The end result should be an outcome resembling Brazil (which ties into my work with the cosmetics industry, if you're curious), a neo-homogenous population of interchangeable human producer/consumer units that would be organized at a nation-state level, but be more easily integrated into international administration, lacking any pre-capital factors (race, ethnicity, history, religion, etc.) that could serve as the basis for nation-level democratic agitation against supranational institutions.

The current wave of nationalism was unforeseen because many expected demographic change had already progressed too far and that leftwing elements had been too integrated into identity-based politics rather than economic populism. We are responding accordingly and advocating a framework of civic nationalism that can serve as a building block to international community by furthering the domestic task of visual, sociological, and biological integration of national communities. Civic nationalism, when successfully co-opted, will help further eradicate intra-national divisions and, coupled with pro-integrationist public-private advertising (propaganda), will progress the goals of creating a neo-homogenous, non-racial society.

wot

Tell us more. You're telling us "units that would be organized at a nation-state level, but be more easily integrated into international administration," they need dumb people without any history to be easily organized in international groups without any conflicts?

>I've found their goals to be extremely anti-left and very concerned with maintaining global commercial institutions.

For more trade thus more tax thus more socialism.

Bump, very interesting

What is propagated everywhere is division, not unity. An infighting populace is the easiest to control. What you are saying directly contradicts the propaganda of division you can find everywhere.

>Women's Liberation
Like paid maternity leave for both partners (or all partners - once the polyandry marriage equality debate gets going)
>Black Power is just BLM
Is another attempt to shake personal responsibility.

Yay, Another larp thread full of common knowledge for an average polack

Not necessarily dumb. Again, a lot of the thinking here is way too conspiratorial. It's just multinationals using their influence to establish and maintain a system that's mutually beneficial.

I, for instance, was just a think tank writer who sort of started figuring out what the agenda seemed to be and writing white papers on how to pursue that agenda. I was rewarded for responding to the concerns of powerful people, and was assigned for jobs. That's why I said "kind-of" insider.

The goal is to transform the nation-state into a local level of administration without primary sovereignty. In other words, the needs of maintaining global economic integration is primary, and national governments are local administrators who ensure that this primary objective is carried out. Nations cease having exclusive interests.

This part: "people without any history to be easily organized in international groups without any conflicts" is quite accurate. Sectarian resistance is one of the biggest problems today. The ultimate goal is a global Brazil, if you will.

>The ultimate goal is a global Brazil, if you will.

Absolutely terrifying and apocalyptic? We will continue the fight, forever.

Can't tell if you legitimately think this is a good idea and are either Jewish or fucking retarded, or if this a good larp troll.

A global Brazil is exactly the end game I will fight to the fucking death.

Didn't even read your post. That gif is hot as fuck and makes me want to fap.

>op doesn't understand the difference between social left and economic left

>writes 5 paragraphs completely missing the point

For what purpose? Profit?

yep. fucking nightmarish hyperconsumer cyberpunk dystopia.

What are some specific issues powerful people face? What problems specifically you tried to tackle?

This is extremely simplistic. What you're calling "socialism" is more akin to state capitalism on the global level.

The division you're talking about was coming whether it was orchestrated or not. If you think your average college professor isn't just a naive ideologue, you're mistaken. The solution to the agitation and division that came in the 1960s/70s was to (1) shift economic administration to the global level so it was no longer subject to domestic politics and fights between groups and (2) the co-optation of identity politics, sublimating it into non-economic concerns. The goal was to de-politicize the economy and to de-economize politics.

The ultimate goal, however, is a global common market and the elimination of pre-capital identity. Identity is to become a collection of commodified consumer objects, where identity categorizations lose their racial/ethnic/racial specificity and become objects that can be assumed through voluntary consumption.

>tattoos

In the garbage are goes

That sounds very reasonable, but surely you recognize that we will fight against this agenda, violently if necessary. What you're saying is that there is more than one faction working against us, and some us of know about several factions. You're confirming a terrible danger to the American vision.

>Civic nationalism, when successfully co-opted
>nationalism
>co-opted

THEY WILL USE YOUR BURGER TRUMP AGAINST YOU

This meme is getting better and better.

goys goys goys it wasn't communism i swear it was [insert new speak mumbo jumbo]

fuck off already. ur gonna burn if u don't repent. just do it faggot.

Might not be Frankfurt School, but its still Jewish as fuck.

Fortunately, Trump is the ultimate antidote to this vision.

Does nothing for me.

That girl has a fat ass and is unfeminine.

That's nigger tier behaviour. But since you're American there's a 44% chance you're not white anyway.

Anyone on the right with any critical thinking skills worked this out by themselves. Why would immigration be pushed so hard against the will of the people? Why so much impetus on new trade agreements and international organisation against the will of the people? There's no way getting self-professed socialists to stop caring about class politics, focus entirely on attacking the moral fabric of society and get on the side of the financial elite and against the working class of their own country could have happened completely organically.

We've already won though by the way mate. Ethnic tensions won't go away, terrorism will continue and dissenting viewpoints are shared more and more. The majority of people in my country have been against immigration, international governments and extremely suspicious of market elites for decades. Even idiots who don't know why they hate globalism, hate globalism. The only people elites can rely on are themselves, effete young people and ethnic minorities. Unless new tech like machine learning changes the game, too many of those people who make the world tick are ready to be mobilised against them.

It's just another cycle in history of an old elite having to slowly adapt to the will of the people or die. 10 years ago, would the elite have thought they'd have to adapt to civic nationalism to survive? They will acquiesce further.

You don't know what you're talking about. Trump has promised to eliminate this threat by replacing multilateral trade deals with bilateral ones, ensuring that the nation remains sovereign. These nationalists are not stupid people.

They both make 'pig disgusting' sound like a massive understatement.

There are three things that can motivate people to genocide: money, faith, and ego.

There is often overlap, but in general, fascists are motivated by money, leftists are motivated by faith, and sociopaths are motivated by ego.

remember, If whites can "bant" about how they arent white they will never team up. because who would team up with niggers?

>First, the idea that "the global agenda" is leftist or communist or somehow related to the neo-Marxism of the Frankfurt school is misguided

First off where the fuck is that the idea? I think you're confusing the agenda of the global elites with "the global agenda" or "globalists" it's not the same thing. Most people don't see it the way you're talking about it.

Also, do you defend the cosmetics companies for using human babie meat in their products with fancy words too?

I would team up with genuine white Americans in a heartbeat.

The problem is that we don't seem to have the same definition of what WHITE means.

There is nothing wrong with being black.

They are not doing very well because they seem to believe in their own bullshit. "All people are the same, race is a social construct"

Do they really think that they'll succesfully niggerify Europe by importing violent, hateful muslims who want to destroy the continent?
If anything, doing that has undone all the work they've managed to do in the last 20 years. This continent is more racially divided now than I ever remember it being.

Avoiding threats to global economic integration.

I did a lot of my work in cooperation with and for the cosmetics industry (I was basically a lobbyist). The goals I worked on there had to do with visual strategies of integration and how the cosmetics industry can participate. Effectively, the strategy had to do with the transformation of beauty and "sexiness" into several commodities of objective consumer goods. For example, instead of beauty being some subjective and uncontrollable attribute, beauty is to be directed into definable and acquirable commodities: breasts of a certain size, buttocks of a certain size and shape, a specific and universalized facial construction. We worked with advertising and entertainment to highlight this new conception of beauty. This would create a more egalitarian beauty that anyone can acquire regardless of their background, and it would obviously (why I got paid) increase the rate of cosmetic surgery. And this is how a lot of the work goes on: different industries lobbying for personal profit while serving a larger process of universalization of populations with the ultimate goal of egalitarian interchangeability.

This is also why I brought up Brazil. The vast majority of our efforts were aimed at Brazil, which was a test case of sorts. The result was one of the highest rates of plastic surgery in Brazil (success). But a side effect, which is actually really interesting, was the explosion of transsexuality, because when female sexuality was transformed into several acquirable commodities, then men also became consumers of these commodities. That was unforeseen.

makes my balls hurt desu.

Noice

>Trump has promised
You're a good goy.

>The goal was to de-politicize the economy and to de-economize politics. The ultimate goal, however, is a global common market and the elimination of pre-capital identity. Identity is to become a collection of commodified consumer objects, where identity categorizations lose their racial/ethnic/racial specificity and become objects that can be assumed through voluntary consumption.
Can you give an example because I can't follow what your saying.

>zog represents the interests/thoughts of white america

...

>(((CIVIC FUKN NATIONALISM)))
(((CIVIC FUKN NATIONALISM)))
>(((CIVIC FUKN NATIONALISM)))
(((CIVIC FUKN NATIONALISM)))

This fukn meme needs to die immediately.

Obvious poltard LARPer

>let me say I'm an insider
>and confirm everything pol says
>so le_donald migrants are muh redpilled

>which is actually really interesting, was the explosion of transsexuality, because when female sexuality was transformed into several acquirable commodities, then men also became consumers of these commodities. That was unforeseen.

That's what I said in the hypno thread! All those commercials and magazines with beautiful, happy, care-free women hook a certain type of impressionable young male.

...

It's all very petty. Many empires believed they were the end of history, and that there was only one last push before the world becomes theirs. All of them failed, and on their ruins, new peoples, kingdoms, and cultures grew. The same will happen to the empire of the liberal West. Be it a global Brazil, or a liberal utopia, it too will fall.

>(((CIVIC FUKN NATIONALISM)))
apparently the Romans had it figured out pretty well until they stopped teaching roman values to the foreigners

I think he means instead of identifying as Australian because of your belief in 'the good aussie bloke' and celebrating ANZAC, you'll identify as an apple user or as someone who loves British TV programmes. Then you can be made to buy all sorts of products from all over the place in order to cement your own identity. It's like co-opting your deepest emotional needs for a more profitable end.

Op and his ilk are dead men walking. Men like me will get our boots on your neck sooner than later and rape you and your entire family with the business end of bayonets. Enjoy your treason now while you can GOD is against you and will act through me and millions like me when the time comes, and it is fast approaching.

thicc

I'd impregnate her no problem

I wouldn't raise the kid though because she acts black and I don't want to deal with it.

>Brazil was the test case
And look at what a shithole Brazil has become. Making the world like Brazil will only lead to disaster.
Next time you go anywhere near these "elites" you speak of, do the world a favour, buy a gun and pick off as many as you can, then place the gun against your temple and pull the trigger.

They are still communist dummy, they just want the current business owners and leaders of global NGOs to be the north Korean style rulers.

The end result will be their permanent ruling class of ultra rich rulers with absolute power, and a communist distribution for the brown underclass of whatever resources are left over.

>The goal was to de-politicize the economy and to de-economize politics.

Take economic concerns out of politics by channeling rightwing energies into "culture war" politics and leftwing energy into "identity politics." This way, politics does not threaten fundamental economic change.

Then, economic administration was to be separated from politics through moving economic administration to the supranational level (WTO, IMF, EU, etc.) and through privatization.

>The ultimate goal, however, is a global common market and the elimination of pre-capital identity. Identity is to become a collection of commodified consumer objects, where identity categorizations lose their racial/ethnic/racial specificity and become objects that can be assumed through voluntary consumption.

Right now, cultures are associated with peoples and their histories. You can't sell "whiteness" or "blackness" to someone who isn't of that race. But, if these racial/ethnic categories were to become blurred and eventually eliminated, cultures would become a consumable goods, i.e. non-racially definable people purchase their culture through consumer products.

Mfw when i realize this from brazillian tv and my country is the most degenerate in the world

Is it true jews/Soros is behind literally everything?

OP kind enough to share some possibly true inside info and you bitch about it REEEE

This is what I meant when I said everyone who matters hates the elite. Someone who talks like this Leaf might not be able to debate you or outsmart you, but him and his pals will happily fucking kill you if you don't succumb to their demands. There are much more of them than you, not to mention that they have a sense of honour and in-group altruism which elites lack.

LARP or not, the OP has a plausible, interesting thesis and is well written.

either alex jones just tripped on acid so hard he dreamed his nightmare into reality and added porn, or we may be witnessing the most imaginative, most non-livehaving turbo autist of our time

not sure why you think anyone on this board cares

90% of the people here have only 2 concerns: finding a waifu and the fact immigrants are importing various cultures into previously insulated homogeneous communities. despite all the aggressive talk about autonomy and cuckolds, if 90% of this board found a white girlfriend and never saw a black person again they wouldn't give a shit about dwindling wages or decreased political representation

I'm not confirming what Sup Forums says. I'm correcting them.

There is no global conspiracy to control everyone through a global government. It's just powerful multinational corporations and their international organization partners trying to ensure global economic integration, create a situation where there is no domestic-level resistance from pre-capital forms of identity and organization, and, lastly, to profit, as I helped the cosmetics industry do.

Okay. That's your opinion, but I helped my clients get what they wanted.

Incorrect. This is too conspiratorial. Many of my clients were in interracial relationships themselves and believe in racial equality and their own project of global integration. You're assuming that they're far more cynical than they really are. They want to make money, but they fundamentally believe that races are equal and something to be overcome.

The factions you're talking about also fight against each other and pursue different strategies and, sometimes, different ends. Climate change, for instance, is an actual point of conflict between international organizations and business. There is no unity on this issue.

How can I get involved in this line of work? Writing is already a strong suit (involved with my BA), and I am indifferent to this level of homogenization, no bias. I would love to be a think tank writer/lobbyist.

>kind-of insider
or in other words, not an insider

also absolutely shit tier analysis, if it wasn't impossible to be fired from ngos I'd say OP has a reason to be worried

Bump, this needs to be seen more widely.

Why does it matter if he's LARPing or not. He's clearly right and using the personal story as a hook.

You are a cuck.

Divide et impera, they dont like communism and they try to keep us in seperate nations because it would remove them from power and harm their profits if the NWO became communist

thats why they have you hating on globalism/communism so much

>because when female sexuality was transformed into several acquirable commodities, then men also became consumers of these commodities.
You are pure evil you sick fuck. Please confirm you're a Jew because I know you are.

And you didn't answer my questions with real life examples you literally copy paste your OP.

And how do you defend human baby meat being used in cosmetics to make a profit of an aborted fetuses.

>shit tier analysis
Well, let's hear your critique of OP's analysis.

What I don't understand about "Globalism".

You turn everywhere into Brazil.

Congratulations, you have poverty and filth and crumbling global societies.

How is that ultimately beneficial for companies? No middle class, no consumers.

What are they going to do then?

don't lie, you're like everyone else on Sup Forums

if someone told you they'd give you a cute waifu in exchange for never talking about politics agaiin, you'd do it. just like 90% of everyone on this board.

we are not all like this. My only goal in life is to seek the truth, so it's why i spend hours making collage about why the jews did 911 and how the holohoax wa faked.
And i know i'm not the only one here. If your statement was true we wouldn't have so many opponents.

come to think of it, this is starting to make sense, like why a sociopathic billionaire such as soros would give any amount of shit about leftwing causes. bump, we need dto understand whats going on here.

That would be Mexico.

>Okay. That's your opinion, but I helped my clients get what they wanted.
No, you forced them to get something that you told them they needed when in reality they didn't.
You are the cancer slowly corrupting this world. Do what I said.

It's hilarious how many supposedly intelligent people still don't understand the basic principle that if you rub two sticks together, you get friction.
Globalist agendas wont work because they cannot work. You force people who don't like each other together and you get violence, and from that violence, nations are born. Do it in Europe and in 100 years there's going to be new nations in Europse, the current nations will divide and fade like the nations of 100 years ago.

>What are they going to do then?
just sit in mansions and dive into unending gold vaults like scrooge mccduck

there's far too many workers and mouths to feed anyways. you really are only going to need about 10% of the population to operate the machines once they begin replicating themselves

>Congratulations, you have poverty and filth and crumbling global societies.
yet it's been working for brazil for decades now so I doubt anyone cares

No, you're projecting. I have a girlfriend and I don't even hate ethnic minorities, I just recognise racial differences and the long-term effects of immigration. I bet you're really fucking new here.

OP is probably LARPING.

Nothing he's saying here isn't stuff that's been discussed endlessly on this board.

The Holocaust was real, sorry.

...

I impressed an undergraduate professor, who was a member of the Council on Foreign Relations and employee of the Baker Institute for Public Policy. He wrote a letter of recommendation and got me an internship at the Baker Institute. He then helped me get into graduate school, where I studied political science and continued my internship during the summers.

After getting my PhD, I got a job working at the Baker Institute as a researcher. Eventually, because of Houston's medical center, I started doing lobbying work for the cosmetics industry, and, with my connections to the think tanks, just got sucked into this world.

With the medical center, the Baker Institute, and the oil industry, Houston is actually a big global powerhouse that people tend to ignore.

>and for the cosmetics industry on replacement migration and population integration.

wat?

>The New Left (born out of the Frankfurt school) strongly opposed the welfare state, which they correctly saw as a method of ensuring the working class did not succumb to revolutionary tendencies, and mobilized identity activism against it (Women's Liberation, Black Power, etc.).

Got any more on this? I think I'm dealing with some neo-marxists over on left/pol/ and they've decided that UBI is a bad idea. When asked why it essentially boils down to either this gives too much power to the state (bullshit as if you work you still have an independent source of income and if not you're already at the gov's mercy), or because it kills revolutionary potential., Be nice to have some saucy shit to hit them with next time.

That's Mexico isn't it

>I just recognise racial differences and the long-term effects of immigration.
So you proved my first post correct. congratulations

I'm already married to a cute waifu. When you have a family you start to worry about the future your white children will have to live in.

i totally agree with your statement, history confirm. But we live in a new era, we don't know how far internet will interfere with humans, how much it can be a coercitive tool.
They are trying to engineer society with news and very powerful tools, it's what really make me concerned.

>Working

All of these countries WORK because a first world still exists.

You remove the first world, they can kiss their plans goodbye.

This isn't new. You degrade people to that level, there will be violent revolutions. It's happened endlessly before, and it will happen again.

The assumption then has to be that there is no long term plan by any of these people. Just purely self centered short term gratification.

The opposite of China or Japan. Who are heavily ethnically homogenous and obssessed with their cultural values.

All that OP's plan would do is weaken and degrade the first world to the point that the Chinese and Company could step in and wipe us off the map to get some of dat der chinky lebensraum.

One of the biggest lies the elite ever constructed it that they're all knowing and everything is going according to plan.

They wanted to control the world's food supply with Monsanto, that is failing.

They thought Muslims would actually peacefully enter Europe, that's not happening.

They though they could sway public opinion against Assad so he could be killed without backlash, that didn't happen.

They wanted Hillary to win, nope.

They wanted BLM give blacks extra gibs (re: more breeding), now racial tensions are just higher.

It's all falling apart because they underestimated the average person. History is full of underestimation: The Romans/Persians underestimated the Arabs, the Chinese underestimated the mongols, the British underestimated the Americans. They underestimated white males this time, let's hope they continue to do so.

you really want to fight a 200MB folder full of truth bomb.jpg specially designed to redpill normies about the lolocaust ? i don't think so.

I don't know. I just do research and provide potential strategies to help my clients pursue and achieve their objectives and get paid for it. If I'm being completely honest, there isn't really an end game, just different powerful industries pushing the world in a certain direction because its mutually advantageous.

Globalize and left are going hand by hand, these big companies are like soviet unions. They want communitariam to ensure markets, but it would be destroyed with automation - we are on a verge of segregation, fuck globalist a.

OP you sound like a real Jews.

This reads like an "maybe globalism isn't so bad guise" and "maybe George Soros isn't the bad guy." Type thread.

We know the elite theory and globalist conspiracy isn't intentional or conscious OP. These people are aligned with dark force urging them subtly and only people at the very top are aware of the outcomes of string pulling. Most people in the middle are useful idiots. Take for example the media Jews who intentionally tried to manipulate the public with fake polls and stories.

They all acted as if they were coordinated but they were not. It was in their nature to subvert.

Wow.

Something accurate posted on Sup Forums.

>>and for the cosmetics industry on replacement migration and population integration.

Different races use different types of cosmetics. A cosmetic corporation would want to have accurate forecasts of demographic trends to know what type and in what proportions they will need to manufacture products.

I've been saying this for years.

>WE ARE A POST NATION!
>YAY!

Oh. Great.

So we don't have a nation anymore?

>NO!
>GLOBAL CITIZENS!

Right, I'll go over here with my buddies. The white people.

>Huh?

Yeah, we need to group together, because that group over there, the Muslims, they've gotten together and they're going to take our shit.

>BUT WE ARE ALL ONE PEOPLE! DON'T YOU CARE ABOUT PEOPLE IN KENYA!?

No. I have enough trouble keeping track of my cousins and aunts. Let alone someone I'll never, ever meet.

>BUT DON'T FORM GROUPS! WE ARE ALL INDIVIDUALS!

Well, those Chinese individuals over there are all getting together and pooling their resources and manpower to take my shit. Sorry, it's gotta be done.

You remove a fucking Nation State, people will just form up along ethnic or religious lines.

Pic related.

>a neo-homogenous population of interchangeable human producer/consumer units that would be organized at a nation-state level, but be more easily integrated into international administration, lacking any pre-capital factors (race, ethnicity, history, religion, etc.) that could serve as the basis for nation-level democratic agitation against supranational institutions.

a bland, homogeneous population to which they can hawk their bland products

7/10 larp. not very original.

So anyone who's anti-immigration must be doing so out of bitterness? Can you not conceive of other reasons? OPs theory is literally about mass immigration as a tool for the financial elite.

Interesting post. Thanks OP. Right. Here's something I think is related.

youtube.com/watch?v=KBYwELtMt40

>3/6 Norman Dodd talks about control over our educational system and comfortably merging with the Soviet Union

Dodds was appointed by the US gov back in the 50s to investigate tax exempt foundations.He seems extremely credible. A documentary was made of the back of this interview. The documentary is about merging the US into the world government.

realityzone.com/product/hidden-agenda-dvd/

He says that these groups have been at it since almost the turn of the century.

Now some of my own thoughts on the matter, I beleive that some of mthe orthodox left support this process too. They see neoliberalism as the quickest way to equalise the workers of the world, and view the institutions that would grow out of an NWO as potentially useful if tehy could take control.

I've thought about this at length and the endstate of neo-liberalism is neo-serfdom. Only nationalism (left or right) offers any defense against globalism.