Was the French Revolution a good thing?

was the French Revolution a good thing?

Other urls found in this thread:

youtube.com/watch?v=AuCJ7tA5sW4
youtube.com/watch?v=dqCvV9hy9TY
youtube.com/watch?v=HMCBzNGSG2w
youtube.com/watch?v=nJGCkEW4x84
youtube.com/watch?v=TXXdOqaI4mc
en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Battle_on_the_Scheideck
youtube.com/watch?v=NtpxO3jYcqg
en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Gerson_von_Bleichröder#Banker_for_Bismarck_and_the_Prussian_State
twitter.com/NSFWRedditImage

youtube.com/watch?v=AuCJ7tA5sW4

no

Yes, now fuck off you cocksucking royalist fags

>inb4 m-muh jews !!!1

No. continental Europeans thought from them on that you should kill your political adversaries.

they threw out the inbred trash.
nothing of value was lost and the ideals of revolution started the genesis of modern states with the segregation of state and religion.
Liberté, égalité, fraternité

Much of the Ancien Regime deserved what they got. The first waves of revolutionaries were arseholes, but Bonaparte was a great man, and it's a shame in some ways that what he achieved wasn't more long lasting.

I dare say the general notion wasn't quite as groundbreakingly novel as you are implying...

It literally stopped France from going the Russia-way of being totally ass backwards in terms of administration and taxation. France was killing itself with its ancient edifices of government where even other Kingdoms had streamlined administration. There were 12 different taxes on Salt between southern France and Northern France for example, making it impossible for salt to travel through the country

Extremely bad. France polluted the Europe with liberalism and egalitarianism that allowed the jews to leave their ghettoes and subvert white nations. France was first country to emancipate them, and thats the exact reason why all the degenerate trends began from this country, starting with equality-democracy bullshit and ending with degenerate art/architecture. France was also the first country to bring niggers in and give them rights.
It literally the reason of jews, liberals and niggers being a thing, there would also never had been a communism without it.
Now france is a half-negrified and 100% judaized nation that has no future.
youtube.com/watch?v=dqCvV9hy9TY

No
FN is a cucked republican party
Real patriots already joined l'Action Française

>literally every single French Republic was a complete failure.

Frog, kys. the Revolution was Satanic and masonic in origin and ruined your country forever.

This desu

post royalist music senpai
youtube.com/watch?v=HMCBzNGSG2w

No. europeans are stupid animals and cant handle concepts like democracy. They need to be ruled over by an all powerful kind of dictator to beat them into submission, much like all the middle eastern countries.

youtube.com/watch?v=nJGCkEW4x84

how I first heard it

Absolutely. And that means Bonapartism.

nice lad

yes because the king was a cuck and Napo was based
and germany needed a good dick slap on their kraut face

>was the French Revolution a good thing?

For the British it was a very good thing yes, in retrospect it gave us our Empire andthe keys to the world.

Why? because they removed their aristocracy and inturn all their high ranking and experienced naval personnel allowing the British to rule the waves and the world.

What the Franch revolution gave France with one hand it took with the other.

>kys
eat shit

1. The Borubon monarchy was the most powerful France had seen in a long time. It had its problems, but it was powerful

2. The revolution brought distrust to authority which still exist to this day

3. . An even more extreme and bloody dictator arose after the Revolution (Napoleon)

4. He wasn't even French; he hated the French and always thought of himself as Corsican

5. Germans to built their empire on the backs of the failed republics

yes because it stopped monarch fags from ruling everything just because they were born lucky
it led to the practice of putting people in positions of power based on merit not on birth
and it increased the general freedoms of people in Europe everywhere

You are saying it like it wasn't nullified and power given to British Empire. Why do you think Communist revolution happened later on? Because Anglo got his power restored and even expanded.

all wrong

you should be a professor at an american liberal arts college

hmm really makes me drink...

¡NO!

its a shame he named himself emperor, and much of the stuff after that

he was a great man though

This thread is literally people using the "they wuz satan and shit" arguement, for a man that even hitler liked.

No, democratic republics were a huge mistake, and there's no coming back.

Everyone who says no is an enemy of democracy and should be bombed asap

They weren't a democratic republic, they were a republic that later transformed into an empire.

It was the beginning of the end of Western Civilization, so no.

fucking amerifats


The King France had, that they killed, the dude in the painting is Louis XVI, not a strong man, quite the opposite. The people they got after the revolution were about as authoritarian as you can get. First Robespierre, who was a blood thirsty authoritarian, and then Napoleon (who I presume you at least have a customary understanding of)

keeping the feudal state would have fucked them harder
germany had a failed rebellion in the early 16th century and it kept us back for centuries until the commoners gained rights

Some parts yes, some parts no. Mostly no.

the republic meme is so stupid, democratic republic is even worse

>monarchy Jew
>western civilization
Who dispersed niggers all over the globe and mixed with Jews the most? The Anglo, the monarchy, the Roman Catholicucks.

Republics began with the FR and spread through the west into what we have now. All republics are democratic, the scope of what is public and what is private in a republic is usually limited through the constitution, but all republics end up being totally democratic and thus totally totalitarian.

> kept us back for centuries until the commoners gained rights

Lol.

They only thing that "brought you forward" (instead of keeping you backwards) were strong kings with the minds of a soldier.

You should be praying to the ghost of Frederick or Bismarck every day

The French revolution is the begining of the end for France. It went from country more populous than Russia to a country with a huge demographic comflict and a society willing to revolt every time that stability was reached. It was the de facto end of French supremacy in Europe.

Napoleon was the greatest man in all of history, respect him.

Its to early to tell.

Aha! Indeed!

Actually, a more appropriate question would be "was it INEVITABLE?"

ruined the world* forever

nah, the german nobles outstayed their welcome by quite a bit
we'd have had an ethnic state way earlier
the swiss did alright without those cunts, as did the duct

French monarchy should have treated their people better and revolution wouldn't be needed and besides UK ruined France and they would had a war either way. If you think monarchy is so splendid then why did British sided with Turks and helped them with slavery of white people on Crimea?

youtube.com/watch?v=TXXdOqaI4mc

>we'd have had an ethnic state way earlier


Lol....how exactly?

Bismarck had to force an ethnic state to happen. When it did, you guys were all happy while the rest of Europe hated it

Point is that France would have been better without the Revolution

ok user where was i wrong

The French didn't revolt because the king was a meanie. They revolt because the crop were bad and the (((bourgouis))) told everyone that the king could feed them but he was too selfish.

We have Bismarck system now you super cuck, literally previous system before Socialism and after we done with this we will transition into top cuck system of USA.

Yes

No shit, Im mocking the mentality of you monarchy cuck LARPer

>for a man that even hitler liked.


Napoleon was everything stormfags pretend Hitler was

>Lol....how exactly?
the pan-germanic sentiments of the rebels
it was a very popular idea for centuries with the commoners

No.1789 was a mistake.

>'Action Française
Kek, that's one sad bunch of cucks

>yes because it stopped monarch fags from ruling everything just because they were born lucky

1. It didn't stop monarchy, at least in Europe, nor did it stop supporters of monarch

2. You're one of those people who think being a king is easy, and that its lucky to be one. Go brush up on the sword of damocles


>it led to the practice of putting people in positions of power based on merit not on birth

No it didn't. You really think no one did this prior to the revolution lol? This makes no sense

>and it increased the general freedoms of people in Europe everywhere

1. That was going on before the Revolution

2. Freedoms were restricted after as well

Read the conversation before replying

>it was a very popular idea for centuries with the commoners

Yeah, the idea of using force to unite Germany was popular. tHAt's why you should be thanking BIsmarkc. Instead, you hate him.

Really makes me think.

They revolted because the king was a weak man who was not suited to lead France.

>life was so good
>high taxes
>not allowed to educate yourself
>burned as witch if you mention light or didn't sleep with high official
>king raped anybody at will, every marriage forced

>Yeah, the idea of using force to unite Germany was popular. tHAt's why you should be thanking BIsmarkc. Instead, you hate him.

I thought those guys handing over the country to the Rothschilds were the bad guys

sure, lazy fucks got what they deserved

people did't take to the street in 1848 to unite germany by force

>The French Revolution increased life-spans around the world

You learn something new everyday

No idea what you're getting at.

What's the point you're trying to make?

That Germany could have magically unified without violence?

>people did't take to the street in 1848 to unite germany by force

lol

en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Battle_on_the_Scheideck

youtube.com/watch?v=NtpxO3jYcqg

Nobody said it expanded life expectancy, but it was a start.

yes, though the nobility would have faced violence

en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Gerson_von_Bleichröder#Banker_for_Bismarck_and_the_Prussian_State

Gold and Iron: Bismark, Bleichroder, and the Building of the German Empire by Fritz Stern is a good read on that.

>yes, Germany could have been unified without violence

How

Short answer: No
Fuck Charles.

if the German peasant rebellion had been successful
it wasn't and germany was worse off for it in my opinion
sorry for the OT

>it wasn't and germany was worse off for it in my opinion

Early 1900s, it was probably the third best country in the world (military, science and economically) after the USA and British Empire

The only way it could have been better is if there wasn't the British Empire

>Yes, now fuck off you cocksucking royalist fags

Are you aware that Napoleon (as I see your retarded picture you put, you are a first empire fan) is the return of central authority and blood and god attributes ?!

No ?

I speak to you faggot.

Without revolution you wouldn't have private ownership or capitalism, since only after you overthrow the king who decides all the politics you can even dream about private property. King owned the mountains, your ass, your wife, every river, no such thing as private ownership in king's realm. It's true that bourgeois were kind of Jewish and then kind of not, since not all bourgeois were happy with those stock Jews, like for example Friedrich Nietzsche.

Napoleon was one of the few good things that came out from the Revolution

Says the guy that bows before a family of inbred French/Germans.

He was the ultimate "WE WUZ ROMANS" fanboy.

He hated the French and loved Italy

He brought bloodshed all across Europe

At least he did spread French culture

>>>/15-18/

>implying i'm a royalist

theres probably more Royalists in Cucknadia, we enjoy taking in your tourist's cuck dollars (shame you can't say the same back)

Napoleon eventually lost to British and then France/UK became buddies in war, France being the minime.

>He hated the french

That's not even remotely true,Giuseppe

>He was the ultimate "WE WUZ ROMANS" fanboy.

no he wasnt

>He hated the French and loved Italy


no he didnt.

>He brought bloodshed all across Europe

you mean all the times he fought against europeans who declared war on France?

He did when he was a young man for what they did to his family. As he got older, he realized he could use the French citizens as shields, and use the french soldiers to create a new Roman Empire

Absolutely not, it ravaged one of the greatest monarchies of Europe and sent it into a great decline after its last hurrah under Napoleon.

>He hated the French and loved Italy
We would he joind the French army then?

>In a codicil to his will, written in exile at Longwood House on St Helena on 16 April 1821, Napoleon had expressed a wish to be buried "on the banks of the Seine, in the midst of the French people [whom I] loved so much"

>you mean all the times he fought against europeans who declared war on France?
This is like saying

"you mean all the times Hitler fought off against Europeans declaring war on Germany?"

It doesn't work.

>no he didnt.


Yes he was

Absolutely not.

A number of French Jews were royalists.

oh.. sorry i slagged you off then
>Napoleon was everything stormfags pretend Hitler was
well put

>"you mean all the times Hitler fought off against Europeans declaring war on Germany?"


No because its entirely different. You are clearly making shit up

Even better than Napoléon was Bernadotte.

>We would he joind the French army then?

Because coding Java software or working at Starbucks didn't exist back then.

His only options were to join the Church, or become a commissioned soldier for the kingdom which just conquered his island
>Napoleon had expressed a wish to be buried "on the banks of the Seine, in the midst of the French people [whom I] loved so much"

Probably because he trapped on a fucking St. Helen island. He would have loved to been buried anywhere but there

>one of the greatest monarchies of Europe
Fuck is wrong with you people? The glory of Europe is in its NATIONS, not the fucking useless inbred cherry on top of the cake.

The Revolution was the DIRECT responsibility of that fuckwit Louis XVI, yet all we hear from the schoolboy historian 'neoreactionaries' online is how everything bad that ever happened since was the result of the actions of the Jacobins alone. Who created the conditions for them?!

No. The French Revolution gave us:

>The nation-state
>Totalitarianism
>The doctrine of Total War
>Political purges
>"International revolution"
>Moral supremacy

And that's just the pre-Napoleon stuff.

There were some good ideas, but it was executed (hue) in a fucking retarded way and gave rise to an even more fucking retarded government that's literally unironically demolishing beautiful churches for no reason whatsoever.

That's not how NATIONS work

>implying those nations wouldnt exist without those cherries on top

No, it was the result of the failure of the Enlightenment.

Instead of dealing with the real problems of France (Nobles and Clergy who were leeches), they decided to kill a king that was just a puppet of aforementioned leeches. The king, being the weak little beta that he was, taxed the population and bourgeois to fund his wars instead of taking the wealth from those who held a greater part of it. It did have good consequences too, but it was the precedent to the shit we live with today.

I wasn't speaking Judaeo-American there, I was using 'nation' in its original primary sense: an ethnic community with common origins, history, language and culture. Plenty of these survived centuries without any such cherry whatsoever.

This. Napoleon fucked up when he called himself "Equal-to-Caesar."

> Plenty of these survived centuries without any such cherry whatsoever.

What are some nations that have survived centuries without a leader