There are millions of vacant homes just sitting around in the US, no one using them.
Why don't we just give these to WORKING people who cannot afford a home. I mean, it will massively help out the working class, and it will stimulate the economy as workers have more money in their pocket.
Why don't we uses the homes to help out our country men? They are just sitting there.
fuck you, commie bastard
Because people own those houses. Why don't I kick down your door and take your toothbrush. You aren't using it right now.
Why don't we give your house to the poor working people?
Cause you slave you get that fir mortgage of your entire life.
This is why
Because most humans frown upon human decency
They think it makes them look weak
When you GIVE someone something, they usually trash it and don't do upkeep.
>people own it
Not ppl live in it.
youtube.com
You mean like they are right now?
Dumb ass, housing is a human right it should only be monetized for luxury after basic housing has been acgieved by the populaxe.
vacant doesn't mean they aren't someones property.
So if I own a home that I am renting out to others, but no one is currently occupying it/paying me for it, I am obligated to let a bunch of hobos to live in it free of charge? How far does human decency go? Do I need to buy them food and clothing as well or else I am an evil capitalist?
Of course, you faggots can't logical debate me, so you resort to add ham-in-them attacks by calling me a commie.
Necessity beats luxury.
heresy
Yes renting is a crime.
that guy didn't get to keep that house. it was wrongfully foreclosed on and the real owners got it back.
The real owner is the one living in it.
These homes belong to NO ONE and would be given to people who work full time.
It is what these workers are owed. If you work full time and live in poverty, someone owes you a lot of money because you should not work full time and live in poverty. Someone is exploiting you
Why?
Because niggers will chimp out. Also, most of these houses have a prive owner no?
Everyone renting apartments and houses will be lynched luxury on houses us only allowed past the 1st house.
Hate to say it, but if these homes are owned by mortgage companies and banks that are just sitting on them, surely they can strike a deal and put those homes to use. Maybe go full on authoritarian mode and restructure Detroit from the top down since they suck so much dick at runny their own city. Attract good high paying jobs back into the city and get those houses sold for a reasonable amount. None of this jacking up the price to 500,000 on a 250,000 home business.
Well we do have squatting rights if someone lives in there foe 7 years or something (my state) then it is his.
Probably has to do with some time in england where people were wandering for shelter and prevent people from withholding it.
I like the squatting laws, good for societal breakdown scenerios
It is feudalism and youll get lynched.
>giving people a reward in return for not having worked for it
>expecting other people to keep working their ass off while others get free shit
>taking unused properties away from their owners to give to other people
>being a commie retard
Define luxury.
Can you read ? These houses go to full time workers, aka not niggers
Someone does own them and they are looking for a renter or to sell it. Having freeloading bums trash their property destroys the value of their asset which is STEALING. There are some owners who will do a rent-to-own deal if you need help look for one of those opportunities to avoid a huge downpayment. Construction workers do not labor for free in America; they deserve to be paid. Get it?
How is it a right?
>hurr durr muh socialism
For entertainment.
Define poor working class.
>thanks for the dilapidated tax burden, gonna go get stabbed try to kick the squatters out
In Sweden yes. Your home will be given to the precious refugees.
But why? A lot of work goes into maintaining apartment complexes. Who is going to maintain the entire apartment/condo if the proprietor is hung from a street lamp? What's stopping some gangsters from coming in and kicking everyone out and claiming the apartment is theirs?
On that note, what happens if I own my state-approved, single room domicile but I go on vacation or go out on business for a month, maybe more. What happens to my home then? Are a bunch of people that I don't know going to kick down my door and start occupying my home because I'm not currently living there? Do I have any say in who comes in? Who is going to ensure my domicile is still there when I come back?
>i have a right to force other people to accommodate my needs
1. Home maintenance costs a lot.
2. Many of those homes are unsafe.
3. It has the potential to be abused.
The owner will now be the peasants, past everyone having their own house luxury housing can be owned and done with whatever
they did work for it. As full time workers in poverty, they are owed sufficient money until they are out of poverty.
Youre a slave without housing.
They shouldn't GO to anyone, other than the one who owns it. Just taking something because someone isn't using it, is still theft.
>being a good little goy
What do you mean by entertainment. TV set in living room?
You're not entitled to free money faggot.
> Who is going to maintain the entire apartment/condo if the proprietor is hung from a street lamp? What's stopping some gangsters from coming in and kicking everyone out and claiming the apartment is theirs?
Nothing. This is the exact situation in Johansburgh SA.
Have fun living in a shoebox for the rest of your life.
And it will be. That's what homegrown suburban commies can't understand.
You are a cuck
We tried doing this. Its what is now known as the projects. People don't take care of that which they have not earned.
>It has the potential to be abused.
better everyone go without then
This is why:
youtube.com
But it's not free money. I still have to pay taxes and fees on that home, doubly so if no one is currently occupying it. I have to ensure to property is safe and on par with city ordinances. Why is it suddenly okay for someone to take advantage of my property and business? If you own a bakery and you have it closed down for a day, is it okay for a bunch of thugs to come in and rob you of your ingredients and product because you weren't planning it on selling that day?
the government doesn't own them
This.
>needing more than 800 SF of space to live in
You should come live in reality, it's not so bad over here.
How about we kill the Jews instead and solve all of our problems. We could kill 6 million birds with one stone by doing that.
Money isn't real you kike. Peoples poverty is. You are holding civilization back with your animalistic kikery.
your reality is a lot like a cult
I'm sorry you feel that way. Some men you just can't reach.
Well, most of the vacant houses in Detroit are condemned, so they are owned by the actual city. Whatever banks that do own houses only get the ones that have recently been lived in.
The city of Detroit is too broke to revamp all these homes, and a LOT of them are HUUUUGE mansions.
>Muh human rights
You have no rights nigger.
Bill wants to give it to the muzzies
Ahmed, my son..
Money is real enough that these people in poverty can't build their own homes. You need money for that. Just like you need money for food and clothing. No one wants to declog your toilet for free nigger. Better get to work.
I think your masters are afraid if ppl start helping each other they might not be afraid of starving as much
Because:
1. those homes are not where the jobs are.
2. many of those homes (specifically wooden ones) have rotted away completely or are unsalvagable.
3. of the ones that are fixable, it would cost more than building a new structure.
4. utility lines have to be rebuilt, this is a huge problem in places like Detroit or Flint
>The real owner is the one living in it.
yes, now.. not that black dude in the video
I have a right to a house to live in, no one has to share what they currently occupy this is only fixing the correct owners by correcting the names of some banks illegal property.
The only rights anyone has are rights that someone is capable of defending. You're 'entitled' to nothing in this life.
idk m8 why don't they give me 10 of them
I'll rent em out
No its not.
Why don't we just kill all of the working class, and give their money to everyone else?
That would stimulate the economy, and drive up demand for working class jobs.
Why don't we use the money to help out our own country men? They are just sitting there.
Better idea - we fill it with us. Make memes. Write ebooks. Enact kek rituals.
>Money isn't real
>But poverty is!
Kys teenage commie, they're both equally artificial.
Nothing is stopping you from buying some land and building your own commune where everyone can live free of charge.
>Implying that muzzies will actually btfo Jews.
If I were a landlord in that situation, I'd rather "rent" my home out to a responsible tenant with good references for something super nominal, like just pay the utilities and do maintenance (I'd provide materials for work needed.) One year lease, keep trying to get a job/do stuff to make money etc. Any situation has possible issues, but one thing i know is that occupied properties with safe tenants survive better than empty or abandoned properties. You do NOT want squatters or homeless. Even a low-grade tenant will just bang the place up a little, but homeless people and/or squatters will literally shit all over it and likely burn it down.
Tenants are anti-blight and if you are doing a good deed too, no problem.
It's been a long time since I was a landlord though and I suspect that the core problem keeping landlords from doing this probably has to do with tax loopholes making it not worth getting tenants. Empty properties which can't be rented may get you can get a bigger tax writeoff than you'd bring in charging minimal or no rent.
I think you are delusional and I also think you will never accomplish those kinds of dreams.
Because this is to give necessity to the people not luxury.
Property taxes should be higher and income taxes lower.
Most states with zero income tax have more affordable housing because the high property taxes needed to make up the difference make it harder for investors to buy up everything.
Exactly youre mot entitled to luxury housing while millions do not have a house
start school when you're 5, then work until you're old, then you can do whatever you want for the last 10-20 years. if you can afford it.
and that's your options
What isbolshevik revolution.
>I have a right to a house to live in
sure you do. If you build it yourself.
This
Liberals would say yes, that you do need to let the hobos live in it. If you're not going to rent it out at the rent-controlled rate of $200/month (landlords are so greedy they won't even take FREE money if its not enough!)And if the hobos get hurt or die or feel slight discomfort because you don't maintain it for them with your own money, then they can sue you for millions of dollars. Oh and actually the government is going to send regulators out weekly to make sure that the hobos are settling in nicely and they don't have any complaints. Also, don't even think about kicking the hobos out and trying to make money by renting it out; it takes 3 years and extreme justification to kick tenants out.
And then the same liberals wonder why housing shortages are a thing.
Either that or wake up and eat food contaminated by pathogens on accident. The first world isn't so bad and you should get a hobby.
Fuck off slavshit slave.
Good for nothing gibsmedats asking for handouts.
> OP
Youte not going to rent anything out becayse no one is going to a landless serf
Why would they work if they have a house that is payed off?
What if he bought his house you stupid bernout?
Oh and plus there are absentee landlords. Where I live, a fuckton of mainland Chinks bought up as much as possible during the depths of the recession. They let a lot of their properties sit, for whatever reason. Some just hold them because the land is all they are interested in and they don't care what happens to the structures on it. They're just letting things ride whilst they hide their money from the commie government over there.
Properties being held by banks is another huge issue. Banks don't give a shit about the communities they ruin--they ought to, as bringing down property values in a neighborhood will devalue the properties they've seized too, but they are not sensible. Or at least they don't care about the millions, only the billions. A few repo'd houses are small fry, they won't even expend one employee's worth to deal with them responsibly.
In my town, there were a shit ton of repo'd houses aka foreclosures from about 2009-2012. They just fucking sat. The city had to put together lawsuits against banks like Wells Fargo and groups of citizens with pull sued them too. Or resorted to literal harassment--we would get retired folks, stay-at-home moms, disabled folks, unemployed peeps, work-from-home types etc. to sit on the phone all day calling and calling and calling and just giving bank people shit. We'd get passed around like a hot potato but took notes and would always call again and track down managers, supervisors etc.
Through persistence we managed to at least get some homes cleaned and boarded up securely--with metal plates, wood wasn't enough against the savages out there--or even rented or put on the market and sold to real people. Man did we have to get bitchy though. I hate banks so fucking much.
Declarations from the UN are about as effective as a resolution from a high school debate club. Sorry.
and those millions are not entitled to a house
what's your fucking point?
But that is exactly what will happen if we get a communist utopia like you want. I'm not even college educated but if I keep the way I'm going, I'll be able to retire very early and I enjoy what I do. What exactly do you think everyone owes you? Do you think you should be able to coast through life in a single-room apartment doing nothing but smoking dope, writing quasi-philosophical blogposts and contributing nothing to society?
Because they want to.