How do I defend Trump?

Family is coming over for Christmas. I voted for Trump. They always like to debate me. They tell me that Hillary was more moral and Trump is crazy (waterboarding etc...) how exactly can I show them that Trump was a good vote?

Other urls found in this thread:

youtu.be/lVicctCp_W8
sdlrla.com/about/history/
wbur.org/radioboston/2016/11/16/local-trump-supporter
twitter.com/NSFWRedditImage

you ignore them

>Getty images

Just Google op, u retard. Half the shit ur family brings up is probably fabricated.

youtu.be/lVicctCp_W8

Hard to when it's the only thing that they want to talk about. Fucking jew family.

>Hillary
>Moral
Pick one.

dont be a faggot

Waterboard them.

...

Thanks.

Ask them to back up all of their claims with sources. Just keep asking them questions about their beliefs and eventually they'll confuse themselves.

...

you voted for him but dont know how to defend your position?

wew lad, seriously

Hillary can't remember what classified markings look like. She spergs out and reveals nuclear secrets on live television, she attacks a cartoon frog for being racist, she collapsed on 9/11 (probably out of guilt from taking all that saudi money).

About the racism:

wasnt he sued for racism in the 90s
mexican judge comment
etc

how to defend

Just talk about the emails.

They have no way of knowing if hillary was moral because she admitted that her public persona was a lie.

Trump has the virtue of being honest about what he's feeling.

That's why he won.

Just stay on these points.

Common sense desu. Point out how the Middle East burned to the ground under Obama (with Hillary as his Sec. of State for a large part of it), how Obamacare is a disaster, and how illegal immigration is hurting us. Just be ready to debunk their bullshit about Trump being "racist" and "sexist"

>sued
>therefore guilty
?

Tell them you prefer wacko rather than witch

he settled

also what about mexican judge comment or pussyfooting around disavowing the kkk

They'll win if you debate using their assumptions, diversity is a strength, both racial and gender equality, globalism is good thing and so on. Challenge them and call them out for mouthing empty platitudes not based in reality. You have to shift the grounds of what is acceptable debate in your favor.

Waterboard them?

...

By the way, "racism" is totally fine. We need to shift the narrative from "b-but I'm n-not racisss" to "what's wrong with racism?"

You can't, because you're a fucking idiot OP

You can't because he is a massive piece of shit.

What you can do is be honest about your own sense of morals, and embrace your stupidity. Why be dishonest about who you are, and who you want to represent you?

Mexican judge was a conflict of intrest, not because he's Mexican, but because he has ties to La Raza which is basically the Mexican version of the KKK. Speaking of which, Trump never "pussyfooted' around the KKK, he disavowed numerous times, but the MSM kept pressuring him to do it multiple times as if he hadn't already. Did Hillary ever disavow Byrd? Where was the media coverage on that?

You mock and ridicule their beliefs as well as rub it in that Trump WILL BE the next president and there's nothing they can do about it

he absolutely did pussyfoot around disavowment, he even winked at the kkk

were u living under a rock or something

How is waterboarding a bad thing?

The lawsuit in the 90s was a very broad lawsuit that targeted many businesses. Trump settled with no admittance of guilt because an ongoing lawsuit is costly, annoying, and in this case bad for PR. The mexican judge comment was completely justified because that judge was a member of "La Raza," a mexican pro-immigration and some would say mexican-supremacist organization (the name literally translates to "The Race"). He wasn't saying the judge was unqualified for his race, he was saying he was unqualified because of an obvious conflict of interest/bias

OP you should troll them and agree with them but take the far left position.

Take Hillary's positions to the extreme them call them out for not being progressive enough.

Doing this, they will either realize you are trolling or realize just how stupid their beliefs are In their purest far left form.

Become the Jew, to help them see the Jewry. In the end, you,re just mimicking their position back at them and helping them realize it's bullshit.

Unconstitutional / against Geneva convention

LOL, good luck with that, faggot

The mexican judge is literally a member of La Raza (pretty much the NAACP for mexicans on steroids), and was on a board that gave scholarships to illegals. Impartiality is absolutely key as a judge in any case, they have an obligation to replace themselves in cases where a conflict of interest could even be INTERPRETED as happening. Even though there was a clear conflict of interest, he still didnt delegate the case to another judge.

This is the correct way to troll the left.

Source: I'm a Bernie bro who got very good at trolling Clinton voters by pointing out how conservative and war-mongery she is

the settlement was putting out a newspaper ad for blacks and low income people. there was no guilt proven or admitted.

why the fuck would you want section 8/welfare people in your apartments in general, let alone when you're trying to class up the area?

No, he really didn't, and even if he did, I don't care. The KKK did nothing wrong. Also, you're clearly lying about the intentions of this thread. Larping leftist sack of shit detected. Time for you to get the fuck

Just smile and nod.

This is unpresidented.

I wish we were.

You're in an unpresidented situation, OP

>Hillary was more moral

>Clinton Cash
>Podesta Mails
>We came, we saw, he died
>Media collusion during elections
>Fucking over Bernie in the presidential race
>niggers are super-predators
>changes her views as she sees fit, even supported a wall and deportations

The only bad things they have against Trump so far is still "he said some things I don't like" and he "outsourced jobs to china" (which is completely normal to survive in the capitalist system.

Don't people on this website usually ask for proof for these sorts of things? Or is that only when it differs from your views?

I'm brazenly racist around my own family, and they're starting to realize I'm right. I say nigger in front of them all the time and nobody bats an eye. Our neighborhood has been inundated with Obama's diversity agenda for quite some time now, and the effects are starting to show. Not to mention I live outside a city with a 50% nigger population. Whites are waking up. It only takes a few people with the balls to address the elephant in the room, and the rest will follow suit.

Bring up the fact that Hillary defended a confirmed child molester in court and then laughed in the face of a 12 who was raped so brutally that she can no longer have children whenever the lie detector results said he was innocent. After this Hillary then said she'd never trust lie detectors again.
People don't care about policy and facts so just mention how disgusting she is.

You can't defend Trump.

He's a racist, misogynist, sociopathic plutocrat with the IQ of a pigeon.

...

Have you thought about thinking for yourself for once? You're asking strangers to justify YOUR vote to your fucking family. Could you be any more of a brainwashed fucking nigger?

>were you living under a rock or something
What are you even on about, he did disavow the KKK. Even then, if an endorsement by a controversial party matters, go look at the fact that the Communist Party of America endorsed clinton. Commie shits are responsible for 40+ million deaths from the past century, whereas the KKK was responsible for 1/10,000 of deaths.

Sounds like you're just a pussy white boy afraid of black people. Grow a pair, little bitch.

12 year old*

If I gave enough of a shit about you, I'd provide you sources, but I don't have time for limp-wristed dweebs such as yourself who can't even directly ask for sources.

Another tactic successful redpill tactic is to not defend Trump at all but to advance nationalism, traditionalism and white identity. For some people Trump himself is the block that they can't get over. You can say he is crude, distasteful and inarticulate but that he is part of Western-wide revolt against globalism and a return to national sovereignty. Don't defend old conservatism either, tell them that all the warmongering neo-cons ditched the GOP, switched sides and that Hilary openly embraced them. Tell them we must secure the existence of our people and a future for white children.

>caring about morality
You're a fag . Do yourself and your family a favor and kill your Christmas tree, oh and yourself

>Hillary was more moral
40,000 dead Libyans can't say no!

>I can't be bothered to post proof, believe me, I have the best sources
nice bait tho

>he has ties to La Raza which is basically the Mexican version of the KKK

Not exactly.

He doesn't have ties to La Raza, which is totally a racist organization.

He is a member of the San Diego La Raza Lawyers Association, a nonprofit professional association of Latino lawyers that is affiliated with a statewide organization, the La Raza Lawyers of California.

sdlrla.com/about/history/

>The organization was formed with a desire to effect change in San Diego by representing the interests of the Latino community, identifying issues which involved the Latino community, and advocating for those issues.

Now, if I created a group with the desire to effect change in the community to represent interests of white people, I would be called a racist. This is a double standard. Curiel may not be pro-Mexico, but he is clearly pro-Hispanic/Latino and that is why Trump said...

>"I’m building a wall. It’s an inherent conflict of interest"

Shitty bait. Better luck next time, nignog.

>more moral
at least one of you is retarded so there won't be a very good debate

i'm so glad she didn't win the election

>He doesn't have ties to La Raza
>He is a member of the San Diego La Raza Lawyers Association
Way to contradict yourself in the same breath. You're dismissed.

When they try to debate you just say
> too late. Election is over, debate has ended. I won you lost lol get fucked

You voted him, you shold know.

This is brilliant! They'll never argue with you again, OP.

You never even asked for proof. By the way, you communicate like a female, indirect, and with a cunty attitude. Might want to get your testosterone levels checked, pal.

It's what I did to my leftie family and they also think I literally wrote in Jeb for principle.

My aunt may have taken me out of her will because of it. I actually sent her wikileaks emails explaining and defending them in a far left "Accept corruption NOW! stop Dumphf!" Format every day we had wiki leaks threads and drops. I only stopped after the election.

Don't get attached too people

Stick with the principles, socialism kills, democrat foreign policy a disaster etc etc

Anybody got that image of the guy in brazil who waved his dink at a bunch of feminists, then sat their grinning as they surrounded him? 'Do what you must, I have already won'?

That. That's what you do OP.

They're two different organizations, you fucking retard.

>How do I defend Trump?
Try this...
>Trump says mean things, builds things, employs people.
>Hillary lies, destroys things, gets people killed.

Is that so hard?

pic related

Be careful about using this argument, because "La Raza" is not the same organization as the "La Raza Lawyer's Association", which is the group he's actually a member of. If the people you're debating with know this then you will get absolutely destroyed and have no counter argument.

A better approach would be to say that no humans are free of bias, that there is precedent for the removal of judges or jury members from cases where significant bias might be a concern due to demographics or background, and that the judge had more reason to be biased against Trump than not due to his ancestry and family members in relation to Trump's comments on Mexico.

I greentexted you and followed up with "nice bait." If you're going to sit there and say that's acting like a female, then I've got some bad news for ya buddy

Both are literally called "The Race". I don't give a shit if there's a distinction between the two. Way to miss the point, dickbreath. Pipe down.

Let add, I did this because my aunt is literally a Democrat employee in a district in NC. She works at the board of elections.

...

I'm talking about your initial post you fucking autismo.

Fucking pieces of shit like you are why Trump won. You probably, in typical "progressive" fashion, believe you morally superior to everybody, smarter than everybody and more victimized than everybody. So you just repeating the talking points from failed fashion models on TV. Your perceptions have successfully been managed.

You can't--they're right and your wrong.

After his presidency, international relationships will be worse, you will be poorer, and have fewer rights.

There is no positive spin to put on those things. Unless you're a billionaire. Then you'll be better off.

...

>Build a strawman

Nice one

Dude come on don't show me that shit

...

The KKK only exists as an FBI honeypot. This guy is a blue pilled cuck.


There is no KKK, only literal Feds posing as them to recruit "white terrorists" and put people on watch lists.

Everyone knows that.

But you are right, he is the reason Trump won. And I am happy people like him are doubling down.

Also one of the Reasons the FBI is so red pilled, they have to be exposed to these conspiracy theories (((Elite))) world control plots running the KKK as a honeypot.

>If I gave enough of a shit about you, I'd provide you sources, but I don't have time for limp-wristed dweebs such as yourself who can't even directly ask for sources.

So would you describe this as female? Or as God gifted masculine manly posting?

Talk about the plight of the white working class in the rust belt. Liberals are supposed to care about them and it's a strong emotional argument.

The woman in this interview does an excellent job making this case (skip to about 9mins if you dont have time):
wbur.org/radioboston/2016/11/16/local-trump-supporter

Don't fight battles you can't win. Most of winning an argument is about framing the discussion. (i.e. If someone accuses Trump of being literally Hitler, if you choose argue that hes not you've already lost because the settled premise is that Trump might be Hitler)
If someone challenges you on in an unfavorable frame you need to re-frame. Something like "Oh really, did you hear that on CNN?" can move the argument to the favorable frame of anti-Trump media bias.
Another good one is "I voted for Trump because I care about working class people"

Pick battles you can't lose

Use emotional arguments

Remember that you aren't trying to convince the other person, they are a foil, your target is observers.

Good luck user, Merry Cristmas

It's called being direct, buddy boy ol' pal. You can't even ask a straight question. Get lost.

WHY DID HE PICK IT UP AFTER

Tell them its over, we won.

>;^)

>communist crying

I asked if we still ask for sources/proof on this website. You are free to feel insecure about anything else I said following that.

Hey don't send them to /out/
We're full already

i hate all of u desu

>not even knowing why you support a candidate
>asking other people to explain to you why you believe what you believe

this is partisanship in a nutshell and the exact reason why American politics are such a clusterfuck

...