Time to destroy or confirm the certificate

Time to destroy or confirm the certificate
debunk this straight pattern in the security paper not curving with the page IF YOU CAN

Other urls found in this thread:

classic-web.archive.org/web/20040627142700/http://eastandard.net/headlines/news26060403.htm
twitter.com/SFWRedditGifs

...

1961, race of father, african
not negro or colored, so legit

But why?!

bupm

neurons firing but we need solid info

fireproof data like the image in this thread

Isn't this a scan? Isn't it just scanning the marks on the page, and that background doesn't curve (and goes off the physical page) because it isn't part of the physical document, it's just the background the scanner put the detected marks on the page against?

I could be incorrect, it's just, if this background were part of the physical page and would curve, then why does it goes off the edge of the physical paper in this image?

i remember hearing about a book somewhere with him in it and it says he was born somewhere else if we could get a copy of it

then we could shit in it and mail it to him lololol

classic-web.archive.org/web/20040627142700/http://eastandard.net/headlines/news26060403.htm

it is security paper, it should curve like the rest but doesn't

We can't confirm/deny anything for sure unless we see proof that the Ah Nee certificate is real. If we shouldn't blindly accept that the Obama certificate is real then we also shouldn't blindly accept that the Ah Nee certificate is real.

boom

No. But they supposedly have the real document and paper.

parallel lines stay parallel when the curvature is orthogonal to the lines
that being said, his birth certificate is probably fake

Isn't that just a type of paper?

If the scanner just printed the marks of the birth certificate onto that type of paper it wouldn't curve,

the curve is from like the edge of the paper not being all the way down flat when scanned. Right?

nobody is so stupid to go against obama if the did not have proof

It's fake
The real question is why the news isn't shitting their dicks on damage control

cool but could be forgery

do you have the internet archive version of this in some page before 2008 or so?

The is nothing to debunk. It's an official photocopy of a fake birth certificate. The security marks are on the paper it was copied onto, this show no change.

This is real, look it up, but the counter to that is that the lady who wrote it says now it was a fact checking error and that one year before another piece of writing on him says he was born in hawaii as now reported

so this isn't compelling to many people anymore

this exactly

checked

i'm not sure, the talked about how the security paper was insecure etc, if it wee like you say things don't follow

the 9 points are what's important.

just an optical illusion goyim, now stop with the fake news already

Because when things are so cut and dry...
>the only winning move is not to play