Guns will protect me against government tyranny

>Guns will protect me against government tyranny

Other urls found in this thread:

en.m.wikipedia.org/wiki/Gabrielle_Giffords
twitter.com/SFWRedditVideos

Someone post it

CAN'T POLICE STREETCORNERS WITH JETS, YOU FUCKING RETARD

if drones could take care of an uprising there wouldn't be a shitstorm in the middle east now would there

>rice farmers and goat herders
>resisted gov tyranny successfully
haha fucking pakis grasping for straws

>what are drones

shiggy

why would you?

Ty

>F-35
>Implying it can enough funds to even get off the ground first

kek & lel

When killing the family members and friends of soldiers, sure, they will be happy to know their loved once gets massacred by a bunch of gun nuts
>ib4 muah airbase
sure

99% of the us military would rebel.
also 3 inch birdshot exists

planes.
You can't enforce laws from a drone 10 miles away

How many missiles can one drone carry?

Two? Four?

Five guys can hold that corner.

How many drones would you need to reliably hold that corner? How many corners can a country have?

If it gets to the point that the US government is dropping JDAMs on its own civilians then they've already lost.

>Will the Military really fight against their own people in a strong, western civilization?

OP, you are a moron.

The strongest thing in the peoples arsenal is a tax revolt. Cut off the tax revenue and the government will quickly wither and die.

Without guns, wheres muh liberty and justice fo all. Dis is a free cuntree.

>Shoot people from an apartment building
>Government bombs the building full of civilians and 1 insurgent
Yeah I see that plan working perfectly.

You are missing a big piece of this issue.

1.) The USA will not knowingly drop fucking bombs on its citizens. We won't even do that to OTHER countries citizens (anymore, kek).

2.) Citizens will not hesitate to open fire on the government.


So in the end, it's really a question of whether or not the government wants to get involved in an armed conflict with its citizens. That is seriously some last-resort shit. It's not likely to ever happen. Yes, they would kill us all. But they are going to avoid that all cost. They'd more likely just isolate us.

Things are a lot different than they were in the 1800's. Or even the 1970s. That barbaric shit is not going to fly.

>posting the same recycled shilling trash will make a difference at all with anything

Tell that to Iraq, you brigander.

KÊK,this cuck can't even have guns in his "country"
That's actually kinda sad

Drones still can't reliably patrol an entire city in a cost effective way, nor can they attack an insurgent without resulting in ridiculous infrastructural damage and the death of innocent civilians/taxpayers/propaganda.

>only 10,000 people starving in a year

lol this goy, chicago would be empty of food in 3 days. No food, no publick transport n shit, and you have a lot of dead niggers.

This has so much skewed logic

>government won't kill family members
>fearless citizens pumped up with adrenaline will defeat the statists
>people won't surrender or puss out
>the government doesn't protect anything
>imb-fugging-plyng hordes of autists with AR-15s could invade a military base unseen miles away

Really gets my neurones firing famalam.

An AA Gun will

>Iraq is the pinnacle of stable government rule

I guess it turns out politicians are not immortal gods.
en.m.wikipedia.org/wiki/Gabrielle_Giffords

Great read

the government could just nerve gas everyone, as if we were a cockroaches, then it would be all over.

I would expect the vast majority of Marines and members of the military would have the proper conscious NOT to drop JDAMs in US cities, but millions of service men and women are not needed for this. All you need is one nhilistic crazy General who thinks sterilizing US soil is for the "greater good" or some shit. He can just lock himself in a bunker and remotely control drones to carpet bomb US cities.

If there's going to be civil unrest/Martial Law in this country its not going to be some massive "hollywood" battle in the middle of Time Square or some shit, they'll quietly limit our internet and cellphone access (cyber attack), blame it on Russia, and start bombing us from the air, and there's nothing your bunker of guns if going to do to help in that scenario.

If you are talking about the U.S., they've had lots of trouble with farmers with AK-47's.

>Ruling over a pile of bodies
GENIUS! Why don't unstable, oppressive regimes do this more often?

>the US military will crush all opposition through their sheer weight

Lets just add this into the mix

think it was a typo

>People still think the government murdering everyone it rules over makes sense
Yeah no. Also communications can't be cut off as easily as you assume, one person can't remotely control every single drone in the US (why do you think we have drone pilots, drones are just remotely piloted), do you seriously think nobody else in the bunker would try to stop him, do you seriously think nobody outside of the bunker would try to stop him, do you seriously think that someone that believes in destroying cities for the "greater good" or some shit would have the competence to become a general with enough power to control the entire drone network (which is already not possible for anyone), and finally do you seriously think the government would destroy the entire state to save the entire state?

this troll doesnt work anymore since now it's liberals paranoid trump is going to put them in a camp and wanting to form malitias

...

> use military aviation against civilians
> liberals for you

>the vietcong were just farmers with rifles!

>It's not like the vietcong were veterans of their multiple year civil war, trained and supplied the the soviets!

>They shot down high altitude b-52s with sticks, I till you!

REBELS WILL BE ENTRENCHED IN THEIR OWN ENVIRONMENT MAKING WHATEVER TECHNOLOGY USED AGAINST THE PEOPLE IRRELEVANT

...

>Can somebody please shoot Trump, like really?
What is it, you faggot?