Why does conservatism appeal to low-iq idiotic nationalists?

Why does conservatism appeal to low-iq idiotic nationalists?

Other urls found in this thread:

sciencedaily.com/releases/2013/08/130811005342.htm
reddit.com/r/science/comments/20lk7x/intelligent_people_are_more_likely_to_trust/
sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S0160289614001081
sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S0160289615000136
people-press.org/files/legacy-pdf/11-7-11 Knowledge Release.pdf
nature.com/nclimate/journal/v2/n10/full/nclimate1547.html
journals.plos.org/plosone/article/file?id=10.1371/journal.pone.0050092&type=printable
cnn.com/ELECTION/2010/results/polls/#val=USH00p1
cnn.com/ELECTION/2008/results/polls/#USP00p1
cnn.com/ELECTION/2006/pages/results/states/US/H/00/epolls.0.html
cnn.com/ELECTION/2004/pages/results/states/US/P/00/epolls.0.html
cnn.com/election/2012/results/race/president/#exit-polls
en.wikipedia.org/wiki/File:LynnHarveyNyborg-Atheism-IQ.svg
nces.ed.gov/pubs93/93275.pdf
nces.ed.gov/pubs99/1999470.pdf
sda.berkeley.edu/cgi-bin/hsda?harcsda gss14
nacacnet.org/learning/communities/Admitted/Lists/Posts/Post.aspx?ID=586
todayscience.org/IER/article/ier.v2i2p01.pdf
princeton.edu/~tje/files/webAdmission Preferences Espenshade Chung Walling Dec 2004.pdf
aei.org/publication/acceptance-rates-us-medical-schools-2014-reveal-ongoing-racial-profiling-affirmative-discrimination-blacks-hispanics/
finaid.org/scholarships/20110902racescholarships.pdf
bls.gov/news.release/hsgec.nr0.htm
nationsreportcard.gov/hsts_2009/race_gpa.asp?tab_id=tab2&subtab_id=Tab_1
jbhe.com/features/49_college_admissions-test.html
fivethirtyeight.com/features/race-gap-narrows-in-college-enrollment-but-not-in-graduation/
census.gov/hhes/socdemo/education/data/cps/2014/tables.html
twitter.com/SFWRedditImages

...

Gee, I didn't know blacks and Mexicans were so based.

Oh wait.

106 iq? whoa liberals are smart af desu senpai

Shut your mouth foo'!

National socialism is very liberal. That's why 92% of 85 IQ niggers voted of Shillary.

China's data humbly provided by CCP
"Ui arr smart, ie" Hui Zhlong Bdzi claims.

Apparently intelligence is seen as the ability to absorb and repeat whatever knowledge you've been exposed to,
Instead of to think for yourself.

Everyone knows about Nazi's today, but nobody knows about Wilheim or Bizmark.

Because biased chart

110 is probably your average college grad, above 110 things skew the other way again towards conservative. Step foot into any engineering or computer science or even one of the high IQ humanities like philosophy and you'll mostly find more conservatives than liberals.Right wing ideology appeals to the bottom third and the top 5% of IQ ranges while liberalism is the ideology of the average or slightly-above-average. I have no idea why.

A survey conducted by a bunch of college educated liberals. No bias there.

This is probs pretty accurate.

IQ is strongly influenced by urban living. For the higher.

So its more likely that people who live in urban environments just have views that have been deemed acceptable and cultivated by our rulers.

>tfw too intelligent to be liberal, and instead went full circle and became ultranationalist.

All the Nazi leaders had genius-level IQs.

Every single IQ category in that pic is retarded.

Why do liberals rely on the vote of the black and Latino vote to win then?

Hardcore Nationalism is not "Conservative," so that study doesn't tell anything about us.

Yeah, it's not like they lie compuslively on every other figure they release.

Oh, wait.

This.

People with high IQs know that correlations don't imply causation.

>conservatism
you mean progressive values

>nationalists?
you mean edgelord communists

In libtard land, you are a genius if you vote based on genitals and skin color and a total idiot if you actually evaluate policies and weigh the pros and cons.

Little off the specific topic but

>most of universities are liberal
>get high education
>turn into liberal
>think highly of yourself
>be above others
>feel good about yourself when you give niggers money or take in refugees
>feel even better by calling conservatives racist
>everyone near you thinks you are such a saint
etc

Even though Hillary was more popular with higher education trump won in very income category expect the two lowest ones. Meaning people with worthless degrees voted for Hillary, artistic humanist liberals.

Anecdotal evidence: I live with 3 other programmers and we are all alt-right (wew)

Mate, you better be teaching all your friends about how Islam is a political ideology sponsored and allied to the Nazi's of WW2, with similar teachings of supremacy and the destruction of other cultures, their people, and their rights to liberty and freedoms within those cultures.

How this recent wave of Sunni Islam migrants are just the pawns to destabilise the financial heart of Europe, so as to take revenge for our victories.

And how Taqiyya is the practice of Islam to lie to non-believers about your peaceful intentions, to attack them when they are unprepared.

Remember 1916? The values our nation was founded on? Do you think that considering we have living veterans today from ww2 giving us pride, that the same couldn't be said for other parts of the world seeking to dismantle that sense?

yup

I suspect there is a stronger correlation between having a college degree and being a liberal than having >100 iq and being a liberal, which would undermine the implication behind OP's pic.

Don't allow ourselves to be persuaded by politically strong elites, do what is right!
DEFEND YOURSELVES!

you don't know what very liberal means do you you dumbfuck.

very liberal means liberal enough to be conservative as well as liberal. it's not known as very conservative because that is incorrect use of the term "conservative".

conservatives are strong enough to be conservative and support liberals. it's called very liberal, not very conservative.

why the fuck do I have to play for the team I support? that's a bunch of bullshit. I just need an idiot donkey/ass to play with and haul my shit around as a gray alien owned gray elephant.

>106

whoa dude, what fucking geniuses liberals are. how hard it must be to be slightly above average.

come back to me when you produce anything as complex as Richard Wagner did.

This. Why does it stop at 110? That is practically braindead.

...

Because people crave social status and currently nationalism and conservatism is low status ie its respected where the low iq people end up. People almost always parrot the views of those who impress them and high iq people aim for jobs in the media, corporations, politics, academia which are all liberal as fuck. 100 years ago when nationalism and conservatism were normal among elites high iq people were nationalist conservatives. Despite the zeitgeist as a species we suck at nonconformity and independent thinking as being high ststus and popular was evolutionally better than being a correct outcast.

>White has a better average IQ than Black
Uuuuh IQ doesn't mean shit.
>Liberal has a better average IQ than Conservative
Hahaha, take that rednecks!

Show a wider range. 80 IQ - 160 IQ

Suddenly all the super smart and normal people are conservative

The incredibly dumb and slightly above average become liberals

I guess its true even for me despite being a Sup Forumsack, I have a 110~ IQ and I have some fairly liberal viewpoints

conservative means playing for the team you believe in and support. it's fucking STUPID BELIEF TO DO THAT. play for one support the other losers. that is called LIBERAL BELIEF.

Holy fuck the abbos are even dumber than the niggs

What the fuck is going on in that 65 IQ region?

The graph stops at 110, fuckwit. No doubt because all the actuall intelligent people (110+) are conservative and the graph was made by a retarded lib.

SHUT YOUR MOUF AND LOOK AT MY WAD

So according to liberals we should all be libertarians because they have the highest average IQ?

>Smart people are just as racist as their less intelligent peers -- they're just better at concealing their prejudice, according to a University of Michigan study.
sciencedaily.com/releases/2013/08/130811005342.htm

>Your typical abbo
Pic related

you have no idea how iq tests work, do you?

"Adolescent" Intelligence, there's your key guys - literally every teenager is liberal unless they're dumb as fuck. It's only in later life that people get some experience, and all the *smart* liberal kids become more conservative. That's why liberals tend to be of average intelligence, while conservatives are either one extreme or the other.

Who did this graph? The same person who did the Hillary winning electoral graphs?

dunno but apparently high IQ people like to have their children run over in christmas markets.

Holy satan and double fours

I-Im not sure its God waiting for us..

>Why does conservatism appeal to low-iq idiotic nationalists?

A SJW who took Hillary's polls made that.

Because a lot of High IQ people live in neighbourhood bubbles such as suburbs or condo complexes or gated communities, and work in institutional bubbles, like universities, or government research labs etc. Their jobs keeps them isolated from the conditions most other people actually live under.

They by and large do not understand the daily scarcity and competition most other people live under. Once everyone has enough money they start to "act white" anyway, like their affable neighbours do.

Therefore, they operating on the potential of human beings rather than the reality of what they are,or the dialectical processes that constitute what they are. They think that all people either will become like them(liberal, optimistic), or are in the process of becoming like them.

They have no concept of the mountains that some would have to climb to reach the level of success that they have - so bring em over by the boatload!

Even worse than this is the high IQ liberal who views government policies as an effective and preferable form of societal control. These people suffer from the same societal isolation, and their only interactions with the working class are with the service sector, and most of their concepts around the poor and working class are based around what they see on TV. They believe that poor people are too stupid to make decisions and should not be held responsible for them, therefore every possible safety net and reset button should be put in place to keep the poor under heel and from turning to criminality - no matter the stress it causes those less evolved people who are not as "cluttered and humanitarian" as they themselves are.

Both of these types support the fallacy that when the poor and working class vote for freedom over the government leash, they are voting against their own interests, but when they vote to keep out foreign workers and competition to actually protect their economic interest they are just being "racist".

You seem to not think for yourself I see.

Did the thought not fall to you, that I was talking about societies pride in being of average intellect, considering themselves as morally unquestionable and above being uncucked?

Well then.

Let me guess, the pollsters behind this graph definitely included plenty of non-whites in their survey, correct? (Obvious sarcasm.)

If they had factored in mestizo and nigger intelligence quotients, the liberal bars would have been a whole lot lower. I can guarantee that.

One of the favorite strategies of the Judeo-globalist elite is intellectual, elitist shaming: "You're not smart unless you support the suicide of your own people."

tumblr confirmed.

Yeah we get that, faggot. This whole thread is about IQ though, so your point made you sound like a sub 80 iq retard. IQ tests reflect, in the most objective way possible, your capacity to learn.

Then I feel proud of having a stable iq from multiple sources of 126, and to be a nationalist conservative defender of liberty.

>"cluttered and humanitarian"

>cultured and humanitarian

Dr. Watson never even said anything that offensive. He just acknowledged that racial disparities might have a genetic component.

niggers have the lowest IQ
spics have the second lowest IQ

niggers and spics vote overwhelmingly liberal

explain that one, Achmed

But no chart on race and IQ?

This is true in my experience. All my avg IQ normie friends who get 100% of their information about current events off twitter and CBC news are liberals while my more intelligent friends who think outside the box are conservative.

Online iq tests are not sources

State admitted, and personally requested. I actively get myself tested to monitor my state of consciousness, since dementia runs in my family, and would like to prevent myself from suffering the same fate.

Because high IQ people are more gullible
reddit.com/r/science/comments/20lk7x/intelligent_people_are_more_likely_to_trust/

>inb4 plebbit
the original study 404'd

This

niggers vote democrat overwhelmingly

sage.

>religious people have low IQ
>they vote conservative almost exclusively

Once we stop pandering to Christcucks, our average IQ will skyrocket. They are so retarded that they outweigh the niggers on the democrats' side.

Most of the nignogs and sand niggers voted for Hillary.

Cheating with statistics is not new Hans.

SHUT YOUR MOUF

Guess who else voted for Hillary ;)

>the graph ends at 106

neat

Yeah fake graphs cool. They know the IQ of everyone that votes. Lefties thinking they know best by spreading lies. What else is new?

lol

shut your mouf

sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S0160289614001081

(2014) Carl compiles one of the first actual cognitive comparisons between American political party members.

His results are as follows:

• Individuals who identify as Republican have greater probability knowledge
• Individuals who identify as Republican have higher verbal reasoning ability
• Individuals who identify as Republican have better question comprehension
• Cognitive ability’s effect on party identity works through socio-economic position

sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S0160289615000136

(2015) Carl shows that while social conservatism may indeed be associated with lower intelligence, market conservatism, i.e., market liberalism, is associated with higher intelligence. This he believes, compensated for other possible losses on the social side

You can be right for the wrong reasons. It's not the same hating niggers by default or because of a bad experience than doing so after correctly interpreting the stats.

SHUT YOUR MOUF

people-press.org/files/legacy-pdf/11-7-11 Knowledge Release.pdf

(2011) Pew Research Center finds that self-identified Republicans know more about politics than self-identified Democrats by a significant margin.

nature.com/nclimate/journal/v2/n10/full/nclimate1547.html

(2012) In a similar vein to the above study, Kahan et. al., find that climate change, "deniers," know far more about climate science than believers in anthropogenic climate change.

journals.plos.org/plosone/article/file?id=10.1371/journal.pone.0050092&type=printable

(2012) Graham, Nosek & Haidt find that Republicans tend to understand Democrats better than Democrats understand Republicans.

Given these results, it may seem apparent that Democrats are going to be less educated or that Republicans much moreso. The reality is that both the least educated and the most highly educated seem to be Democrats quite consistently, it just so happens that essentially everyone in-between those poles is Republican. Exit polls consistently show this:

cnn.com/ELECTION/2010/results/polls/#val=USH00p1
cnn.com/ELECTION/2008/results/polls/#USP00p1
cnn.com/ELECTION/2006/pages/results/states/US/H/00/epolls.0.html
cnn.com/ELECTION/2004/pages/results/states/US/P/00/epolls.0.html
cnn.com/election/2012/results/race/president/#exit-polls

Yeah I thought smarter people make more money?

>Massachusetts

you silly goose ;^)

are truncated graphs misleading?

CAMBRIDGE in Massachusetts

Nice try Drumpfy

If you take Lifescience serious. You will troll yourself

Because they dont live in a fantasy life while being an eternal student

>religious people have low IQ
go back to /r/atheism

>en.wikipedia.org/wiki/File:LynnHarveyNyborg-Atheism-IQ.svg
>no correlation if you remove african countries

Simple my dude, nationalism is a natural instinct that humans picked up in early prehistorical times (like most instincts). The dumber a person is, the more he/she is governed by these instincts. Smart people are less likely, but smart people get outsmarted by the joo who tells them what to think through their media.

SHUT YOUR MOUF

nces.ed.gov/pubs93/93275.pdf
nces.ed.gov/pubs99/1999470.pdf

(2002) The National Center For Education Statistics conducts their National Adult Literacy Survey and presents interesting results.

Their results show that there is a monotonic increase in the Black-White IQ gap as education increases, such that White high school dropouts have IQs that average 7 points higher than Black high school dropouts and Whites with graduate degrees have IQs 11 points higher than Blacks with graduate degrees. Whites are much less likely to drop out and are more likely to receive degrees.

In this nationally representative data set of 26.000 US adults, Blacks at every level of formal education scored lower on adult literacy measures than did Whites who scored one rank lower than them on this measure of educational attainment. This means that a Black with a graduate degree is less intelligent on average than a White with a four-year degree and so on.

This implies a need for greater meritocratic discrimination in the hiring process, as credentials do not necessarily imply ability and IQ still remains the greatest predictor of job success per (Huffcutt & Arthur, 1994; among many others).

The smarter it is the easier it is to logically construct justifications for not following your natural intuition. Nationalism is a natural state but associated with violence so people construct utopian ideals of a borderless world, ignoring basic obvious realities.

sda.berkeley.edu/cgi-bin/hsda?harcsda gss14

The General Social Survey is one of the US' most comprehensive, consistent, and accurate surveys of many aspects of life in the United States.

The survey reveals quite readily that the correlation between IQ and years of education has declined from as high as ,7 in the 1950s to ,56 in the 1970s and now ,42, as student selection criteria slackens. In addition to this, university students from when the survey began in the 1970s were 9 IQ points more intelligent than university students now. This effected has occurred in total, and has had marked signs intra-racially as well.

It is oft-stated that the IQ of recent university graduates hovers somewhere around 115. The data actually shows that this was more true in 1972 where the average IQ of graduates was 113,7 as opposed to now where it is 104,3 and precipitously declining. This corresponds with an increase in the sheer number of individuals receiving degrees in any manner. In the '70s only a pithy amount received degrees while in 2006 roughly 26% of American adults aged 25+ had a bachelor's degree or more.

nacacnet.org/learning/communities/Admitted/Lists/Posts/Post.aspx?ID=586

A 2015 report by the National Association for College Admission Counseling found that 1 in 4 schools openly admitted to race-based selection policies that abrogated any pretense of meritorious selection.

todayscience.org/IER/article/ier.v2i2p01.pdf

(2014) Rubin scrutinizes the admission criteria of 68 supposedly highly selective colleges and finds that, "membership in an under-represented group,” tied with, “exceptional talent,” as the top pick for what makes a student, “fit,” their university.

princeton.edu/~tje/files/webAdmission Preferences Espenshade Chung Walling Dec 2004.pdf

(2004) Espenshade, Chung & Walling utilize data on 124.374 applicants to 10 of the most selective universities in the country, controlled for whether or not the applicants had alumni family members, SAT scores, and whether or not they were involved in college athletics and found that black applicants are 5,2 times more likely than white applicants to be admitted and also show that hispanics are 3,5 times more likely than white students to be admitted.

aei.org/publication/acceptance-rates-us-medical-schools-2014-reveal-ongoing-racial-profiling-affirmative-discrimination-blacks-hispanics/

A 2015 report by the Association of American Medical Colleges finds that even with worse qualifications, Blacks and Hispanics are 7 and 3,7 times more likely to be admitted to medical schools when compared to Whites.

finaid.org/scholarships/20110902racescholarships.pdf

(2011) Kantrowitz analyzes the distribution of grants and scholarships by race and finds that there are more grants available to non-whites and that when applying for the same grants, non-whites are roughly 10% more likely than whites to receive them in spite of merit.

bls.gov/news.release/hsgec.nr0.htm

The Bureau of Labor Statistics reveals that black high school students are now more likely than white high school students to make it into college. This is due almost purely to discrimination as evidenced by the fact that blacks receive more aid, and they have worse grades and lower standardized test scores.

nationsreportcard.gov/hsts_2009/race_gpa.asp?tab_id=tab2&subtab_id=Tab_1
jbhe.com/features/49_college_admissions-test.html

Of course this is partially accounted for by the fact that so many non-whites that are selected for non-merit reasons are not able to meet the requirements of their college and subsequently drop out. This is to say, the admissions gap has nearly disappeared while the graduation gap has been growing wider proportionally.

fivethirtyeight.com/features/race-gap-narrows-in-college-enrollment-but-not-in-graduation/
census.gov/hhes/socdemo/education/data/cps/2014/tables.html

I find it funny how most people with a high IQ dont bother to speak the way you are trying to speak, because generally high IQ people realize its more important to be understood and quickly/concisely get your points across

Exposure. If you're on the lower end of the IQ spectrum, you aren't as likely to read much or go to college, both of which increase the chance that you get your morals and views from fiction and theory instead of hands-on experience and natural inclination. The case for "higher intelligence means tendency towards liberal views" isn't as clear-cut as it seems at first, and it certainly doesn't mean that smarter people "get it right".

Textbook example of bad graphing. Apparently 80% of the people on this board dont exist.

>He doesn't realize that the very foundation of a civilized society is built upon a Christian principle and people adhering to it
>he thinks he'll be able to form an atheist society that doesn't dissolve entirely into Marxism and the destruction of the nuclear family
>he thinks he's intellectually superior

This is why people have a problem with atheists, you build up a straw man of what religion means "haha, old guy sitting on a cloud, yeah right" and you debunk it with logic a child could manage, but you seem unable to see the consequences - which have been proven before when you remove social cohesion in a society, it leads to the inevitable introduction of a totalitarian superstate to fill the void.

If this were true, then iq is a litmus test for how likely you are to drink the commie jew-aid.

126 IQ doesn't mean shit if you can't listen/read without bias. You posted without bothering to fully understanding his point, then immediately tried to make a your own point about something you already know about. We are all guilty of this.

when I enter the link I dont see a scientific publication. I see a blog written by a woman about a canadian marxist

post the actual scientifiic study that supports this chart

I expect religious conservatives to be unintelligent but I don't expect lefties to be intelligent because women and blacks have lower intelligence than white males

>it stops at 110
really made me thinks

SHUT YOUR MOUF

Also, greater intelligence means greater ability to conceptualize abstract ethical systems, and it's also linked to generally higher empathy. Intelligence enables people to become victims to different pitfalls than if they were more limited in their thinking; the risks lie in the overemphasizing of the theoretical over the practical. One must always take care to step out of echo chambers and try to consider all arguments well. Everyone has biases, and humans are generally shit at reasoning and realigning their stances.

Christian principles existed and were used before Christianity existed. Christianity simply took what they wanted and what worked from what people already did.

Now somehow not murdering your neighbor and not stealing is "Christian" when in reality its just common fucking sense and some of the most basic laws we needed to have functioning society - which is definitely far older than Christianity.

The reason you need religion in a society is to control people.
This might be overly optimistic or idealist but I think that its possible to have an intelligent society that is redpilled/aware of what is good and bad for societies.
Replace religion with a strong cultural attitide, like Japan. Heck, have religion if only as a shared activity rather than a true belief system.