Neanderthals and Humans

How does Sup Forums feel about the fact that Europeans and Asians are LITERALLY genetically different from Africans, specifically sub-Saharan Africans?

With recent developments in sequencing not only our genome, but Neanderthal genome, scientists have concluded that modern Europeans and Asians (even Australian Aboriginals) carry and exhibit Neanderthal genes.

As of yet, those genes present in Humans of Neanderthal origin have been linked to either benign or negative traits, however it's only a matter of time before they think a gene to something positive (increased chance of higher cognitive abilities, anybody?).

I see this topic gaining much, much more attention in the years to come. With evidence now pointing to Neanderthals not only possessing an intelligence that rivaled that of Homo sapiens, but also of culture and even possibly spiritual or religious ideals, I think the truth that not only are the races 'different' (side note, many Asians carry DNA from a 3rd hominid species, Denisovans), but that there is a real genetic difference between them.

Now, the question is, who is more human? And who is better for our dear old Earth?

Other urls found in this thread:

dailymail.co.uk/sciencetech/article-2952418/Neanderthals-interbred-longer-modern-humans-east-Asia-DNA-reveals.html
twitter.com/NSFWRedditImage

Who cares faggot you're American

It's a real shame we killed off all our close human relatives.

Neanderthals are where we get our tiny dick genes from
That's why blacks have the BBC
if our ancestors never mated with neanderthals we would be packing the same size as blacks

>not caring about what it means to be a modern human
>not realizing this is the holy grail of racist fodder

Sorry, chief. I guess you'd rather talk about the talking heads on TV and how they're all liberal cucks or maybe you're too busy stroking the wiener that no girl has ever touched, while browsing pictures of Papa Trump??

>Now, the question is, who is more human?

Irrelevant question.

>And who is better for our dear old Earth?

No humans would be better for the Earth as a whole. Every different human culture does its fair share at fucking the planet and ruining it for all the other species.

I just wish people would realise and accept we are and always have been tribal creatures. Multicultural societies eat themselves alive. It's why Neanderthals don't exist anymore - I'm sure despite looking slightly differently they had severe cultural and linguistic differences which just didn't gel well with the rest of the upright apes.

Yeah we also wouldn't have inherited genes that allowed for Homo sapiens to thrive in Europe.

homo sapiens- black people
homo sapiens + neanderthal - white people
homo sapiens + neanderthal + denisovan - asian people.

Chinks have massive dicks tho.

wut

Here's the proof. East Asians have most neanderthal DNA than any other people:
dailymail.co.uk/sciencetech/article-2952418/Neanderthals-interbred-longer-modern-humans-east-Asia-DNA-reveals.html
East asians have tiniest dicks
Ergo neanderthal genes proven to cause tiny dicks
BBC proven by science

Yeah but on the upside without neanderthal DNA you'd be stupid as fuck like Africans

You're an idiot. EVEN IF, humans are tribal creatures at a primal level, the point of any argument like this is that we, as modern human beings, should overcome our primal urges and act in a civilized way. Since the intellectual awakening of humankind, this has been the overall arch of civilization, hence the word civilized.

I know man I'm packing as well (10 inches) but overall majority of us are lacking
Blacks win in that department

While this is certainly a possibility, there is no hard evidence of this being the case, yet. I speculate this link will happen in the next 3-5 years. I also wouldn't be surprised if such information was swept under the rug by academics with their own agenda to push, however we will see.

...

>10 inch phallus
>Southeast Asian

Whites confirm that they was living in caves.
KEK

Idk i'm white and muh dick is pretty big. Lots of white giys have bigger cocks than blacks.

Tu n'es pas sérieux Bubba...

That is an antiquated view of Neanderthals. An unfortunate misstep in the early days of Anthropology for sure, however this misdeed has since been rectified. Although it appears plenty of people in the masses still hold this archaic view of them.

The fact of the matter is that Neanderthals were far from the cavemen we believed them to be, there is multiple pieces of evidence that not only did they possess the means for vocal communication, they also cared for their injured and elderly, made tools on par if not surpassing the quality of tools made by Homo sapiens at the time, as well as burying and mourning their dead. The last one is a huge deal because it is evidence of not only that they understood mortality, but that they had a culture of sorts, complete with some type of spiritual or religious component.

Yeah & while you're at it why don't you overcome those other base unsophisticated instincts like, not enjoying pain, not liking freezing temperatures, not being happy about starvation etc etc etc.

Sérieusement...

What are you even trying to say?

Are you serious?

Even a quick browse will show you nothing I said in that post was inaccurate.

>Even a quick browse will show you nothing I said in that post was inaccurate.

J'ai dit le contraire, Bubba?

we aren´t the same species. It is just to "hard" to comprehend that there are two opposition races with high intelligence on earth. Simply because we set empathy on others based on intellect.

furthermore, neanderthal had a visual culture which exceeded that of h.sapiens, thought to be related to the larger occipital lobe.

it was only upon the occasion of the mixture of the two sub-species that art was born in the caves of southern France about 22,000 years ago.

this is also why negros cannot into art or painting.

It feels great. Who the fuck wants to be an African Australopithecus fucker?

Sick ass motherfuckers in this thread talkin bout bbc. You know Its fuckin big and mean and best.

Go ahead lil cucks. Take a good long look and beat your white dicks senseless. Save your wifes shit for me.

tbqh Ive often wondered if the multiple stories about elves, dwarfs, orcs and giants amongst the worlds of men, are some kind of anestral memery of the time when different types of man lived side by side.

neanderthals had massive brains and were probably high test

>muh dick
are you sure you arent a nigger?

You seem to imagine humans have advanced beyond intrinsic animal instinct when all our actions are predicated on it, followed by posthumous rationalisation, we're still tribal whether you like it or not.

>unironically believing the bbc myth

Maybe I should have put things in simpler terms. I am not claiming Homo neanderthalis and Homo sapiens are the same species. I'm merely stating that they mated and produced FERTILE hybridized offspring, not only once, but on three distinct occasions (the first of which is interestingly enough predates the accepted 'Out of Africa' theory). This interbreeding more than likely lead to the extinction of pure Neanderthals (the mechanism of which is still unknown), but left their genetic fingerprints all over all modern non sub-Saharan humans.

Neanderthals were largely more "barbaric" than say cro-magnons, but what set the neanderthal apart was its ability to plan ahead and strategize which made it king of the ice age.

In a place like subsaharan africa, you would just hunt and pick food the same day. Every day. All year long.

In Europe and Asia at the time, they had to ration food, preserve meats, and scout sparsely populated hunting grounds.

Notice why "yolo" and "being in the moment" is a thing among niggers. They have no concept of thinking ahead years, not even days.

I suppose that means we can bring back slavery right? Blacks are not humans.

The first part is definitely true, however your second claim is inaccurate, and your third claim is down right laughably incorrect.

That's not the point, however I could see how this topic could easily be twisted into the wetdreams of racists.

The idea that Neanderthals were somehow more 'barbaric' than Homo sapiens at the time is debatable, and the more we uncover about Neanderthals, the more this idea becomes less and less correct.

I'd put money on geneticists realizing that this so called 'cro-magnon man' are actually examples of first, second, or maybe even third generation Neanderthal/Homo sapien hybrids.

You've watched too much porn, Mr. Gook.

We also would still be living in caves, you retarded gook.

I think u got b8'd, m8

Hey, no need for racial slurs. With language like that it's clear you're missing the bigger picture.

slavery doesn't work for a lot of reasons, not just the ethics.

Chabal is a based Cro Magnon, not a filthy (((neanderthal)))

Pic looks like a typical ASU student.

kek i love that medposting is a thing now

good to see meds fighting back after being mocked and belittled by nordfags for years

>Notice why "yolo" and "being in the moment" is a thing among niggers. They have no concept of thinking ahead years, not even days.
I haven't been able to confirm this, hard to prove a negative after all, but so far as I know no sub-Saharan African language has any indigenous words for concepts relating to abstract time. "Future", "tomorrow", "next year", "10 years from now", I have not in three years of research found a sub-Saharan African language that can express these concepts without loanwords.

kek, in this case though, pic mocks Euros in general who are neanderboos, not Nords in particular

neandertals were smarter than pure homo sapiens but they were a much more stagnant people. They didn't have much children. when that italian super volcano erupted, it killed off most neanderthals and the remaining population were assimilated and bred with a bunch of homo sapiens who went north.

pure homo sapiens were dumb and weak, but they were adaptive and expansive
neanderthals were smart and strong, but they were stagnant and didn't expand
neandertals + homo sapien created europeans and asians, who were adaptive, expansive, strong and smart.

there's no real proof they were smarter, but perhaps the adaptation to the cold climate influenced their behavior and impulse control in such a way that our interbreeding produced a type of homo sapiens more apt to large scale social organization and less prone to chimpouts, which could also explain why west Eurasia and east Eurasia have been the cradles of civilization