Daily reminder that Republicans are tearing up Net Neutrality

arstechnica.com/tech-policy/2016/12/fcc-republicans-vow-to-gut-net-neutrality-rules-as-soon-as-possible/

are you ready to pay your meme tax citizen

Other urls found in this thread:

en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Wickard_v._Filburn
twitter.com/NSFWRedditGif

>Still Thinking Donald was the right choice

Fucking cuck

Hillary Clinton was the right choice

>Supported NAFTA, a deal with shipped many black jobs to Mexico
>Supports TPP a deal which will ship black manufacturing job to China
>Supports abortion, which keeps the black birthrates low
>Supports gun control, black peoples only real defense in high-crime rate neighborhoods
>Supports BLM a group which creates riots and ruins black communities, robs black stores, and smashes black business windows
>Supports regulations which make it impossible for small business owners, many of which are black
>Her economic austerity will starve black schools of funding needed to educate young blacks
>Her support of feminism will increase more break-up of black nuclear families
>Supported the 3 strikes act, a law that has created the mass incarceration phenomenon which is why 1/3 of blacks will spend time in prison.
>Supported the Youth Criminal Justice Act which ruined the lives of many Black youths
>Supports the war on drugs which as ruined many black lives and was a way for police to violate the privacy of blacks
>Mentored by a KKK member
>Supports mass immigration which will leave even more blacks unemployed
>Wants to spend more on welfare keeping blacks poor
>Supports private prisons which are part of the reasons so many blacks will spend time in prison
>Economic policies will create unemployment which means more unemployed blacks
>Is in bed with wallstreet, and wallstreets 2008 crash is the reason so many blacks got thrown out of their homes.

oh nooo Google's gonna have to pay fees

ssuuuuuuuuuure

go bac to israel kike

no for real anyone on Sup Forums that hates net neutrality is probably legit retarded

daily reminder that sites like Sup Forums would never have been possible without the internet being treated as a 'dumb pipe'.

>net neutrality never exists
>moot makes Sup Forums
>the 5% of internet customers who pay for unrestricted access are the only ones who can even see it
>site dies out because it generates no content and no meaningful discussion

>jeff bezos makes amazon
>the 5% of internet customers who pay for unrestricted access are the only ones who can even see it
>site dies out because no one buys anything from it

Repeat thousands and thousands of times for all your favorite sites.

>Using Autism as a insult
Thanks to my autism I have 150IQ, I'm also a psychopath (legitimate condition) which means I'm not held back by irrational emotions.

Like im held back by law and shit but when on stage I'm not held back by fear. I am like king

>black jobs, black manufacturing jobs, black small business owners
5/10

It's true. Clinton's policies will send black manufacturing jobs to Mexico and her administrative policy will harm black businesses.

Funny thing is, even if net neutrality ends, the only result is that people find other ways onto another network that is freed of the restrictions of supposed "providers."

A huge underground movement and scene will pop-up beneath the woodwork, a new network that is truly free.

Ending Net Neutrality is the dumbest thing these people could do to their businesses.

Trump is a "de facto" kike. He just recognized Jerusalem as Israel's capital and his daughter is married to one.

Most burguer Sup Forumstards are way too stupid to remember that. They even call him "man of the people" (loool). The sort of guy that placed CEO's on his cabonet, was born a millionaire and lived his life in a tower surrounded by Louis XV furniture.

>cabinet

net neutrality is a leddit tier meme

in romania they have fast internet because the government has its hand out of it

You're dumb the fact that he appoints only the rich to his cabinant proves hes a man of the people.

govt is the one granting monopolies in the U.S. through regional monopolies

the U.S. is closer to mercantilism than it is to traditional capitalism in terms of ISPs

How

Congratulations, this is the worst thread I've read all week.

sage

You poor fellow... Do you understand what the Internet actually is, and how it works?

either we adapt to other networks that already stem from the underground or someone goes through the trouble to make a whole new network, something similar to tor or the freenet but even better.

Back when I was liberal, I really cared about this.

But now, as a conservative, I realize net neutrality won't change a damn thing for me. The scare tactics people use - saying they will throttle websites and such - it is ludacris. It's impossible.

Let me lay some numbers on you. There are over 250,000,000 internet domains. Not pages - just domains. Like "www.domain.com". And over 6 million are added and removed every single day.

Now tell me, how the fuck are you going to whitelist/blacklist a directory of 250-fucking-million domains that is constantly changing? It's not possible. Not in any way that would really affect us.

Now you have the business side. If Comcast wanted to raise the bandwidth costs on a 3rd party company (say, Crafts of Egypt), they immediately have a conflict of interest. Amazon, Walmart, and hundreds of other high-traffic retailers sell 3rd party goods on their website. If you start running up costs on 3rd parties, 1st parties are going to get pissy because that's their paychecks. The is an enormously tangled web between online retailers and they can't just go jacking up rates willy nilly.

Your internet won't change. This is purely about profit between businesses and consumers won't even notice.

... The real concern with net neutrality is one of censorship, but no one ever talks about it for some reason. You'd think people would care that ISPs lose their Common Carrier status and gain the right to block websites at their discretion. Funny, that.

>Implying ISPs are going to want to pay for the cost of deep packet inspection and managing DNS requests to mediate tiers of 'access'
At most it just means comcast is gunna start monitoring people for p2p again, and maybe fuck with netflix.

Everything else is irrelevant because it doesnt comprise any significant bandwidth

I have to admit though hes not a liar. He said he would end lobbying and corruption.

He just did it. The corrupters themselves are the government lool.

I can't believe people care about the internet.

Go outside

>net neutrality
>anything to do with domains

>isp's
>can't jack up prices willy nilly

are you retarded

VPNs are going to be a really sore spot if the ISPs try to get freaky. 99% of my traffic is talking to some VPN in Chicago. How are they going to regulate that? VNPs are a legitimate network security measure. They can't just raise rates on people using VPNs. There'd be huge backlash.

>Now tell me, how the fuck are you going to whitelist/blacklist a directory of 250-fucking-million domains that is constantly changing?
the same way youtube deals with its video uploads, automatic censoring of certain material performed by a bot.

They can already do that shit now, is the point.
"getting rid of net neutrality" just means a couple extra money grubbing practices, not OMG IM GUNNA HAVE TO PAY TO GET ACCESS TO Sup Forums NOW

Dumb, D-Trump is literally Bruce Wayne.

>Hide behind billionaire playboy persona
>fight the league of shadows at night

How about you tell me what you think is wrong instead of shitposting.

Based on a set list of filters. You can't filter wildcards from domain names in a blacklist for your entire customer base. Even if you did, people would just change their domain names.

Why would they want to?
Again, for them to do any kind of this shit they have to spend equipment time on stripping packets apart to figure out what kind of traffic it is. And where is the profit motivation for spending that time and charging people for VPN use?

This will be a gateway for Verizon and Comcast to punish bandwidth hogs like Netflix in a bid to get you to use their content instead.
ISPs don't give a shit about anything else.

P.S. What VPN do you use? I've been meaning to pick one up.

i already did

its right here

It's not faster, it's just cheaper
1GB download speed is 13 dollars a month

...

Also because their country is slightly smaller than Wyoming, and that means its easy to run high-capacity lines since it's no longer across 3000 miles of wasteland

>talking about making blacklists

Now just imagine if it's a whitelist instead of a blacklist.. and you only have comcast in your area.. and comcast only "sells" you access to some website, the websites that have made a "deal" with comcast. Congrats you get access to amazon.com for only $50/year!
Sup Forums.com will be $100 -- it's a higher tier cost network!

>Sup Forums.com

>Merchantrubbinghands.jpeg

That's an outright lie.

Net neutrality never existed until the FCC brought it into policy. Like from the beginning until 2014 I think the internet was NOT affected by net neutrality because it didn't fucking exist. It's just a government power grab. In fact the internet was better before it. More diverse content, more dark corners.

nice bait, leaf

ok why didn't this happen before net neutrality?
why were states unable to regulate ISPs before the FCC decision?

Low quality Canadian fecesposting. Here's your (you), now >>>>>reddit

This is how Newspeak works.

You assholes are talking like the Internet never existed or thrived under no net neutrality. How fucking old are you people? Do you not remember the fucking internet? Net neutrality is younger than a or schooler in terms of legal policy by the FCC.

How terrible was pre neutrality internet?

I remember getting tons of free media pre "neutrality'.

Places like Rotten, Sup Forums were born and grown in an environment without net neutrality.

Democrats were pushing for net neutrality to be used to censor speech on the internet. It has to go.

Thank God. "Net Neutrality" is obviously some sort of mind virus that turns your brain to Swiss cheese because everyone who ever uses this term turns out to be retarded.

this guy has a point.

why exactly did net neutrality become a concern again? was comcast trying to extort shekels from netflix or something?

fairness doctrine 2.0 internet boogaloo
Also don't forget the usurping of slate power by telling them what restrictions they can put on local municipalities

>why exactly did net neutrality become a concern again?
Critical theory 101, solutions in search of problems.

>was comcast trying to extort shekels from netflix or something?

...yes

net neutrality was always the de facto state of the internet, then the turbojews at comcast decided they weren't fucking their customers hard enough so they moved onto shit like netflix to try and steal from them

>net neutrality was always the de facto state of the internet, then the turbojews at comcast decided they weren't fucking their customers hard enough so they moved onto shit like

Nobody gives a shit about your electric jew shows you man child

not an argument, friend

Net neutrality is all about giving the government a hand in things so they can censor fake news. If a government can enforce "neutrality", it can enforce censorship just as easily. The laws and means of dealing with monopolies and collusion of ISPs to extort us exist. It just requires an actual functioning Department of Justice.

I dont care if Comcast is get Netflix to pay more shekels
It is not something I am willing to give the feds more power over

>more power

they already had it

It is them continuing to usurp unconstitutional powers

>people worrying this much
Well if anyone did any research into the issue instead of barfing all over the keyboard, they would know that this refers to Title 2 of the communications act of 1934 which makes ISPs legally considered common carriers, Title 2 was put into place March 2015, if you didnt have to pay to access Sup Forums prior to March 2015 you wont have to pay now. Thats all the power over Net Neutrality the FCC has, as the DMCA along with the CDA and Good Samaritan acts make it so you dont have to pay to access websites. The FCC only enforces the Good Samaritan act, and in order for them to remove it,there would need be a massive court preceding between them and all the ISPs that have agreed to it.
Shut up and shitpost more fags.

Wouldn't be a lot better to simple remove any regulation on the market?

cite it

it is not commerce between the states

so cite it

cite what?

This is literally another issue that only exists because the government is propping up small monopolies.

or, you know, with the FCC actively saying it isn't interested in enforcing net neutrality, the ISP could just be like

yeah we're throttling the shit out of netflix because it competes with cable, as well as facebook because we invented comcastbook

if you don't like it you can fuck right off to dialup

saying "oh that's never been a problem before" is no reason to open the floodgates on possible abuses. deregulation under that logic is why the entire U.S. economy collapsed not even a decade ago

1. States can regulate ISPs
2. Netflix can do like Google did and start their own ISP

explain how state regulations differ from federal regulations

answer clearly and concisely

You're either below 18 or retarded.

One is constitutional

I like how you put so much thought and effort in there

but next lets hear from someone who doesn't have a disability

both are

>THE GOVERNMENT WILL FIX IT

Sounds like a bunch of god damn fucking statists in my god damn thread?

Ever heard of the free market you god damn retards?

now that i'm starting to think about it a bit more, the problem wouldn't exist in the first place if the monopolies comcast has in certain places didn't exist

i'm fine with net neutrality going the way of the dodo as long as those polices go with it, but i'm pretty sure (((they))) won't let that happen

Why specifically should I give a fuck?

ISPs are not commerce between the states
Do you have a point?

I'm a pretty much a statist on all things real and I realize this is bad.

The net doesn't work like telephones or packaged goods.
Government will never understand this.

you stated that before and it was gibberish then and now

answer the question

>Ajit Varadaraj Pai (born January 10, 1973) is a Commissioner at the United States Federal Communications Commission (FCC). He was nominated for a Republican Party position on the commission by President Barack Obama

>Michael O'Rielly is a member of the U.S. Federal Communications Commission (FCC), an independent agency of the United States government. He was nominated by President Barack Obama

wow really makes you think

I gave you two answers

...

try giving correct ones

>government mandated monopolies are good!
kys

Why dont we just forgo the middleman and let the government provide the service at the expense of all rather than line the pockets of a CEO who exploits people? Why should I trust a company to give me free internet when they care about their revenue more?

> Sup Forums, that will be an extra $10 a month goy
> Oh, email that isn't from our system that we don't get ad revenue for? That will be another $5
> AND you want Netflix? That will be another $15 to use that
> The adult browsing package for porn will be $25 more a month

How specifically does net neutrality prevent those items?

see attached

ISPs that are also cable companies have been trying to extort netflix to not get throttled for some time because they also sell cable

wouldn't make a difference if regional monopolies weren't a thing, but fixing that would require the federal government to do something about it, whereas this is maintaining the free market-esque status quo of the current internet. one's a much easier legal battle.

yeah my point was you have a mental disability

Dammit, leaf. Could you at least post these things via proxy?

Where do the feds get the authority to regulate ISPs?

same place they get it to regulate other industries

Completely this, the pro NN shills pretend like the internet would collapse if we didn't have it yet the regulation wasn't even codified until last year and we haven't had the blacking out of small sites or premium charges for certain websites at all. This was a non-issue made by the media and leftists to give the FCC, and ultimately the federal government, greater control over the internet.

nobody pulled a stunt like comcast did until recently

>regulation

thats not what de facto means

>What is ARPANET
>What is DARPANET
>gov't.
Time Warner and Comcast jerk off to the collapse of NN. Packaged content deals are already being talked about and shilled to the unsuspecting masses.

probably interstate commerce

Thanks, Eisenhower. You were the last good president, but you fucked us good.

A

We have had throttling of certain items by ISP's however. You are ok with that?

unconstitutionally
it was FDR

en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Wickard_v._Filburn

Anyone who is for it is a retard who only reads headlines. Companies should be allowed to charge whatever the fuck they want for their resources. The problem is government-created artificial barriers to entry. What you fags think is a solution is simply handing the government more control over the internet.

Stop pretending like you understand what's going on. You clearly don't.

sure why not?

>unconstitutionally

then cite it

it's not even neutral it gives more benefits to cell phone companies

I don't feel like using AskJeeves, user.

you mean the one time Comcast had a tizzy with Netflix, resulting in slow streams for like a week, then they resolved the issue? I think I can live with that.