Actually, we're all just a bunch of niggers

Out of Africa theory. True or false, Sup Forums?

Other urls found in this thread:

ancient-origins.net/human-origins-science/human-skull-challenges-out-africa-theory-001283?nopaging=1
amazon.com/Erectus-Walks-Amongst-Richard-Fuerle/dp/1604581212
en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Liliger
en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Dog
en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Mule#Fertility
youtube.com/watch?v=cauBnrPXpbg
twitter.com/SFWRedditGifs

All land dwelling species initially came from the sea. Does that mean we are fish?

Somewhat true. However Europeans have A LOT of Neanderthal DNA in them.

Modern whites are a hybrid of Homo sapiens who migrated from Africa and Neanderthals who are Native to Europe.

How come black and Asian people have black-people noses, but those in the middle east don't? Did the trait disappear than reappear?

no, just because our ancestors migrated from africa doesnt really mean we are niggers

do you not comprehend how evolution works?

When did we actually migrate from Africa though? What's the consensus?

actually, that means that niggers are least evolved since they weren't capable of leaving africa.

If you have fair eyes or skin you are most certainly not from Africa. Everyone with blue eyes is related to a single chad from europe.

WE WUZ KANGS

"We're all Africans!" is the stupidest argument I or anyone else has ever heard in their entire lives.

We share a common ancestry with earthworms, so, "WE ALL WORMZ YO!"

Why don't we hear shitlibs make that argument? Oh, right, because it reveals their argument for what it is: dogshit.

>Every blue-eyed person on the planet is descended from a single European who lived around 6,000 to 10,000 years ago, and who first developed a specific mutation that accounts for the now widespread iris coloration.

We are another species entirely different to the afranigger

False. At least these numbers given.

ancient-origins.net/human-origins-science/human-skull-challenges-out-africa-theory-001283?nopaging=1

>prehistoric africans go to Europe
>they fuck neanderthals, get smart and end up building many empires
>prehistoric africans go to Asia
>they fuck denisovan, get smart and end up building many empires
>prehistoric africans stay in Africa and don't build shit in hundreds of thousands of years

>Black Africans magically evolve white skin and facial features in less time than it took for Homo Erectus to evolve into modern humans
Nice try, Shekelstein

So what u be sayin is

We wuz niggaz?

So we all wuz kangz?

a fix to OP's map, australoid's didn't migrate through the chinese mainland, they went through southern india before reaching the south asian islands and eventually australia.

fpbp
/thread

What parts of it wouldn't be true? Where else do you think Humans come from? Could you explain?

>we wuz niggaz?
yes

>we wuz kangz?
nope, the jewish people who left egypt with moses wuz kangz

That's literally what the map shows, are you retarded?

>Out of Africa theory. True or false, Sup Forums?

False. We have enough archaeological evidences to start building new theory, but polit correct fashists do not allow this to happen.

One can check this book for example:

amazon.com/Erectus-Walks-Amongst-Richard-Fuerle/dp/1604581212

There is no consensus. "Out of Africa" means recently out of Africa and not millions of years ago from African monkey ancestors. Recently out of Africa has been debunked within the past five years with peer-reviewed (aka kosher-approved) studies showing Africans partially hanging off the Eurasian branch of genetics. It's the other part they haven't addressed and currently the big elephant in the room of genetics studies: Sub-Saharan Africans are half Eurasian and half primitive (aka non-Sapiens). He admixture happened 12k years ago.

We didn't come from Africa and the only reason sub-Saharans partly resemble genetically modern humans is because 12k years ago genetically modern humans mixed with their non-human ancestors. Which is fucking OBVIOUS. Similar case with abos I would imagine

Where are my blue eyed cousins at?

Yes

>"Out of Africa" means recently out of Africa and not millions of years ago from African monkey ancestors.

Except that's not what I was taught.

But what about pangea

True.

Middle eastern semites are a remnant population of the original migration. That probably falls to the Dravidians who originally inhabited much of the middle east before being displaced by caucasoid semite farmers and aryans later on.

>Listening to americans about anything ever
Kill all american posters. All they do is be retarded. Not shitposting. Not irony. They're just so retarded

You're telling me that primitive human mixed with an aboriginal ancestor? Are you huffing petrol?

blue eyes are the best eyes.

It's true. All it means is that evolution is a powerful force. And it lends some hope for final racial victory no matter what, since it means nogs could continue evolving into humans.

This theory is the most Jewish of them all. Whites are from Hyperborea. Niggers are from Africa. Asians and Native Americans are from Asia. End of story.

>actually, we're all junst a bunch of fish
This is now an out of oceans theory thread.

This is true. The only thing that brought them out of africa was slave ships.

Hey, I'm not questioning you on this, but can you point me to peer-reviewed sources?

Middle Easterners have the highest concentration of Neanderthal DNA.

Google "cladistics".

Can you breed with a nigger?

If so, you are the same species.

Eurasians really only began to surpass African material culture circa 10,000 BP.

True white pussy was made for Big Black Cock.

We left Africa to get away from them, just like we left the cities to get away from them in the 1960s and just like we will leave the earth to get away from them in the 2060s.

Explains those nigger lips.

Different species can create offspring, sometimes the offspring are fertile too.

>cmon guyz, lets out-of-africa into europe?
>who are these stocky guys with bigger brains that already live here?
>lets breed and kill them out of existence.

>You're telling me that primitive human mixed with an aboriginal ancestor?

Irish prisoners bred abbo bitches just recently.

You think it couldn't have happened long ago, too?

>Kill all american posters.
You're a Cucknadian. That's about all that needs to be said.

Only after the aliens left, they left their creation run wild after their use was finished.

keked, FPBP

Literally just proves blacks are unevolved

>Actually, we're all just a bunch of niggers.

European Colonialism has just been justified, noice! Europeans were just revisiting good'ol Mother Africa.

>Middle Easterners have the highest concentration of Neanderthal DNA.

Pretty much. Black people are like the sibling who just never went to college, got a job, etc. and just lives at home in their mom's basement and collects wellfare for their 47.5 children, all by different men.

>Can you breed with a nigger?
>If so, you are the same species.
Nope different species can create offspring.

...

Come back after your wife/daughter/sister have been raped and/or murdered by "refugees". Not happening here in Trumpland.

They cannot by definition.

Even ignoring that, the genetic variance between Africans and Eurasians is practically null compared to between HSS and HSN.

>Can you breed with a nigger?

A horse can breed with a donkey.

A horse is not a donkey.

They found neanderthal bones in my grandmothers yard in the west bank.

>spe·cies
>ˈspēsēz,ˈspēSHēz/Submit
>noun
>1.
>BIOLOGY
>a group of living organisms consisting of similar *individuals capable of exchanging genes or interbreeding.* The species is the principal natural taxonomic unit, ranking below a genus and denoted by a Latin binomial, e.g., Homo sapiens.
>synonyms: type, kind, sort; More

Is the offspring fertile?

>Wolf and doge are the same species
>Horse and Donkey are the same species
Liberals not even once.

>Actually, we're all just a bunch of niggers.

45,000 years of evolution in the frozen north is what it takes to turn a nigger into a human. Kind of like coal turning into diamond after spending years under heat and pressure.

Mules (male donkey, female horse) are fertile. Hinnies (female donkey, male horse) are sterile usually.

Doesn't matter.

A lion and a tiger can produce a fertile liger - as was proved by a Russian zoo.

en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Liliger

You have different species breeding with each other.

Yes, wolf and dog are the exact same species. "Canis lupus".

Horses and donkeys are not. They cannot generate fertile offspring.

I'm not saying that Africans are teh intellectual equals of Eurasians, but it's a fucking ignorant absurdity to assert that we're different species. Hell, it's probably an anthropocentric stretch to categorize HE as a separate species.

No we evolved from niggers. While niggers stayed the same sub human brian dead monkey fucks for 250,000 years

Fucking mules, idiot. Separate species created from male donkey breeding with a female horse. Killer bees are another example of hybrid speciation.

Wolves and dogs technically are the same species, since they can produce viable offspring. So they properly would be considered a subspecies of wolf.

Horses and Donkeys produce Mules, which are not fertile. Therefore they are not the same species since the offspring is not viable.

>canis familiaris
>canis lupus
>same

Mules are only rarely fertile, and only ever mares. They cannot reproduce with any kind of regularity to necessitate creating a rule.

Mules are fertile, Hinnies are not.

Dogs are Canis lupus familiaris, not Canis lupus. Wolves are Canis lupus lupus. Open a fucking bio textbook sometime.

the Chinese disagree.

fpbp

> brian dead

Were there humans in Australia before abos?

Calm down you autistic shitskin you knew exactly what i meant.

It's true, science confirms it.

You're not against science are you?

Unlike the donkey/horse or lion/tiger analogy, dogs and wolves produce fertile offspring. There are lots of wolfdog breeders in my home state.

>Middle Easterners have the highest concentration of Neanderthal DNA.

Blatantly untrue

you're still related to blacks, dumbass.

Mules are infertile vastly more often than not.

Bot sexes are not consistently fertile. Therefore they do not qualify as a species.

Wrong.

Dogs are "Canis lupus familiaris". Wolves are simply "Canis lupus".

en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Dog

>Canis lupus familiaris

>en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Mule#Fertility
>There are no recorded cases of fertile mule stallions. A few mare mules have produced offspring when mated with a purebred horse or donkey.

One would mean subspecies the other would mean different species. Not the same thing you sub limey cunt.

I'm also related to gorillas and whales what's your point?
>Not the same thing you sub limey cunt.
Yet you all knew exactly what i meant and it sent you shitskins into an autistic rage.

youtube.com/watch?v=cauBnrPXpbg

Lions and Tigers can produce fertile offspring known as ligers, or tyglions (don't know spelling on that one).

Further more, there have been documented instances of fertile Mules (as in, they've given birth).

Niggers, Abos, and Humans are all subspecies of Homo Sapiens.

Fuck no. We are all "Middle Eastern" is more credible theory.

Neither are *consistently* fertile, or fertile most of the time, or fertile across both sexes.

Do blacks and abos have legends about the flood? Euros, asians and native americans have them which may indicate common ancestry. Ive never heard anything about our legends overlapping with the legends of the kangz. Im saying this because maybe our ancestors were one of many groups which migrated from africa or Caucasus and we just eradicated all the others except abos, subsaharans and black pajeets.

Kangs

friendly reminder that liberals and niggers would have you believe these are all the same species.

Does it even matter? Modern day Africans are as different to Ancient Africans as we are.

Africans do not. Abos do, primarily relating to the separation of Australia, Torres islands, New Guinea and Tasmania. This is for the same reason that Lauro-Eurasians have a flood myth: they were in regions affected by melting ice age ice caps.

Not only that, but the sub-Saharan common ancestors (i.e. not shared with the other races) actually bred with a currently unnamed sub-Saharan variant of Homo erectus (I call it the Homo wewuz), which is represented as that twig in the upper right corner of pic related.

ITT: muh neanderthals. this meme needs to die. there is 0 evidence that humans gained anything useful from neanderthal admixture.

The secret of civilization is gene-culture coevolution. thats the final redpill. Read "the 10,000 Year Explosion" (free pdf is somewhere online). then look into hbd bloggers peter frost, hbdchick and others.

80kish years ago. It was probably many migrations.

Don't overstate your case. Though obviously not on par with the West, there have been notable state-like formations in West Africa. (im assuming you're referring to nigs and not mixed populations like ethiopans , egyptians and such). Ashanti, Mali, and Songhai to name a few. I don't get why people find it so hard to acknowledge racial differences, and acknowledge the fact that colonialism fucked a lot of shit up at the same time.

holy kek look at this graph
>chimpanzee
will science be great again?

Human beings didn't all suddenly come from one single spot on Earth, that's not how that works

They do in nature. Some animals of different genus can produce viable offspring. Bison and Bos (cows) create viable offspring. Did you know that most buffalo in the us have non-native cattle DNA from unsupervised breeding over the last 150 years?

A few bird genus can also cross.

Don't talk about what you don't know.

source?

All of the pairings among all those would result in a fertile offspring most of the time and when their territories overlap their mating habits lead them to interbreed.

True but false.

The location is consistent with the first civilization of Sumer. It would make sense for civilization to spread outwards from there. However this doesn't mean we were niggers. Niggers were just the ones that stayed the longest.

It's the other way around, female miles can be fertile, but yes it is rare.