Welfare

How should we stop welfare queens?

Hard mode: no shutting down the entire system

God mode: no racial extermination

Other urls found in this thread:

therightstuff.biz/2016/04/06/healthcare-and-the-spic-nig-cycle-2/
express.co.uk/news/world/670000/Unemployed-Russians-face-parasite-tax-economy-nosedives
twitter.com/NSFWRedditGif

make it illegal to not actively be looking for a job while on welfare

One payment per household.

I am not God, therefore racial extermination

vote republican

Sauce?

Please tell me this is some my 600 lb life show

Bankrupt the system.
Stop paying taxes. Find every tax loop hole.
Use any government benefit you qualify for. Structure your life to use up as much government resources as possible.

Reform the tax code so there's no dead zone where people get more on welfare than they do working and getting taxed, cap child benefits at 2 children, and offer benefits primarily via tax cuts to encourage people to seek jobs.

remove all government aid and welfare and social securtity etc and institute a universal basic income

The way it works in the 20s. You have to wait in line all day to get your handout.

>2016
>not being a tier-7 welfare wizard

Send all blacks back to Africa.
Because it isn't racial extermination, it's fine for God mode..

Easy, we poison all the KFC food and kool aid.

Reduce benefit amounts for each child born whilst the sow is receiving welfare.

Give blacks their own autonomous territory in the Unites States, say Mississippi, Louisiana, Alabama, and the Florida panhandle. They can run their society however they want. They can have their own government, schools, police force, etc, and they'll never have to worry about being oppressed by mean ol' whitey anymore.

No.

Why is it better for poor single mothers to not be looking after their children and have to leave them alone alone at home/ on the streets?

Absolutely socially damaging

Privatize welfare.

Open welfare centers. At these centers you are assigned a duty for the day... cooking food for school lunches or might be cleaning toilets at the Y , could be picking up litter on the streets, removing graffiti, etc.

Failure to complete your assigned task means you get less money this month.

therightstuff.biz/2016/04/06/healthcare-and-the-spic-nig-cycle-2/

You have to submit to a regular government drug test.

If you pass, you get welfare.

Damn, my solution was to give these lands to white-ethnotards. Let them create there nation-state. We can get cameras and broadcast the show on netflix or some shit.

Without shutting down the system...

We could retool the "system" so that all public expenditure on welfare is geared toward investment instead of "free" money.

Do what China did with the ethnic han.. one child rule.

it would be a great place though

Make welfare a conditional benefit. The problem with welfare is that people treat it as an acceptable and permanent supplement to living expenses. Almost like it's a right instead of something that is meant to help you get back on your feet. Make it so that recipients are expected to behave and contribute back to society for benefits to continue. The following is required:

1) No criminal behavior. This means no misdemeanor theft, drug use/possession or assault. Pretty much anything above a speeding ticket is grounds for revoking benefits. You're already jobless. Don't be a shitstain on society.

2) Community service 6 hrs a day, at least 2 times a week. Pick up garbage, clean graffiti, or weeding/landscaping public parks. You want a paycheck from the government? Do work for the government. Missing a session for the month means a 25% reduction in benefits for that month. Miss another and it's 50%. Miss another and it's 100%. Hours and schedules are flexible and if you make up a missed session before month's end, benefits will not be cut.

3) An additional 2 days of your work week will be for either applying for jobs or attending an accredited education/training program to develop marketable skills for a better employment. Progress will need to be reported to your case manager every 3 months via copies of resumes submitted via mail/fax/email to whatever company and/or progress reports from training courses. Every 6 months, your records will be audited. If the case manager feels that effort is insincere or fraudulent, benefits may be cut or revoked entirely.

Businesses accept some losses to shoplifting as a cost of doing business, because there are measures of prevention that would cost them more. There are always going to be some welfare cheats, and trying to eliminate them all isn't worth it when you end up hurting people who need help to help themselves (and them give back, oftentimes).

Why do some people, like some Conservative MPs in Canada, encourage mothers to stay home with schemes like split income tax, but the moment the father dies or bail on their kids, withhold from the mother the income she would need to continue doing her job as a mother, especially now that the kid(s) would only get attention and care from one parent instead of two? So long as the children are small and need nurture to become citizens the stay at home parent is doing work.

If the number of children increase after the start of hard times, there should be more in-kind benefits and less discretion - but this will only be fair and feasable if the woman has access to birth control - most doctors are reluctant about tubal ligation. The last time I was uninsured, birth control pills cost $60 to $70 for three months of prescription, and keep in mind poor people experience more stressful situations under which hormonal birth control will fail: using antibiotics to treat infections, using anti-depressants such as St.John's Wort, noting taking the pill on time due to irregular working shifts and sleeping schedules.

Why don't the women just abstain from sex? Well, in addition to sex being a part of most human's natural urges (and how fair is it that again, women gets the blunt of the tango's blame?) Pressured sex happens more often to disadvantaged women, especially when she can't afford to rent alone so she must live with and share rent with a boyfriend to stay out of a shelter or her abusive childhood home.

It uses to be churches and communities that would help out. Now the government just gives handouts to everyone

>what's 1+1?
>hard mode: not 2

If you really wanted to stop them you could send them to labor camps after X years of being on welfare. But seriously, it's just not worth it. You lose less money by keeping things as they're now.

dude they abandon their kids and go clubbing anyway

Been saying stuff like this for years! You could further this idea by adding benefits for doing more community service that goes up to a cap. This way, they have to work for a minimum, but can use "free time" to help their communities and get indirectly paid slightly more for it.

express.co.uk/news/world/670000/Unemployed-Russians-face-parasite-tax-economy-nosedives
parasite tax

Replace all welfare with UBI (universal basic income). It's just one payment per month and with all other welfare gone if they squander it it's their own fault and they get to starve.

shutting down the entire system with racial extermination

>Taxing people who have no money
Does Russia want Yeltsin-era breadlines back?

>offer benefits primarily via tax cuts to encourage people to seek jobs.

This is fucking brilliant.

If you are too fat to outrun a hungry person, you are now food.

>Hard mode: no shutting down the entire system
Only give welfare to whites for limited periods of time.

>God mode: no racial extermination
See above. No handouts for the shitskins.

EZ

Can't take away welfare cause there would be 100 million people in trouble. There is no cost effective way of dealing with this but the current system. In fact, increasing the payments is advised and is implemented today. Increasing prisons due to 100 million people is more expensive than giving them their welfare per month. Prove me wrong. If all of them request trials, which they all will to shut down the system, you'll have expenses and anarchy.

Hate to break it to you but we've been paying people not have a revolution for years.

you're missing the point. They're about tax those who refuse to take jobs being offered to them. The only way to motivate a porch monkey, is not only take away their welfare, but to also threaten to tax their weed profits, for refusing to work and support society.

>How should we stop welfare queens?
We really shouldn't; it would cost more to find and punish the relatively few people who find loopholes than it would to let them go live their miserable lives. Besides, changing the rules would just cause more problems by fucking over the people who are legitimately trying to get off of welfare and cost even more money in terms of unnecessary rules and by depressing the economic output of those who could otherwise find a job if they had assistance.

Poverty is a trap and the more people we let get stuck there, the worse we are as a whole. Poor people can't buy nice things, they can't invest, they often turn to crime or are affected by it, which drives up the cost of social services. If they can't get out of it, it just furthers the problem another generation.

It's actually a big social problem - human beings are obsessed with fairness and being cheated that they'll sabotage themselves just to deny someone an advantage. That's what the whole "welfare queen" meme was created to exploit; Reagan made up a woman (literally) to stoke people's passions and justify cutting welfare.

simple
to be on welfare you must be sterilized

that encourages single motherhood, we should be encouraging a father in the house

want welfare? = agree to permanent sterilization and revoke adoption rights.