What's Sup Forums's political compass history? Am I still Liberian?

What's Sup Forums's political compass history? Am I still Liberian?

I've seen it all

...

I've noticed almost all people start in the green quadrant. I think it might be evident of the lefty liberal version of history most people in the west have been taught since the mid 20th century.

We're almost the same guys

Indeed, it appears as though I trust the market ever so slightly more than you though.

Most everybody starts life as a liberal in our generation because we were raised with forced sharing and "girl power" and "everybody can do anything!" mindsets. It's only when we got older and were capable of independent thought that we realized that was fucking retarded

>Going from commie to literal Natsoc white power shit

How tho?

been a bumpy ride

...

There is no much of a history with me.

I was a Communist Atheist - Capitalist Atheist - NatSoc Christian and now Catholic Nationalism.

This is me!

From Right autoritharian Pinochet tier, to left libertarian Gandhi/Dorothy Day Tier. It's been a fun ride. I just realized judeomasonic conspiracies and such bullshit the anglos believe aren't actually real.

Nationalism was condemned by Pope Pius XI.

Been stuck here for a few years. I consider myself a true fascist or "third position".

Ironically I'm more anti-capitalist than nationalist

Too tired of thinking i guess

...

So?

So fuck you, LARPing asshole and stop associating the Catholic faith with your idiotic supremacist ideologies.

t. Mexican intellectual

How is that last one libertarian?

I've basically been in the top left quadrant forever, but I've gotten more extreme.

What exactly did he say? Mit brennender Sorge doesn't count.

UNA PINCHE HOJA

this is me.

Well, no, because Left Libertarianism doesn't exist. It's a myth. All Leftism is inherently authoritarian because it restricts property rights.

This underlines one of the key problems with this four-square chart: You can theoretically end occupying a position on this chart that doesn't exist in reality. In reality there is no such thing as a Left Libertarian, but this chart will tell you that there is. So you'll believe it and operate under that assumption when really you've just been in the lower levels of the Red square the whole time.

political compass asks you about philosophical beliefs, not political beliefs

I believe in socialist mob rule but I don't believe it should be implemented through policy or government intervention

Being right-wing is fine. As is being left-wing. Neither is right or wrong.

The American Republican party is Cancer though. It went from being a party of states rights, expansion of civil liberties and lower taxes, to anti-science, anti-intellectism, corrupt shills for whoever has the biggest money dick.

The chart is basically economic right-economic left and socially conservative-socially liberal. People always misinterpret it though. For example, I'm in the red quadrant, which is meant to signify socially conservative and economically leftist, but people always interpret it as communism because it's on the left side.

It's been a bumpy ride

Daily reminder that a forgiving God is a cu cucked God.

It counts, just like Non Abbiamo Bisogno, Populorum Progressio and Solicitudo Rei Socialis.

So you like straight democracy basically?

Mit brennender Sorge is about the radical nationalism of the Nazis. I dare you to find a similar condemnation of Francoist Spain or Salazar's Portugal. Even Mussolini's Italy was ok for a while.

Well sure, but that's why everybody STARTS as a greenboy.

Also the Republican party is such a fucking mess because literally anything that isn't "nice guy" politics the democrats and left push ends up getting lumped in.
Republicans aren't so much a cohesive party as it is a bunch of people shoving religious agendas, with other people shoving anti-environmental agendas, and neither group actually giving a shit about the other.
It's internally fragmented.

it was quite a ride

Spengler was a cuck edgy contrarian with shit tier opinions on anything about religion. His views on christianity apply only to the protestant sectsm the only ones he studied.

>not enforced y government or policy

he's ancap

Mexican just like most of LatAm have no idea what Catholicism is. You combine the faith with your dirty natives ideas.

But I'm sorry, I can't expect a brown manlet understand what Catholicism Nathionalism is.

SJWs end up in the left libertarian category cos they're love mass immigration and whatnot even though they're authoritarian as fuck.

No, you're a communist

Then you're bottom left, ya retard

Well...

such a classic Sup Forums evolution

Well what about Libertarian socialists? Like the left leaning independent Bernie migrants during the last election?

People who hold the belief in a free-market, but also believe strongly in civil liberties and a neo-anarchic property and legal structure.

It's retarded but they do exist.

...

Salazar and Franco established two different kinds of regimes. Salazar was all ok according to Catholic Social Doctrine. Franco was an opportunist who despised the traditionalist carlista and falange revolutionary movements and established an absurdly statist regime even abhorred by Pope Paul VI.

...

...

Literally a lie proposed by a queer. The Jew spawned Bolshevism and it was nobody's else's fault.

Hmmm... The Second Vatican Council... best thing ever for Catholics.... really makes you think.

...

>Muh mexicans believe in pagan syncretism

T. Some anglo pendejo

I can't take this seriously coming from a negro peroncho. Btw las malvinas son inglesas, pendejo.

Libertarian Socialists do not exist. Socialism is authoritarian, period, because it requires state interference in the economy.

What you're describing is someone who is socially liberal and economically liberal. Those people are called Libertarians and they're in the purple square, but the moment they begin to advocate for the State to confiscate peoples' property to create communal shit by force (i.e. the moment they become Socailists) they become authoritarians. That is authoritarianism no matter how fervently you call it anarchy.

no you aren't a lesbian anymore

>He thinks it's a lie

Nope. Christianity has ways been crypto-jewish.

>Inb4 get ye gone ye synagogue of Satan
>Inb4 do u even Talmud bruh?

I used to be a traditionalist Catholic until I realized Vatican Council 2 nigger Boogaloo was final. It's over, Christianity is causing the destruction of Western Europe AGAIN. Eastern Orthodox is still pretty based though.

>Being this retard
You just prove my point, indio. Now go pray to your trees or whatever Aztec believe in.

If you think the pre-conciliar church abhorred other races you are seriously retarded. The only racist brands of christianity are the protestant ones. You judaized shill.

Build that wall Pedro

Rejected out of hand like the liar that you are. No force has fought so fervently and so successfully against the Jew as Christianity.

I am so proud and glad that the Left and the Atheist pigs, and particularly the Pagans, are on the losing side of this battle. You deserve destruction and you shall receive it.

I'm not interesting.

But Franco even signed a Concordat with the Church. Hardly the type of regime that the church should focus its criticism on.

>hey fuck the government everyone should share wtf
>hey fuck the government everyone should be able to fuck over everyone. Also I don't like age of consent laws
>hey fuck people why do they get a choice.

And the democrat party isn't much better. I'd concede it's even worse in relation to upholding it's core values. Atleast the republican party has remained right-wing and conservative. The Democrats have been slowly drifting further right and being cucked trying to draw voters to the point America doesn't even have a major left-wing party anymore. You now have a choice between far-right (Republicans) and moderate right. (Democrats)

I say this as an actual moderate left wing supporter.

>Argentinos cogidos por Thatcher actually believe this

shit, forgot the image.

...

you seem new to politics.

wtf is this shit

Sup Forums has literally always been far right

it was started because m00t was tired of nazifags shitting up /new/

(((Franco))) was a jewish loving sephardite plant and gave Spain back to the Borbones

No. The only thing that was based about the church was the we wuz Israelites shit. Jesus was only talking about the hellinistic Greeks when he was declaring the new chosen people as the gentiles. You and your shitskin ilk don't belong in Christianity. Christianity is the imperialism which is causing the migrant crisis in white countries because of its moral order. The Bible and the Christian revolt against the Judeans created the Bolsheviks. The overpopulation of Africa is caused by the Christians (Catholics especially) feeding the animals.

Fuck of Juan, Race > Religion.

I went from this

This guys is called phyletism and is a heresy, don't fall for it.

To this

Easy.
> Start off as clueless ancap
> Understand the inherent problems of capitalism, over time turn full lefty-lib
> Understand the inherent problems of social libertarianism, and the importance of structure in society. Move to full Venus Project leftist-statist
> Understand that universalism is a failed concept, and that socialism can only work within a homogenous group, because such groups have shared interests. Go radical centrist/full on Strasserism/Folkhem politics.

I didn't "fervently" call anything anarchy.

I postulated a hypothetical group of people who held a differing set of non-interfering beliefs and asked would it constitute left wing libertarianism.

You're dead. Your whole idealogy is dead. Europe because of your folly and pride has bandkned your God for the God of modernity and industrialization. They don't need you anymore because you serve no purpose to them. Islam will replace you at the whim of your own Christian people. You are the ones who prwch forgiveness and tolerance. You are the ones who are inviting the hordes into our borders eveb against the teachings of your Jewish forefather who told you to shun the beasts and lower ilk of the world for being unredeemable.

troll harder

As opposed to what? Another failed republic? His only mistake was in not taking control of the education of Juan Carlos, because Juan Carlos ended up being a cucked English-style liberal monarch with the education he got.

I actually am. I always was a die hard leftist. not surprising, considering my country. At the age of 18 I got redpilled, but at the same time I was absolutely skeptic about politics, having a hard time to a party or somebody in the political landscape. It's been 8 years since then, but when the Syrian war started and got pissed, I began to position myself. Now I don't think my thoughts have changed that much over time so there you have my shitty chart.

shitskins pls go. fags can stay though.

>Implying Franco wasn't an anglophile

How?

Every time I take the test the past 2 years it's the same result:

0 left/right
-5.5 down

Oh aye, same with the Syrian war thing. Merkel's Mother Theresa moment will forever be a turning point

>This term just happened to coincide with the roots of Zionism's popular appeal in the mid/late 19th century

Keep plugging your ears, the church only wants you to belong to it because of a power struggle back in the day. So we'll just ignore "render unto Caesar" because we need to be good goys.

im pretty close to this but i havent crossed back to left economics

I'm a radical centralist

I Used to be at what this picture call social democracy (17)
Then years later I was at social democracy or classical liberalism (18), based on how I interpreted the questions.
Then I was at classical liberalism or paleoliberalism part based at how I interpreted the questions of the site.
At this moment the same thing happens, but most of the time I get paleoliberalism.

Lets see if I will continue at the same UP/DOWN axies, but continue moving to the right side at the left/right axies

as much as the brexit is, mate.

It's because I believe in social safety nets to an extent as long as it isn't going to illegals and drug addicts. Like if someone's just having a bad time then sure to help them get back on their feet. But they need to end the rampant abuse and stop paying more for laquesha to pop out ten more babies for more money

I was the exact opposite. I started off as an edgy leftist libertarian, then became a part time commie and then proceeded to muh anti-statist Rothbard phase. The I discovered Sup Forums and started reading De Mainstre, Spengler, and Evola, and I've been becoming more fashy since then.

I have a tendency to take things too far, but I think I'm happy at the reasonable place I've finally gotten to

Radical centralist here

>his smile and optimism: gone

>I only come here for the memes: the post

here's mine

it went something like this.

before i started taking the test, i was somewhere in the upper left.

I went from middle blue in 2004 to middle purple in 2016. The major shift happened in 2009 or 2010

Why do people say most of us go from green, to purple, to blue? I understand the need for authoritarianism, but government is part of a greater economy. If anything, I'd think we'd shift from green, to blue, to purple

This was my first quiz I ever took