Do we even hate globalism that much or is it just the Jewish bureaucratic super-state aka New World Order that we...

Do we even hate globalism that much or is it just the Jewish bureaucratic super-state aka New World Order that we dislike?

globalism will inevitably lead of the extinction of europeans there for we oppose it.

We hate globalism.

Oh right, Hitler's 14 words. If all the world were white or you weren't, would globalism be a bad thing?

Post more.

>Do we even hate globalism that much
Yes

>If all the world were white or you weren't
But it isn't and I am

I love you Hungary, never change.

The only people who voted for Trump are rural and suburban retards.

City people all voted for Hillary.

I like it because it has allowed me to cure my yellow fever while getting paid for it

By the time I get home I'll be completely cured and new 20,000 richer

Not about to

>Do we even hate globalism
Yes.

I'm just here for tits

I voted for Trump because I'm a liberal. Come at me.

If you discuss the topic, sure. If Christian charities invested donated money into introducing education and capitalism to poor countries and resources and labor were free to shift between nations, would this be a bad thing?

...

Globalism is bad first and foremost because in a global regime there's no alternative, and no other power to check the regime (except revolution or civil war). I don't want the whole world to be white. I just want white countries to be white. If I wasn't white I would still want to live among my own people. Nationalism is modernization of tribalisn, and tribalism is a biological response to the threat/power of external unity among a people. The only reason for a "global tribe" would be if we needed to fight off an alien invadion, and it would fall apart after we won because most people don't wanna be surrounded by weird foreigners or compromise their cultures .

...

Yeah but I'm not talking about the dissolution, only the freedom of trade and travel between them, the action of one nation or a private body in said nation investing in a nation of bodies therein with the intention of a world without poverty etc. etc. Would this be a bad thing?

Definitely both.

Yeah. Socialism like that de-incentivises striving to get what you want on your own and promotes inferior genetics.

What if corporations loaned to impoverished communities in the world's bread basket the equipment needed to effectively cultivate the land's natural resources, under the understanding that if they are unable to pay the company back they'll be slaughtered and replaced with farming robots?

Globalism is racism against all people, so if you like culture at all you should oppose it.

Let me guess, you don't read much.

me too, let share our webm collections lads

...

>t.shlomo shekelstein

Culture is the reason why black people shoot police officers and protest about getting shot by police officers. Culture is broken by education, and with education comes prosperity, and with prosperity a different culture is developed.

That's a very interesting book and a testament against collectivism and collectivist governments, but is there one of those that tells you why globalism absent of collectivist government is a bad thing?

Farming is a step in the right direction but hunting and gathering is the best for making better humans. Permaculture is best to revitalize the forests.
Gobalism is just universal collectivism.

Perhaps the word is globalization?