Why can't South America and Mexico be rich unlike Germany, Japan, Korea, Israel which were heavily damaged by wars?

Why can't South America and Mexico be rich unlike Germany, Japan, Korea, Israel which were heavily damaged by wars?
>inb4 genetics

I've been curious for years.

Other urls found in this thread:

mentalfloss.com/article/31510/9-things-invented-military-use-you-now-encounter-everyday-life
en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Marshall_Plan
en.wikipedia.org/wiki/United_States_involvement_in_regime_change
twitter.com/NSFWRedditGif

genetics

We had no big wars fucking our countries. Despite what many think, wars are what makes humanity be more advanced

>Rich
Doesn't mean I'd want to live there. Uruguay is heaven compared to any of those overcrowded industrial hell holes

Because spics are lazy commie bums.

genetics indeed

corruption, lack of resources, crime, low iq, etc.

genetics

Mexico is rich and has a larger economy than Canada.

Problem is it's all at the top. If you're not a king, you're a beggar in mexico.

>Why can't South America and Mexico be rich?

abundance of shitskins keeps them downtrodden and poor.

They are very new nations

Get on Europe's level where we have been fighting and playing one upmanship for thousands of years.

Before the Spanish and Portuguese brought somes version of civilization to SA they were just jungle bunnies and backward tribes fucking monkeys and tree roots..

Shit,they still are.

Because they hasve nigger blood. Seriously, the darker the skin, the darker the sin.

>Before the Spanish and Portuguese
For all that shit talk about using time machines to kill baby Hitler the real goal should be to destroy those to country before they got a good start in fucking every backwards monkey they could find around the world.

Its true.

We had the Celts, Romans, Saxons, Vikings, Normans and too many to list civil wars, world wars, European wars, we've had a war with everyone i think, some you win some you lose, but you always learn.

low iq mixed with higher test (aggression) = just fight amongst ur barbaric selves with no civ advancement.

see: africa

to elaborate on this
think of democracy, majority wins, right?
what if the country is 50.01% idiots?
you'll quickly get to communism and revolt

different idiot populations requires different governing methods
so yes, when shitposters argue ME/ Africa is devastated by western intervention, they have a point
by spreading "democracy", you're dooming them

also, US electoral college is made to allow for ~53% idiots from 50% in a pure democracy
UK's """unfair""" system is even better, allowing up to ~55% idiots

nice tribbz
funny how people act like high T is something to be proud of
you're literally a male version of PMS

If the answer isn't genetics, it's Europeans and USAians.
South America is home to resources, poverty, and the legacy of macho political culture descended from the Spanish dominion over two thirds of the New World.
Racial difference is a major factor in Latin American history so I don't think many Latin Americans would tell you that genetics has no role in things.

>funny how people act like high T is something to be proud of
Why don't you say that whenever the topic of East Asian vs European IQ is brought up on Sup Forums

genetics
culture of self improvement and hard work
culture values education and educated

South America is under high influence of communists for a long time, thats why we never had any real advancement in our economy.

Mexico is in fact very wealthy but most of its money is under the bed

because the anglojewsphere dont want us to grow, just look at the borders

Dumb opinion

100% correct

there are numerous factors obviously, so I will name one of them.

America heavily subsidized Japanese/Korea defense spending during their post-war years (and to this day) so they can focus on economic development instead of constantly having to upgrade on weapons/infracture/logistics/etc. that comes with maintaining and upgrading an army/navy/etc.

This is so America can maintain hegemony in the region. It was a win/win strategic for a while. As for Latin America, USA already had hegemonic control over everything above the amazon and american interest usually clashed with latin american interest.

mentalfloss.com/article/31510/9-things-invented-military-use-you-now-encounter-everyday-life

Also, the internet

Canada had about as many wars as we did and they're not half as shit as us. Commies fugged us over like they're about to fuck the leaves.

Because Germany, Japan, Korea, Israel are all defended and subsidized by the U.S. Military and aid.
> Yes, it's true. Suck it.

We went over this in econ development class. Basically, they had the knowledge and resources needed to be successful and war damage was just a temporary setback.

is this college or high school? this sounds grossly simplistic. Can you elaborate?

How come the closer you get to the equator the shittier it gets?

All of the countries you listed received tremendous amounts of aid and trade deals after the war

Mexico had a bumpy ride for the past 200 years, if anything we've been steadily climbing out of the shitpit in the past 60 years, we just need more time and more young people with careers.

Genetics, Tojo.

>Genetics, Tojo.

>this is what reductionist armchair anthropologists on Sup Forums unironically believe

Why do memers unironically believe that everything can be reduced to IQ? Do nations and the people that occupy them exist in a vacuum?

It's not a perfect 1:1 correlation Paco, but you cannot be a successful nation without sufficient IQ. It's really just that simple, and South America generally doesn't have it.

The latter countries received generous foreign aid and reconstruction. The former countries until recently were under the heel of the USA, and US business interests actively thwarted any attempt at improving living conditions for the average person.

Look up the War of the Triple Alliance.

Wrong. Until relatively recently South America and Central America had notoriously violent and repressive right-wing regimes. The communist and socialist movements were borne out of hope for a future free of such regimes.

That's not true. There's substantial variation among low-latitude countries.

Corruption man. Corruption.

So, genetics are the only determinant factor in achieving a stable and prosperous society, huh?

For instance, which genetics are to blame for the surge in violence in Mexico after the US-pushed iniciativa merida in 2006?

Are stormtards really that intellectually dishonest to pretend that living next to the most imperialistic and powerful nation in the world has no side effects? Clearly the US has never been involved in determining the policies or path of Mexico, or another south American country, it's all about MUH GENES.

Lmao

Before you start sperging out, I'm not saying that the US is responsible for everything bad that happens

Agreed. My countrymen tend to exaggerate greatly on the influence of defunct communist movements and classifies anything that isn't liberal and pro-West as Marxism.

>subhumans
>first-world

Pick one.

>So, genetics are the only determinant factor in achieving a stable and prosperous society, huh?
No, I literally just said it wasn't a 1:1 correlation. Learn to read. It's a big factor though. For example, China currently sucks, but it is capable of becoming a first world country and so far it is moving in that direction quite rapidly after they started getting rid of communism.

Of course bad US policy doesn't help, but you would still be a shit country even if we were perfect angels.

Still, that pretty much looks like a regular war in Europe, and there were countless of those there.

Also, we are igoring other things like IQ differences and corruption that are being cited in this thread. But again, war is what makes people move their asses. Just look at how much humanity has improved trough both world wars and the cold war

>The communist and socialist movements were borne out of hope for a future free of such regimes.
KEK

Yeah right, no influence at all. Which is why the bandits of yesterday rule today

>It's not a perfect 1:1 correlation
It's in the first line he wrote, Paco. Genetics, we admit, do not represent everything; other factors (historical circumstances, natural resources, geographical features, etc.) affect a country's ability to grow prosperous. Nevertheless, genetics — and, most importantly, the intellectual capacity of the populace — is vital.

>inb4 the reason

fucking moron

So you're both just pulling data out of your ass and making conjectures based on Sup Forums posts, this "this isn't a perfect correlation" argument was pulled out of your ass for certain.

Based on which criteria do you determine what is the minimum average iq required for "maintaining a decent civilization"? Don't pull it out of your ass too hard.

>you'd still be a shit country even if we were angels
Nice circular logic

don't bother, he is here to meme.

FPBP

What is 1+1?
> in before 2
I've been curious for years.

According to Sup Forumsbro scientists we Mexicans should be getting 50% bigger paychecks than Saudis, because we surpass them by 5 iq points and they earn 50% more than us on average.

Sup Forums science, really makes you think

intelligent people tend to be more intelligent making more intelligent societies with more intelligent individuals.

stupid people tend to be more stupid making nore stupid societies with more stupid individuals

if you lack the abilities and capacities to thrive you're doomed to fail. and because how the world developed, intelligence is the most important abilty to have . and having intelligence implies another set of useful tools that stupid people tend to lack like teamwork, abstract thinking, comunication, etc.

but of course, having high iq and not using it is even more stupid than being an idiot

>tl:dr

the smarter the better

No one says high T is good in those threads, fag. Unless it's trolling with muh dick jokes. Whites have better imagination than Asians. For example, look at gun powder. They had it for years and did nothing with it. Whites got it, and within a century used it to conquer the planet and made lots of uses for it.

...

They lack the common sense necessary to do that

because the cultures practiced by white, east asian and jewish people are objectively superior for the purpose of generating wealth

What you are failing to undersand it's richness.

It's not about money, it's about quality of life.

Do you live on top of oil field? Because the Saudis live on top of one. Take the oil away and then compare.

...

real response here: first off the politicians are corrupt as fuck and the people are conformist. this leads to the people voting for the same shits over and over again while fornicating and maki more little shits.
the second point goes back when to the US made the leaders into puppets and fucked with us. the most resent being Venezuela, when they cooperated with Russia. where getting better doe, our population is stagnant and will be decreasing while our economies are growing.

>Why can't a bunch of brown mentally deficient manlets make a functioning country like whites do?

Really makes me think.

I know why IQ is important, I don't see why it's logically coherent for a person to think that IQ vastly overshadows the countless list of factors that aren't related to intelligence.

Mexico's main source of foreign revenue is oil, retard.

This still isn't a rebuttal because it actually confirms my argument, IQ isn't as vital as you make it out to be, otherwise Saudi Arabia wouldn't be rich.

> pic related

>He thinks China isn't already on the brink of collapse

What meme is this?

What was the Marshall Plan?

en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Marshall_Plan

Can you even into geopolitics and economics?

>it's a literal dindunudfin post coming from a Swede tryhard

If America could have a say in what the average Mexican eats for breakfast, do you think they would not seize the opportunity to make a buck or benefit somehow?

I wouldn't say that America is responsible for all of our problems, though you need to be a massive cum gargler to believe the meme you posted

well the USA has consistently removed democratically elected governments from power in Latin America, and replaced them with puppet regimes that serve corporate interests.

en.wikipedia.org/wiki/United_States_involvement_in_regime_change