Why is there such a strong correlation between being first world and prevalence of blonde hair?

Why is there such a strong correlation between being first world and prevalence of blonde hair?

Other urls found in this thread:

youtube.com/watch?v=-VLON2EpsxY
akinokure.blogspot.com/2013/07/where-is-blond-accomplishment.html
sq.4mg.com/LynnIQdiff.htm
strawpoll.me/11939474/r
twitter.com/NSFWRedditImage

Not even kidding by the way

People who survived the ice age in europe are more evolved.

Übermensch

youtube.com/watch?v=-VLON2EpsxY

By that sense the Eskimos must be geniuses. As intelligent as they are, I doubt they're the cognitive elite of the world.

>more evolved

what does this mean?

This guy gets it

Wow had no idea Serbia was that black.

Explains a lot.

Sigh, wish it was WW2 so we could cut their throats again for teh kekz

Blondes countries:
Iceland, Finland, Balts and the Scandinavian countries.

Medium:
Britain, Germany, France. Russia, Poland etc

Low:
Greece, Portugal, Italy and pretty much rest of the Southern European countries.

True

Harsher climate=you need to be more intelligent to survive. Pretty simple natural selection.

Why is there such a strong correlation between NOT having blonde hair and accomplishing anything of significance?

akinokure.blogspot.com/2013/07/where-is-blond-accomplishment.html

>I browsed over the Wikipedia article on Scandinavian literature and picked out the ones who even I, a non-specialist, recognize. If hair color is unrelated to accomplishment, blonds ought to make up at least 30%, and more like 50% or more. Instead they are all dark-haired: Ibsen, Strindberg, Knut Hamsun, Hans Christian Andersen, Soren Kierkegaard, Aleksis Kivi (OK, I didn't recognize him, but he's the only Finn listed, and described as one of the greatest in Finnish), and Astrid Lindgren (she looks brown or red-brown, but not blonde).

any science behind this?

I'm a part of what some people call the "alt-right" and it feels punk as fuck. It feels like an actual counter culture, or rebellion against the PC culture that dominates American colleges.

Look

yeah but that's just about your people and ice age, not about harsher climates in general

It says that in harsher climate intelligent people are more likely to survive and pass on their genes.

edgy

sq.4mg.com/LynnIQdiff.htm

that's just cherrypicking

Daily reminder that both Nordicism and Mediterraneanism are retarded.

You can still advocate Mongrelism amongst your fellow Mongrels.

The picture, kinda, but it raises a good point of blondes being underachievers, which is true. You'd be hard pressed to find even 10 prominent blonde and blue eyed figures despite those traits being common in the places they usually originate from.

There literally isn't a correlation, you fucking snowback. The only worthwhile empires throughout history were Anglo or Mediterranean Europeans. Nordics haven't accomplished a single thing for themselves. Fuck, even Asians were ahead of you guys at almost every point in history.

Well, OP, look at Norway, which is not as blonde as Finland but is nevertheless richer. Why? Oil. Look at southern Germany, which is richer than the north. Blondism, in other words, is not automatically conducive to greater national wealth.

Besides, look at the great colonising powers of Europe. They were Spain, Portugal, France, England and Holland; that is to say, the Southern Europeans were well-represented and, if anything, proved their virtue with their navigating prowess (in the case of the Portuguese, most notably) and Christianising zeal (most prominently for the Spanish).

Furthermore, Sup Forums likes to mention IQ differences, which many leftists will refuse to acknowledge amidst desperate frog-like screeches. If you guys have bothered to look at the maps, you will notice that Italy, an undeniably Southern European and brown-haired country, figures quite highly.

I am not an American, Sven. Also, that is not an argument.

Because niggers used to think non-brown hair colors were caused by evil spirits and so killed the children in the hopes of averting disaster.

Now, now, there is no need to insult the Nordics; they've plenty to be proud of, although the Nordics who reject the wisdom of their ancestors who converted to Christianity are rather annoying.

Probably because Northern Europeans were the ones to embrace Protestantism and, by extension, usury.

...

...

...

Also, do not make the mistake of neglecting history. The Baltics, for example, are blonde, but they remain relatively poor (for Western European levels, anyway) and corrupt. Even Estonia, hailed as the home of an e-government revolution, does not yield a satisfactory result in this regard.

Southern Europe also tends to lack the natural resources of Northern Europe? Have you ever heard anyone speaking of the great coal mines of Greece? No, you have not, but you have heard much chatter of British mines. For Southeastern Europe specifically, Turkish rule did much to keep them from developing properly, too.

obvious climate..

If your theory is true then those baltic countries should be much higher.

First world doesn't mean what you think it does,

No, the eskimos make the mistake the nigger makes, which is by living to close to the extreme of the global extreme. The more evolved people realized the ideal temperate zone just so happened to be Scandinavia et al.


6'2'', Blonde hair, blue eyed, fit, doctor here.

Thanks in advance.

people in west and nordic europe are more evolved
they always tried to do better, in turn, the blacks/arabs always were ok with what they had
in order to sustain that way of living and thinking, the europeans tried their best, they raised their kids as good as possible, the group dynamics were better, they knew more, and so also the youth had to adapt to much more
just compare some guy from a desert, that grew up, only knowing sand, was poor as shit, and when he was an adult, he walked arround with donkeys, and made his money with that, till he died. he knew nothing, and could do nothing, and so his children were the same
nordern europe tho, there were mountains,grass lands, forrests, sea´s, a huge variety of things you could do, and had to do in the group
like making food, weapons, cloth etc
long story short
northern europeans are more evolved, had much more knowledge and the pressure to do good was more intense than anywhere else, that was given on to children and so on
the blond hair are just a natural adaption to that, it has nothing to do with anything else. its just, northern europe as a whole, is where the people are smart, and the hair are just a natural adaptation to the area they lived in
it was just a good area to be, and the people were better than the rest
thats the reason why the german and sweden yes areas were the best

germanic tribes conquered and inherited the power of the roman empire and it hasn't been taken from them yet.

You already know.


Cucks stand up to defend Jewish extortionists.
strawpoll.me/11939474/r

It's called the nigger coefficient.

Trump desu

>Be European
>Have Neanderthal genetic mixture
>Dominate World