Google Rolling out Filtering Algorithm to Stymie Hate

Who decides what's credible?

csmonitor.com/Technology/2016/1221/Google-updates-algorithm-to-filter-out-Holocaust-denial-and-hate-sites

Other urls found in this thread:

youtube.com/watch?v=3g1abcMAVy0
businessinsider.com/shocking-new-holocaust-study-claims-nazis-killed-up-to-20-million-people-2013-3?op=1
entertainment.slashdot.org/story/16/12/23/2257203/bittorrent-lives-cable-killer-p2p-video-app-finally-hits-ios
twitter.com/SFWRedditImages

Slippery slope? How do these algorithms work?

Literally stop using Google products. Everything they make is shit. Every product they offer has a better alternative.

YouTube?

Veimo and Pornhub.

whats a better search than google? tell me i wanna stop using jewgoole
fuck them

While it's webcrawler is newer and therefor has less results, I suggest DuckDuckGo, If it doesn't have what you want, give it a week.

I tried it for a few months a while back. It's sort of irritating. You have to get used to either being really specific with your searches or dealing with an inconvenient UI (at least on your mobile)

Algorithms for Google are a search program within a computer's hardware. In google's case the program will query lots of information and distribute it to many local entities. These entities are responsible for re-searching their.,

Better webmail platform than gmail?

>Literally uses google search around a wrapper for adsense moneys

>Firefox
>Block all ads
>You already know all of the URLs you visit you fuck, save memes
>Never login to anything

Congrats you just became a ghost.

cock.li is one that I use. Seems nice. Good UI and nice community.

here's a hint: if it denies the holocaust, it's probably not that credible. Perhaps with a few rare exceptions.

What fucking features do you need? That's an easy one. Literally anything else gets the job done

You can't punch a ghost, now can ya?

Yeah, sure. They're totally drawing a bold line at holocaust denial.

I don't think denying the holocaust is a valid ground for censorship, anyway

Re-searching their what?

>filtering out holocaust denial sites

How about we start mass producing pro-holocaust sites that exaggerate every aspect of it to ridiculous proportions?

>Be SJW
>See opinion that goes against what I beleive.
>Comment "The Holocaust is false" in response.
>Google hides conversation.

G o r r i l i o n

Ahhh. No @nzu posting. Fucking faggot.

How many times do you have to report a shill before they actually do anything?

Truth

Must've reported like 15 times

The real question is: If Google is going to seemingly bend reality to fit it's agenda, how do we gain control of its choice in agenda?

4 for me before I hit cool off.

And apparently shills think newfag is the verboten insult

Have the most money I guess. That'll require getting jobs and swindling people. It's not impossible for us to outjew the jews.

hi

It's not about money at that level of the game. It's the ability to threaten their infrastructure. I'm sure the government and Google have each other by the ball in a Swedish Standoff. If either squeezes they both loose... So for the meantime is a friendly stroke session.

Who has the power to topple that delicate balance?

Reported and hidden.

Fuck off

i wanna fuck that roach

youtube.com/watch?v=3g1abcMAVy0

The federal governments of the country's involved? Perhaps if we got active in our communities, attained important political statuses, and made our names known in good light, we could attain high political positions. Then we'd have the control of the stability.

Would infiltration of ICANN have more effect, or a government regulatory group that has a say in physical infrastructure? Would it be conceivable to limit Google access to the fiber backbones if we can show they are manipulating public perception?

Throw them under the bus for "letting trump win"? It would be an interesting turn of play

I guess that makes sense. My real question would be, how do we get some of the same people doing good things on yt to consider using other platforms.

I sound like an sjw crying about representation in games without developing any myself.

Googles
Skypes
Pop Rocks
I forget the rest

You are still talking about money- public election is the way fools are parted from their money. Appointed positions are the efficient way to gain access

JESUS CHRIST RE-SEARCHING THEIR WHAT

We could private message them, or find those who can and ask them to through polite, well thought out letters on the issue.

Sup

If the Holocaust was credible they wouldn't be jailing be who question it imo

This is an interesting find. Where'd ya get this?

>have each other by the ball in a Swedish Standoff. If either squeezes they both loose... So for the meantime is a friendly stroke session

I took a look at this. How do you parse this with the other articles that mention figures other than 6 million

...

They got him

Well, getting involved can help you raise money, I.E. selling food for reasonable prices and helping repair broken things to raise property value.

This isn't about the specific topic being censored, it's the principal.

Fucking mongoloid Canadian shitposter.

Your soft headed countrymen are the most susceptible to manipulations- you ought to care

Just reverse image search but I got it from here from one of the many info dumps that happen

>articles that mention figures other than 6 million
You mean the 20million? Oy vey never forget!

businessinsider.com/shocking-new-holocaust-study-claims-nazis-killed-up-to-20-million-people-2013-3?op=1

No I under stand that aspect too, but I have been awaiting it for a while and already am well aware about "the memory hole" that is about to occur...

>wah I can't be a misogynist racist pig in modern developed society

Cry more, bitch.

Kek I'm not denying the denial. I just wonder. I saw a vid of this old dude going through all those articles you posted in their original print

I was thinking more along the lines of finding an influential person who could find a lot to gain from Google being usurped and pushed out of its comfy relationship with the NSA/government coffers

Care to elaborate what you mean by this?

...

>I saw a vid of this old dude going through all those articles you posted in their original print
Probably Ernst Zundel

...

...

>Who decides what's credible?
The NYT

That could be done quite easily, now that you mention it. Getting some billionaire like Trump or the guy that invented paypal to do it may very well be simple as buying their stock.
If we could all get together and buy %60 of a big company's stock, we'd have some momentum.

If digital media can be disavowed effectively... If we can prove that all fact and information online is labile and subject to change for the sake of narrative convenience.... That could be an important step. What other groups have the computational power and infrastructure to rival Google?

...

...

Who is this person? They seem familiar.

Well, there is a new service out now.

p2p video hosting

entertainment.slashdot.org/story/16/12/23/2257203/bittorrent-lives-cable-killer-p2p-video-app-finally-hits-ios

Have a (you)

You could be on to something. What kind of hostile takeover could work on Google? It's publicly traded...

You might be joking, but it's probably best to read from as many places as you have time for before you try to make up your mind about anything, which is why censorship would be devastating

Anzujaamu

Did you reply to the wrong post?

That is why you don't support the botnet in any way shape or form. Use Startpage and host your own email. The most I use is youtube, but only through youtube-dl rather than giving them page views.

>Protonmail
>DuckDuckGo

Wew a secure mail client that isnt cucked by the alphabet soup agencies and a decent search engine that doesn't filer results

you don't deserve to live in this country

They seem to be made of several companies varying in size. If we could buy the smaller ones, the bigger ones might shrink or collapse.

...

...

Did you just post porn on Sup Forums? Isn't that against the rules?

roll

A little under $800 a stock, volume is just below 350k shares.

$280 billion dollars in stock.

So probably a little less than $130B to have a say in how and what they do.

Seems more cost effective to rape them from a regulatory angle

why would google pay congress to regulate google?

Maybe we could pay congress to regulate google?

rawlin

Why wouldn't they? Every large organization has lobbyists and money flowing into Washington. Google doesnt have to pay for influence though. They are practically a branch of government, albeit one with actual checks and balances.

That's not my point. How do you hurt Google more easily? With regulation or by competition?

I hate to say it, but meme magic should do it

Damn- sliding hard.

The post-election shockwaves are pretty intense. The left is going apeshit. They got blown the fuck out and now are preparing for a win in 2020.

You aren't wrong. But they have quite a bit of mojo themselves. It's not the same as conjuring a minor djinn or two to beat an old lady with brain damage.

This is big league memetics. We are trying to damn the largest river of ideas on the planet

Not even $280B would be enough, founders have superstocks.

Can a government enforce free speech within a private company?

Reminds me of leftys trying to force that bakery to make a big gay wedding cake

Whilst preventing our river from also being damned, might I add.

If the private company is considered a corporation, not always. Corporations have equal to human rights in America, and probably a few similar countries.

That's why I would opt for the policy angle.

Slap these fuckers in the face with an injunction. If the left want a system in place to prevent "propaganda " and subversive activities, that language could be applied to any group that
manipulates public perception... including Google. Wouldn't hurt if the next supreme court nominee was sympathetic to our concern

Roger that. I wouldn't give this place up to assuage trannies and cucks, but I would lose this place to end the threat of that kind of manipulation. It would be a sacrifice with making

Damn- sliding hard.

Would you x?
Why are s?
Risk thread
Etc.

Fucking bullshit

I always joke about formally studying memeology. Seems like more of an interesting subject as time goes on.

It is the basis of many, if not all cultures.

It's legit. They have been writing books defining memes for decades. A practical study of them is a long way off. Might be a good time to get in on the ground floor

Mind naming a few publications you know of that are in PDF form?

I think Richard Dawkins coined the term meme. Maybe first mentioned in 'The Selfish Gene'. I've been putting off reading it cause I've been averse to the spergy atheist side of the man. I think I'll read it now

>ifunny

You lazy maggot you couldn't at least crop that out.

And none of the fags who replied to you have even mentioned it.


Sup Forums you fucking paradise turned to niggerville. Invaded by normies. Allahu snackbar you all to hell.

Sadly I did notice, but he made a good point