Anarcho-communists actually exist

>A newly formed hard-left faction within the Greens has publicly stated it does not believe in the rule of law or the legitimacy of the Australian state and says it will work to “bring about the end of capitalism”.
“A rejection of class antagonism, and capitalism, also depends on a rejection of the state’s legitimacy and the right of it, and its apparatuses, to impose oppression upon the working class,” it says.

theaustralian.com.au/national-affairs/rebel-greens-faction-to-fight-police-capitalism/news-story/62973b321b06511d36ddbf92013e867b

Other urls found in this thread:

salon.com/2000/11/22/weimar/
twitter.com/NSFWRedditGif

>no state
>but let the stats distribute the wealth/food everything
Nigga what? !?

Wut

Technically that's not a flaw of communism, communism was made to be stateless and voluntary because everyone's nice and the new international man is selfless and stuff.

>what kina gubment u want son?
>"just be yourself"

I heard about this on The Convict Report

the fuck is going on down there? sounds like your libs are going crazier than ours

...

>newly formed hard-left faction
They are as old as any communist group. They were crushed by the Bolsheviks in the Kronstadt Rebellion. They also want to kill you.

Daily reminder that Lee Rhiannon studied Marxism in Russia in the 70s and her older family founded the Australia Communist Party.

peter singer the god head of the lefties an aussie FFS, has said theres no differance between eating a chicken and fucking a chicken in the ass and cutting its head off before you cum to tighten its asshole and make your orgasm more intense.

You cant make this shit up

Personal property is not private property to them. They see private property as anything any means of production and personal property as things like clothes, your toothbrush, etc.

So anarcho communism is redundant?

>fucking a chicken in the ass and cutting its head off before you cum to tighten its asshole and make your orgasm more intense.
That sounds eerily familiar to a story about Weimar Germany.

salon.com/2000/11/22/weimar/
>“I saw pimps offering anything to anybody, little boys, little girls, robust young men, libidinous women, animals. The story went around that a male goose of which one cut the neck at the ecstatic moment would give you the most delicious, economical, and time-saving frisson of all, as it allowed you to enjoy sodomy, bestiality, homosexuality, necrophilia and sadism at one stroke. Gastronomy too, as one could eat the goose afterwards.”

anarcho-monarchism makes about as much sense by comparison

In theory yeah, but all communism ends up with a totalitarian state so they felt the new for a new type of Marxism to separate themselves from the previous failures. "True communism" is supposed to be classeless and stateless, with local groups organizing the "means of production" rather than a central entity.

See pic, no commie has ever given a good definition of personal property that doesn't overlay means of production.

Theoretically yes, but in reality you have Stalinism, Trotskyism, Leninism, Maoism, etc. and so socialist transition states run by a vanguard have become associated with communism in everyone's mind, hence the qualified to distinguish it from the statist forms.

Let's say I have a truck.
It can be used for my own travel or I can start a business giving rides.
Is that confused personal property still? At what point do we draw a line? And if you argue ride is a service then what if I had a coffee machine. Is it my or is it a means to produce coffee for others?

>previous failures
The anarchists have always been there alongside the other communists, they just have never gotten anywhere really and end up suppressed by the statist commies.

They're crazy as fuck but they have very little power.

Maybe that's why they're mad actually.

>At what point do we draw a line?
This is why the system is fucking retarded and all of these stupid ambiguities and semantics are why they end up divided into dozens of subcategories which bicker and fight amongst themselves and never get anywhere.

It doesn't really matter anyway because the average life of regimes following their ideology is a few weeks, before order is restored by communists, fascists, or anyone really.

>crazy

pls no sanism ok?

Shit wrong one.

Nah, they'll just beat you up if you a white male bigot

It'll of course end in facism

...

That is retarded and impossible. You'd have an easier time convincing people to kill themselves than to give away all of their stuff.

See cult behavior

Worse than that actually, you can keep your stuff. According to commies first the state must be seized either through revolution or politics depending on the type and then expand state powers to seize the means of production then the State just gives up or is dissolved, that's unclear, then you have an organized stateless society. They've all failed the state dissolution part though.

It kind of happens in very small tribes. Lots of stuff is shared and communal because otherwise no one will survive. It absolutely doesn't work on a larger scale and once you add regional, ethnic, and racial differences it definitely isn't going to happen. They don't see human nature for what it is though and so they are deluded. They think they can kill us off have a paradise.

The Greens have always been watermelons

>retarded

...

This is the dumbest ideology ever.

It is Marxism in its purest form.

>dumbest

That's ducked up

Marx was basically a NEET who was supported by friends and family and he never paid his maid (houser and fed her though) and fucked her then kicked her out when he impregnated her, what could you expect of that kind of person?

Also his uncle was Gerard Philips, founder of Philips.

There is no money so you'd really have no reason to make a business out of it. It would remain your personal property and you'd be known as the nice guy who gives out rides.

Lets be real the odds of this being a falseflag or overexaggeration to shit on the greens is pretty big.

That being said

ahhahahah fucking greens lmao get rekt.

What if I only give rides if you give me your personal property?

Same shit as people who say rape is worse than murder. From the chicken's perspective what's the difference? From your perspective, you're a degenerate sure but singer only cares about muh animals.

It goes back to feudal Europe. Communism as an idea stems from relieving of feudal leadership in favor of a community-based system. Communists see all capitalists as essentially feudal leaders that hold them from achieving equality. In a communists eyes, the USSR was actually a State Capitalist enterprise, because it was a state-mandated oppressor, not communism. In that sense it is sort of a system that is whatever they want it to be. See the writings of Proudhon on Marxists.org for examples of this lunacy. Marx was the first one to write grievances with the capitalist system, and proposed a state-communism. The Parisian commune is a good example of anarcho-communism, prior to Marx's state communism as an idea.

>Go away troll
Can redditards even argue with out assuming you're trolling or projecting? I will put it this way, as one Individualist to another, if you touch me for spreading "hate" (AKA having an opinion) I will fucking shoot you.

not a leftard, but the tpical answer is that the line is when you start to rent it to someone else to give rides whilst you take some of their profit

an-com is even more retarded than an-cap

it very may well be the most retarded political ideology ever thought up

An-cap may still be retarded but at least it acknowledges people work in their own self interest.

They've failed at every level.

an-cap is definitely retarded but it still works in a fucked up way

an-com just doesn't make any sense whatsoever

Third for Ancap being retarded. But out of all Anarchist groups, they are the most morally reprehensible. Their practice of illegalism has logic to it, and doesn't harm innocent people. Ancoms practice illegalism because they want nice, free shit, usually at the expense of low income workers, no matter how much they sugar coat it in "We're stealing to surv1ve!!1!!". Pic semi related, look up Deeray "Defense of Looting" you will rage.

A big reason I bring this up because apart from having a retarded belief system, Ancoms are REALLY shitty people.

greens keepin it real af

God damn, this is fucking hilarious. I've never met a competent socialist/communist.

>organized
>stateless

Deray is not an anarchist, a communist, an anarcho-communist, or any variation thereof

He is a boring dumbass milquetoast means-testing liberal who periodically says something brainless and provocative, but without any coherent ideology behind it

This just sounds like the insane ramblings of a mentally ill man.

I know, that's why I said semi related. He uses the same justification for looting that I see a lot of Ancoms using.