Guys nukes are bad

>guys nukes are bad
>there are too many nukes in the world
>we need to build more nukes

So how does it feel to know that you elected a LITERAL FUCKING RETARD? Lets also not mention the fact that he is a fucking Jew lover that is backpedalling already on all his promises.

At least with Hillary this shit would be under wraps and we would be happier, being none the wiser.

Other urls found in this thread:

youtube.com/watch?v=s7jjT2FKq6k
twitter.com/SFWRedditVideos

>hating jews
Leftists, muzzies, and cucked germans are your company.

...

you gotta stay relevant bud

...

Have you ever wondered why violent crime is so low in areas where gun ownership is high and high in areas where it's low? Now put that on an international scale. Voila!

Watch this video.
youtube.com/watch?v=s7jjT2FKq6k

It still baffles me that people don't understand the entire purpose of nukes.

Deterance.

If we take all of our nukes away, we are sitting ducks, if we have significantly less nukes than others, we are sitting ducks. If everyone has a gun but you, you can guarantee your death.

Also Trump hasn't backpeddalded on anything yet. He's not even pres yet for Christ's sake.

>>guys nukes are bad
>>there are too many nukes in the world
>>we need to build more nukes
I agree with all three of these.

Peace though strength is what he is saying. We have to be the biggest baddest nuclear power.

>a president who actually understands MAD

I like Trump more and more

>At least with Hillary this shit would be under wraps and we would be happier, being none the wiser.
Reminder that #draftourdaughters wasn't just a 4chantroll but we took it directly from Hillaries emails.

She wants war

we make more nukes, they make more nukes

we make less nukes, they make more nukes

>happier being none the wiser

Wow, you fucking cuck. Why such a pussy?

Under Hillary the entirety of NATO would be in a war against Russia

Then we can make nukes 4 germoney or no?

If we sign a non aggression pact or alliance with Russia, MAD goes out the window. We could fix our ABM shield over the US enough to cockblock China and then nuke with impunity.
>Pyongyang
>Beijing
>Mecca
>Islamabad
>Mexico City

But, isn't there like a reasonable threshold of nukes?
I mean, if you can destroy everything already, why build more?

Look into Obamas nuclear programme and the NATO shield and how close shit has already come to a stand off. You're safer now than you were 2 months ago. Please walk to Syria with the rest of the lemmings.

When the fuck did Trump ever say that he was going to get rid of our nukes, and more importantly when the fuck did Sup Forums say they wanted the US to get rid of it's nukes?

Having a more powerful military and better access to powerful weaponry can only increase our ability to influence other countries and thus is a net positive for us; and right now is a perfect time to stockpile. Russia is the only other country uncucked enough to build more nukes and they're poor as fuck, the US has the ability to amass a nuclear stockpile so massive that the entire world will be unable to even pretend to have the ability to retaliate if it ever came to nuclear war.

Strenghtening and expanding nuclear capability has a lot more into it than just growing the number of warheads. You can build a more powerful nuclear arsenal even if you reduce the amount of actual payload.