Versions: technical failure, terrorist attack, collision with a flock of birds, a bug when adding weight to
The investigative Committee opened a criminal case under article 351 of the criminal code — "violation of safety rules of flights and preparation to them." Vladimir Putin instructed to create a Commission that will investigate the disaster headed by the Minister of transport Maxim Sokolov.
Considering several versions of what happened. Main technical malfunction. However, experts do not exclude the version of act of terrorism.
As told to "Novaya Gazeta" candidate of technical Sciences Vadim Lukashevich, the pilots had to report a technical malfunction. He recalled that the wreckage was found far from each other. In his opinion, "any technical fault is unable to lead to the destruction of the aircraft in the air."
Another version, which was called media — on collision with a flock of birds. So, the source of Interfax noted that near the Sochi airport is a station for migrating birds and the ornithological Park.
"A flock of birds? Then must cut down two or three engines at once. But at the height of two to three miles they have plenty of time to make a decision. A vivid example — "miracle on the Hudson". The plane almost immediately after takeoff, hit a flock of birds, the pilots had a few minutes on deciding what to do next. You must realize one thing: sudden loss of communication is a sudden impact on the whole plane, that's all," he stressed.
Sometimes it's really just accidents that happen. We're talking about a fucking dinosaur of a plane here.
Gavin Campbell
>any technical fault is unable to lead to the destruction of the aircraft in the air. Didn't the Polish PM die in the same model of aircraft falling to pieces in the sky due to technical failure tovarisch ?
Connor Fisher
>failing to pieces in the sky I thought, he failed on the land.
The worst accident on Norwegian ground was a Tupolev Tu-154. It says that 2600 have died while flying Tupolev Tu-154
Cooper Fisher
>Tu-154 When everyone knows the plane is crap, Aeroflot discards the, but MoD keeps them running because they don't want to spend budget to replace.
Sad story is sad.
Lucas Green
Do you guys even read the OP?
The problem is not that this shit plane might have crashed. The problem is sudden loss of communication.
This can't be caused by engines ginving up.
Hudson Watson
Plane had only 6689 in-air hours and was renovated in 2014. Recommended retirement is 36k hours and could be bumped to 60k hours in certain circumstances. There have been two incidents involving tu154 that were caused by engineering failure.
This plane was probably older than the Soviet Union. Anything could've brought it down.
Jace Gonzalez
>sudden loss of communication >not the slimey turks but flocks of birds
i didn't know birds were also capable of jamming comms THEY CAN'T KEEP GETTING AWAY WITH IT Sup Forums THE FLOCKS OF BIRDS MUST BE STOPPED.
Andrew Nguyen
>Didn't the Polish PM die in the same model of aircraft falling to pieces in the sky due to technical failure tovarisch ? No, they crashed into a hill during foggy weather.
Joshua Thomas
> what is (((quality control))) Mate, you cant imagine how chucked it is here.
The problem in fact is tho not a plane, that Sochi gone bigger after olympics. So they taught tower-people how to operate bigger airport. But "forgot" to change their hiring guidelines. > hire unqualified personnel > blame unqualified personnel > or terrorists > or whoever is no a kike/anglo
t. plane flies in turbulence trace of another due to poor management of hiring practices
Charles Nelson
They're all dead (see gary killdal, barnaby jack, illya jitomirsky) or tortured into faggotry (see bradley "chelsea" manning).
Landon Jackson
Its only for discardation, because its build as a multipurpose plane, able to be refit i to a bomber. Too heavy, less place for passengers, very noisy.
It has to do with commerce only. Reliability is not perfect, but pretty normal.
If we'll just refit the tech to modern materials, we'll have best multipurpose bomber in the world.
Michael Nelson
If there was a bird strike the crew would have radioed back. This was a bomb or missile.
Cooper Murphy
I'll never sit in a tupolev. Can't trust an airplane who was designed by some poor locked up engineer in a cell.
>terrorist attack This youtube.com/watch?v=RZEKvE338qA Where were you when Russian military airliner got blown the fuck up by terrorists?
Angel Baker
>designed in 60s and hasn't changed since >one of the worst safety records in aviation >has killed the entire crew and all passengers 24 times before, including one mid-air collision with an su-24 that also killed that crew >NATO name is "careless" pssssssssssssshhhh >Sup Forums suspects foul play bwaahahaha
