America: 50% Republic 50% Oligarchy

America: 50% Republic 50% Oligarchy


100% Cucked

Other urls found in this thread:

politico.com/story/2016/12/donald-trump-donors-rewards-232974
twitter.com/AnonBabble

Drumpfcucks can't face the facts, apparently.

Why does everyone think rich people are automatically evil and corrupt?

lmao and most of these 70 countries are socialist. I wonder how they got down there

He pretty much did this to spit on Bernie's face for kissing Hillary's ass while trump was complimenting him

>implying that rich people are automatically satan incarnates
Sure, commie. Keep crying, and maybe we will drop you something from the table.

communists did this

>implying capitalism is good and communism is bad

Both are kike's inventions just to make perpetual conflict. You're fucking bluepilled normies.

t. autoritarian centrist

>Before the election: DRAIN THE SWAMP!!! BANKERS AND GLOBALISTS BTFO!!!
>Trump appoints known insiders to cabinet
>g-globalists aren't so bad if they support our guy!!

The pretzels drumpftards twist themselves into to justify Trump's cabinet choices, honestly.

Ok.

Do you think that those people who Trump appointed will use their power to help others and build a sustainable economy or do you think that they'll use their power to make themselves even richer at the expense of everyone else?

I'll give you some time to think.

We accept facts just fine. "Being rich" is not a legitimate criticism. That's a fact. Sanders made a non-point which is only compelling to Leftists.

Since we aren't Leftists, we don't find it compelling. End of discussion.

Drain the Swamp was about ending the role of lobbyists in the government. Trump's ethics reform does that decisively. Choosing highly qualified characters for your cabinet is not the same as allowing corporations and foreign interests to openly lobby your politicians you stupid asshole.

It amazes me how many people who pretend to have been Trump supporters are just fucking Leftists. No, having worked at a bank does not make you a lobbiest. Period. You may take as much time as you'd like to do your research and show me any ACTUAL moral or ethical transgressions any of these people have made, until then, stop talking about things you don't understand.

Trump is following the Russian model of 'postmodern dictatorship'

In 2013 Surkov was characterized by The Economist as the engineer of 'a system of make-believe', 'a land of imitation political parties, stage-managed media and fake social movements'.[79]

In Western media outside Russia, a vocal and eloquent critic of Surkov and of the administration of Vladimir Putin in general has been Peter Pomerantsev. Pomerantsev has written op-eds in The Atlantic,[80] The New York Times,[81] and the London Review of Books[8][13][82] accusing Surkov, "Putin's chief ideologue" with "unsurpassed influence over Russian politics", of turning Russia into a "managed democracy", and of reducing Russian politics to nothing but "postmodernist theatre". In a talk before the Legatum Institute, Pomerantsev, along with Pavel Khodorkovsky, termed Russia a "postmodern dictatorship".[83]

How does this same question not apply to random people chosen off of the street? What angelic supermen do you think government officials have to be? The way you ensure that they do not act corruptly is that you FIRE the ones who act corruptly, which I absolutely believe Trump will do. He doesn't owe any of these people anything, if they make him look bad he'll throw them on the street.

If we cared about wealth we wouldn't have voted for Trump in the first place.

>t. autoritarian centrist
so your natsoc?

Second option obviously, these vultures are professionals at creating "economic crises" where everyone but themselves loses.

>what are conflicts of interests

These already powerful people now have government power as well. This is the Dubya years all over again, but you're probably too young to remember that so I won't judge.

who want broke ass niggas in they cabinet?

>Rich people are bad people

babbys first rhetoric

Wow, so this is socialist thinking?

Here the things about rich people, they're more responsible and fit to lead than people who merely pretend to be capable. I'd rather choose them them some people who kiss babies to appeal to the press.

>No, having worked at a bank does not make you a lobbiest. Period.

lmao who do Lobbyists work for? We're not talking about simple employees, we're talking about The fucking PRESIDENT of Goldman Sachs, The CEO of Exxon-Mobil, The CEO of a George Soros Hedge Fund having the absolute highest positions in government.

You're a fucking shill or an absolute retard. Period.

This is beyond belief...

"Drain the swamp" is just a policy proposal.
>First: I am going to institute a 5-year ban on all executive branch officials lobbying the government after they leave government service.

>Second: I am going to ask Congress to institute its own 5-year ban on lobbying by former members of Congress and their staffs.

>Third: I am going to expand the definition of lobbyist so we close all the loopholes that former government officials use by labeling themselves consultants and advisors when we all know they are lobbyists.

>Fourth: I am going to issue a lifetime ban against senior executive branch officials lobbying on behalf of a foreign government.

>Fifth: I am going to ask Congress to pass a campaign finance reform that prevents registered foreign lobbyists from raising money in American elections.

You shouldn't project your own meanings to his words.

How is he following " the Russian model of 'postmodern dictatorship' " You didn't show any connection whatsoever.

>"Trump can't be bought!!!!"
>Rewards his donors and backers with cabinet positions

lol, Trump is literally just the American Erdogan.

I don't understand why you foreigners think the president should surround himself with poor, unsuccessful people.

These successful brilliant people are the exact people he should be picking

Not poor minorities just for SJW points.

Trump's Cabinet are not Lobbyists.

There is no such thing as a Lobbyist that is a CEO or a billionaire.

Tillerson is a Kremlin stooge

Only Lefties want Liberal Academics in government.

Look what happened to America in 2008 when we let a College Professor run the Federal Reserve.

I'm starting to understand now why the border between our countries is so strictly guarded.

>Drumpftards can only think in black and white

This isn't a question of appointing either a billionaire or some bum off the street. It's about him rewarding his donors (when he said he's self funding and can't be bought) and giving governmental power to already powerful people.

Surely you should be trusting your money with a homeless poor man offering only good intentions than with a successful bank owner who has proven for years to be responsible with other people's money

Why do Socialists and Liberals in general hate successful people?

>Trump's cabinet is full of "White supremacists" and extrmists!!
>Trump's cabinet is full of rich establishment cucks

Make up your mind libkikes

Also sage for crappy shitposting demoralisation thread

Which donor did he give a cabinet position to? Specific name, please.

Go post records of his cabinet's donations then.

Exactly.

If I were president, I'd want the most brilliant and, as a natural by product in a capitalist society, the richest and most successful people I could get surrounding me.

I wouldn't use affirmative action for my cabinet picks which is what these nut job liberals are advocating.

Smart people are generally rich. It just works out that way.

He has no right to speak considering he dived into the swamp and swam around with the alligators when he supported Hillary Clinton.

politico.com/story/2016/12/donald-trump-donors-rewards-232974

How is it even possible to earn 175k as a congress opinions guy and yet still to have the audacity to shit talk other people. Bernie is the worst swamp dweller there is

Sanders has no right to speak unless spoken to because of him taking money from Clinton. He's quite literally one of (((them))) and seemed fine with the DNC pushing him to the side and scooping up his supporters.

The Dubyah years were better than the last eight years. You have to be at least 18 to post here, son.

>Politico

Stop posting fake news, faggot. Give me a credible source or fuck off.

>lmao
>proceeds into non-argument
Low-quality bait.

>lets fill the government with poor people

>How does this same question not apply to random people chosen off of the street?

'Cause our boy Bernie would never let that happen!

>Obama's cabinet
>100% commie

Swamp status drained

Yup.

Hell im old enough to lived thru the Reagan years.

Reagan>W. Jr>Clinton>W. Sr>Obama.

I'm putting trump between Reagan and W. Jr as an educated guess.

lol good one

>You shouldn't project your own meanings to his words.

Why not? He definitely hoped people would.

>t. someone who thinks that Infowars and Breitbart are "credible sources"

>63% workforce participation
OwO whats this?

Breitbart actually is legit news.

Just because it doesn't agree with your narrow minded and intolerant leftist views doesn't mean it's fake.

>Infowars and Breitbart: Trump will win
>every other source: Trump will lose

They seem credible to me. Stay salty, cuck.

Politico actually is legit news.

Just because it doesn't agree with your narrow minded and intolerant far-right views doesn't mean it's fake.

I see what ya did there. Nice.

But, Like the other guy said, one accurately predicted who would win the presidency while every other news source was wrong.....

A broken clock can be right twice a day, who knew.

Politico said Trump will lose. Trump won. Therefore, Politico is fake news.

Stay salty.

Who won the popular vote, again?

Lol "Trumps gonna fire anyone corrupt" This isn't apprentice and isn't how government accountability works. The 15 year olds in Pappas Sup Forums army need to read a book.

That's fair enough.

But a lot of us don't consider Breitbart and less legit that Politico. Let alone Huffington Post, Jesus that's like reading children's stories.

I think the next 4 years under Trump will sort out the legit news sources from the sensational ones.

Not an argument

Is this at all relevant in the US presidential election though ?

Well he has less legitimacy. The people chose Hillary, the system chose Trump.

2008 crisis was a result of the housing market. Good thing trump doesn'tt hump Goldman Sachs the ones who DID crash the economy. Oh wait.

Bernie owns like 3 houses too.

He never really accomplished anything in Congress either and Ron Paul, himself, stated that Bernie backstabbed him on the Federal Reserve amendment so even Ron Paul doesn't like Bernie.

Education Secretary?

Actually, Trump said he is working toward making it easier to fire people in government.

Government bureaucracy can be changed.

>such wealth
>such class struggle

nobody except the socialist gives a shit about how much they make, we care about how they make their money, whether they make it in a moral way or via corruption.

if trump supporters gave a fuck about class struggle, we would have voted for bernie. Socialists cannot see language or actions from any perspective but their own.

The swamp is one of corruption, selling our soverignty to foreign countries to be ruled by tyrants. This is the language of LIBERALISM NOT MARXISM.

WE ARE NOT MARXISTS WE GIVE 0 FUCKS ABOUT YOUR CLASS STRUGGLE

So we should be letting a nigger on welfare control our nations finances? Maybe we should let a janitor make military decisions... Being wealthy isn't inherently evil no matter what the man who has pissed away most of the money he's made after decades in office and once exceeded $60,000 in credit card debt.

That doesn't mean much though.

You may as well be saying "yeah but they had more rushing yards!!" In American football when everyone knows the only thorn that matters in the end is who scored more points.

It's like Hillarys side was playing Team Deathmatch when the actual game mode was Capture the Flag

They ran a god awful campaign and lost. Badly.

It is Bill Clinton's fault, anyway.

We used to have a Ban on Media Monopolies until Bill Clinton reversed the Ban with his shitty communications law.

America used to have like around 40 national news organizations with even more state news organizations.

I guess Politicians thought it was a hassle trying to bribe 40 news CEOs, all in different time zones, to get what they want so that is why today you need to just bribe 6 News CEOs to get what you want.

>They ran a god awful campaign and lost. Badly.
What? She won the popular vote by 3 million votes and was within 100 electoral votes. Trump ranks in the bottom half historically by margin of victory.

Nah, he has complete legitimacy. Popular vote is meaningless.

So tell me, on the scale of one to 6 gorillion, just how triggered are you that he won? Be honest.

>She won the popular vote by 3 million votes

Oh look, more fake news. Lmao, so salty. I bet the Russians hacked the brains of Americans to vote Trump too, lel.

I'd be more upset if I lived there. I can just laugh from the sidelines.

Anyway, how relieved are you now that Belgrade won't be carpet bombed for a second time?

/tread

I believe they are corrupt, but not necessarily evil.

>Facts and numbers are fake news

I understand you live in one of the worst countries in Europe, so you're obviously not that well educated, but that's no excuse.