did he ever admitted to a mistake ?
Did he ever admitted to a mistake ?
He would have to make one in the first place.
>Watch a Molyjew video
>He's debating about Trump with some libtard
>Libtard wipes the floor with Molly
>Molly shoots off on useless tangents, commits many logical fallacies
>Eventually, after getting completely BFTO, Molyjew suddenly boots him off the air ("lalalala not true cut video")
Good job molyneux another libtard converted by reason and evidence
Why does he talk like retard?
I'm sure his mother admitted he was a mistake.
He admitted atheism was a mistake and got half his fanbase angry at him.
Not even Alex Jones makes me cringe like this guy.
He has dead eyes, a shit-eating smile and a very emotional way to talk.
Are you talking about the most recent one? Because that kid was just a crybaby.
He was sighing in response. That's the biggest not an argument I've ever heard.
He's basically turned 360 and become full Statist but he won't admit it.
He admitted he was wrong about religion.
>Implying I'm going to sit through 45 - 60 minutes of this guy preaching in order to find out.
was that a recent video?
a retard*
if that's how you really perceived that then you are truly lost, or a shill, or both
Atheism and socialism, he admitted were mistakes. I'd like to say fpbp, but it's really not
Plot twist: he's the crybaby who called in for that show
no, he just realized we cant just flip the switch and away goes the state. going stateless is going to to take generations. he's focusing on what can be now to head in that direction.
Doesn't he have entire videos titled "Why I was wrong about X"?
This, molymeme committed philosophical heresy in the video.
Source.
No. He got fucked badly by some young kid in a recent video but couldn't admit even that. Instead he went on imitating the guest with a stupid voice and told the guy to make his own show.
*Sigh* Will you let me finish? *50
Wow dude what a great fucking debate to go on stefan's show with.
youtube.com
I have to agree with this guy. If you watched that last debate with the libtard and think Moly won, your suffering from a massive dose of Cognitive Dissidence.
Here is the Vid
youtube.com
He is super dishonest here.
>mistake
Make no mistake, winter-ize your car now at Stefo's garage.
What people watch a mans upper chest upwards going on a rant for about 20 mins or more?
You need that much of a conformation you are will to watch a middle aged man on his own speak for 20 mins?
Yeah he admitted on Joe Rogan's podcast to being too quick to judge the cause of Robin Williams's death. (He blamed his mother and Joe btfo him a new asshole about how it just sounds like he's got mother issues himself etc and how he was grasping at straws)
The libtard is a "can't even" type for sure. But the tripe that comes out of Molys mouth borders on propaganda. There is nothing wrong with just admitting that Trump was playing the game of politics, so played fast and quick with the facts, like every politician. To try and do the mental gymnastics Moly is doing here, then claim to be a philosopher, is just Jewy.
Didnt he blame it on the divorce?
Yeah, and then admitted he shouldn't of jumped the gun to Joe Rogan. But obviously never took don the video.
ya mollyman is bad at debating it seems he should stick to his presentations and echo chamber vids with other like minded people
where is your argument, friend?
I watched ten minutes of that and molymeme was purely retarded
he did win though
the kid had no arguments
The greatest of his mistakes was being born. Everything followed from that.
I always skip these "caller" episodes, because I cringe every time. The constant *sigh* can I finish please? (starts talking for 15 mins straight but then interrupts the guest after 1 min of talking)
He's great at presentations, shit at debates.
Except the valid ones molymeme could only sputter and counter with leading statements prosecutor style?
agree
very bad social skills frankly
> Not watching every molly video at 2x speed
Get with the times. It's current year.
He doesn't usually make mistakes (aside from this whole Trump cockriding thing), but when he does and someone calls him out on it correctly he will admit fault. I don't think he's ever gone back and edited a podcast with a correction though. He has deleted some old podcasts that had his wife, or some other content that some retard got upset over to certain degrees.
>Leaf
The guy said trump was dishonest for saying 1000s of Muslims danced on the streets celebrating after 9/11.
Moly denied that this was a lie and squirmed out some piss poor argument about Trump thinking past the sale, as to get people talking about the, at most, 100 muslims who vocally celebrated the attacks. This is not winning an argument. This is propaganda.
Sorry, i meant danced on the streets of New York/Jersey
I watched it all, but I guess you know more about it.
>Oh he was mean, that means his arguments aren't valid. *cries*
>The guy said trump was dishonest for saying 1000s of Muslims danced on the streets celebrating after 9/11.
kys faggot
youtube.com
Some people enjoy listening to ideas, others prefer concealing their insecurities by pointing out flaws they perceive in others, like you.
Both are extremely cringe worthy. Molyjew tried to tell the guy that Trump uses exaggerations to get his message across, it's a marketing tactic.
THOUSANDS OF MUSLIMS WERE CELEBRATING ON 9/11!
Technically though, Trump couldn't back any of this shit up with sources. At most it was documented at around 50 to 100 muzzies celebrating.
Both didn't come away from it very well because most of it was an autistic shit flinging fight.
It's documented that Trump does lie and exaggerate, and I don't think he is above proclaiming things that he has no intention of following through with.
>>Oh he was mean, that means his arguments aren't valid. *cries*
lol no the fucking retard tried to say that Trump saying 3 million illegals voted in the election was more trustworthy than the Russian hacking allegations. For no particular reason at all. His argument was "Are there illegals? Do they vote? Than 3 million illegals may have voted."
The same logic applied to the hacking, Russian agencies are known to hack it's entirely possible they did. He should have just fucking dropped the point and said "Sorry couldn't research this topic I can't say whether this is right or wrong."
Watch this:
youtube.com
Then watch of one of Molyneux's videos, read up on his DeFOO shit, and decide for yourself whether or not he's got the makings of a cult leader.
He projects a lot about his own childhood onto the problems of others.
His series of trying to do Exposé on recently deceased celebrities is pretty poor taste. He doesn't know these people, he is only guessing.
I watched the whole thing and it was by far the weakest I've ever seen molymeme
He's pretty much dropped the lolbertarian defoo cultish stuff nowadays.
That's nothing like what Stefan talks about.
"Controlled Opposition": the video
He never admits anyone who could outsmart him in his show because he handpicks them.
That's why he's NEVER going to discuss with Varg to talk about his Jew mother, the Jew Trump and capitalism in general.
There are no solid numbers on how many illegals live in the USA though. Official numbers, which are bullshit, are 12 million but estimates range up to 30 million.
It wouldn't be such a stretch for 10% or 15% of illegals to vote, especially in California.
he admitted he was wrong about christianity and borders
this year he was even sentimental about christmas
in 6 months, he will undergo a baptism at the vatican and go total 'deus vult'
>muh jews
fuck off
...
It was a quote from another listener that he wanted to elevate.
If you think they'll help you get rid of mudslimes and let you off on good terms, you're dead wrong silly goy.
The jew is the State, the jew created marxism and feeds off your compassion to him. Stupid goy.
Of course not, but there are many similarities on how he addresses his audience. If he ever did go off the deep end on day, he's got the potential to take a lot of people with him just like the Heaven's Gate guy.
This old chestnut. He was quoting another another user's comment.
>messiah
>making a mistake
you just insulted my cult leader pal. watch out!
But it wouldn't be a stretch to believe the Russians hacked information which influenced the election.
If we want to talk about hard facts we need proof, and it doesn't seem like there are any hard facts available on this topic.
Besides that like I said, if he didn't know he shouldn't have opened his trap about it.
>no links to said user
>not even a mention of a name of said user
Guess we'll take your word for it.
Why would he talk to a LARPING, back-stabbing, welfare hoarding, meme viking guy who shills his RPG-maker game?
I remember at least one video titled "I was wrong"
he is a preachy cunt
He grew up between Canada, England and Ireland. Try that accent on for yourself
Do any of these internet youtube personalities ever do that? Most of them are narcissists or very overconfident to some degree (not always a bad thing though) I don't know what to think about Molyneux, sometimes he seems well meaning, then there was that one time he threw a tantrum because somebody only donated him one dollar
...
I could honestly see him completely abandoning the non-aggression principle and taking a bulldozer to non-whites.
Everything that we know regarding race and Jewish influence, he knows, but he hasn't gone fully into the deep end yet either out of pragmatism or some misguided ideal that he can correct the jews and the niggers.
Same reason he talks to this pleasant fellow, who he can't stop sucking off each time he's on the show.
Because besides the attacks you're throwing at him, he's making legitimate arguments about how modernism, its ideas, its comfort by domestication and general disrespect for our ancestors forced us to become slaves for the State and the international Jewry
That's a combat that Molyneux only feigns to fight because he openly supports the king Jew and has no interest in defending the will of the European man.
part 2
>golden opportunity to combat SJWs in the west
>purposely ignore real professor&philosopher, probably out of jealousy
More or less the moment I called it quits on Molymeme
I stand corrected. Thanks for proof.
The liberal stated Trump's exaggerations were lies because they were too far from the real figure.
This is the liberal caller's perception. To me, Trump's exaggerations are meant to produce a strong emotion. To do this, Trump uses absolutes ("it's the best") and inflated figures. Trump is never taken literally.
Influenced in a small way, sure, but I don't think they determined the outcome.
Hilary Clinton, Obama and the US media are more responsible for Trump's election than Putin.
I'm sure Putin or at least Russian nationals do play silly buggers with hacking, but so does Israel, China, Iran, etc etc.
The Democrats are only using Russia as a punching bag because they have gotten fucked over by Putin in the Ukraine and Syria.
Yeah but when you suddenly go "DA FUCKING JOOS" you already sound insane enough and if you bring up a literal edgy murderer on your podcast the normies wouldn't even bother.
The Jew issue should be cropped up sneakily and gradually.
Hes emotionally unhinged, probably from his upbringing
Well, we have PROOF that the (arguably) biggest leak (DNC) was from a DNC employee. Who cares how the info got out if it already has? Do you claim it's wrong to factually be honest?
>Trump is never taken literally.
If this is true, how can you be sure he will deliver on key policy platforms like deporting illegals, imposing tariffs and building a wall?
Trump has Jew'd up his cabinet when he was under no obligation to do so. He could have gotten rid of all the former neocons and jewish bankers, instead he is inviting them in to power. This does not bode well for the future.
>A BLU BLU BLU I WANNA SHIT ON DRUMPH BECAUSE HES A RACIST BIGOT: The Caller
putting (You)s back was a mistake
I remember Peterson reaching out to him on twitter wanting to be on his show (before he blew up on all the other podcasts and went on Joe Rogan) and Stefan ignored him, despite people in the comments asking for an interview.
>purposely ignore real professor&philosopher, probably out of jealousy
Don't know, but maybe. Stefan keeps touting about he's a philosopher when he's just an actor. That's it for him. Peterson is a PhD in clinical psychology and studied philosophy in-depth so probably because they're in the same wheel-house he'd outshine Stefan at his own thing.
I watched "An honest conversation with a stoner"
>uhh dude, what if like when we sleep we get transported to another dimension man
>NOT SCIENCE
>NOT AN ARGUMENT
>BRAIN DAMAGE
>YOU SHOULDN'T HAVE CHILDREN
Then when the stoner said he'd hide his drug habit from his child until they're 18 and can choose for themself Stefan said parents shouldn't hide things from their children and he should either go clean or not have children.
Stefan really likes to pick those low hanging fruits.
I've got to say the libtard was really, really distracting me with his relentless self-victimisation so I have to listen to it again, but I got the impression that all he had to say was that Molyneux was wrong because he disagreed with him.
I also noticed that Molyneux really doesn't like deviating from the script, about halfway through the video he got mad that the libtard wanted to talk about something he hadn't prepared himself for.
Careful Serb or we will have to "peace keep" you again.
There is no time to be politically correct anymore: facts reason and evidence are on our side and people who manipulate everyone into believing the opposite are scam artists.
Our salvation will not come into electing a new master a telling ourselves that he will be a better master than the last one.
There is naught to be hoped from the reaction of the population anymore. They long lost their way to narcotics, be it actual drugs and alcohol, or television and noise, or any sorts of religion and politics. They're all different sides of the same coin that is today the State.
Our people keep hoping it will somehow become better if they vote for the right one, and Molyneux fulfills their illusion. He enacts it.
He's gotta appease the crowds somehow, and what better way than to beat the shit out of low hanging leftists?
he reuploaded an old video about the christmas truce of WW1 and i thought it would be some cool story about how the english and germans didnt want to fight
instead he was like teary eyed and emotional about it in a really weird way
>former neocons
Such as...?
>jewish bankers
He never ran on a platform of being Hitler. He did run on a platform of sound fiscal management and so he hired the guy from his campaign that helped him win ahead of schedule and under budget.
General/Primary: OMG TRUMP IS LITERALLY HITLER
Post Election: OMG TRUMP IS NOT LITERALLY HITLER
>people shouldn't lie
Lies is absolute ass off on Joe Rogan.
Anyway, I like his presentations - but for everything else, pass. And as a human being, would not want to meet him in real life. He gives off a sleazy, self-important, narcissistic vibe, but perhaps I'm wrong. I can only judge him from his interviews and debates (in the interviews he can't stop fellating his guests and talking for half the show, even though the episode is supposed to be about THEM, and in the debates constantly interrupting his, very low energy, low IQ callers, to rant for 15 minutes by himself).
The point is that the caller said that Trump saying 3 mil illegals voted was dishonesty on the level of the hacking claims. Molyneux tried to counter this by saying since there are millions of illegals in the United States it's more reasonable to believe 3 million voted than it is to believe Russian hacking influenced the election. One thing that was never clarified was what specifically the caller was referring to by reference to the Russian hacks, it was unclear whether he meant that the Russians rigged the election or influenced. However Stefan was too busy brow beating to actually do this. Maybe if Sam Harris and Stefan Molymeme could do one of those reality show life Swaps they could learn how to even themselves out.
I think they're upset about the guy that worked for Goldman Sachs 5 years ago, but hasn't been publicly involved since then.
Pretty sure he's in it for the moral superiority granted by the whole "serving the weak" paradigm. He'll have to prove himself.
How could you not be after knowing anything about WW1? Especially the fact the leaders tried so hard to stop it ever happening again
>1:07:32
where should I skip to? Or anyone want to greentext it? what are their viewpoints?
Yeah that's who I was referencing.
For neocons, I'm not sure what is being referred to. The mustache guy who chopped off Reek's dick is a neocon, and it was blatantly obvious from the start he wouldn't be hired (if you look goofy as fuck Trump doesn't want to be staring at you for 8 years)
Yeh its super weird. He's also hypocritical in the manner in which he has arguments. Such as telling people not to interrupt while continuously interrupting. Maybe his mother smashed his nogging around too much, who knows.
Molymeme just moved to a new niche, the alt-right. He's too lazy or too incompetent for having a real job so he want to make a career of his youtube videos, his true endgame is donations