All U.S. Aircraft Carriers now in Port, none at Sea

What the hell? Is this normal?
"For the next week, not only will there be no U.S. Navy aircraft carrier in the Middle East, but there will be no American aircraft carriers deployed at sea anywhere else in the world"

Sorry for using Fox:
foxnews.com/us/2016/12/30/no-us-carrier-at-sea-leaves-gap-in-middle-east.html

Other urls found in this thread:

gonavy.jp/CVLocation.html
youtube.com/watch?v=1Pfl51b7fZ0
youtube.com/watch?v=roROL5KdXlw
youtu.be/rkBILYqXLSI
youtu.be/Tiz2WLB2Z0o
twitter.com/SFWRedditImages

Pearl Harbor 2.0 by "Russian hackers" soon

Shameless self bump because for some reason you guys see nothing odd in this. Jesus.

bump i would like to know historical context as well

Kek, Navy fag here. This isn't true. I know of at least one that's out right now. I'd have to e-mail an ol' buddy to see if his is out.

They had to withdraw due to budget cuts but they still have naval and air presence. It will be interpreted as a sign of United States that is more isolationist

The glorious Charles De Gaulle is still at sea: we won!

Which one is still out? Why would it be reported that ALL are at port?

gonavy.jp/CVLocation.html

This is their exact locations, ALL are at port but perhaps the Dwight Eisenhower. It appears to be out. Still odd as fuck regardless

Eisenhower is VERY close to port at "Lant". Probably returning to port

I guess Obama wants to start a war and stay in office.

Has this ever happened before?

Something important is being updated.

Probably at port, the Eisenhower hasn't been updated since the 28th. So yes, they are ALL at port regardless of what the retarded "Navy" user said.

I dont think so. Why would we even fathom having all our Aircraft Carriers at home? They are crucial in battle.

Faraday cage over all crucial electronics. ;)

Obama is doing this intentionally to provoke an attack

He really is being borderline treasonous at this point with sabotaging trump

>implying that the USA would tell the entire world the location of all their aircraft carriers

>>implying that the USA would tell the entire world the location of all their aircraft carriers

Why wouldn't they?
Are you able to figure out some way to effect any of its capabilities at all?
If so, even if they didn't release that information, I'm sure you could find it on your own.

Idiot:
gonavy.jp/CVLocation.html

Meant for

>gonavy.jp/CVLocation.html
Why? Why would they do that?

Let me guess - you guys have never heard of strategery.

USS Abe Lincoln here

The Navy sucks. If I died in a terrorist attack, it'd be an improvement.

Why not? It's not as if we aren't hiding plenty of nuclear subs everywhere

Holiday season, just like we did back in 2012-2013

You're trolling

>exact location
>entire carrer battlegroup found on internets for the chinese to missile'd one

Obama is trying to make the biggest mess he can for Trump at the expense of the country out of spite or because the Jews told him to.

>implying they wouldnt
Fear is a better weapon than actual weapons

> the US military is unaware of the threat of missiles

How retarded are you?

This is literally the dumbest thing I've ever seen. We really just give out our ship locations. Just playing battleship will tell you that's a terrible idea.

digits confirm
shitstorm a-brewin'

They know a big war is possible, they want to make sure all carriers are refit and restocked.

Former Navyfag here, there was absolutely no secrecy about aircraft carrier deployments. In fact its like a big send off celebration and news headline every time one does deploy. Why? Aircraft carriers are impossible to hide and also serve as a deterrent.

The secrecy comes from where our ballistic missile(nuke) submarines are deployed. In which case no one even hears about them, which is why you plebs are so clueless.

you can fool me once, but uhh
it's all subliminabubble

Isn't it obvious?

They're all resupplying themselves with weapons and probably nukes for next week.

There's more to it than battle. We have treaties with nations to patrol their waters at all times. That's why our carrier battle fleets rotate out all the time. If they're all in port, we may be breaking multiple treaties world wide with many many countries.

>Lincoln
So a nuke Chief, Senior Chief, and a Master Chief all go "Hey, it's been a while since we've done any maintenance" and every nuclear department across both fleets have safety training for a fucking month because they take resistance checks on live 4160V with a fucking Fluke and splatter themselves all over the EDG compartment like a bunch of dipshits.
Fuck the Lincoln, I hate you all.

Aircraft carriers are emptied out when in port, they "restock" at sea where they can defend themselves.

All carriers in port = air carriers unarmed and defenseless.
The aircraft that joins a carrier are actually squadrons who are normally land based. Then they fly in when the Carrier is off the coast and capable of receiving them.

No worries, they set delay to 3 minutes

Okay guys, here's the real skinny. Ex-Air Force here - the smart service.

Yes, the USA does advertise the location of its aircraft carriers, for two reasons:

1. It is not possible to conceal the location anyway, aircraft carriers are easily tracked by satellites.

2. By pointing out the location of our aircraft carriers it is sometimes possible to negate a threat rather than confront it.

That's about all there is to it. As for why we would have them all in port, I can only imagine we are preparing in advance for Donald Trump's non-interventionist policies.

I wouldn't worry too much about the location of our aircraft carriers though. Aircraft carriers are short-range tactical weapons. All of our strategic weapons are securely in place, and no one has bothered to challenge our control of the seas in over 70 years.

see

>What the hell? Is this normal?

If I were you, I would be celebrating new year in the bunker user.

Nah, aircraft carriers are basically obsolete.

It's kinda like how every nation had a bunch of battleships before WW2, and they played almost no part in the war. Same way with aircraft carriers. We just use them to fuck with tiny countries, and would be better off without them.

They're all set to defend the mainland for whatever comes out of Antarctica

It's in preparation for an assault on North Korea.

Obama pulling the goalie and hoping for a happening after Trying to trigger Russia and Israel didn't work.

Why does Norfolk look so great?

>Aircraft carriers are obsolete

>Still the best way to project force across the world

The military put them all in port to prevent Obama from having one of them false flagged to the bottom of the ocean with massive loss of life to kick off WWIII. The military has switched their allegiance to Donald Trump and are no longer taking orders from the African monkey.

I want to believe

I would agree with your battleship analogy, but that would also mean I would have to agree that airpower is obsolete. That is what you said right? That airpower is obsolete. Son, that is next level stupid.

Thanks Obama you ginormous nigger.

You realize that they're the best thing ever against any nation that isn't fucking China or Russia right?

>and no one has bothered to challenge our control of the seas in over 70 years.

Wrong!

The days of the U.S. Navy are numbered.

Not as successful as you think.

Just stinky little nig monkeys who try real hard. They get lucky sometimes.

Its a beautiful place.

>Obama is doing this intentionally to provoke an attack
Provoke an attack from whom? Upon whom? The only country that's been aggressively attacking other nations for the past decade+ has been the US and its direct vassals.

full of beautiful ships

IF an adversary attacked three sites, Norfolk, Virginia, and San Diego, California, and Bremerton, Washington . . . it would wipe out ninety five percent (95%) of our ability to project power around the world.

We're sitting ducks.

This is no accident. This was done for a purpose - to wipe out our ability to do things globally.

We have been betrayed and we are going to be attacked.

Ron Paul's dream realized

>we're going to be attacked

Why do people hate America? Is it because we're the best?

If I was a terrorist I would blow them on NYE during the fireworks, nobody would suspect a thing.

6 at Norfolk right now. Pearl Harbor 2.0 when.

SHEEEEIIIITTTT

99% of the US fleet is being satellite tracked by Russia and China anyway (and the opposite also). It's extremely easy to do so since ships travel very slow, all you have to do is find out each ship's position once and you're good to go.

What did they mean by this?

Obviously it's an extremely secure facility but nevertheless, this just seems recklessly irresponsible

>Why would it be reported that ALL are at port?

Really? Fog of war perhaps?

REEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEe

Very

Ships' locations cannot be held sectred, balistic nuclear missiles carrying subs is where the secret game is.

who in their right mind would go pearl harbor 2 electric boogaloo on continental us?
random ackmeds don't have the means and for established countries it would be suicide

Always wanted to take a tour of the Wisconsin, never got a chance
them Iowas sure are purdy

>who in their right mind would go pearl harbor 2 electric boogaloo on continental us?

ISIS/IRAN

Please be true

They are going to nuke the ocean! :O

Yeah right these guys can strike the most secure US base.
youtube.com/watch?v=1Pfl51b7fZ0

And Iran wouldn't even dream of trying, at least until they have a nuclear arsenal

More classic ISIS
youtube.com/watch?v=roROL5KdXlw

We have other branches of the armed forces overseas you know, particularly the Air Force. Just because the Navy doesn't go out doesn't mean there are not others. Besides Norfolk isn't the only naval base in town, there is Little Creek which has Marines, SEALS, and amphibs, Oceana which is closer to sea and has the F-18 squadrons, the multiple shipyards in Portsmouth and the naval hospital, and Langley AF base in Hampton.

Let's just hope they don't set off a (Tsunami) nuke off NYC during tonight's celebrations. This would be my guess if anything. Drag us right into WW3

Remember when the U.S.S.R. scoffed at the USA using camouflage? They never camo painted their ICBM launchers. Why would they?

aww shit nigga time to make one of those in my room like in that one zombie flick

You're right of course but regardless, all those assets in one place... Is it not prudent, even if the risk is extremely low, to hedge your risk by spreading these assets out across several bases?

>GuTS
>Olive drab ID
>dubs

Seems legit

>obama wants to start a war
>brings 90% of our non-nuclear force projection capabilities to port

Just ask nigger in chief why he parked them all at the same time.

>all your collectable action figures are back in the dislay case

Seriously, I don't care where our marine-penises are docked. They'd be pointless in a conflict with people not living in grass huts. And if all of them sank right now, it'd save the US taxpayers over $50,000,000 PER DAY in upkeep, and that doesn't even count the hundreds of escort ships that follow them around.

How mad will Sup Forums be if Obama is still in charge, come 21st January?

>for a week

wow, it's literally fucking nothing

ICBMs outgoing soon!
Submarine fleet is substantially deployed.

Plenty of bases, missiles, subs and bombers out there user

youtu.be/rkBILYqXLSI

It has been like that for a long time, NSN has been a round longer than Obama has been alive.

thanks, Obummer

youtu.be/Tiz2WLB2Z0o

l m a o

the paranoia here is almost tangible

>random ackmeds don't have the means and for established countries it would be suicide

I just think it's weird.

I was only in the navy for four years and stationed on the Kitty Hawk for 3, but I've never thought of this to ever happen. Even during Christmas and New Years there were always fleets patrolling the oceans and seas, something is very strange with this.