Would masturbation ruin men's ability to bond the same way promiscuity ruins women's?

Would masturbation ruin men's ability to bond the same way promiscuity ruins women's?

I don't know.

All I know is that the only people who voted for Trump are rural and suburban retards.

City people all voted for Hillary.

To porn, yes.

Only women have problems

They were smart enough to not live in the cities.

>rural/suburban retards
>smart

Anime made me bond with my waifu

What biochemical difference does it make?

>Living in crime infested hellholes
>Smart

Yes, it does.

Fuck.

Difference between what?

>wasting your life in a rural/suburban shithole and avoiding any opportunity
>smart

The problem isnt women wasting their youth

The problem is boys remaining manchildren too long and never becoming men

Boys polarize to chads and NEETs rather than becoming responsible men in time to marry women before they get used up and thrown away

Masturbation=/=sex

That said however, if you masturbate in excess it will probably effect the ability to bond.

The argument that promiscuity ruin women's dopamin receptors and thus ability to bond. Why would it apply to jerking off to porn and not imagination?

I was that kind of man.

I would not recommend.

Change that Would to a Could, and then you'll be cooking with fire

if you're asking a question like that, you're too stupid to comprehend. forget you.

WELL
maybe not moderate masturbation
but a porn addiction is like any other addiction and fucks with the brain's reward system. you mess with that in any given area, food, video games, sex, you'll need more and more novelty to achieve the same high
i really shouldn't have to explain this to you
as while you require an explanation for a biochemical difference you don't seem to need one to automatically claim that promiscuity ruins a woman's ability to bond
inb4 that fucking oxytocin diminishing returns nonsense that doesn't make any sense at all or women couldn't breast feed or stay with one partner or one child. fucking board, i'd gas you all if i could.

>The problem isnt women wasting their youth
>The problem is boys remaining manchildren too long and never becoming men
It is both.
Both manchildren like Charlie Sheen and Sex and the City sluts are awful people.

Sup Forums has ruined women for me more than fapping ever has

Maybe it's for the better

Educate me then

So jerking off to other media= moderation

Jerking off to porn= addiction?

No but the combination of porn + iron grip makes it a lot more difficult to cum from blowjobs or sex.

No porn/jerking off for a few weeks fixes this.

This is the only valid reason to no fap, or at least tone it down a lot.

>Why would it apply to jerking off to porn

Because it has the same effects on the brain I guess, and being much easier than sex its addicting properties take a stronger hold of you I suppose.

>and not imagination?
Oh you mean why it's different than masturbating with your immagination,
fucker I thought you swedes were good with english.

I guess because immmagination takes more effort, and is not as stimulating, while with porn you get a real visual input.

I think wen are different than women. I can go out and fall in love with the host at a restaurant. Come home and fall in love with a pornstar in a porn, then honestly say I love my gf and kids.

Women are less generous with their love. Theyll pick one thing, kid, cat, man, herself, and covert it until if falls out of fashion. Then move on.

Maybe check your english faM. You're comparing addiction vs non-addiction. Im talking about addiction caused by diffrent media for example porn vs imagination.

>Maybe check your english faM.
The way you worded it made me think you were asking why it doesn't ruin immagination, wich it does as a matter of fact.

>You're comparing addiction vs non-addiction.
What? how?

>Im talking about addiction caused by diffrent media for example porn vs imagination.
First of all immagination isn't a media, it's a part of the thinking process, you can't be addicted to thinking, you just do it because it's a fundamental function of human nature.

But I immagine, and am pretty sure of it, when porn wasn't a thing people might have had a problem with masturbation all the same.

I was talking about ruining the ability to bond.

> first of all immagination isn't a media, it's a part of the thinking process, you can't be addicted to thinking, you just do it because it's a fundamental function of human nature.

If you're constantly thinking about lewd things then jerk off to orgasm it's an addiction.

> when porn wasn't a thing people might have had a problem with masturbation all the same.
I jerked off several times a day when I was a teen and hadn't discovered porn.

The problem with promiscuity is not only on bonding. There is also a moral/cultural issue.

The mainstream view on sex is that sex is about pleasure. Then you have the idea that sexual pleasure is important for your life. Someone that believes in this is unlikely to be happy or to be a good parent. Just take a look at Hollywood celebrities.

Most people don't even realize that there is an alternative view on sex.

>I was talking about ruining the ability to bond.
Yeah, so was I.

>If you're constantly thinking about lewd things then jerk off to orgasm it's an addiction.
Yeah.

>I jerked off several times a day when I was a teen and hadn't discovered porn.
Ok?

masturbation doesn't affect pairbonding ability unless you have a porn addiction

dudes just pairbond easier while even two or three partners will obliterate any woman's already extremely limited pairbonding ability

So your point is it's easier to be addicted to maturbating with the help of porn than without? Maybe. Im not arguing that. But the root of the problem is still excess masturbation whether with porn or not.

>city
>opportunity

Ok? so we're just passive aggressively agreeing with each other?
do you feel conflicted about it?

No I felt like you misunderstood my question and just tried to clarify. Back to the question, does maturbation ruin man's ability to bond or not.

>does maturbation ruin man's ability to bond or not.
Yes, if it's an addiction.
No if it's not.

>leaf
>smart

Why is that? Biological difference between men and women?

I think so, if one didnt masturbate, and had a craving for sex all the time I personally at least would search much harder for a gf, instead these days I just find sufficient flaws in someone and ignore them, go home and fap. So bonding loses some of its value for men when its not the only source of stimulation

But I'd say it doesnt affect the ability to bond, but rather the wish of bonding

Its not like an ultra slut doesnt want to bond but shes not held back by shame when temptations for sex pop up, 50 or 51 dudes on the list doesnt matter, innocence lost

Most women do eventually want something stable, after clearing her whore-mongering bucket list and realizing there is more to life, and the fear of ending up alone once their beauty fades with age.

So bonding is less important for both parts as stimulation does not have bonding as a requirement. Contrary to how it was when people were required to marry before fucking

likely

>Would masturbation ruin men's ability to bond the same way promiscuity ruins women's?

Studies don't seem to show this. Masturbation doesn't activate pair bonding the same way actual sex does.

Promiscuity ruins EVERYONE'S ability to pair bond equally.

some men are biologically inclined to pairbond as opposed to seeking as much pussy as possible, either due to being unable to get that much pussy or simply not wanting to

I believe they are called beta males

Bullshit. Majority of men want one stable partner deep down.

aren't beta males the majority of men?