Why are democrats standing in the way of Keith Ellison? They dont want to win in 2018 and 2020?

Why are democrats standing in the way of Keith Ellison? They dont want to win in 2018 and 2020?

The worst thing the Dem Party can do right now is select non-whites to positions of leadership. It would be like cementing them as the non-white party.

There will be a big push in the party to nominate a non-white for president in 2020 and if they do it, it's over for them.

All the various non-white groups in the Democratic coalition hate each other. The Democrats are held together by white liberals who push everyone else's pet issues. The second that whites stop dominating the Democratic party is the second it splits and depends into infighting.

True. And I think whites are leaving the Democrat Party en masse right now.

the kind of white people who feel threatened by nonwhite politicians arent gonna vote democrat either way

you realize that if they had run a non-white all the tribesmen wold have turned out and they would have won?

You fool. Obama won twice and would have won again if he were running in 2016. White libs generally don't care what race a candidate is, but minorities WILL turn out for minority candidates

What could possibly go wrong

It's not about feeling threatened, it's about white democrats feeling like their party is not a "Party for non-whites". Once they think of it in those terms, most of them will leave.

Hate to break it to you, but almost half of the country is non-white and looks like it's going to get worse in the forseable future. They may just be playing the long game and racking up oppression points right now.

Non-whites don't think of themselves as a group. Obama was a unique candidate, but he did not get abnormal turnout outside of whites and blacks. Obama also ran two of the best ran campaigns in history.

>We get it guys, definitely. We ignored the white working class.
>*chooses Keith "Farrakhan disciple" Ellison as leader

Are there any potential DNC chair candidates that actually want to fix the party up such as removing the superdelegates and those that did the fix for Hillary or do they just want the same old?

Obama won his first term because white America (what was left of it) wanted to once and for all prove they weren't racist. He won his second term because politicians win re-election most of the times.

Between 2008 and 2016, a lot of whites in America became redpilled on race. With Black Lives Matter, police killings, non-stop Islamic terrorism, the first states in the union becoming majority-hispanic, and anonymous internet communication becoming more widespread, there was a lot of redpilling that happened in those years.

... how is that not about feeling threatened?

Why? I imagine he has all sorts of fucking typical nigger behavior in his background that they know Trump will tweet out the minute his nigger ass tries attacking him..

But, as always, they don't take into account the changing environment.

You're going to see whites start to unite as a race for the first time in history. You'll see us start to have big families again. There will be a major pushback. You can't threaten the survival of the most powerful beings on Earth and expect not to get one hell of a fight out of them.

He's the Nation of Islam kind of Muslim. It's going to be a piece of cake to use him to tarnish the Democrats amongst white workers

That's the point.

Obama won because he is the whitest nagger ever. Even his thinking about race is that of a 'white progressive' not a nagger. That's what made him the perfect Democratic candidate. You had all the hype of first black President, the massive black turnout, but you also didn't get whites' subconscious instincts triggered by nagger mannerisms. White blue-collar types could and did actually vote for Obama because nothing about him resembled the black guy whose presence in the same convenience store at 10 pm would unsettle you.

exactly, trends don't have to continue, just look at the stock market, most trends reverse themselves at some poitn

Nonsense. The identity politics of the last few years alienates people. White Liberals will continue to bail on the Democratic Party as the narrative of "evil white cis hetero" whatever continues. It's pretty simple really. And it's fantastic.

#NoWhiteDmocrats #KillWhitey #40Acres&Mule

Now will he be able to attack him without sucking on Zionist cock? I dont think Trump can.

Also this is for DNC Chair not President. He poses no direct threat to a shitlord like Trump

There's a difference between voting for a non-white who you think has your interests in mind and voting for a non-white who you think may not have your interests in mind. Once white democrats feel like their party is a non-white party for the interests of non-whites, they're going to leave in big numbers.

In before next leader of dem party is a muzzie.

Obama won because he acts like a white guy, fuck he's more of a pussy white bitch than most regular white guys.

A black Muslim head of DNC?

>They really want to lose again don't they?

God I hope he wins and heads the DNC. Say hello to Trump until 2024.

Also

>Niggers are 12% of U.S. population
>Muslims are 1% at 3 million.

Really, they're supposed to represent some group?

If I'm gonna be honest, Keith Ellison will just be another nail in the coffin for the DNC

So I'm all for him, I really hope they make him chair :D

>Obama won because he acts like a white guy

Also he had Joe Biden, who is from PA...an old white guy who knows how to talk to people in the Rust Belt.

They had a strategy to win.

He was already endorsed by Harry Reid, Chuck Schumer, and loads of other Democrats, way more than any of the other candidates. Who exactly is "standing in his way"?

>progressive muslim
seriously what the fuck

>30 million illegals about to get kicked out
>entitlements and welfare are dead within a decade
>shitskin attacks in europe continuing to redpill people
it's all coming together

>Who exactly is "standing in his way"?

Themselves.

They will lose in 2020. They're doubling down on "M'Minorities"...this Obongo coalition is not going to work in 2020.

Nobody thought Trump was capable of winning even days before he pulled it off. It's silly to assume things four entire years away from the next election. Plenty can change in that time.

Because some of the big Jewish billionaire DNC donors hate him.

Haim Saban publically denounced him, basically calling him Hitler, and said he would be a disaster for the party.

I don't understand why the Dems think they can win with an anti-white platform.

They do realize the majority of America is still white?

>Plenty can change in that time.

No one in their right mind is going to vote Democrat if they're heading the Muslim coalition.

Dems plans was to make Mexicans citizens by 2016/2020, but when Trump limits immigration, they just won't have the numbers to win in 2020. You clearly have no idea how this election worked.

4 years won't change much of the demographic, especially with limited Mexican immigration. Most of these people move to commiefornia and new york, which doesn't matter, it's always blue.

He can represent all minorities, under 40 year olds and progressives.

Obama. He hates Ellison and endorse some random establishment guy for the chair

It's always been about one thing: When does coming out as "racist" feel less painful than staying silent?

Revolutions always hinge on that type of question.

>I don't understand why the Dems think they can win with an anti-white platform.

Because they shot their load a little too early.

They're clearly delusional.

Trump won by a huge margin in the electoral college, and if he keeps doing what he promised, he will win bigly in 2020.

2024 may be up for grabs, though, if Dems figure out how to bamboozle the people again like they did with Obongo.

Dems planned to have

1. Nigger president
2. Woman
3. Spics
4. Gay/muslim/jew

If they keep going this way, they're going to lose.

If they WANT to win again, they have to move millions of people into swing states and the rust belt.

Pushing identity politics further would be suicide. The smart Democrats realize they're alienating White America (which by the way is still the largest voting bloc) by getting behind racist movements like BLM and prioritizing minorities concerns over white working class struggles. There's a reason why even the majority of white women voted Trump.

Keith Ellison is from that left wing of the party and has ties to the Nation of Islam, which is a black supremacist organization.

amen

honestly i cn't tell

how can anyone still pretend to like the rapefugees after all the murders, terrorism, rapes, etc?

caffling

>He can represent all minorities, under 40 year olds and progressives.

Still not enough numbers to pull in the swing states like OH, FL and PA.

Lots of white people are still in Rust Belt.

Most "progressives" are a majority in 2 states, which are always blue: NY and CA.

Now you can see for yourself that those jews are full of shit. He endorsed Bernie Sanders, the most sucessful jew to ever run for president. EVER.

Bernie also endorsed Keith Ellison for DNC chair. So clearly they are mad thar he isnt an establishment candidate and smear him as Antisemitic so he doesnt get the job. They think hes a bad goy so they unleash attacks

Ok, then he can stand with Rust Belt unions too. That should be all he needs

Whats sad is the dems loved some 74 year old Commie faggot jew who hasn't accomplished shit in 50 years that he's been in the Senate.

Dems are retards.

Most of the unions were with Hillary. It didn't work.

You're just assuming everything Trump does will be successful and go over well. What if he fails to accomplish anything, fails to limit immigration, etc.? Public opinion swings against him even more to the point where anything with a D next to their name can win an election. Even a candidate as bad as Clinton almost beat Trump.

Dude, Ellison as top of DNC is political suicide.

You still don't get it do you?

I actually hope he heads it because Dems don't have a leader right now, and the closest is the 74 year old commie jew from Vermont who wants to feed the gibsmedat generation.

I hope Dems go this route and give more power to Repubs.

I prefer repubs because I prefer less tax and I don't depend on the government for bullshit like healthcare or welfare.

Fuck all the do-nothings, let them suffer.

>whitest nagger ever
you're a fucking cuckold. Literally. No one is looking over your shoulder asshole. Go ahead, type it, you'll feel better. NIGGER, NIGGER, NIGGER. There is a First amendment in the US, and yes, NIGGER is protected by it.

Sucks fucking cuck you type "nagger?" Just write it or fuck off to kikebook or leddit.

Obama kept DWS on as chair for eight year, no one is going to care what his thoughts on the matter are.

>Even a candidate as bad as Clinton almost beat Trump.

She didn't beat him at all. He won by a large margin in the electoral college, which is what matters.

Also historically it's difficult for conservatives to win the presidency.

Even during Bush 2000, it was much much closer than in 2016. Shitlary won by 2.8 million votes, which mostly came from hard blue states like CA, so it doesn't matter.

Trump actually did better than a neocon like Bush in the electoral college.

I don't think the Trump presidency will be a failure at all -- the guy clearly is a workaholic and doesn't like his name to be smeared so he'll do his best to come close to his promises. Most of them are in line with the Republican majority in the house/senate anyway, so in the first 2 years they have free reign. Illegal immigration and lower taxes is something they all agree on. And less gibsmedat.

Raegan didn't even want to sign for welfare in the 80s, but they forced him.

>Obama kept DWS on as chair for eight year, no one is going to care what his thoughts on the matter are.

Obongo is not the leader of the Dems anymore -- they're looking for the "next generation" leader.

It may as well be a Black Muslim Transgendered Non-Binary Numale.

Socialism is good you fucking faggot. A socialist in the Democratic Party is perfect

Hillary didnt meet with a single union in Michigan

That's not a white woman.

>Socialism is good you fucking faggot. A socialist in the Democratic Party is perfect

Fucking idiot.

I've lived under communism for 15 years, you have no idea how bad Socialism is.

>Socialism as a meme

Stupid Amerishit.

Any fucker who is lazy and wants free handouts can move to another country.

People who work hard don't want to pay for the lazy fuckers.

That might be true, but most unions did endorse here. The whole "why aren't I 50 points ahead" thing came from some meeting she had with union bosses.

>She didn't beat him at all. He won by a large margin in the electoral college, which is what matters.

His victories in Michigan, Wisconsin, and Pennsylvania were by lass than 1%. All it takes is less than 100k voters in those states to get buyers remorse over Trump and he loses.

> fails to limit immigration

It's impossible. He has unilateral authority to enforce the law, so he can start deporting on day 1. He probably has discretionary funds with which to start building the wall as well on day 1, although there would be a legal question as to whether he could do that without congress.

Why do you think fewer people would vote for him? I'd say it's much more likely he'll win by even more.

Fostering buyer's remorse is harder than you think. Also keep in mind that a huge amount of people didn't vote for him because they honestly believed he was hilter or whatever. In 4 years assuming Trump doesn't have a major fuckup (and even then he might win anyway), he'll pick up a bunch of college educated white voters that normally lean republican but were fooled by media propaganda.

If he fails to uphold the promises he campaigned on or does things that people don't like then he will become less popular. That is common sense.

He had at least a chance to win even with FL and OHIO (historically swing states).

He won all the swing states and the rust belt.

Gtfo you have no idea what you're talking about.

It's miraculous because a non-politician did that without spending too much money and having the bigger/professional organization that hilldog did.

Anyone who says Trump's win isn't miraculous is an idiot.

Yeah right look at the democrats for the past 8 years. You have Obama and the left just kept getting more and more anti white. The white democrats just stop showing up not voting for democrats. Whites are one of the few races that actually vote so losing them has been deadly for their numbers. Just like in this election white democrats just didn't show up.

It's not about them caring it's about them not getting excited to vote when all they talk about is non whites

Where did I say his win wasn't miraculous? It's just a fact that if he hadn't won those three states he would have lost even with all the others he won, and he won those three by a very small margin.

Out of those three states, he only needed PA or MI to win.

Not like it really matters anyways. America is screwed if the dems get their hands on positions of power. If Trump can't win he has to be prepared to set up a dictatorship since America doesn't have a chance otherwise. If Trump fails it is time for a civil war.

>Not understanding how electoral college works

Like the other user said, he didn't even need OH or FL.

PA and MI would be a lock for him.

The 2.8 Million Democrat Popular Vote needs to die.

The guy ran an unconventional campaign and won by an almost electoral landslide.

Democrats haven't been winning the white vote for decades. It's impossible for them to win campaigning only for white votes, that's why they need minority votes.

If the Democrats were to jettison minority votes entirely then it will be repeat of 1984 where every damn state goes red.

NIGGER NIGGER NIGGER NIGGER NIGGER NIGGER NIGGER NIGGER NIGGER NIGGER NIGGER NIGGER
Merci, France. That felt great.

>Democrats haven't been winning the white vote for decades.

WRONG.

Lots of white people voted for Obongo in the Rust Belt.

Also they voted for Clinton in the 90s.

we going take yo women, yo jobs, then yo government. Yall go ahead whities and keep those welfare checks. We done with them now.

I'm pretty sure he meant the national white vote and he would be right. The last time a democrat won the national white vote was probably Clinton.

Non-whites are going to vote Democrat whether the Democrats pander to whites or not. Non-White Americans are used to a white-central culture anyway.

They really have nothing to lose by openly courting whites a little bit.

>Non-whites don't think of themselves as a group.
Nigga 90%of blacks vote the same fucking way everytime. I guarantee you if the Democrats put up an Hispanic next time with a black VP, they'll have the minority vote in the bag. If they make the choice an Hispanic woman, that always mean they'll get the white female vote and then a knock out win.

Everyone except whites are tribal. This is a fact of life.

Obama won SOME whites, but not MOST.

He won 43% of the white vote in 2008 and 39% in 2012.

Clinton was the same, won 39% in 1992 and 43% in 1996.

Even Carter only managed to win 47%.

Democrats campaigning solely for the white vote is just a losing strategy. Winning for them is getting 40% of the white vote, 90% of the black vote, and 60% or more of the hispanic, asian, etc.

the electoral college is not going away m8.

>How can we bring white people back into our party?
>Let's appoint a black muslim as the chair
Oh I am laffin

Hispanics hate nigs.

I'm not sure that would work. Remember Trump could have lost Florida and still won. Assuming he holds onto the rust belt states, he'll get re-elected and there isn't enough minorities up there.

They do though. It doesn't matter if they gain say 5% of the white vote if it means losing huge numbers of black voters. They will still lose.

He would be a great candidate, as long as he gives Israel the riot act

They're not going to lose the black vote by pandering to whites. It's simply far-fetched.

Actually, yes they would. Blacks need to be pandered to constantly to be motivated enough to vote. Turnout was down a lot among blacks in 2016.

Why wouldn't they? If enough black voters feel neither party cares about them, they will simply not vote. You already saw this happen with Hillary because of what she did in the 90s.

Voter turnout maybe, but they'll stay in the party. They go where ever the most gibsmedats are, so as long as Dems offer them that, they'll stay.

I think the possible loss of turnout is small compared to the benefits of pandering to whites. Democrats simply have to pander to whites, there's no other way for them, so it's sort of a moot discussion.

I agree that their best strategy right now is to try and win back white voters, but so far it looks like the democrats aren't going to go that way with Pelosi still being the leader and Ellison possibly being the DNC chair.

My point was that they hate each other. Of course they are tribalistic in their own groups. Right now they are held together by white liberals who actively betray whites.

It just isn't possible for Democrats to win white voters outright. That's the only way it'd be worth ditching minority issues entirely.

>black muslim

just lol

these niggas think they're wizards for reading the koran in prison