The Libertarians have nearly 500,000 members and the Greens have around 250,000.
Sup Forums, based on 4plebs data, has AT LEAST 400,000 people posting here.
What's stopping us from fielding candidates of our own? We certainly have far more impact online than either the Libertarians or the Greens, and could potentially galvanize more votes in elections.
autsim
Trump was our candidate you faggot
we would need people with law degrees, which would be possible to find, but they wouldn't just throw their life away to work for a Sup Forums party
fpbp
Because we aren't organised to the point of making a difference. And I'm in a different country so the fuck am I able to do with your nations stuff.
The fact that it would be (((shut down))) almost immediately and all its members arrested
i want an agarthan rep in the senate.
pssst they are down there.... way, way down.
The fact that the 400,000 is split amongst quite a few countries might bugger your plans a bit OP.
the agarthans live for thousands of years and have space ships
We are not from a particular country
.
If we met each other you will hate it because not all of us are white or christian as we pretend to be. LARPing is real.
We would be instantly demonized by the media and our homes will be attacked. We will lose our jobs.
Who is going to fund us?
Most of us are beta faggots who can't hold a conversation for fuck's sake.
We'lol start our own country. With blackjack, and hookers. And beer kegs.
Because:
1. creating a political party requires you to have read more than one book in your lifetime
2. Sup Forums's ideology is illegal in any moderately prosperous state
3. politics requires you to talk to people, not just sit on the computer all day
4. people would SEE you and would realize you are mostly underage, autistic and overweight
The fact that our political stances are mostly already covered by the American nazi party
You can't do that Anonymously, it takes a lot of paper work and social security numbers.
The New New Orleans people are already working on a floating city in international waters.
like the pirate party in iceland, which is surprisingly successful
...
...
Not shilling for shambhala...
Shameful
Pirate Party people have actually a couple pet issues that are - somewhat - feasible.
Because Sup Forums is too incoherent ideologically.
Also seriously, where even would it be based?
I think closest you could get would be a hardcore anti-Bank party since that hits both Sup Forums's antisemitism and its dislike for the neoliberal take on Keynsianism.
Mind you, they'd be split on whether that's best done by ending central banking or nationalizing all banks.
Both have the potential of getting whoever proposes it FUCKING KILLED because bankers take such things personally.
The fact that third parties have 0% chance to win presidency and at best are able to mass red pill normies
A leppo did the best a third party candidate has ever done in US history and he got 3%
the fact that you are being manipulated like a puppet
Sup Forumslacks could create a political party, but if it were ever to gain any traction it would immediately be co-opted and cease to be representative of Sup Forums. See the group calling themselves "Anonymous" for a similar example.
>Greens
Let us take over the greens, Shalliday.
>The Libertarians have nearly 500,000 members and the Greens have around 250,000.
>Sup Forums, based on 4plebs data, has AT LEAST 400,000 people posting here.
>What's stopping us from fielding candidates of our own? We certainly have far more impact online than either the Libertarians or the Greens, and could potentially galvanize more votes in elections.
no leaders here
fuck off.
This
One of Sup Forumss strengths is the lack of any kind of leadership or head. You can't be a leaderless monolithic group in politics because someone has to be leader in some fashion. It's why the "alt-right" label was made, so ((they)) have a name to call ((us))
In fact, screw the beer and blackjack.
It is better to co-op an existing party, rather than start a new party that will be co-opted by established parties.
>A leppo did the best a third party candidate has ever done in US history and he got 3%
t. retard
Ross Perot got 19 fucking percent of the vote in 1992.
Teddy Roosevelt, running for the Progressive Party, came in second in 1912, losing to Democrat Woodrow Wilson but having a greater share of the popular vote and electoral vote than incumbent Republican Taft.
We wouldn't be able to decide between ancap/libertarianism or fascism
Yes, yes, little do they know!
i will lead you to greatness Sup Forums
yea morons we meme'd trump into relevance he was outshined by Rubio for a moment the media liked Jeb and Cruz if I recall correctly.
Trump was our guy shithead
We can just take over the Republican party and its infrastructure